Anathem
Anathem book cover

Anathem

Hardcover – September 9, 2008

Price
$27.09
Format
Hardcover
Pages
960
Publisher
William Morrow
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0061474095
Dimensions
6.12 x 2.03 x 9.12 inches
Weight
1 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly In this follow-up to his historical Baroque Cycle trilogy, which fictionalized the early-18th century scientific revolution, Stephenson ( Cryptonomicon ) conjures a far-future Earth-like planet, Arbre, where scientists, philosophers and mathematicians—a religious order unto themselves—have been cloistered behind concent (convent) walls. Their role is to nurture all knowledge while safeguarding it from the vagaries of the irrational saecular outside world. Among the monastic scholars is 19-year-old Raz, collected into the concent at age eight and now a decenarian, or tenner (someone allowed contact with the world beyond the stronghold walls only once a decade). But millennia-old rules are cataclysmically shattered when extraterrestrial catastrophe looms, and Raz and his teenage companions—engaging in intense intellectual debate one moment, wrestling like rambunctious adolescents the next—are summoned to save the world. Stephenson's expansive storytelling echoes Walter Miller's classic A Canticle for Leibowitz , the space operas of Larry Niven and the cultural meditations Douglas Hofstadter—a heady mix of antecedents that makes for long stretches of dazzling entertainment occasionally interrupted by pages of numbing colloquy. (Sept.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Bookmarks Magazine Stephenson has never been an easy writer to pin down, and he has a reputation for not always wearing his erudition lightly. Particularly in his later books—and that now includes Anathem —readers are vetted at the door before being invited into the author’s labyrinthine worlds. The early books were held up alongside the work of William Gibson, Bruce Sterling, and other cyberpunk gods, though in the last decade Stephenson has carved a niche as one of the most ambitious writers working today in any genre. Anathem is intellectually rigorous and exceedingly complex, even to the point, as the Washington Post avows, of being “grandiose, overwrought and pretty damn dull.” Others complained of too much abstraction. Stephenson’s fans are legion, however, and many will add Anathem to their list of must-read doorstops.Copyright 2008 Bookmarks Publishing LLC “Reading Anathem is a humbling experience.” — Washington Post on ANATHEM “A sprawling disquisition…[a] logophilic treat for those who like their alternate worlds big, parodic and ironic.” — Kirkus Reviews on ANATHEM “Stephenson’s expansive storytelling echoes Walter Miller’s classic A Canticle for Leibowitz, the space operas of Larry Niven and the cultural meditations of Douglas Hofstadter – a heady mix of antecedents that makes for long stretches of dazzling entertainment.” — Publishers Weekly on ANATHEM “A magnificent achievement. ” — Booklist (starred review) on ANATHEM “Clever and intricate...truly ingenious...it’s brilliance is undeniable.” — Locus, Gary K. Wolfe on ANATHEM “A masterpiece...mind-bogglingly ambitious...readers will delight in puzzling out the historical antecedents in philosophy, science, mathematics, and art that Stephenson riffs on with his customary quicklsilver genius...it’s one of the most thought-provoking novels I’ve ever read, and also one of the most engaging.” — Locus, Paul Witcover, on ANATHEM “The Seattle writer is kind of a cross between William Gibson and Richard Powers, hard-wired to tell stories, explore technology and riff on anything that catches his fancy.” — The Oregonian (Portland) on ANATHEM “[O]ne of Stephenson’s best novels…a captivating blend of culture clash, deductive reasoning and pure action.” — Columbus Dispatch on ANATHEM “What ever happened to the great novel of ideas? It has morphed into science fiction, and Stephenson is its foremost practitioner. A-” — Time magazine on ANATHEM “[R]iveting idea porn.” — Details on ANATHEM “The cult legend’s newest book, Anathem, [is] destined to be an instant sci-fi classic.” — Popular Mechanics on ANATHEM “He mashes up genres with the flair of Thomas Pynchon and the intellect of William Gibson.” — Winnipeg Free Press on ANATHEM “Blending quantum physics, phenomenological philosophy and various other fun hobbies...Stephenson’s enthusiasm to share his theories and explanations is infectious...think “The Name of the Rose” crossed with “Dune”...genuinely fascinating brain food.” — The Oregonian (Portland) on ANATHEM “Stephenson writes in twists and turns, double-backs and cul-de-sacs, winding tunnels and fast-moving tracks. It’s a Rube Goldberg sort of book: intricate, sometimes difficult to follow but always fascinating to read.” — Grand Rapids Press on ANATHEM “Anathem duly marries extensive dialogues on quantum mechanics and the nature of consciousness to literal cliffhangers, hi-tech warfare and derring-do.” — Leicester Mercury on ANATHEM “Anathem is a challenge: Make yourself one of the avout. Make yourself a scholar, and try to understand the world a little differently.” — Eugene Weekly on ANATHEM “Stephenson displays his ingenuity when it comes to mixing science, sociology and satire with swashbuckling adventure. Anathem marries extensive scientific and philosophical dialogues to cliffhangers, hi-tech warfare and derring-do.” — Sunday Sun (UK) on ANATHEM “It’s almost impossible to not be impressed by Anathem; there’s simply too much erudition, wit, craft and risk-taking.” — San Francisco Chronicle on ANATHEM “In Anathem, Stephenson creates a religion for skeptics and nerds.” — Austin American-Statesman on ANATHEM “Anathem is a brilliant, playful tour of the terrain where