The Lacuna: A Novel
The Lacuna: A Novel book cover

The Lacuna: A Novel

Price
$14.16
Format
Hardcover
Pages
528
Publisher
Harper
Publication Date
Dimensions
6.13 x 1.41 x 9 inches
Weight
1.85 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly Starred Review. Kingsolver's ambitious new novel, her first in nine years (after the The Poisonwood Bible ), focuses on Harrison William Shepherd, the product of a divorced American father and a Mexican mother. After getting kicked out of his American military academy, Harrison spends his formative years in Mexico in the 1930s in the household of Diego Rivera; his wife, Frida Kahlo; and their houseguest, Leon Trotsky, who is hiding from Soviet assassins. After Trotsky is assassinated, Harrison returns to the U.S., settling down in Asheville, N.C., where he becomes an author of historical potboilers (e.g., Vassals of Majesty ) and is later investigated as a possible subversive. Narrated in the form of letters, diary entries and newspaper clippings, the novel takes a while to get going, but once it does, it achieves a rare dramatic power that reaches its emotional peak when Harrison wittily and eloquently defends himself before the House Un-American Activities Committee (on the panel is a young Dick Nixon). Employed by the American imagination, is how one character describes Harrison, a term that could apply equally to Kingsolver as she masterfully resurrects a dark period in American history with the assured hand of a true literary artist. (Nov.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Bookmarks Magazine The Lacuna contains two very distinct parts. One features a vibrant Mexican landscape with the equally colorful personalities of Rivera, Kahlo, and Trotsky. The other centers more on Harrison's reclusive existence in small-town America and his battle with the House Un-American Activities Committee. Despite the prodigious research that both parts exhibit, critics clearly preferred the former, marveling at Kingsolver's lyrical passages and her expert recreation of 1930s Mexico. A few reviewers also noted instances of sermonizing and inaccurate history. However, the novel's compelling, engrossing story certainly outweighed these minor complaints, and in the end, Kingsolver has created a convincing "tableau vivant of epochs and people that time has transformed almost past recognition" ( New York Times Book Review ). “Rich…impassioned…engrossing…Politics and art dominate the novel, and their overt, unapologetic connection is refreshing.” (Chicago Tribune )“Masterful…a reader receives the great gift of entering not one but several worlds…The final pages haunt me still.” (San Francisco Chronicle Book Review )“Compelling…Kingsolver’s descriptions of life in Mexico City burst with sensory detail—thick sweet breads, vividly painted walls, the lovely white feet of an unattainable love.” (The New Yorker )“A work that is often close to magic.... Much research underlies this complex weaving...but the work is lofted by lyric prose.” (Denver Post )“Shepherd’s story in Kingsolver’s accomplished literary hands is so seductive, the prose so elegant, the architecture of the novel so imaginative, it becomes hard to peel away from the book” (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette )“[Kingsolver’s] playful pastiche brings to vivid life the culture wars of an earlier era...” (Vogue )“...True and riveting...Barbara Kingsolver has invented a wondrous filling here, sweeter and thicker than pan dulce, spicy as the hottest Mexican chiles, paranoid as the American government hunting Communists ” (Philadelphia Inquirer )“A sweeping mural of sensory delights and stimulating ideas about art, government, identity and history…Readers will feel the sting of connection between then and now.” (Seattle Times )“A sweeping narrative of utopian dreams and political reality…A stirring novel…intimate and pitch-perfect.” (San Diego Union-Tribune )“Kingsolver deftly combines real history and the life of the fictional protagonist…A sweeping tale.” (Atlanta Journal-Constitution )“The most mature and ambitious [novel] she’s written…An absorbing portrayal of American life…A rich novel [with] a large, colorful canvas…A tender story about a thoughtful man.” (Washington Post )“A lavishly gifted writer... Kingsolver [has a] wonderful ear for the quirks of human repartee. The Lacuna is richly spiked with period language... This book grabs at the heartstrings...” (Los Angeles Times )“Breathtaking...dazzling...The Lacuna can be enjoyed sheerly for the music of its passages on nature, archaeology, food and friendship; or for its portraits of real and invented people...But the fuller value...lies in its call to conscience and connection.” (New York Times Book Review )“The novel achieves a rare dramatic power...Kingsolver masterfully resurrects a dark period in American history with the assured hand of a true literary artist.” (Publishers Weekly (starred review) )“[Kingsolver] hasn’t lost her touch...she delivers her signature blend of exotic locale, political backdrop and immediately engaging story line...teems with dark beauty.” (People )“[Kingsolver] stirs the real with the imagined to produce a breathtakingly ambitious book, bold and rich…hopeful, political and artistic. The