1812: The Rivers of War (Trail of Glory)
1812: The Rivers of War (Trail of Glory) book cover

1812: The Rivers of War (Trail of Glory)

Mass Market Paperback – October 31, 2006

Price
$12.50
Publisher
Del Rey
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345465689
Dimensions
4.19 x 0.92 x 6.91 inches
Weight
9.4 ounces

Description

Review Advance praise for The Rivers of War“Eric Flint [drops] his readers into another time and place, where cultures collide, the action is hot and heavy, and we get to experience the best of the human spirit.”–DAVID WEBER, New York Times bestselling author of the Honor Harrington adventures“Eric Flint has a genius for taking his passion for history and turning it into powerful, action-packed stories that instantly grab the readers and plunge them into a time and place that might have been.”–DAVID DRAKE, author of The Far Side of the Stars and Redliners About the Author Eric Flint graduated summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from UCLA with a degree in African history. His first novel, Mother of Demons, was picked by Science Fiction Chronicle as a best novel of the year. His alternate history novels, 1634: The Galileo Affair, and 1632, received lavish critical praise. He has collaborated with David Drake on five novels in the acclaimed Belisarius series, the next of which will be The Dance of Time. A longtime labor union activist, he currently resides in northwest Indiana with his wife, Lucille. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 February 6, 1814Fort Strother, Mississippi TerritoryThe first time Sam Houston set eyes on Andrew Jackson, the general’s left arm was in a sling, and he was losing his temper.“Do I make myself clear, sir?”Jackson’s eyes were like small blue volcanoes erupting under bushy blond eyebrows and an even bushier head of sandy-gray hair. The scar on his forehead actually seemed to be throbbing.Sam had heard tales about that scar. Supposedly, it had been put there decades ago, during the Revolution, by a British officer. After seizing the home occupied by Jackson and his family in the Carolinas, the Redcoat had ordered a thirteen-year-old Jackson to shine his boots. Jackson had flat refused, and hadn’t changed his mind even after the officer slashed him with a saber.When he’d first heard the story, Sam had been skeptical. Now, watching Jackson with his own two eyes, he didn’t doubt it any longer. The general’s jaws were clenched, his bony fists were clenched, his whipcord body was clenched. He seemed ready to jump right out of his uniform and start pummeling the officer who was facing him.“Answer me, blast you!” Jackson bellowed. Shrieked, rather, since he had a high-pitched voice. The general thrust his head forward so aggressively, his chin leading the way like the ram on an ancient war galley, that his fancy hat fell right off his head. The two-cornered general’s hat landed on its side, like a shipwreck on a reef. Jackson paid no attention to the mishap.The officer who was facing him—somebody in the Tennessee militia, judging from the uniform—was doing his level best not to wilt under Jackson’s fury. But his level best . . .Wasn’t good enough. Not even close.The man sidled backward a step, his eyes avoiding Jackson’s accusing gaze. “Tarnation, General,” he muttered, “you can’t just—”“Yes, sir, I can! And, yes, sir—I most certainly will! I’ve done it before, and I’ll do it again!”For the first time, Jackson seemed to catch sight of the two officers who had entered his command tent. He glared at General John Coffee first. But the glare was fleeting, nothing more than a split second’s reflex.“Coffee,” he stated tersely. The greeting had an approving air to it, from what Sam could tell.But then the glare turned on Sam himself, so he didn’t have any time to ponder the matter.It was quite a glare, too. Easily worthy of one of the heroes in Sam’s treasured Iliad. Maybe not quite up to the standards of Achilles, but certainly the equal of anything Agamemnon or Menelaus could have managed.“And you, sir!” the general barked. “You’re wearing the uniform of a regular soldier in the army of the United States of America. Can I assume that you will follow orders?”The general’s eyes flicked to the militia officer. Jackson said nothing, but the glance alone was enough to make clear what he thought of the fellow.Sam might have been amused, except he was starting to become angry himself. He didn’t like bullies, never had, and the general looked to be about as bad a bully as he’d ever encountered.