Rogue Lawyer: A Novel
Rogue Lawyer: A Novel book cover

Rogue Lawyer: A Novel

Kindle Edition

Price
$9.99
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date

Description

"Terrific Grisham, can still devise distinctivecharacters, tricky legal predicaments and rogueishly cheating ways to worm out of them."--Maureen Corrigan, "The Washington Post" "Sebastian Rudd is a kind of social justice warrior and Grisham uses him to take jabs at the legal system all with a blunt, rude, gravelly poetic wise guy voice that makes Rudd come across as a kind of 21st-century Philip Marlowe."--Benjamin Percy, "The New York Times Book Review"" --This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1. My name is Sebastian Rudd, and though I am a well‑known street lawyer, you will not see my name on billboards, on bus benches, or screaming at you from the yellow pages. I don’t pay to be seen on television, though I am often there. My name is not listed in any phone book. I do not maintain a traditional office. I carry a gun, legally, because my name and face tend to attract attention from the type of people who also carry guns and don’t mind using them. I live alone, usually sleep alone, and do not possess the patience and understanding necessary to maintain friendships. The law is my life, always consuming and occasionally fulfilling. I wouldn’t call it a “jealous mistress” as some forgotten person once so famously did. It’s more like an overbearing wife who controls the checkbook. There’s no way out.xa0 xa0 xa0These nights I find myself sleeping in cheap motel rooms that change each week. I’m not trying to save money; rather, I’m just trying to stay alive. There are plenty of people who’d like to kill me right now, xa0and a few of them have been quite vocal. They don’t tell you in law school that one day you may find yourself defending a person charged with a crime so heinous that otherwise peaceful citizens feel driven to take up arms and threaten to kill the accused, his lawyer, and even the judge.xa0 xa0 xa0But I’ve been threatened before. It’s part of being a rogue lawyer, a subspecialty of the profession that I more or less fell into ten years ago. When I finished law school, jobs were scarce. I reluctantly took a part‑time position in the City’s public defender’s office. From there I landed in a small, unprofitable firm that handled only criminal defense. After a few years, that firm blew up and I was on my own, out on the street with plenty of others, scrambling to make a buck. xa0 xa0 xa0One case put me on the map. I can’t say it made me famous because, seriously, how can you say a lawyer is famous in a city of a million people? Plenty of local hacks think they’re famous. They smile from billboards as they beg for your bankruptcy and swagger in television ads as they seem deeply concerned about your personal injuries, but they’re forced to pay for their own publicity. Not me. xa0 xa0 xa0The cheap motels change each week. I’m in the middle of a trial in a dismal, backwater, redneck town called Milo, two hours from where I live in the City. I am defending a brain‑damaged eighteen‑year‑old dropout who’s xa0charged with killing two little girls in one of the most evil crimes I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen plenty. My clients are almost always guilty, so I don’t waste a lot of time wringing my hands about whether they get what they deserve. In this case, though, Gardy is not guilty, not that it matters. It does not. What’s important in Milo these days is that Gardy gets convicted and sentenced to death and executed as soon as possible so that the town can feel better about itself and move on. Move on to where, exactly? Hell if I know, nor do I care. This place has been moving backward for fifty years, and one lousy verdict will not change its course. I’ve read and heard it said that Milo needs “closure,” whatever that means. You’d have to be an idiot to believe this town will somehow grow and prosper and become more tolerant as soon as Gardy gets the needle. xa0 xa0 xa0My job is layered and complicated, and at the same time it’s quite simple. I’m being paid by the State to provide a first‑class defense to a defendant charged with capital murder, and this requires me to fight and claw and raise hell in a courtroom wherexa0no one is listening. Gardy was essentially convicted the day he was arrested, and his trial is only a formality. The dumb and desperate cops trumped up the charges and fabricated the evidence. The prosecutor knows this but has no spine and is up for reelection next year. The judge is asleep. The jurors are basically nice, simple people, wide‑eyed at the process and ever so anxious to believe the lies their proud authorities are producing on the witness stand. xa0 xa0 xa0Milo has its share of cheap motels but I can’t stay there. I would be lynched or flayed or burned at the stake, or if I’m lucky a sniper would hit me between the eyes and it would be over in a flash. The state police are providing protection during the trial, but I get the clear impression these guys are just not into it. They view me the same way most people do. I’m a long‑haired roguish zealot sick enough to fight for the rights of child killers and the like. xa0 xa0 xa0My current motel is a Hampton Inn located twenty‑five minutes from Milo. It costs $60 a night and the State will reimburse me. Next door is Partner, a hulking, heavily armed guy who wears black suits and takes me everywhere. Partner is my driver, bodyguard, confidant, paralegal, caddie, and only friend. I earned his loyalty when a jury found him not guilty of killing an undercover narcotics officer. We walked out of the courtroom arm in arm and have been inseparable ever since. On at least two occasions, off‑duty cops have tried to kill him. On one occasion, they came after me. xa0 xa0 xa0We’re still standing. Or perhaps I should say we’re still ducking. 