Lacuna fills a lacuna with powerfully imagined social history (Kansas City Star ) Barbara Kingsolver's work has been translated into more than twenty languages and has earned a devoted readership at home and abroad. In 2000 she was awarded the National Humanities Medal, our country's highest honor for service through the arts. She received the 2011 Dayton Literary Peace Prize for the body of her work, and in 2010 won Britain's Orange Prize for The Lacuna . Before she made her living as a writer, Kingsolver earned degrees in biology and worked as a scientist. She now lives with her family on a farm in southern Appalachia. From The Washington Post From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by by Ron Charles Barbara Kingsolver's new novel, "The Lacuna," is the most mature and ambitious one she's written during her celebrated 20-year career, but it's also her most demanding. Spanning three decades, the story comes to us as a collection of diary entries and memoir, punctuated by archivist's notes, newspaper articles, letters, book reviews and congressional transcripts involving some of the 20th century's most radical figures. The sweetness that leavened "The Bean Trees" and "Animal Dreams" has been burned away, and the lurid melodrama that enlivened "The Poisonwood Bible" has been replaced by the cool realism of a narrator who feels permanently alienated from the world. That central, though oddly faint, character is Harrison Shepherd, a popular writer of romantic adventure novels. Kingsolver neatly weaves this quiet, watchful man through tumultuous events that rocked two countries, and one of the most impressive feats of "The Lacuna" is how convincingly she tracks his developing voice, from when he's a sensitive teenager in 1929 until he becomes a national celebrity in the early 1950s. The story begins in Mexico when Shepherd is 13, but we gradually learn that he was born in Washington, D.C., the product of a doomed marriage between a dull federal bureaucrat and a saucy Mexican beauty. His mother has abandoned America and taken up with a brutal right-wing businessman in tropical Isla Pixol, hoping to land a better husband. Alone and without any formal education, Shepherd begins reading moldy adventure novels and Mexican history, and he also takes up the lifelong practice of journal writing -- "the beginning of hope: a prisoner's plan for escape." Those journals, carefully transcribed and surreptitiously preserved years later, become the bulk of this complicated novel. A "permanent foreigner," not at home in the United States or Mexico and aware that his budding homosexuality must not be expressed, young Shepherd quickly develops an outsider's detached perspective, tinged with loneliness. He has a sharp eye for the beauty of Mexico, its lush tropics and its colorful towns, and Kingsolver convincingly positions him near some of the era's larger-than-life figures. A handy cook, he gets a job making plaster for the Mexican muralist Diego Rivera and eventually becomes a part of his household. Rivera and his wife, the painter Frida Kahlo, leap off these pages in all their flamboyant passion and brilliance, repeatedly cheating on and punishing each other, even while their international reputation blossoms. As Kahlo's closeted gay confidant, Shepherd offers this gifted female artist a rare chance to share her frustrations about her husband and the shadow he casts over her work. Shepherd's connection with Rivera and Kahlo, both committed communists, quickly brings him into contact with their contentious friend Leon Trotsky, and this fascinating section shows the Russian Revolution from the perspective of one of its reviled and isolated engineers. Constantly at risk of assassination by Stalin's death squads, Trotsky and his frightened wife remain awkwardly holed up in Rivera's house, trying to carry on the workers' battle without money, without an army, without anything but his prodigious writings, which Shepherd neatly types up for him each day. In this touching portrayal of a doomed idealist, the out-maneuvered leader can hardly ignore his irrelevancy. "In 1917 I commanded an army of five million men," he tells Shepherd. "Now I command eleven hens." It's a loser's game trying to estimate the peculiar boundaries of my own ignorance, but I'm willing to go out on a limb and suggest that most readers could use more background than we get here on Trotsky, Rivera and Kahlo. Kingsolver has made Shepherd's diary so realistic that it shows little sense of the needs of some future, public readership. But for the truly interested, background information is newly available: Bertrand M. Patenaude recently published "Trotsky: Downfall of a Revolutionary," a biography of the man's final years in exile. And this month, Robert Service completes his trilogy on the founders of the Soviet Union with "Trotsky." Both books offer a lively and finely detailed description of the bizarre household that Kingsolver dramatizes. The second half of "The Lacuna" shifts, like "The Poisonwood Bible," from an exotic foreign land to the United States. Shepherd moves to a small town in North Carolina in the 1940s and eventually finds himself in the odd position of being an agoraphobic, homosexual heartthrob to millions of female