“Yes, sir,” he said stiffly, straightening up to his full height of six feet two inches. “I took the oath and I’ll obey orders. Presuming the orders are lawful, that is.”With that, he fell silent. For a moment, it looked to Sam as if the general would literally explode. His pale face seemed so suffused with blood and fury that his temples threatened to burst. Both of them were throbbing now.Then, to Sam’s surprise, the general grunted a little laugh. “Ha! Got some backbone, do you? Good.”Jackson pointed a stiff finger at the target of his rage. “The issue in question here, young ensign, is whether or not these miserable militiamen will be allowed to desert their country in its time of need. I have informed this—this—this—individual that I will have shot any militiaman who attempts to desert.”The fact that the general’s left arm was in a sling only added emphasis to the rigid, accusing finger of the other hand. For two reasons. First, because Jackson seemed to have an uncanny knack for striking dramatic poses. The lion, wounded, yet still able to challenge the hyena. Second, because the militia officer knew—so did everyone, including Sam himself—that the wound in question was the result of a recent shootout at a hotel in Nashville between Jackson and his friend Coffee and the Benton brothers. The pose might be histrionic, but Jackson’s capacity for violence was by now a legend on the frontier.Again, that jaw thrusting forth. “Damn me if I won’t, sir!” he roared. “I’ll shoot them myself, if I have to!”The jaw receded, leaving the man a sinking wreck. Jackson’s eyes turned back to Sam. “I will trust you to carry out the order, young ensign. If you’ve got spine enough to stand up to me, you ought to have spine enough to shoot a worthless deserter.”The officer, though sinking, hadn’t quite dropped out of sight yet.“General,” he pleaded, “the terms under which the men enlisted—”“Blast your terms, sir! Blast them, I say!”This time, Jackson’s finger pointed out of the tent. “Do the Red Sticks care about your ‘terms’? I’ll crush those savages, so help me I will—and you’ll be there to help me do it. You will, sir! Don’t doubt it! Or I’ll crush you first!“Now get out of my sight. Your protest has been heard, adjudged wanting in all right or reason, and summarily dismissed.”With that, the general took a half step back himself, as if he’d encountered a bad smell. The officer took advantage of the momentary space and scuttled out of the tent.After he was gone, Jackson shook his head. “God save us from militiamen,” he growled. “Lawyers, every one of them. And shysters at that.”His eyes came back to Sam, ranging, for a moment, up and down the uniform that identified him as a regular in the Thirty-ninth Infantry, U.S. Army. While European armies had adopted close-bodied coats or jackets in the course of the Napoleonic wars, American uniforms remained the traditional cutaway style, with elaborate lapels, facings, and turnbacks. Coats were still closed with hooks and eyes rather than buttons.Sam’s uniform was typical. The coat was blue and long-skirted, with scarlet cuffs and a standing collar. The woolen trousers were white, plain, and tucked into his boots. He had his tall leather infantry cap—often called a “tombstone shako”—tucked neatly into the crook of his arm.After an inspection that lasted for several seconds, Jackson seemed satisfied. “Fortunately,” he continued, “I now have real soldiers on the spot. What’s your name, Ensign? And how long have you been serving the colors?”“Sam Houston, sir. I enlisted in March of last year.”Jackson eyebrows lowered slightly. “Houston. I believe I’ve heard about you. Aren’t you the one who was adopted by the Cherokee?”The sentence seemed almost like an accusation, but . . . not exactly. Sam couldn’t really tell what lay beneath it.“Yes, sir,” he replied. “When I was sixteen, after I ran away from home. I lived for three years with John Jolly and his people. He’s the one adopted me, and gave me my Cherokee name.”“And that is?”“Colonneh, sir. It means ‘The Raven.’ ”Jackson sniffed. “Nasty birds, ravens. On the other hand, they’re also tough, and smart. Let’s hope they picked the right name. Do you speak the language?”“Yes, sir.”“Fluently?”“Yes, sir.”“Do you get along with the savages?”