logic, mathematics, philosophy and quantum physics intersect, a novel of ideas par excellence, melding wordplay and mathematical theory with a gripping, human adventure.” — London Times on ANATHEM “Anyone who has read Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle will be familiar with his ingenuity when it comes to mixing science, sociology and satire with swashbuckling adventure, and ANATHEM duly marries extensive dialogues on quantum mechanics and the nature of consciousness to literal cliffhangers, high-tech warfare and general derring-do.” — The Examiner (Ireland) on ANATHEM “As with Stephenson’s previous work, plot and character are wrought to the highest standards of literary fiction but they’re scarcely as fascinating as the worlds he conjures up. If there’s anything more readable than ANATHEM it should probably be banned.” — Word (UK) on ANATHEM “Learned, witty, weirdly torqued, emotionally complex, politically astute, and often darkly comic…ANATHEM is an audacious work by a highly intelligent imagination, a delightfully learned text.” — Edmonton Journal (Alberta) on ANATHEM “A daring feat of speculative fiction…ANATHEM offers the reader a luscious arrangement of words, jokes, and speculations.” — Boston Globe “This is a book about science and philosophy which demands the full concentration of the reader -a worthwhile, smart, exciting read.” — Time Out London “A tour-de-force of world building and high-concept speculation, wrapped around a page-turning plot.” — St. Louis Post-Dispatch on ANATHEM “[R]avishingly brilliant, outrageously ambitious…ANATHEM is thought-provoking fun, at turns a post-graduate seminar of philosophy and physics, and a rousing yarn with characters you care about.” — Orlando Sentinel on ANATHEM “Suddenly, novels of ideas are cool again.” — io9 on ANATHEM “The world Stephenson builds is richly visual, its complicated social politics are convincingly detailed, and its cool and conflicted heroes struggle with thrilling intellectual puzzles while they are tested in epic physical adventures.” — Slate, Best of 2008 List, on ANATHEM [R]avishingly brilliant, outrageously ambitious…Stephenson embarks on a mission of world-building, and he is thoroughly successful at it.” — South Florida Sun Sentinel on ANATHEM Anathem , the latest invention by the New York Times bestselling author of Cryptonomicon and The Baroque Cycle , is a magnificent creation: a work of great scope, intelligence, and imagination that ushers readers into a recognizable—yet strangely inverted—world. Fraa Erasmas is a young avout living in the Concent of Saunt Edhar, a sanctuary for mathematicians, scientists, and philosophers, protected from the corrupting influences of the outside "saecular" world by ancient stone, honored traditions, and complex rituals. Over the centuries, cities and governments have risen and fallen beyond the concent's walls. Three times during history's darkest epochs violence born of superstition and ignorance has invaded and devastated the cloistered mathic community. Yet the avout have always managed to adapt in the wake of catastrophe, becoming out of necessity even more austere and less dependent on technology and material things. And Erasmas has no fear of the outside—the Extramuros—for the last of the terrible times was long, long ago. Now, in celebration of the week-long, once-in-a-decade rite of Apert, the fraas and suurs prepare to venture beyond the concent's gates—at the same time opening them wide to welcome the curious "extras" in. During his first Apert as a fraa, Erasmas eagerly anticipates reconnecting with the landmarks and family he hasn't seen since he was "collected." But before the week is out, both the existence he abandoned and the one he embraced will stand poised on the brink of cataclysmic change. Powerful unforeseen forces jeopardize the peaceful stability of mathic life and the established ennui of the Extramuros—a threat that only an unsteady alliance of saecular and avout can oppose—as, one by one, Erasmas and his colleagues, teachers, and friends are summoned forth from the safety of the concent in hopes of warding off global disaster. Suddenly burdened with a staggering responsibility, Erasmas finds himself a major player in a drama that will determine the future of his world—as he sets out on an extraordinary odyssey that will carry him to the most dangerous, inhospitable corners of the planet . . . and beyond. Neal Stephenson is the bestselling author of the novels Reamde , Anathem , The System of the World , The Confusion , Quicksilver , Cryptonomicon , The Diamond Age , Snow Crash , and Zodiac , and the groundbreaking nonfiction work In the Beginning . . . Was the Command Line . He lives in Seattle, Washington. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A #1
  • New York Times
  • Bestseller,
  • Anathem
  • is perhaps the most brilliant literary invention to date from the incomparable Neal Stephenson, who rocked the world with
  • Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon,
  • and
  • The Baroque Cycle
  • . Now he imagines an alternate universe where scientists, philosophers, and mathematicians live in seclusion behind ancient monastery walls until they are called back into the world to deal with a crisis of astronomical proportions.
  • Anathem
  • won the Locus Award for Best Science Fiction Novel and the reviews for have been dazzling: “Brilliant” (
  • South Florida Sun-Sentinel
  • ), “Daring” (
  • Boston Globe
  • ), “Immensely entertaining” (
  • New York Times Book Review
  • ), “A tour de force” (
  • St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • ), while
  • Time
  • magazine proclaims, “The great novel of ideas…has morphed into science fiction, and Neal Stephenson is its foremost practitioner.”