readers. "Nearly every day," he confesses, "I wake up shocked at how little in this world I comprehend." Though this section is much less dramatic than his adventures in Mexico, it offers an absorbing portrayal of American life at a time when the country moved swiftly from Depression, to World War, to consumerism spun through with political paranoia. The other considerable pleasure of this second half is the subtle depiction of Shepherd's relationship with his discreet secretary, Violet Brown, a 46-year-old widow, "sensible as pancake flour," who speaks in the antiquated English of Shakespeare's day. Theirs is an intense but formal affiliation, cemented by her devotion and his respect. In the notes she supplies to Shepherd's journals, she remarks on his "secretive temperament" and suggests that he suffered from "some kind of dread that went past the bashfulness." But she's determined to preserve his memory, even if he exists in these voluminous clippings and diary entries only as a kind of lacuna, or missing space, whose life is suggested by the shape of everything he describes around him. It's a lovely portrait of an intensely private writer, a man who suffered both the benefits of fame and the horrible costs. From beginning to end, though, this is also a novel of capital-L Liberal ideas -- workers' rights, sexual equality, artistic freedom -- the kind of progressive causes that Kingsolver tries to encourage with her Bellwether Prize for socially responsible fiction. More often than not, that's a recipe for Literature for the Betterment of the People, in which all the precious brown-skinned characters and the requisite Mystical Negro line up against a battalion of wicked white landowners. Kingsolver is far too good a writer for that (though not all the Bellwether winners are), but the concluding section of "The Lacuna," in which Shepherd is harassed by J. Edgar Hoover's cronies, recites a predictable Red Scare story we've heard many times before: the just-the-facts FBI agent who asks incriminating questions, the mysterious collapse of the blacklisted writer's career, the outrageous behavior of the House Un-American Activities Committee. Considering the audience for literary fiction -- Kingsolver's in particular -- it's unlikely that "The Lacuna" will shock or change a single right-thinking mind. Nevertheless, this rich novel is certainly bigger than its politics. It resurrects several dramatic events of the early 20th century that have fallen out of public consciousness, brings alive the forgotten details of everyday life in the 1940s, and illustrates how attitudes and prejudices are shaped by political opportunism and the rapacious media. But despite this large, colorful canvas, ultimately "The Lacuna" is a tender story about a thoughtful man who just wanted to enjoy that basic American right: the right to be left alone. As he was fond of saying, "The most important part of the story is the piece of it you don't know." [email protected] Copyright 2009, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In her most accomplished novel, Barbara Kingsolver takes us on an epic journey from the Mexico City of artists Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo to the America of Pearl Harbor, FDR, and J. Edgar Hoover.
  • The Lacuna
  • is a poignant story of a man pulled between two nations as they invent their modern identities.
  • Born in the United States, reared in a series of provisional households in Mexico—from a coastal island jungle to 1930s Mexico City—Harrison Shepherd finds precarious shelter but no sense of home on his thrilling odyssey. Life is whatever he learns from housekeepers who put him to work in the kitchen, errands he runs in the streets, and one fateful day, by mixing plaster for famed Mexican muralist Diego Rivera. He discovers a passion for Aztec history and meets the exotic, imperious artist Frida Kahlo, who will become his lifelong friend. When he goes to work for Lev Trotsky, an exiled political leader fighting for his life, Shepherd inadvertently casts his lot with art and revolution, newspaper headlines and howling gossip, and a risk of terrible violence.
  • Meanwhile, to the north, the United States will soon be caught up in the internationalist goodwill of World War II. There in the land of his birth, Shepherd believes he might remake himself in America's hopeful image and claim a voice of his own. He finds support from an unlikely kindred soul, his stenographer, Mrs. Brown, who will be far more valuable to her employer than he could ever know. Through darkening years, political winds continue to toss him between north and south in a plot that turns many times on the unspeakable breach—the lacuna—between truth and public presumption.
  • With deeply compelling characters, a vivid sense of place, and a clear grasp of how history and public opinion can shape a life, Barbara Kingsolver has created an unforgettable portrait of the artist—and of art itself.
  • The Lacuna
  • is a rich and daring work of literature, establishing its author as one of the most provocative and important of her time.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(1.2K)
★★★★
25%
(961)
★★★
15%
(576)
★★
7%
(269)
23%
(883)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