“Very well, sir.” Sam’s big shoulders shifted. “And I don’t take kindly to people insulting my family.”Jackson surprised him again. The general grinned—rather cheerfully, it seemed. “It’s against the law to challenge a superior officer, youngster, so you’d best leave the rest of that thought unspoken. I’d have to shoot you dead, and I’d prefer not to do that. Still and all, I’ll refrain from using the term. In your presence, at least.” There was a hint of sarcasm in his voice.The general rubbed his long chin. “I can use you for liaison then, if Coffee needs it. We’ve got five hundred Cherokees allied with us in this campaign, and about a hundred friendly Creeks. Do you speak their language, too?”Sam hesitated. That was a hard question to answer. The Creek Confederacy was an amalgam of a number of tribes of different origins, further divided between the so-called Upper and Lower Towns. The term “Creek” itself was a white man’s word. Creeks were more likely to think of themselves as Coweta or Alabama or Tuskegee.“Well . . .” he began.But apparently Jackson understood the reality of the situation. “Any of the dialects?”“I can get along, sir, with some of them. I speak a little Choctaw, also.”“No Choctaws with us on this campaign, so that doesn’t matter. It might later, though. Once we’re done with the Red Sticks, we’ll be facing the British, you can be sure of it. Maybe the Spanish, as well. John? Do you want him? If you do, I’ll have Colonel Williams detach him from duty with his regiment.”The officer who had accompanied Houston shrugged his shoulders. “I could certainly use Ensign Houston, General, but I don’t really need him. At least a third of the Cherokees speak English. The Ridge doesn’t, true enough, but he’s got that young John Ross fellow to translate for him.” Major Coffee chuckled. “Of course, I don’t think Ross really speaks Cherokee all that well. But we’ll get along, true enough.”Jackson nodded. “All right, then. To tell you the truth, John, it’d probably be better to keep the ensign with his unit. I’ll be counting on the Thirty-ninth to keep the ragtag-and-bobtail in line.” He glanced at the flap of the tent through which the militia officer had beat a hasty retreat. “I think I did a pretty good job of bullying the little piglet. But you know as well as I do that they need bullying on a regular basis. How was my tantrum, by the way?”Coffee smiled. “Pretty good. Not your very best, though.” The major looked down at Jackson’s hat, which was still lying on the floor. “For a really top performance, you should have stomped on the hat.”The general stared down at the object in question. “Tarnation. I didn’t think of that.” He seemed genuinely aggrieved.Jackson stooped over and picked up the hat, brushed it off, then jammed it back onto his head. By the time he was finished, Sam was thoroughly amazed at the transformation in the man. The general who now stood before him, smiling and relaxed, seemed like a completely different person.Jackson gave him a cool, thin smile. “A lesson here, Ensign Houston, which will stand you in good stead. A reputation, once developed, is as valuable as a fine sword.”Then the smile became very thin. “But don’t forget that it has to be a valid reputation. Or the sword’s got no edge. I will shoot the bastards, if I have to.”There didn’t seem to be much to say to that, so Sam kept his mouth shut. After a moment, the general turned away and motioned for them to follow him to a table that stood in the corner of the tent. “And now, John, let’s discuss the campaign.”There was a large map spread across the table. “The Georgians are worthless, as usual,” Jackson growled. “There’s nobody quicker to steal land fromIndians, but whenever it comes to having to actually fight the savages—”He broke off, tossing Sam a sly glance. “Excuse me, Ensign. I should have said ‘the gentlemen of the red-skinned race.’ But whatever you call them, the Georgians run for cover every blasted time they appear. I just got word that General Floyd has retreated—again—and relinquished command to Colonel Milton at Fort Hull. Who’ll probably be just as useless as every Georgian seems to be. So it’ll be up to us Tennesseans to put an end to the Red Sticks.”Coffee studied the map intently, as did Sam. It was hand-drawn, and showed the terrain of the Territory of Mississippi, where the Red Sticks were concentrated. The Red Stick faction of the Creeks, the southern allies of Tecumseh, came mainly from the Confederacy’s Upper Towns. By and large, the Lower Town Creeks had either remained neutral or were allied with the United States.American newspapers tended to portray the Red Stick war as an attack on white settlers. It