2. At 8:00 a.m. Partner knocks on my door. It’s time to go. We say our good mornings and climb into my vehicle, which is a large black Ford cargo van, heavily customized for my needs. Since it doubles xa0as an office, xa0the rear seats have been rearranged aroundxa0a small table that folds into a wall. There is a sofa where I often spend the night. All windows are shaded and bulletproof. It has a television, stereo system, Internet, refrigerator, bar, a couple of guns, and a change of clothes. I sit in the front with Partner and we unwrap fast‑food sausage biscuits as we leave the parking lot. An unmarked state police car moves in front of us for the escort to Milo. There is another one behind us. The last death threat was two days ago and came by e‑mail. xa0 xa0 xa0Partner does not speak unless spoken to. I didn’t make this rulexa0but I adore it. He is not the least bit bothered by long gaps in the conversation, nor am I. After years of saying next to nothing, we have learned to communicate with nods and winks and silence. Halfway to Milo I open a file and start taking notes. xa0 xa0 xa0The double murder was so gruesome no local lawyer wouldxa0touch it. Then Gardy was arrested, and one look at Gardy and you know he’s guilty. Long hair dyed jet‑black, an astonishing collection of piercings above the neck and tattoos below, matching steel earrings, cold pale eyes, and a smirk that says, “Okay, I did it, now what?” In its very first story, the Milo newspaper described him as “a member of a satanic cult who has a record of molesting children.” xa0 xa0 xa0How’s that for honest and unbiased reporting? He was never a member of a satanic cult and the child molestation thing is not what it seems. xa0But from that moment Gardy was guilty, and I still marvel at the fact that we’ve made it this far. They wanted to string him up months ago. xa0 xa0 xa0Needless to say, every lawyer in Milo locked his door and unplugged her phone. There is no public defender system in the town—it’s too small—and the indigent cases are doled out by the judge. There xa0is xa0an unwritten xa0rule that the xa0younger lawyers in town take these low‑paying cases because (1) someone has to andxa0(2) the older lawyers did so when they were younger. But no one would agree to defend Gardy, and, to be honest, I can’t really blame them. It’s their town and their lives, and to rub shoulders with such a twisted murderer could do real damage to a career. xa0 xa0 xa0As a society, we adhere to the belief in a fair trial for a person accused of a serious crime, but some of us struggle when it comes to the business of providing a competent lawyer to guarantee said fair trial. Lawyers like me live with the question “But how do you represent such scum? ” xa0 xa0 xa0I offer a quick “Someone has to” as I walk away. xa0 xa0 xa0Do we really want fair trials? No, we do not. We want justice, and quickly. And justice is whatever we deem it to be on a case‑by‑case basis. xa0 xa0 xa0It’s just as well that we don’t believe in fair trials because wexa0damned sure don’t have them. The presumption of innocence is now the presumption of guilt. The burden of proof is a travesty because the proof is often lies. Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt means if he probably did it, then let’s get him off the streets. xa0 xa0 xa0At any rate, the lawyers ran for the hills and Gardy had no one. It’s a commentary, sad or otherwise, on my reputation that I soon got the phone call. In this end of the state, it is now well known in legal circles that if you can’t find anybody else, call Sebastian Rudd. He’ll defend anybody! xa0 xa0 xa0When Gardy was arrested, a mob showed up outside the jail and screamed for justice. When the police perp‑walked him to a van for the ride to the courthouse, the mob cursed him and threw tomatoes and rocks. This was thoroughly reported by the local newspaper and even made the City’s evening news (there is no network station based in Milo, only a low‑end cable outfit). I howled for a change of venue, pleaded with the judge to move the trial at least a hundred miles away so we could hopefully find somexa0jurors who hadn’t thrown stuff at the kid, or at the least cursed him over dinner. But we were denied. All of my pretrial motions were denied. xa0 xa0 xa0Again, the town wants justice. The town wants closure. xa0 xa0 xa0There is no mob to greet me and my van as we pull in to a short driveway behind the courthouse, but some of the usual actors are here. They huddle behind a police barricade not far away and hold their sad signs that say such clever things as “Hang the Baby Killer,” and “Satan Is Waiting,” and “Crud Rudd out of Milo!” There are about a dozen of these pathetic souls, just waiting to jeer at me and, more important, to show their hatred to Gardy, who will arrive at the same place in about five