dissapointed

I love Barbara Kingsolver. I have read nearly everything she has ever written. "Prodigal Summer" and "Animal Vegetable, Miracle" are two of my favorites. I also love Frida Kahlo and have read her excellent biography, "Frida" by Hayden Herrera. So when my husband gave me "The Lacuna," I was so excited by the prospect of an excellent Kingsolver book about this period in history. The first few chapters were really nice. But the book became disjointed, uninteresting and the journal format was disappointing. I skimmed and skipped probably 50% of the center section and read only the end. I wish I had something better to say about an author who is usually so engaging. Ah well. Better will come in the future I am sure.
19 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

She got it wrong.....

Man, just couldn't suspend my disbelief....

Kingsolver simply got a number of things WRONG. The press didn't start that stuff about Diego eating human flesh (when he was young and living in Paris), as she writes. He did. It's all there in his autobiography with about a thousand other lies--but that book is a damn good read, even if read as fiction. And at one point she mentions that Tom Cuddy (did anyone ever talk or write in a bebop fashion like that? me thinks not, coolkat...) had handled two Kahlos at the museum. That is EXTREMELY unlikely. Almost all Frida paintings were in private hands, as during her lifetime few museums--and certainly few outside Mexico--considered her to be an artist of note. And then that silliness at the end about being deported back to the US to face "un-American" charges in the House (and hence the narrator had to swim through the lacuna); he had a Mexican passport, he was a Mexican citizen, and in the fifties the Mexican government and press found the Communist witch-hunt brouhaha in the US to be totally absurd. Not in a million years would Harrison Shepherd have been deported. (To date, Mexico will only deport its citizens to face trial when they have murdered someone outside the country--and even then the death penalty must be taken off the table.) And there is more. But I only mention these because Kingsolver takes such pains to poke fun at the yellow press--and she's not much above getting things wrong, herself!

Finally, there were a few structural turns that bothered me. We never got to see Frida with Mrs. Brown on that first visit to Mexico, and I really wanted that. (Kingsolver hints that they hadn't got along, but I think it would have been better IF THEY HAD!) And I found those conversations at the end with Artie to be repetitive and, ultimately, a bore. Again, perhaps that is just me. I DID finish the book. And this says a lot, particularly for a book that isn't decades old (my usual taste in reading).