was that, certainly, but it was more in the way of a civil war among the Creeks themselves. The people massacred at Fort Mims by the Red Sticks a few months earlier, on August 30, had mainly been Creeks, not whites. Mixed-bloods, true, most of them—but the same could be said of the Red Sticks, especially their leaders. Tecumseh and his brother The Prophet had sought to unite all Indians against the whites. But, like most Indians, they viewed the distinction between “red men” and “white men” more along cultural lines than strictly racial ones. Many of Tecumseh’s followers, especially the Creek warriors of the Red Stick faction, had some white ancestors themselves.Tecumseh himself was dead now, killed in Canada in October, when U.S. forces under the command of General William Henry Harrison had defeated the British and their Indian allies at the battle of the Thames. It was reported that Colonel Richard Johnson, who’d led the final cavalry charge and had been badly wounded in the affray, had shot Tecumseh personally. But the fires Tecumseh and his brother The Prophet had lit among the many Indian tribes were still burning in the southern territories of the United States.Coffee rubbed his chin. “Are you sure you don’t want to wait for the Georgians to regroup, General?” His finger traced the lines of the Coosa and Tallapoosa rivers. “We’re not going to move easily through this terrain. It’s pretty much pure wilderness, by all accounts I’ve received.”Jackson shook his head impatiently. “We haven’t time for a slow campaign, John. The real enemy is the British, don’t ever forget it. We’ve got to crush this uprising as soon as possible or we’ll still be tied up when the British arrive.”“You may be jumping to conclusions, General. Napoleon might beat them, you know, even after his defeat at Leipzig. If he does, the British won’t be in any position to send more troops all the way across the Atlantic.”Sam was a little surprised that Coffee didn’t hesitate to argue the matter. After witnessing the Homeric temper tantrum Jackson had just thrown, Sam himself would have been a little hesitant to disagree with him under any circumstances. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Eric Flint’s acclaimed 1634: The Galileo Affair was a national bestseller from one of the most talked-about voices in his field. Now, in this extraordinary new alternate history, Flint begins a dramatic saga of the North American continent at a dire turning point, forging its identity and its future in the face of revolt from within, and attack from without. In the War of 1812, U.S. troops are battling the British on the Canadian border, even as a fierce fight is being waged against the Creek followers of the Indian leader Tecumseh and his brother, known as The Prophet. In Europe, Napoleon Bonaparte’s war has become a losing proposition, and the British are only months away from unleashing a frightening assault on Washington itself. Fateful choices are being made in the corridors of power and on the American frontier. As Andrew Jackson, backed by Cherokee warriors, leads a fierce attack on the Creek tribes, his young republic will soon need every citizen soldier it can find.What if–at this critical moment–bonds were forged between men of different races and tribes? What if the Cherokee clans were able to muster an integrated front, and the U.S. government faced a united Indian nation bolstered by escaping slaves, freed men of color, and even influential white allies? Through the remarkable adventures of men who were really there–men of mixed race, mixed emotions, and a singular purpose–The Rivers of War carries us in this new direction, brilliantly transforming an extraordinary chapter of American history.With a cast of unforgettable characters–from James Monroe and James Madison to Sam Houston, Francis Scott Key, and Cherokee chiefs John Ross and Major Ridge–The Rivers of War travels from the battle of Horseshoe Bend to the battle of New Orleans, and brings every explosive moment to life. With exquisite attention to detail, an extraordinary grasp of history, and a storyteller’s gift for the dramatic, Flint delivers a bold, thought-provoking epic of enemies and allies, traitors and revolutionaries, and illuminates who we are as a nation, how we got here, and how history itself is made–and remade.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(170)
★★★★
25%
(71)
★★★
15%
(43)
★★
7%
(20)
-7%
(-20)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