minutes. During the early days of the trial, this little crowd attracted cameras and a few of these people made it into the newspapers, along with their signs. This, of course, encouraged them and they’ve been here every morning since. Fat Susie holds the “Crud Rudd” sign and looks like she wants to shoot me. Bullet Bob claims to be a relative of one of the dead girls and was quoted as saying something to the effect that a trial was a waste of time. xa0 xa0 xa0He was right about that, I’m afraid. xa0 xa0 xa0When the van stops, Partner hurries around to my door, where he’s met by three young deputies about his size. I step out and am properly shielded, then I’m whisked into the rear door of the courthouse as Bullet Bob calls me a whore. Another safe entry. I’m not aware of any case in modern times in which a criminal defense attorney was gunned down while entering a courthouse in the middle of a trial. Nevertheless, I have resigned myself to the likelihood that I could well be the first. xa0 xa0 xa0We climb a narrow rear staircase that’s off‑limits to everyone else, and I’m led to a small windowless room where they once held prisoners waiting to see the judge. A few minutes later, Gardy arrives in one piece. Partner steps outside and closes the door.xa0 xa0 xa0 xa0“How ya doing?” I ask when we are alone. xa0 xa0 xa0He smiles and rubs his wrists, unshackled for a few hours. “Okay, I guess. Didn’t sleep much.” He xa0didn’t shower either because he’s afraid to shower. He tries it occasionally but they won’t turn on the hot water. So Gardy reeks of stale sweat and dirty sheets, and I’m thankful he’s far enough away from the jury. The black dye is slowly leaving his hair and each day it gets lighter, and his skin gets paler. He’s changing colors in front of the jury, another clear sign of his animalistic capabilities and satanic bent. xa0 xa0 xa0“What’s gonna happen today?” he asks, with an almost childlike curiosity. He has an IQ of 70, just barely enough to be prosecuted and put to death. xa0 xa0 xa0“More of the same, Gardy, I’m afraid. Just more of the same.” xa0 xa0 xa0“Can’t you make them stop lying? ” xa0 xa0 xa0“No, I cannot.” xa0 xa0 xa0The State has no physical evidence linking Gardy to the murders. Zero. So, instead of evaluating its lack of evidence and reconsidering its case, the State is doing what it often does. It’s plowing ahead with lies and fabricated testimony. xa0 xa0 xa0Gardy has spent two weeks in the courtroom, listening to the lies, closing his eyes while slowly shaking his head. He’s able to shake his head for hours at a time, and the jurors must think he’s crazy. I’ve told him to stop, to sit up, to take a pen and scribble something on a legal pad as if he has a brain and wants to fight back, to win. But he simply cannot do this and I cannot argue with my client in the courtroom. xa0I’ve also told him to cover his arms and neck to hide the tattoos, but he’s proud of them. I’ve told him to lose the piercings, but he insists on being who he is. The bright folks who run the Milo jail forbid piercings of all types, unless, of course, you’re Gardy and you’re headed back to the courtroom. In that case, stickxa0’em all over your face. Look as sick and creepy and satanic as possible, Gardy, so that your peers will have no trouble with your guilt. xa0 xa0 xa0On a nail is a hanger with the same white shirt and khaki pants he’s worn every day. I paid for this cheap ensemble. He slowly unzips the orange jail jumpsuit and steps out of it. He does not wear underwear, something I noticed the first day of the trial and have tried to ignore since. He slowly gets dressed. “So much lying,” he says. xa0 xa0 xa0And he’s right. The State has called nineteen witnesses so far and not a single xa0one resisted the temptation to embellish a bit, or to lie outright. The pathologist who did the autopsies at the state crime lab told the jury the two little victims had drowned, but he also added that “blunt force trauma” to their heads was a contributing factor. It’s a better story for the prosecution if the jury believes the girls were raped and beaten senseless before being tossed into the pond. There’s no physical proof they were in any way sexually molested, but that hasn’t stopped the prosecution from making this a part of its case. I haggled with the pathologist for three hours, but it’s tough arguing with an expert, even an incompetent one. xa0 xa0 xa0Since the State has no evidence, it is forced to manufacture some. The most outrageous testimony came from a jailhouse snitch they call Smut, an appropriate nickname. Smut is an accomplished courtroom liar who testifies all the time and will say whatever the prosecutors want him to say. In Gardy’s case, Smut was back in jail on a drug charge and looking at ten years in prison. The cops needed some testimony, and, not surprisingly, Smut was at their disposal. They fed him details of the crimes, then transferred Gardy from a regional jail to a county jail where Smut was locked up. Gardy had no idea why he was being transferred and had no clue that he was walking into a trap. (This happened before I got involved.) They threw Gardy into a small cell with Smut, who was anxious to talk and wanted to help in any way. He claimedxa0to hate the cops xa0and know some good lawyers. He’d also read about the murders of the two girls and had a hunch he knew who really killed