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(2.7K)
★★★★
25%
(1.1K)
★★★
15%
(674)
★★
7%
(315)
-7%
(-315)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

no spoilers review

First off, I'll let slip that I am a big Neal Stephenson fan, although I did not enjoy the Baroque Cycle. Anathem is, in some respects, "difficult" to read. Yes, there is language here that Stephenson made up, although he didn't take it to the same level that Tolkein did in his Middle Earth works. (There is an glossary of terms at the back, and entries from a dictionary are spreckled throughout the book.) And Anathem may be "slow" in that it takes approximately 200 pages to get to the core of the plot. However, I never found myself bored with the writing.

It is a difficult book to describe to others. In some ways, I felt like I was reading a novelization of "Goedel, Escher, Bach". There are some complex ideas here, some of which are expanded upon in appendices, which contain dialogues (ie in the Socratic sense of a philosophical or mathematical discussion between two people of differing views). I find such discussions intriguing, so I never found the book dry or boring, though strictly speaking, much of the material could have been removed to focus strictly on the plot. (This would, however, have weakened the reader's understanding of the plot.) Such digressions are quite characteristic of Stephenson's work (ie the discussions of language theory present in Snow Crash), and for a certain audience, it is quite enjoyable. If you have a tolerance for (or perhaps even enjoy) side-discussions of interesting material, and enjoy speculative fiction, then none of this should put you off. If you read xkcd, or liked Snow Crash, or the Foundation series by Asimov, then Anathem is likely a good bet for you. If mathematical or philosophical concepts make you cringe in fear, then you would probably not enjoy Anathem (or anything else by Neal Stephenson for that matter).

This review is based on an advance copy.
592 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Book About Everything.

Is Neal Stephenson a science fiction author? His two earliest novels, "The Big U" and "Zodiac" are contemporary satire; his masterpieces, "Cryptonomicon" and "The Baroque Trilogy" are historical romances. Take away the two Crichtonesque thrillers he collaborated on under the pseudonym "Stephen Bury," and what's left is a pair (could this be a pattern?) of books, "Snow Crash" and "The Diamond Age," that combine the near-future info-tech milieu of 80's cyberpunk with the irony and social consciousness of 60's sf. These two, and only two, indisputably science fiction novels came out back to back within a couple of years of each other in the early 90's.

Now, thirteen years later, we get a third: "Anathem." It is the first time Neal Stephenson returned to a genre. I think it's significant that genre is science fiction. I wanted to know, does he revive the tradition of those previous two works, or has he created something new?