A Meditation on the Scots-Irish

In addition to what the other reviewers have mentioned--that this is a fast-paced, enjoyable novel--this book is a sophisticated fantasy/meditation on the role of the Scots-Irish in American history. Flint is clearly aware that the Scots-Irish were the cutting edge of American populism--and also at the cutting edge of American white racism. He tries here to conceive a plausible way for the Scots-Irish to preserve their populist role in American history, while at the same time recasting them as members of a multiracial alliance of blacks, Cherokee, etc. This is in many ways a 21st-century fantasy read back on the past: Patrick Driscol, our radical and racially tolerant Scots-Irish sergeant/hero, appears to be a mouthpiece for the author, whose biography blurb mentions prominently that he is "a longtime labor-union activist." Specifically, it is a fantasy that longs for an updated version of the New Deal alliance, where patriotism, populism, and multiracial liberalism remain firmly yoked--a fantasy whose real-world political correlate is (I think) the election of (the proudly Scots-Irish) James Webb as Democratic Senator from Virginia. It is not, ultimately, entirely historically plausible, in that it fails in the end to give proper weight to the racial and (especially) religious beliefs that inspired the Scots-Irish to make their actual political choices in history. But this is a historian's quibble: it is as somber and clear-eyed a treatment of human nature (and Scots-Irish character) as one can expect from a fantasy, and it is a most attractive fantasy. One can wish that the world were as Flint imagines it could be, while doubting it ever will be.

For an autobiographical-genealogical note: one of my great-grandmothers was largely Scots-Irish. So Flint's book is, in a small way, a family matter for me.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Pretty Good Flint, or Just Ok Alt. History

I would argue that this is one of Eric Flint's better works. While still very typically Flint, the flow and pacing of this book is far better then some of his other series (the Ring of Fire series comes to mind). There are overall less characters, or at least less characters integral to the overall plot. The plot itself is less convoluted, which is both good and bad. It is easy enough to follow where he is going, but where he tries to be subtle, it comes across as fairly blatant. That being said, I like what he does with the native Americans. Their plot line is fairly interesting and well done. As alternate history this is well thought out, and unlike many of the alt. history on the market, believable.

The weak point of this book is the character. As usual the characters are a more cardboard standouts rather then actual characters. He gives each a trait, and that character sticks to that trait without showing any of the nuance or gray areas of people. The fact that he has heaped these on some historical figures further exasparated the problem, as we know quite a bit about them. As a Texan, I found his depiction of Sam Houston particularly troubling.

His charazation aside, this is a pretty good read as alt. history goes. Not the best book on the market, but for solo Flint, it should be considered fairly good. I would recomend this to fans of either Flint or the genre.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Sex, Death, And History! Can't Beat It

Eric Flint, according to his afterword, apparently wrote "1812: The Rivers of War" and its sequel, "1824: The Arkansas War" (which I have not read) because somebody challenged him to write an alternate history of the United States in which the Trail of Tears never occurred. This required him to go back considerably before the Trail of Tears (which occurred in the late 1830's) so that the Cherokees could prepare themselves to become a nation in the sense that Europeans and Americans would define a nation in the mid-nineteenth century. Two of my best friends are part Cherokee, so of course I love the idea; but it could easily have been done in an utterly unreadable fashion. Instead, Flint delivers a no-holds-barred, spectacular alternate ending to the War of 1812.

