The Princes in the Tower
The Princes in the Tower book cover

The Princes in the Tower

Hardcover – January 3, 1994

Price
$15.95
Format
Hardcover
Pages
287
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345383723
Dimensions
6.5 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
Weight
1.5 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly In this carefully researched and absorbing work of scholarship, Weir ( The Six Wives of Henry VIII ) investigates the events surrounding the disappearance in 1483 of England's 12-year-old King Edward V and his younger brother, Richard, Duke of York. Upon the death of their father, King Edward IV, in 1483, the brothers' uncle, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, was named Edward V's guardian. In a breathtaking chain of sinister events, Richard had Edward V and his brother confined to the Tower of London, declared his nephew's accession to the throne invalid and proclaimed himself king in June of 1483. Weir relies heavily on Sir Thomas More's History of King Richard III (written 1514-1518 and upon which William Shakespeare based his play) to conclude that Richard had his nephews murdered in the tower sometime after his coronation. Weir carefully considers alternative theories about the brothers' deaths, but argues convincingly that More had the best access to evidence and the least reason to lie. Photos not seen by PW. Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal Proponents of Richard III will not be pleased by this book. Weir ( The Six Wives of Henry VIII , LJ 2/15/92) explores documentary evidence and various theories about the fate of the famous princes (Edward V and his brother, ages 12 and 10) in the Tower of London. Relying on contemporary accounts, Weir assesses credibility and compares details. Her sound research and rational arguments make a convincing case for Richard's direct involvement in the murder of his two young nephews. While she admits that there is no convincing evidence that Richard was hunchbacked or more evil than his contemporaries, Weir does show that he was supremely unpopular, largely because of the murder of the children. This is an excellent and persuasive book, one that belongs in all collections covering the history of Great Britain. - Katharine Galloway Garstka, Intergraph Corp., Huntsville, Ala. Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Booklist Popular British historian Weir, author of the widely received Six Wives of Henry VIII , seeks to solve one of the most enigmatic events of British history. The facts are these. In 1483, the good king Edward IV died too early, leaving his boy-son on an uneasy throne. King Edward was also survived by a younger brother, Richard, duke of Gloucester, who coveted his little nephew's crown. Richard could not restrain himself and, in short order, usurped the throne from the boy, who, along with his younger brother, was incarcerated in the Tower of London, never to be seen again. The eternal question has been: Did Richard III, as he was known after swiping the crown, murder his two nephews while they languished frightened in prison? Weir proceeds through the documentary evidence in the case, indicating where, when necessary, other investigative historians have been misled and what paths they should have taken. With particular {x82}elan, Weir reconstructs the tumultuous period, the distinctive personalities of the cast of characters (most effectively the notorious Richard III), and arrays the evidence to point to ole King Dick as indeed the perpetrator of the murders of the princes in the Tower. For all popular history collections. Brad Hooper From Kirkus Reviews The methods of a Mafia boss characterized the career of Richard, Duke of Gloucester, who in the 15th century briefly ruled England as Richard III. Here, Weir (The Six Wives of Henry VIII, 1992) throws new light on this horror story--and especially on the mysterious disappearance of the two boys who stood in Richard's way. In the 15th century, the succession to the English throne was never stable. A crisis occurred when the saintly Henry VI had a nervous breakdown and was ousted in 1465 by Edward IV. Henry was confined in the Tower of London, part of which was a royal palace, and eventually he was murdered there on Edward's orders, probably by Edward's youngest brother, Richard of Gloucester. When, in 1483, Edward died prematurely, Richard seized power as Lord Protector of the Realm, since the heir apparent, Edward V, was only 13 years old. Within weeks, Richard coerced Parliament into declaring him king on the supposed grounds that the late king's marriage had been invalid. Edward V and his brother, the ten-year old Richard, Duke of York, were removed to the Tower of London, never to be seen again, and most people assumed that Richard had ordered the princes murdered. Richard's former allies began to plot against him--but the monarch died in 1485 at the Battle of Bosworth. Here, Weir relates these many intrigues and political executions in a highly readable, brisk manner that's at once vivid and scholarly. She makes special use of older accounts written by Dominic Mancini, the Croyland Chroniclers, and St. Thomas More, and she emphasizes the role of Edward IV's queen and her ambitious family. Above all, Weir argues her way convincingly through recent scholarship and the ongoing debate as to the princes' fate and Richard's role in it. (A genealogical table is provided.) A fascinating historical whodunit in which truth is more sordid than fiction. (Eight pages of b&w photographs) -- Copyright ©1993, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved. From the Inside Flap hensive and insightful, THE PRINCES IN THE TOWER offers a unique perspective on a profound mystery." Faye KellermanDespite five centuries of investigation by historians, the sinister deaths of the boy king Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York, remain one of the most fascinating murder mysteries in English history. Did Richard III really kill the young princes, as is commonly believed, or was the murderer someone else entirely? Carefully examining every shred of contemporary evidence as well as the dozens of modern accounts, Weir reconstructs the entire chain of events leading to the double murder to arrive at a conclusion Sherlock Holmes himself could not dispute. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • "Comprehensive and insightful, THE PRINCES IN THE TOWER offers a unique perspective on a profound mystery." Faye KellermanDespite five centuries of investigation by historians, the sinister deaths of the boy king Edward V and his younger brother Richard, Duke of York, remain one of the most fascinating murder mysteries in English history. Did Richard III really kill the young princes, as is commonly believed, or was the murderer someone else entirely? Carefully examining every shred of contemporary evidence as well as the dozens of modern accounts, Weir reconstructs the entire chain of events leading to the double murder to arrive at a conclusion Sherlock Holmes himself could not dispute.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(584)
★★★★
25%
(243)
★★★
15%
(146)
★★
7%
(68)
-7%
(-68)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Good story, brutal history