Actually, he has reinvented the wheel. Shockingly, it is a bigger, better wheel. And it's about time.

"Anathem" is a work of Hard SF, meaning that everything that's weird or new in it is a rigorous extrapolation of science, mathematics and philosophy. It's the kind of book Arthur C. Clarke used to write in the 40's and 50's. He wrote about rockets and satellites because scientists were working on rockets and satellites.

Most (I would argue all) recent Hard SF, however, is about "rockets" and "satellites." Science Fiction has become an exclusively literary genre, with books inspired less by new scientific research than by previous science fiction books, and, regrettably, movies. Ideas turn into tropes, and instead of extrapolation, we get variation: of the generation star ship, the space alien, the artificial brain, the parallel universe.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. Writers like Ted Chiang and Gene Wolfe write brilliant books by breathing new literary life into these old tropes. But their concerns are ultimately moral. They're not interested in New Ideas About Everything as much as in the problems and choices those ideas pose.

In the last thirty or so years, the only sub-genres of Science Fiction willing to take on new science and technology have been cyberpunk and its cousin ribofunk (addressing respectively info- and bio-tech.) But recently, both these sub-genres have been petering out because, I would argue, real-world progress in both those areas has been both too fast and too gradual: fast enough to make most writing obsolete shortly after, or even before, publication; too gradual to produce anything truly transformative for the long view (we're still waiting for AI, immersive VR, and genetically modified humans.)

(This is probably why Stephenson left the field.)

Well, now he's back with his big fat (wonderful) book, and what he's done is pretty startling, because it's been done before, but not in a very long time. Instead of borrowing tropes from existing science fiction, he started from scratch. He went to the source, to the work of physicists, mathematicians, philosophers, and even French literary theorists, and produced a nineteen-forties-style SF book of Big New Ideas About Everything.

The result feels both fantastic and oddly non-fictional, or non-literary. "Anathem" often reads more like a book by William Gladwell or Douglas Hofstadder, or Jared Diamond. But that's okay. The ideas are real and new, and developed in exciting ways. And Hard SF is supposed to be chunky. (After all, it was Arthur C. Clarke who came up with the idea of the geosynchronous satellite.)

Don't get me wrong: Neal Stephenson can write. And so "Anathem" is also a cool, funny, and exciting read. (Intriguingly, aspects of it greatly resemble Gene Wolfe's "Book of the New Sun" and "Book of the Long Sun" and Ted Chiang's "The Tower of Babel," which could be a case either of convergence or descent. But I don't care.)

And best of all, if Neal Stephenson sticks to his pattern, there's going to be a second one soon.
527 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Another intellectually amazing novel from Neal Stephenson

Anathem is another in a line of unique novels from Neal Stephenson. His earlier books like Snow Crash and the Diamond Age are excellent glimpses of the concept-driven novels that he has been writing for the last ten years. One weakness of his earlier books is that he didn't end stories particularly strongly (Snow Crash being a notable exception) but he has gotten progressively better at that, particularly with the System of the World, the last of the Baroque Cycle trilogy. Starting with Cryptonoicon, he started writing "long" fiction. One typical thing about these novels is that they have a slow build while you get introduced to the characters and situations. I know several very bright people who couldn't stomach the long lead-up in Quicksilver and never got to the fantastic 2nd and 3rd novels in the series, The Confusion and System of the World. Like the beginning of a rollercoaster where you need to climb to the crest of the first hill, the first sections of his novels pay off as the rest of the story becomes compulsive reading.

No spoilers to follow: Anathem finds him back in top form with a new cast of characters, a new world, and a new language. Not surprisingly, this means that the first chapters of the book are challenging and somewhat difficult, but as another review stated, nowhere near as convoluted and involved as The Lord of the Rings or (in my opinion), Dune. The more you know about history and ancient Greek thought the more you will be blown away by Anathem; and that is before the correlations to more recent philosophy and an extended meditation on zero-gravity navigation. A re-imagining of intellectual history, only Neal Stephenson can make the fine points of esoteric philosophical and intellectual minutia so much fun to read.