The only complaint I have about this book is the title. No part of it actually takes place in 1812. Even the preface takes place in 1806 to introduce Andrew Jackson, who is far from the most important character in the book and is totally absent from the second act. Then we skip ahead to 1814 to witness the climax of Jackson's war against the Creeks, which was part of the war of 1812. One more minor complaint -- the back side of the book refers to Tecumseh fighting the Americans, but he was killed in 1813 and is only referred to in the text. The "Five Civilized Tribes" are the heart of the reason Flint wrote this book and they were not allied to Tecumseh. In fact, only half or so of the Creeks are allied to the British, but this still leads to a very bloody battle at what became known as the Horsehoe Bend of the Alabama River.

The hero of the book is Irish immigrant and universal soldier Patrick Driscoll, who thinks of the United States as his third nation, Ireland and France having been broken by the British, or "the Sassenach," as he calls them. If this book is ever made into a movie, I want to play Driscoll -- I am too short to play the other major Anglo characters, and I'm also about the right age. He is introduced at the beginning of the second act and is thereafter never absent. His views on religion and politics are about as modern as Flint could possibly make them and he is probably a stand-in for Flint himself. It's not exactly the climax of the book, but one of the two most fun scenes for Flint to write was certainly the scene that ends chapter 29, when Driscoll basically says "a pox on all your houses" because Earth has never contained a scoiety he would really be proud to be a part of.

The other, of course, is the love scene. Tiana Rogers, a sixteen-year-old Cherokee who towers over Driscoll at six feet, is gently pushed by her brothers to marry Driscoll after challenging them to find her a better husband than Sam Houston (in the time of this novel, a 21-year-old junior officer in the U. S. Army). She needs very little coaxing, finding in Driscoll her equal as a fighter and dreamer. Driscoll has been totally geared to fighting and killing the Sassenach for as long as Tiana has been alive, and she helps him turn towards the idea of letting his life be about building and loving.

Books like "The Rivers of War" are the reason I love alternate history. It's so much more hopeful than anything by Harry Turtledove. Whatever your background, if you have any interest in nineteenth-century America, you will love this book. I give it my strongest possible recommendation.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Loved it. Great Military, Alternate History SF

I love Military Fiction. I love Science Fiction even more. Though this book has plenty of military action, it is the characters and the 'not quite' real history that make it irresistable.

There are really two books (so far) int the series. They are both Alternate History. I'm not sure if that makes them SF or Fantasy or something else, but they were both written by Eric Flint and I consider them to be SF.

The two books are: "1812: The Rivers or War" and "1824: The Arkansas War."

In the first book, set in the war of 1812 we meet a number of interesting characters, some historical, such as Andrew Jackson and Sam Houston and some that are made up or conglomerates.

It doesn't sound like much, but it was VERY interesting, to see 'almost history' from a different perspective, and I think Eric Flint is one of the best in the business when it comes to creating ENGROSSING characters, and describing amazing military battles and activities.

The premise essentially is that Sam Houston, serving as a young officer under Andrew Jackson is injured in a battle (I believe it was the "Battle of Horseshoe Bend.") In real history, his injury was quite severe and kept him out of the rest of the War of 1812, but in the book, because he slipped, his injury was more minor. Then, the cascading effects of the presence of Sam Houston, in some battles and places where he otherwise would NOT have been (because HISTORICALLY he was recuperating, not defending Washington DC or New Orleans) led to some real changes in history, in particular a 'softening' of the attitude of a lot of people (including Andrew Jackson) to the 'Indian Question' and the EARLIER (and more voluntary) migration of the Cherokees (and Choctaws, Creeks, etc.) to the west to the Arkansas/Oklahoma area. Because they got there earlier, and voluntarily, they ended up with better land, a better position and more power than they would have otherwise, and were able, in essence, to create their own nation (think the 'Indian' equivalent of Texas) on the borders of the United States, where they could maintain more of their own culture.