Speaking of which, here are far better books on Mexico:

THE EAGLE AND THE SERPENT by Martin Luis Guzman
TEMPEST OVER MEXICO by Rosa E. King
THE DAYS OF OFELIA by Gertrude Diamant
MEXICAN VILLAGE by Josephina Niggli (which I remember noticing was in Frida's library in Coyoacan)

All are beautifully written and those (the first two) on the Mexican Revolution are shocking. I found the James Michener book on Mexico (MEXICO) to be good beach reading. Harriet Doerr wrote a couple of good books on Mexico when she, at a ripe old age, was in the writing program at Stanford. And the best book I ever read about the McCarthy years was Lillian Hellman's SCOUNDREL TIME--again, probably half lies, but a good read nonetheless. (And Hellman knew a thing or two about metaphors; to my mind, "pentimento" works a helluva lot better than "lacuna.")

Cheers!
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A shallow history lesson

As a great fan of Barbara Kingsolver's Prodigal Summer and Poisonwood Bible, I looked forward to reading The Lacuna. However, her latest novel does not have the same compelling edge as her previous works. While all of her novels are well researched and teach you as you follow the great story, The Lacuna is lacking that driving story. As readers follow H.W. Shepard, important names and events are mentioned (and even lived through), but without any back story to truly inform the reader, or the deep insight that allows for greater understanding.

Kingsolver also stumbles with the form of this novel. Harrison's diaries come across as clunky, and often bore. Furthermore, her use of an archivist who jumps in at places to talk through missing points (such as a missing journal as a transition) is jarring. While effective, a more smooth transition would have been appreciated.

While this novel did not lower my opinion of Kingsolver, it was a big miss for me. I did not enjoy it and cannot recommend it.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

a challenging novel with a big pay-off - keep at it!

I just finished this book, and I loved it. I am still reeling from its incredible force. Why, then, did I only give it four stars? As has been indicated by many other reviewers here, reading it - until our hero, Harrison Shephard, comes to Asheville about halfway in - was a terrible chore. I make it a point to finish every book I read, but in this case, it was tough. The writing style Ms. Kingsolver adopts throughout HWS's childhood and adolescence is almost unbearable. A story of journal entries, letters, and newspaper clippings, the former half of the book is told from the point of view of a young boy whose sense of self is so weak that he can't even acknowledge his existence in his own journal. For example, he might not say "I brought the cake to the table", but instead "The cake was placed on the table." This goes on for almost 300 pages. It's so clumsy and distracting. I kept getting lost and re-reading pages. I truly almost gave up on this one. But. Having powered through (to the other side of the Lacuna, as it were), I see now that it was, more or less, necessary. That said - so much of it? I don't particularly think so.

Now for the good stuff. The second half of the book is magical. Shephard comes into his own here, and he finds a confident (if not a little apologetic) voice in which to tell his tale. And then there's Mrs. Brown. Violet Brown may be one of my favorite literary characters of all time, and the dynamic that the two share is a thing to be treasured, right up to the last page. To the weary readers who, like me, want to put the book down and move on: wait until you meet Violet. That's when it gets so good.

It's a story about beauty and loneliness, in the landscape of political upheaval in Russia, World War II, and misguided patriotism in the United States. Even as a victim of fanatical Americanism, Mr. Shephard, up to a point, maintains a position of elevated tolerance of it all, which he occasionally seems to mistake for naivete. In this way, it's a timely story: a cautionary tale. Let's not allow fear for the safety of our country become a hindrance to common human decency. But it's not a political book, really; Shephard isn't a political character. Just a man with a heart-breakingly beautiful story to tell.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Progressive Baloney