them. Since Gardy knew nothing about the murders, he had nothing to add to the conversation. Nonetheless, within twenty‑four hours Smut claimed he’d heard a full confession. The cops yanked him out of the cell and Gardy never saw him again, until trial. As a witness, Smut cleaned up nicely, wore a shirt and tie and short hair, and hid his tattoos from the jury. In amazing detail, he replayed Gardy’s account of how he stalked the two girls into the woods, knocked them off their bikes, gagged and bound them, then tortured, molested, and beat them before tossing them into the pond. In Smut’s xa0version, Gardy was high on drugs and had been listening to heavy metal. xa0 xa0 xa0It was quite a performance. I knew it was all a lie, as did Gardy and Smut, along with the cops and prosecutors, and I suspect the judge had his doubts too. Nevertheless, the jurors swallowed it in disgust and glared with hatred at my client, who absorbed it with his eyes closed and his head shaking, no, no, no. Smut’s testimony was so breathtakingly gruesome and rich with details that it was hard to believe, at times, that he was really fabricating it. No one can lie like that! xa0 xa0 xa0I hammered at Smut for eight full hours, one long exhausting day. The judge was cranky and the jurors were bleary‑eyed, but I could have kept going for a week. I asked Smut how many times he’d testified in criminal trials. He said maybe twice. I pulled out the records, xa0refreshed xa0his memory, and went through the nine other trials in which he’d performed the same miracle for our honest and fair‑minded prosecutors. With his muddled memory somewhat restored, I asked him how many times he’d had his sentence reduced by the prosecutors after lying for them in court. He said never, so I went through each of the nine cases again. I produced the paperwork. I made it perfectly clear to everyone, especially the jurors, that Smut was a lying, serial snitch who swapped bogus testimony for leniency. xa0 xa0 xa0I confess—I get angry in court, and this is often detrimental. I blew my cool with Smut and hammered him so relentlessly that some of the jurors became sympathetic. The judge finally told me to move on, but I didn’t. I hate liars, especially those who swear to tell the truth and then fabricate testimony to convict my client. I yelled at Smut and the judge yelled at me, and at times it seemed as though everyone was yelling. This did not help Gardy’s cause. xa0 xa0 xa0You would think the prosecutor might break up his parade of liars with a credible witness, but this would require some intelligence. His next witness was another inmate, another druggie who testified he was in the hallway near Gardy’s cell and heard him confess to Smut. xa0 xa0 xa0Lies on top of lies. xa0 xa0 xa0“Please make them stop,” Gardy says. xa0 xa0 xa0“I’m trying, Gardy. I’m doing the best I can. We need to go.” --This text refers to the paperback edition. John Grisham is the author of forty-seven consecutive #1 bestsellers, which have been translated into nearly fifty languages. His recent books include The Judge's List, Sooley, and his third Jake Brigance novel, A Time for Mercy, which is being developed by HBO as a limited series. xa0 Grisham is a two-time winnerxa0of the Harper Lee Prize for Legal Fiction and was honored with the Library of Congress Creative Achievement Award for Fiction. xa0 When he's not writing, Grisham serves on the board of directors of the Innocence Project and of Centurion Ministries, two national organizations dedicated to exonerating those who have been wrongfully convicted. Much of his fiction explores deep-seated problems in our criminal justice system. xa0 John lives on a farm in central Virginia. --This text refers to the paperback edition. "Terrific…Grisham, can still devise distinctivexa0characters, tricky legal predicaments and rogueishly cheating ways to worm out of them." --Maureen Corrigan, The Washington Post "Sebastian Rudd is a kind of social justice warrior and Grisham uses him to take jabs at the legal system…all with a blunt, rude, gravelly poetic wise guy voice that makes Rudd come across as a kind of 21st-century Philip Marlowe." --Benjamin Percy, The New York Times Book Review --This text refers to the paperback edition. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • #1
  • NEW YORK TIMES
  • BESTSELLER • Featuring one of John Grisham’s most colorful, outrageous, and vividly drawn characters yet,
  • Rogue Lawyer
  • showcases the master of the legal thriller at his very best.
  • On the right side of the law—sort of—Sebastian Rudd is not your typical street lawyer. His office is a customized bulletproof van, complete with Wi-Fi, a bar, a small fridge, and fine leather chairs. He has no firm, no partners, and only one employee: his heavily armed driver, who also so happens to be his bodyguard, law clerk, confidant, and golf caddie. Sebastian drinks small-batch bourbon and carries a gun. He defends people other lawyers won’t go near: a drug-addled, tattooed kid rumored to be in a satanic cult; a vicious crime lord on death row; a homeowner arrested for shooting at a SWAT team that mistakenly invaded his house. Why these clients? Because Sebastian believes everyone is entitled to a fair trial—even if he has to bend the law to secure one.
  • Don’t miss John Grisham’s new book,
  • THE EXCHANGE: AFTER
  • THE FIRM, coming soon!