For me, one of the high points of the Baroque Cycle was how he made European history, the history of science, alchemy, and the history of banking and commerce so unbelievably enjoyable to read about. Anathem moves into more speculative areas by showing how the differnet ways in which we frame our thoughts have real and powerful impact on the world at large, even if it takes a long time for those speculative thoughts to produce concrete effects. I get the feeling that his novels are the product of his own intellectual curiousity about history, science, mathmatics, and now philosophy. Thankfully, he has a knack for packaging these ruminations into adventurous exciting novels and I'm incredibly happy that he's kept it up for this long. Highly recommended.
268 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Brilliant Author--"Anathem," An Overindulgent Swing and a Miss

Unlike many of the other reviewers of Anathem, this was my first crack at a Neal Stephenson novel. I was looking for a intellectual challenge, wrapped in a stimulating, well-written novel. Sadly, I got too much challenge and too little well written novel. Regarding this novel, a few things are abundantly clear:

1. Neal Stephenson is a heckuva of a smart guy--eons--(as he would say "cosmi" or "polycosmi") more so than me;

2. This book was a "labor of love" to read; unfortunately, more "labor" than "love;"

3. It is clear that Mr. Stephenson's focus in writing this novel was on the concepts he presents, and unfortunately, plot and character development merely serve as a vehicle for presentation of such ideas. (The quote from the NY Times Book Review on the book jacket states that the author cares as much about telling good stories as he does presenting cool ideas. I couldn't disagree more!)

I enjoyed the first 200 pages or so, even though it required constant reference to the timeline in the front of the book and the glossary in the rear. I thought the introductions of Apert and the concurrent presentation of the secular and theorical worlds was fascinating. At that point, there was little plot, but in a 900 page novel, one expects these things to be drawn out.

I LOVED the next 400 pages or so. (I was certain this was going to be a 5 Star Review). It was largely plot driven, and while there was plenty of philosophy, geometry, science etc., I felt that it served the story, and I was able to wrap my apparently limited mind around it.

Then the book simply wore me down. I HATED the last 300 pages--I doubt I would have finished it, had it not been for my rule that "what I start, I finish." The writing grew more obtuse than the parts that preceded it (or maybe I just collapsed under the cumulating heft of all those weighty ideas). Given my stupor, I lost the will to go back and find and then re-read and re-read again earlier lengthy digressions (which just didn't seem to generate an adequate payoff. The plot slowed down (or maybe I just didn't get it) and I lost interest. At that point, I was just grinding, crawling to the finish.

All this having been said, I nonetheless give the author his props! He is clearly a clever fellow, but this book is way too much uninteresting manual labor for way too little payoff. I blame the failings of this book on the lack of a good editor--or any editor, for that matter. At 500 pages, this would have been book of the year. At 900, it's an overindulgent swing and a miss.
100 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Philosophy as Popular Entertainment

Stephenson's is a fascinating mind. He latches on to so many differing ideas and swirls them into a world both familiar and unique. In Anathem we are introduced to a world drenched in history from the viewpoint of a scholar class that is set apart from the popular culture.

The hallmark of Stephenson's writing is an effortless ability to explain and illuminate the big questions. Anathem tackles the biggest of questions and to elucidate further risks draining the reader's motivation to tackle a 1,000 page story. Suffice it to say that the journey is entirely worthwhile.

The author invites his readers to examine their beliefs--not only what they think they believe but to engage in the dialogue familiar to the students of philosophy. Stephenson is adept at weaving exposition into the narrative without seeming overly preachy; although, as he did in the Baroque cycle, his disdain for shoddy thinking is always present: witness the many references to BS, which echo Dr. Frankfurt's illuminating work.

Frankly, I don't quite know how a Stephenson novice would approach Anathem. Like anything artfully and skillfully complex, Anathem requires one to reach for the "upsight," it requires one to think--and I don't believe that I could pay this work a higher compliment than that. In a world that is increasingly defined by torrents of BS, Mr. Stephenson invites us to rejoin the great thinkers of the past and to try and make some sense of the situation in which we find ourselves.
60 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Brillant Writer's Unchecked Ego Creates a Boring Mess

I am a big Stephenson fan. Having mucked my way through the first 200 pages of "Quicksilver" before The Baroque Cycle story took off and I was richly rewarded for my patience, I can honestly say having forced myself to grind through the first 200 pages of "Anathem", I am tapping out of this free lance, creative mess. Reading a new language and definitions created by Stephenson was just too much for me. The story is flat out boring with pages and pages of conversation in a language and world I could care less about.