My expectations upon beginning this book were quite high based upon a recommendation from an acquaintance. Unfortunately I found that the author was aggressively pushing her left wing/progressive agenda. The prose is eloquent and the reader is presented with sympathetic characters and colorful metaphors which can be appreciated. The problem comes when the observations of these characters are unpacked. The author seems to desire to be taken as intellectually deep and thoughtful. However, I am sorry to say she created a one sided and superficial perspective with her work. The moral observation about the use of the atomic bomb did not consider the consequence of not using the bomb which would have been the deaths of not just Americans but huge numbers of Japanese. People are not wealthy based upon a life of virtue but rather they are apparently just lucky and would starve if they were not rich. This baloney just goes on and on in the book. The author is cleaver in the use of her craft, but she is unfortunately shallow. If she wants to push a left/progressive agenda that's fine, but if her book were more honest it would have been a much better use of the reader's time.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Lacuna

I concur with all the one-star critiques of The Lacuna. I was so disappointed and I feel entirely justified in not finishing the book. I wonder if BK has reached an impasse in her career. I have seen this happen with other great writers - Robin Cook comes to mind.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Almost Like Two Separate Books, 3.5 Stars

The two sections of this book are different enough that it could almost be reviewed as two separate books. They really are THAT different.
First 275 pages or so = 4 stars
Final 230 pages or so = 2 stars

Kingsolver is at the peak of her descriptive powers in the first part of the book. Her bright, lively detailing of Harrison's early life in Mexico compensates for the patchiness of the narration. Add to that the real characters of Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, and Lev (Leon) Trotsky, and it makes for an intriguing story.

The second part is so drab by comparison that it's almost a chore to get through. The dullness is compounded by a lack of narrative flow. Try making a story from a collection of letters, news articles, and journal entries. Not too appealing.
I understand Kingsolver's agenda for the book. Nothing wrong with that. It's honorable to promote one's concerns and ideas through fiction. In the latter part of The Lacuna, however, I think her need to educate or make a statement competes too loudly with a story so richly begun.
I did like the way it ended. The Afterward section gave me chills and made me chuckle just a little. Hence, my waffly, weaselly overall rating of 3 1/2 stars.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Think More Believe Less

The Lacuna is certainly Barbara Kingsolver's most mature, ambitious, powerful and provocative novel. It is just not an easy, fun read; it's difficult, painful and discouraging.
Award winning author, Barbara Kingsolver, wrote the excellent and educational Lacuna to answer the following question. "Why is the relationship between art and politics such an uneasy one in the US?" She examines the American political psyche using artists as the vehicle. She fills the lives of fictitious characters, Harrison Shepherd and Violet Brown, with real people and real events spanning the years 1921 - 1959.
The real people include Mexican revolutionary artists, Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo, American Presidents FDR, J. Edgar Hoover, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, and Russian Lev Davidovich Trotsky, who was meant to succeed Lenin, but was instead assassinated by Stalin. Some of the other real events in the book include The Bonus Army Marches, World War II, the movement for socialist democracy and anti communist censorship.
I had to google "Bonus Army" to find out if it was true; "an assemblage of some 43,000 marchers--17,000 World War I veterans, their families, and affiliated groups--who gathered in Washington, D.C., in the spring and summer of 1932 to demand immediate cash-payment redemption of their service certificates" were in fact attacked, injured, arrested and evicted from their camps by the US Army under the leadership of Gen. MacArthur, prompting the spectators to yell, "Shame! Shame!"
I just watched this YouTube of a Flash Mob protesting the NDAA. [...] A young woman with aquamarine colored hair is reading the announcement that in the 11th hour on New Year's Eve President Obama signed the bill allowing for any American citizen anywhere in the world to be detained indefinitely without cause or trial. In the tradition of the Occupy Movement, people around her are repeating the lines she's reading. Soon enuf the NYPD hauls her away. The crowd now shouting, "Shame! Shame!" does absolutely no good what so ever.
Are you beginning to see why I found The Lacuna discouraging? It doesn't seem that we have learned from history. In fact it seems that the situation has gotten worse instead of better during my lifetime. Here are a few choice thoughts from The Lacuna.... Until working people in every nation own the means of their own production, the factory owner is the enemy exploiting labor and keeping the poor powerless. "When a man's words are taken from him and poisoned, it's the same as poisoning the man." "For most readers out there, controversial means exactly the same thing as anti American." Foreigners aren't even worth the full measure of American contempt. If a man is not a communist, they will prove he is.
I was about ready to just give up, until I watched this YouTube interview of John Trudell. [...] Everything is Energy. We've got to use our creative intelligence to see what's really going on. The military industrial complex serves the industrial ruling class. They consume our energy. We react how they have programmed us to. We must pledge to no longer believe their lies. We've got to think a whole lot more and believe a whole lot less.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Barbara Kingsolver's epic, The Lacuna, examines the spaces between truth and perceived reality