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(19K)
★★★★
25%
(15.8K)
★★★
15%
(9.5K)
★★
7%
(4.4K)
23%
(14.5K)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Good Writing, Bad Book

I'm usually a Grisham fan but this is a truly terrible, grossly irritating book. First off, it was done first---and better--by Michael Connelly. Second, it is neither a short story collection, a novella or a novel but some sort of crude amalgam off all three. Third, though well written--and what Grisham isn't?--it's still annoying as hell. Maybe his next book will be better.
123 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I seriously don’t understand how Grisham thought this book was a good idea

If John Grisham is ever in urgent need of help from the police, for his sake I hope the officers that respond haven’t read this book. I understand this is fiction, but I seriously don’t understand how Grisham, his agent, editors, publicists and publishing team thought it would be a good idea to create a protagonist that denigrates police officers and other public officials on nearly every page of the book. I would be very interested to read a review of this book that is written by someone affiliated with law enforcement.

There is even a character that declares he is going to renounce his citizenship and leave the country because he can’t take “it” anymore. “It” being America, I guess. Well, hey, in the real world I have lived overseas in service to my country and I have been in places where the people truly live in fear of the cops and the government. And guess what? It doesn’t look anything like America.

Again, I know this is fiction—but even setting aside the asinine ramblings about how corrupt it is in America, this is still a terrible book.

It is divided into six parts, and they are so disjointed that for the first half of the book I couldn’t fathom why it was being sold as a novel. It felt like a collection of unrelated novellas. There is very little dialogue in the beginning of the book. It’s “this” and “that” and “then” and on and on it goes. The threads do finally come together, at least somewhat, in the second half of the book, and for a moment I thought it might even get interesting because there was a scene that perfectly set up the rogue lawyer to show some growth as a character … but geez, it turns out he was right all along. The cops, mayors, judges, soldiers and city councilmembers are all evil.

Honestly, if this is a reflection of John Grisham’s worldview—and it might be, because as he did with GRAY MOUNTAIN he tends to insert his causes into his writing—then I feel sorry for him. I don’t care how much money he has, it must be a miserable existence to have such a bleak outlook on life. Look, I get it—we have problems in America. Things aren’t perfect. Fiction is a great tool for illuminating those problems and generating discussion for how they can be fixed.

But that is not happening with this book.

I simply can’t recommend it: 1/5 stars.
90 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I can't finish it.....

its unusual for me to stop reading a book once I've started. Unfortunately Rogue Lawyer is one of those exceptions. I keep waiting for those layered, flawed, cherishrd Grisham characters to develop; instead we're given insipid Mickey Spillane dialog from wise cracking bad guys, deadbeat gumshoes and other absurd stereotypes (! beautiful but cold as ice lesbians! heart of gold hookers!). The bad guys are sooo bad, theyre kidnappers, drug kingpins, sex slave sellers and serial killers all rolled into one-and as mentioned before story lines only loosely tied together. a waste of money.
44 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Seedy Characters, Scattered Plot, Crummy Finish