My time is too precious to wade through a brillant writer's unchecked ego looking for a worthy story reading words that appeared to have been made up after Stephenson spilled a Scrabble game board on the floor. Some of the sentences would have made Dr. Suess proud. I will gladly wait a few more years for his next book hoping Stephenson gets out of his system whatever drove him to try his hand writing this story and he gets back to being a serious, respected writer using a language actually spoken on our planet today....now there's a novel idea.
42 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Waste of time, space, and space-time

I used to love Neal's work, and I still think Snowcrash is one of the best SF novels ever written. But Anathem...I did not get it. I read about 150 pages of excruciating and meaningless description, all couched in cranium-grinding alternate vocabulary, only to wait for the big something to happen. It never did, I began skipping paragraphs...then pages...then chapters .

In browsing the other reviews, people seem to agree that this is a philo-scientifical masterpiece "if you can make it through the first 300 pages". Wow. I'm yearning for the old Neal, whence steroid-pumped gargoyles harpoon cars to go skating and then conspire with cool historian computer programs to bring down despotic mind-control floating island cults out in the ocean.

Don't get me wrong, I have a few doctoral degrees and love an intellectual challenge. But, Anathem was no fun at all.
32 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

"High School Buddies Save the World!"

The plot of this book is unintentionally hilarious! Heinlein's YA fiction is more plausible: not every kid in Starship Troopers went straight to top spots at Command Headquarters.

This book centers around a group of 18 and 19 year old friends from a cloistered order of intellectuals.

For reasons not explained, they from among countless more experienced and intelligent persons in a huge worldwide pool are chosen to be the center of action when the entire world is threatened

My unanswered question is this: Why, if he is so smart, does the young protagonist never ask what I kept thinking:

"Holy Coincidence, Batman! How did my best friend end up being the only intellectual(Avout) in the entire world chosen to go with an 8 person group on a world-important space mission? How did my girlfriend, who is even younger than I am, get put in charge of military
strategic evacuation plans? Why was I chosen to attend the world-saving conference when I am only the equivalent of a college freshman, and know squat? And how come all my other friends are coincidentally at this conference, too, including a kid who only recently joined the order and few people can even stand?" And so many more, but you get the idea.

I'm 3/4 through this, and will finish, but it's actually getting funnier as I read. The juxtaposition of deep scientific discussions with blatant disregard for the silliness of the entire endeavor is wildly entertaining.

Maybe something will turn up at the end to explain it all, but the teenagers' lack of curiosity in that regard is amusing.
29 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dialog, maybe; Literature, not

Neal Stephenson's novels have always been novels about ideas. Cryptonomicon, about cryptology and anarchy, the Baroque cycle about the rise of the modern West. But in these previous novels the idea-stuff was balanced with enough literature-stuff: characters, plots, extraordinarily sharp use of language. One always had the nagging suspicion that the literature part was optimized for male teenagers--particularly when it came to the sex and violence--but still others could listen in with pleasure. Particularly if you were a geek who enjoyed Stephenson's love and understanding of technology.

This balance gets destroyed in Anathem. This time the core ideas are the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, Plato's theory of Ideals, the philosophy of language, the nature of consciousness and the place of intellectuals in society. Perhaps a large list even by Stephensonian standards. Moreover ideas that are speculative and likely to be unfamiliar to even geek audiences. As a result, unlike, say, Cryptonomicon, where the ideas unfold through the story, here the exposition of ideas actually displaces the literature-stuff.

As a result what is left as a novel is just the optimized-for-teenagers part: how a crisis throws a group of kids into adult roles and their ensuing adventures--including martial arts in space and unmentioned biological interactions on hospital beds. There is none of the linguistic artistry of the earlier Stephenson. The commentary on real society is flat and direct and lacks the inventiveness of Snowcrash.

A not-so-great novel from an undoubtedly great author.
29 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Biggest disappoitment of the publishing year - unreadable

I looked forward to the release of this book all year. I pre-ordered it months ago. I looked forward to opening the book and engaging once again with one of my favorite authors.
I am incredibly disappointed. I find the book to be pretentious, boring and bordering on the unreadable. It would be one thing to use non-English language in the book, but to use something made up this extensively is bizarre.
This strikes me as the book Neal always wanted to write - just none of us want to read. While I blame Neal for the total work, it is too bad a good editor did not give him better guidance.
29 people found this helpful