Although [[ASIN:0061577073 The Poisonwood Bible: A Novel (P.S.)]]is one of my all-time favorite novels, I almost didn't read Barbara Kingslover's latest publication, The Lacuna. I had waited for her next novel and was excited when the The Lacuna was released. Unfortunately, I didn't it buy right off. No doubt I had other books on the go as is the norm with me. But more to the point, I had been disappointed in her non-fiction book, [[ASIN:0060852569 Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life (P.S.)]] and this influenced my purchasing decision. To complicate matters further, when I asked friends what they though of The Lacuna, I received disappointing reviews. And so, despite its Orange Prize-winning status, I back-shelved it and went on my merry-readin' way.

And then this summer I visited Mexico City.

I knew of Frida Kahlo and she held some fascination for me--as she does for most people who have seen her paintings. Let's face it, they're not easy to forget. She left little unsaid. Her pain, her love, her passion--it's bold and gut-wrenching; undeniable. So when I had the surprising opportunity to view the originals--and those of Diego Rivera--well, let's just say I had the time of my life.

Jazzed from our excursions I talked to my daughter about Kahlo and Rivera; wondered if anyone had every fictionalized their story. So, like a good writer of my times, I Googled the question: any novels about Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera? BINGO: The Lacuna.

Lickety-split I got the novel and read it. Here's what I discovered...

A Brief Synopsis

The Lacuna follows the life of Harrison Shepherd from his lonely childhood in provincial Mexico of 1929 and back to 1950s cold-war era America, as a well-known but reclusive novelist.

Born in the United States, Harrison is transported to Mexico when his mother leaves his father for another man and returns to her homeland with the boy in tow. But his mother is long on dreams and short on promises and young Harrison finds himself most often alone. Housekeepers and kitchen staff fill the parental void, putting him to work cooking and running errands. On one such errand, Harrison encounters the muralist Diego Rivera and eventually goes to work in his household.

During his time at La Casa Azul, Harrison forms a bond with Diego's wife, the artist Frida Kahlo that will last a lifetime. He also becomes a scribe for their house guest, Leon Trotsky, the exiled Russian Marxist revolutionary under constant threat of assassination.

Inadvertently caught up in Trotsky affair, Harrison returns to the States, ostensibly to transport Kahlo's art. Once there, he embraces the opportunity to remake himself and embarks on a writing career. But as his success gathers momentum the political climate changes and he tragically becomes a target of anti-communist zealots. It is his stenographer and friend, Violet Brown, who reveals the lacuna between truth and public presumption of Harrison Shepherd's life.

My Review

Comprised of memoir, diaries, letters, newspaper reports and congressional transcripts, The Lacuna is a sweeping literary tour de force. And while the book is ambitious and complex in its architecture, the story remains accessible, emerging effortlessly from the hodge-podge of text.

As a writer, I marveled at Kingsolver's achievement and often stopped my reading to consider how she'd manipulated the epic plot. I was further amazed at how little was lost. With such a complex structure, the writer risks loose ends, but The Lacuna leaves no question of substance unanswered. And although predictable, as historical fiction must be, it offers a uniquely nuanced overview of America's recent past while offering greater understanding of Mexico's political predilection as both nations are forming their modern identities.