Some of the (famous, actual) Native Americans (especially some of the Cherokees) are major characters in this book, though not the MAIN characters.

1824: The Arkansas War takes place 12 years later. Many escaped slaves and Freedmen have made their way to Arkansas (part of the 'Indian Confederation' allows slaves and part of it doesn't) and these former slaves (along with some Indians and White men) have come to dominate the Arkansas portion of the new nation. Naturally, being so close to 'The South' and being a haven for runaway slaves, there was going to be friction. So certain people influence the US to go to war against them. Native Americans, though present, are less conspicuous in these battles, but I found the whole thing to be COMPLETELY fascinating.

I recommend these books.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A strange anti-British rant

I have always enjoyed Eric Flint's books and so happily bought '1812' believing it would offer some interesting variations on a poorly understood subject. Instead I found myself immersed in what, from this side of the Atlantic, appears to be an anti-British rant. Why Mr Fint feels the need to invent battles between the British and Americans so as to chalk up a few undeserved wins for his home team is beyond me. The more I read the book the worse I felt and in the end gave up in disgust; a first for me with one of his book. However, I shall not be buying any more of his books in this ilk. I'm just glad that his low opinion of us is not shared by the vast majority of his countrymen.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A strange anti-British rant

I have always enjoyed Eric Flint's books and so happily bought '1812' believing it would offer some interesting variations on a poorly understood subject. Instead I found myself immersed in what, from this side of the Atlantic, appears to be an anti-British rant. Why Mr Fint feels the need to invent battles between the British and Americans so as to chalk up a few undeserved wins for his home team is beyond me. The more I read the book the worse I felt and in the end gave up in disgust; a first for me with one of his book. However, I shall not be buying any more of his books in this ilk. I'm just glad that his low opinion of us is not shared by the vast majority of his countrymen.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Nice new theme for Flint

After the enjoyable but definitely group effort of the 1633 series, this is definitely a change of pace in both era and scope. There is still the hard core alternate history and fast moving plot, however.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Nice new theme for Flint

After the enjoyable but definitely group effort of the 1633 series, this is definitely a change of pace in both era and scope. There is still the hard core alternate history and fast moving plot, however.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A whole lot of fighting going on here

This is an alternative history novel, the premise here being that if Sam Houston had not been gravely wounded during the War of 1812 what would have happened. Flint saw this one change as possibly impacting not just the War of 1812 but drastically changing the way the United States treated the native Americans. Specifically Flint thought that Andrew Jackson's forced relocation of the Cherokee Nation would have been altered resulting in the Cherokees forming an alliance with freed slaves and other disenfranchised people to form an independent nation in the center of the country. Before anyone attacks me for giving away the plot this information is given in the description of the book on the back cover.

I thought this was an intriguing premise and began reading eagerly but before long I found myself being bogged down in detailed description after detailed description of battle after battle. A large array of characters was introduced and often these battle scenes were told and retold from various points of view. I found it a bit difficult to keep track of who was who, and which side each was on which I found a bit surprising since my degree is history, and I was therefore already familiar with the events the novel is based upon. Between the overly large cast of characters and the numerous, and rather repetitious battle scenes I found this book quite easy to put down, and had to force myself to get through it. Happily it did improve as it went along. I will probably get the second book, which I hope will focus more on the 'good' stuff, the actual alternative history part since this novel was by in large just a very long, detailed set up for the main plot.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Alternate History or Bad History book

Well, I like the Alternate History genre, but this book reads like a bad History book - The Cherokee people call themselves this, and Cherokee is a white man's word, and blah-blah-Zzz - this novel spends so much time explaining the characters, which if you did not take American history EVER you would need, however, I did go to school and I know who these people are - quite honestly, I know that the other series is supposed to be better, but I will not be spending any of my future book shopping time going out of my way to find the 1632 series - eventually I will, but first, I must finish my Eric Flint induced Coma-nap inspired by - Zzz.......
1 people found this helpful