Sebastian Rudd is a lawyer who defends scumbags. He is unafraid of the inherent dangers that accompany many of these defenses, and he is a fearless negotiator who tries all angles available to him to ensure that justice is done even to the most unsavory characters. The public thinks he is a scumbag himself for defending such vermin, and many of the vermin that he defends don’t deserve a lawyer of his caliber, and they don’t appreciate his talent or his ability to play with his gloves off. He is tough and always seems to operate best when he is right along the borderline of ethical behavior. He is divorced, his ex-wife is an industrial grade bitch, and he loves cage fighting in his off time. He shoots pool at weird hours, and his office is in a van, driven by his bouncer, Partner. The book weaves its’ way in and out of a number of seedy people with nasty legal problems, and he is in constant danger from many different places. He deals with criminal behavior from the police in one instance, and he tries to defend a fighter who killed a referee in another case. An assortment of people who are mostly on the fringe make this a very interesting read, with no real lasting value other than entertainment. This book has a scattered plot; it seems to jump from one story to another without too much tie. Grisham attempts to make connections by concocting some wild events that give the story a contrived feel. The end is very unsatisfying. It leaves too many loose ends dangling, and it feels like the author just got tired of writing, so he quit. All in all, a satisfactory book to entertain. It is high on entertainment, low on value.
31 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Never again will I purchase a book by this author

I struggled with whether to purchase this book after his last one was such a disappointment but I gave him another chance...the struggle continued while reading it. I cannot recommend this book and won't be buying any future books by this author. He's become arrogant and boring. The book started to pick up about 3/4 thru and...stopped. Disappointing and waste of money and time. (I'm being "kind"...)
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Copycat

Michael Connelly did it first and better. In my opinion a rip off of The Lincoln Lawyer
30 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Very Disappointed

I've been reading John Grisham for years and I had a rule of thumb about his novels. When he wrote about legal matters it was going be a great read… guaranteed! I pre-ordered Rogue Lawyer and anxiously waited for its arrival. When it finally reached my Kindle I read it at my first opportunity… and was very disappointed.

Sebastian Rudd is lawyer who offers his services to the dregs of society, people who other lawyers will not touch.

The story is written in short halting sentences within short chapters sometimes only 2 pages long, designed to keep the readers moving along. His clients all have miserable lives and he practices law within a society that has a corrupt and an unbelievably incompetent police force within a judicial system that also corrupt. The only person who is fair, competent and ethical is our hero. The bad guys have single syllable names where the good guys may have two. The story is divided into six parts or cases with a single thin thread trying to link the story together. There isn't a main story-line compelling enough to hold the book together. Rudd’s personal life is also miserable with a running battle with his ex-wife about custody issues with his son. The one bright spot in the book and his life is his interest in the mixed martial arts in which he sponsors a talented fighter, but this also ends miserably. The book ends abruptly without a satisfying conclusion.

I don’t recommend this book unless you enjoy reading about people with miserable lives. With the next Grisham novel, if there is one, I will certainly take a closer look at the reviews before reading it.
28 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Can you say sequel?

Entertaining book for awhile ..... but turns out to be just a collection of short stories with an ending that screams numerous sequels. While entertaining it's not up to any of the author's previous efforts and could have been written over a long weekend. For some reason it makes you feel like you're waiting for a Sue Grafton ish "S is for sequel."
26 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Couldn't wait for another great Grisham novel, instead got this ridiculous antiestablishment cliche diatribe.

Every cop hater cliche in the book. Unimaginative, insalubrious jail cells, dishonest prosecutors and judges keeping the system going by putting on sham trials that can only be stopped by a Rouge Lawyer. I want my money back!
23 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It finally happened

Well, it's finally happened! A Grisham book that I do not like. Dare I ask....did he really write this as a stand alone book, or did he take all of the notes he's gathered over the years and glob them into something he calls a book? I wasn't fond of Grey Mountain, but at least it held my attention. This one....not so much. As the widow of a police officer turned detective, I sort of resent how he protrays the police. In today's climate, where every day you see people blaming every bad decision on the police (never the bad guy) I think you, Mr Grisham, have done a diservice to our protectors. Also, this smacks of Lincoln Lawyer, just not as well written or interesting. Unlike some reviewers, I liked Sycamore Road........I liked the characters........and I could see another movie out of that one. I am regretting buying this particular book. To make bad matters worse, I recommended it to a friend before I had read it......based solely on the previous books by this author. I won't do that again. You have given me lots of reading enjoyment....so I am not marking you off my reading list over this one failure but please do better next time.
22 people found this helpful