Kingsolver sensitively tackles many themes and subjects by examining the lacunae in our life--those spaces between truth and perceived reality--on a micro and macro scale. In the novel's grand scheme, the media creation of, and obsession with, celebrity is examined. And then, to a lesser degree, The Lacuna touches on many other issues: a sense of home; who comprises a family; the influence of a father, a mother; how we love and who we choose to love; the meaning and value of art, friendship; what it means and how it feels to belong--and to be cast aside; the purpose of literature, art. As you can see the list is vast. However, fortunately for us, so are Kingsolver's abilities as a storyteller.

My Final Word

If you have even the slightest interest in Mexico, Diego Rivera, Frida Kahlo, Leon Trotsky or small town America during WWII and the Cold War Era, you'll love The Lacuna. If you're a fan of Barbara Kingsolver's distinctive use of voice, you'll savor meeting the vibrant characters, especially Violet Brown with her backwoods, Elizabethan patter and naively grounded sense of right and wrong. If you're wondering about the complex, epic format, don't - it's accessible and reads with ease - at least for the most part. I did struggle a bit near the end with a couple of the more dry reports. But don't let that put you off. Overall, the structure works. From the outset, you'll question how the story even came to be. But in its surprising, full-circle conclusion, The Lacuna reveals its secrets.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Death by headline

What a book and I am struggling to put my thoughts about it down on paper.

This was chosen by one of my bookgroups as it's monthly read but I sort of put it to the back of my mind as I have never read any of this authors novels and there was just something about them that put me off. No idea what but I just seemed to be a bit scared of reading one of them. So fate played a hand, when I was mooching around the Friends of the Library bookstore ([...]) and there was a lovely brand new hardback copy of this book for a couple of dollars. Well I just had to take it and give it a try.

During the first 196 pages I thought that my initial thoughts about this author were justified. While the subject matter was interesting the style of writing just did not work for me. It started and then came to an abrupt stop in the first two chapters and then proceeded in a very "staccato" style of diary pages. I was struggling so much with following it because of this style and also, because of the Mexican places and names and use of Spanish interspersed amongst the English that seemed to stop my reading flow dead in it's tracks. I even went so far as saying to my husband that I was going to give up as life was to short to read something that I wasn't really enjoying. Then a voice in my head said no, so I looked up some of the reviews of this novel on one of my favourite book websites (readitswapit.co.uk) where a number of trusted acquaintances made similar comments that they had struggled with the first part of the book but had kept reading and it was really worth persevering with. So I persevered and I am so glad I did.

Such an interesting story where a number of real characters and their stories were linked together by the main character Harrison Shepherd. I thought the characters were so well developed that I really felt for Mr Shepherd, amongst others, and was really angry at his trial by media. It is difficult to say much more without inserting spoilers. It showed me that even back then when there wasn't the same levels of media intrusion that goes on today, a person could be hung because one journalist chose to write blatant lies or twisted the truth to suit their own headline needs. It is also frightening to think that the Government had/has such power to brand someone with an undesirable tag and then hound them out of their livelihood and country. I would love for one of my Eastern European friends as well as a friend who was alive and remember the Anti Communist upsurge during the post war years to read this book and get their opinions. I truly can't wait to discuss it at bookgroup anyway. The staccato start and stop dead moment at the beginning of the book all became clear as the book came to it's conclusion and then actually added to the experience as a whole.

It has been a while since a novel has left me really wound up and full of the injustices of this world like this has. I know it is only a book and is fiction (although heavily based on facts) but it has really made me quite angry and almost ready to seek vengeance on behalf of Harrison Shepherd, lol! Better watch what I write or
I may get investigated by the Committee of Un American Activity - if it still exists today!!!!

I nearly gave it 4 stars out of 5 because of the start but as my thoughts come tumbling out it upgrades itself to a 5 star as it is a book that most people should read at some point.
2 people found this helpful