I'm of two minds on Alison Weir's The Princes in the Tower. On the one hand, it is an immensely readable history of Richard III, king of England, and the mystery of what happened to his nephews who he had confined to the Tower of London. Weir comes down strongly on the side that Richard had his nephews killed. Weir writes well, and the reader is sucked in to the story. On the other hand, though, Weir's research and conclusions are atrocious and beneath what a proper historian should be. She makes many suppositions and then treats them as fact. Some of her timelines are wildly inaccurate, and since she uses these to support her theory, that puts the entire theory in doubt. Thus, while it's an enjoyable read, I can't really recommend the book unless the reader is aware of this and willing to read further on the subject without taking Weir's view as indisputable fact.

Where to begin? Weir starts out by discussing the various sources of information on the controversy. Many of these sources weren't contemporary at all, being written after Henry VII had taken the throne. The one she bases most of her theories on, an unfinished history by Sir Thomas More, she claims is contemporary. However, Thomas was eight years old at the time these events occurred and didn't start his book until much later. He supposedly had access to many people "in the know," and Weir takes this as proof that what he says is, for the most part, accurate. What she fails to take into account, however, is More's history was written during the Tudor reign, when it wasn't exactly safe to be extolling Richard's virtues. Sure, More's sources may have been there, but do you really think they're going to risk their head by telling the truth? In fact, Weir states many times that many people who were involved in the events were still alive at this time, and surely would have been in a position to know if More wasn't accurate. This is complete hogwash, since it would have meant dire consequences to dispute these "facts." The other sources written during the Tudor reign suffer from this problem as well.

Weir states at the beginning of the book that she wrote this book "...because there is a need for the subject to be dealt with from an objective viewpoint based on common sense and sound research." After saying this, however, Weir proceeds to write a hatchet job on Richard that shows no real signs of objectivity at all. She mentions the Tudor historians and the problems inherent in taking them at face value, but then proceeds to do just that when they support her theory. When they don't, of course, they may have gotten it wrong. She casually presents and discards some of the pro-Richard historical work that is around, dismissing them as impossible.

Elsewhere in the book, she gets timelines wrong in ways that make what she says impossible. One of the most blatant is when she's discussing the timing of the murders. She says that the murders had to have happened on the night of September 3. However, later when she's discussing how other monarchs around Europe felt about Richard and the Princes, she states that Louis XI of France clearly believed that Richard had committed the murders. She goes on to say, though, that Louis died on August 30, 1483, 4 days before the murders supposedly happened! How can this be? There are other problems in Weir's logic that similarly cast her theories into doubt.

Finally, many times in the book she says that something "could have" happened, or she claims that it's logical to assume something. She then goes on to base many more "facts" on these suppositions, making her conclusions balanced on a tissue-thin platform just waiting to collapse. One of the most outrageous is her assumption that More has credibility because he talked to some nuns. Thomas More used to go visit a convent in which Brackenbury's widow and some other Yorkist (a noble family at this time) ladies were in retirement. He could have talked with them, says Weir, and they could have known the real truth about the princes, and they could have told him. She then goes on to say that thus, More's tale has to be accurate, because these nuns would know. Huh? Weir has no idea if More actually did this, but she goes on to base her assumption on this. The book is filled with these "might have been" statements.

It's a shame that such a well-written book has to be so poorly presented as history. I really like Alison Weir's books (though I am aware that many historians find her work shoddy), but this one is just too much. Even I, a historical novice, can see how badly done this book is. She did a lot of research, but the conclusions she has taken from that research are flimsy and not well-supported at all (though she attempts to show that they are). If you find yourself reading this book, please keep that in mind and read something else on the subject as well. As long as the beginning reader is aware of this, then it's not so bad and this book can be a good start on getting interested in the subject. However, if the new reader comes in unaware, then many "facts" will have to be unlearned later on.
304 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I love Alison Weir

This was my 3rd Alison Weir book. I loved it just as much as her others. She is an excellent writer and I can't wait to read all of her other books!
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

My daughter loves the book

She likes the writer and is interested in reading more of her books
✓ Verified Purchase

A fascinating account of the disappearance of the sons of ...

A fascinating account of the disappearance of the sons of Edward IV. All evidence seems to point to Richard III as the an behind their murder and the author makes her case in a very compelling fashion. Anyone interested in British history should read this book.
✓ Verified Purchase

Sherlock's on it!

Any new info about the Tudor period is interesting to me.Ms.Weir is the expert and it was very gratifying to get an informed take on a centuries old murder mystery.
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

Great history....added it to my collection
✓ Verified Purchase

Quick, Fun, Read on the Princes

I enjoyed this book but, unfortunately, I think at this time the book is a bit dated. I believe Ms. Weir has updated this book recently but I have only read this edition. Ms. Weir has a wonderfully engaging writing style that draws the reader in and makes them not want to put the book down. I will say, however, that in this book she often contradicts herself and jumps around a bit in regards to timelines which makes it not one of her best efforts. It is a quick read though as Ms. Weir doesn't stray to far from the life and times of the princes. I would pick this up if you want a quick read on the princes but if you want more information and, in my opinion, a better analyzed look, pick up Ms. Weir's book on Elizabeth of York as she delves quite deeply on the subject of the princes and of Richard's involvement in the princes' lives and in the life of Elizabeth.
✓ Verified Purchase

Four Stars

Easy to read and understand.
✓ Verified Purchase

Love the subject and the author

Have not read this book yet. Love the subject and the author.
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

a