The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher: A Shocking Murder and the Undoing of a Great Victorian Detective
The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher: A Shocking Murder and the Undoing of a Great Victorian Detective book cover

The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher: A Shocking Murder and the Undoing of a Great Victorian Detective

Paperback – Illustrated, February 24, 2009

Price
$12.29
Format
Paperback
Pages
400
Publisher
Bloomsbury USA
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0802717429
Dimensions
5.5 x 1.4 x 8.2 inches
Weight
15.2 ounces

Description

“[A] fastidious reconstruction and expansive analysis of the Road Hill murder case…Summerscale smartly uses an energetic narrative voice and a suspenseful pace, among other novelistic devices, to make her factual material read with the urgency of a work of fiction.” ― New York Times Book Review “A terrific book.” ― Nicholson Baker “A brilliant reconstruction of the obstacles facing detectives long before the advent of forensic technology.” ― L.A. Times Book Review “Not just a dark, vicious true-crime story; it is the story of the birth of forensic science, founded on the new and disturbing idea that innocent, insignificant domestic details can reveal unspeakable horrors to those who know how to read them.” ― Time “One eloquent doozy of a true-crime thriller. A-” ― Entertainment Weekly “ The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher combines a thumping good mystery yarn with fine social and literary history.” ― Fresh Air “This is a great biographical fiction of an interesting real life mid nineteenth century detective working a shocking homicide case.” ― Mysterylovers.com “Fascinating.” ― Denver Post “If you are a mystery lover, or if you have ever wondered how the modern love of the genre began, you'll enjoy Summerscale's tracing of the early days of the profession and the fascination it exerted...a fascinating look at Victorian life, death and detection.” ― Associated Press “In crime annals, it's right up there with the Lindbergh trial or the mystery surrounding JonBenet Ramsey: In 1860, one of Scotland Yard's finest was sent to solve the murder of a little boy at an upscale address near London. It turned out Jack Whicher's hunch was right, and his footwork fed the public imagination as well as writers such as Charles Dickens. Sadly, failure to clinch the case in court upended Whicher's career.” ― Minneapolis Star-Tribune “Takes you back to a specific place and time with all the imagination and skill of a top-tier historical novelist. You hang on every word, flipping pages faster than you can read them….If you like your murder mysteries wrapped up in a neat little package, this isn't the book for you. But if you're looking for a complex, intellectually stimulating thriller that will leave you breathless, well, this mystery is well worth inspecting.” ― Fairfield County Weekly “Summerscale's clean writing makes The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher so dynamic that she can't be accused of "freezing" the past--instead, she has done a masterly job of reviving it, with all its curiosities and contradictions. But, most strikingly, she has created an enthralling mystery by overlaying the fictional tools of misdirection and suspense onto a nonfiction narrative that, in its day, helped inspire writers to create a new fictional genre--a strange and very impressive feat.” ― American Scholar “Told and interwoven with admirable skill and definition.” ― Bookpage “A bang-up sleuthing adventure.” ― Kirkus Reviews “A mesmerizing portrait of one of England's first detectives and the gruesome murder investigation that nearly destroyed him…Whicher is a fascinating hero, and readers will delight in following every lurid twist and turn in his investigation.” ― Publishers Weekly, (starred review) “Summerscale organizes the book like a period novel, with a denouement that suggests that full justice was never done. Erik Larson ( The Devil in the White City ) fans will be enthralled.” ― Library Journal Kate Summerscale is the former literary editor for the Daily Telegraph and author of The Queen of Whale Cay , which won the Somerset Maugham Award and was shortlisted for the Whitbread biography award. Summerscale lives in London. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. The SUSPICIONS of MR. WHICHER A Shocking Murder and the Undoing of a Great Victorian Detective By KATE SUMMERSCALE WALKER & COMPANY Copyright © 2008 Kate SummerscaleAll right reserved. ISBN: 978-0-8027-1742-9 Contents Introduction........................................................................xiFloorplan of Road Hill House........................................................xivFamily Tree.........................................................................xviList of Characters..................................................................xviiA Note on Money.....................................................................xxPrologue............................................................................xxiPART ONE: THE DEATH1 To See What We Have Got to See....................................................32 The Horror and Amazement..........................................................173 Shall Not God Search This Out?....................................................27PART TWO: THE DETECTIVE4 A Man of Mystery..................................................................435 Every Clue Seems Cut Off..........................................................596 Something in Her Dark Cheek.......................................................777 Shape-Shifters....................................................................918 All Tight Shut Up.................................................................999 I Know You........................................................................11510 To Look at a Star by Glances.....................................................13311 What Games Goes On...............................................................14712 Detective-Fever..................................................................16113 A General Putting of This and That Together by the Wrong End.....................17914 Women! Hold Your Tongues!........................................................193PART THREE: THE UNRAVELLING15 Like a Crave.....................................................................20716 Better She Be Mad................................................................22717 My Love Turned...................................................................24718 Surely Our Real Detective Liveth.................................................26119 Fairy-Lands of Fact..............................................................28320 The Music of the Scythe on the Lawn Outside......................................291Afterword...........................................................................303Postscript..........................................................................307Notes...............................................................................315List of Illustrations...............................................................353Bibliography........................................................................355Acknowledgements....................................................................361Index...............................................................................363 Chapter One TO SEE WHAT WE HAVE GOT TO SEE 29-30 June In the early hours of Friday, 29 June 1860 Samuel and Mary Kent were asleep on the first floor of their detached three-storey Georgian house above the village of Road, five miles from Trowbridge. They lay in a four-poster bed carved from Spanish mahogany in a bedroom decked out with crimson damask. He was fifty-nine; she was forty, and eight months pregnant. Their eldest daughter, the five-year-old Mary Amelia, shared their room. Through the door to the nursery, a few feet away, were Elizabeth Gough, twenty-two, the nursemaid, in a painted French bed, and her two youngest charges, Saville (three) and Eveline (one), in cane cots. Two other live-in servants slept on the second floor of Road Hill House - Sarah Cox (twenty-two), the housemaid, and Sarah Kerslake (twenty-three), the cook - and so did Samuel's four children from his previous marriage: Mary Ann (twenty-nine), Elizabeth (twenty-eight), Constance (sixteen) and William (fourteen). Cox and Kerslake shared a bed in one room. Mary Ann and Elizabeth shared a bed in another. Constance and William had a room each. The nursemaid, Elizabeth Gough, rose at 5.30 that morning to open the back door to a chimney sweep from Trowbridge. With his 'machine' of interlocking rods and brushes he cleaned the kitchen and nursery chimneys and the hotplate flue. At 7.30, the nursemaid paid him 4 s .6 d . and saw him out. Gough, a baker's daughter, was a well-mannered, good-looking young woman. She was thin, with fair skin, dark eyes, a long nose and a missing front tooth. When the sweep had gone she applied herself to cleaning the nursery of soot. Kerslake - the cook - sluiced down the kitchen. One other stranger called at the house that Friday, a knife-grinder, to whom Cox - the maid - answered the door. In the grounds of Road Hill House, James Holcombe, the gardener, groom and coachman to the family, was cutting the lawn with a scythe - the Kents had a mowing machine, but a scythe was more effective when the grass was damp. That June had been the wettest and coldest on record in England, and it had again rained overnight. Having cut the grass, he hung the tool in a tree to dry. Holcombe, who was forty-nine and crippled in one leg, had two helpers in the grounds that day: John Alloway, eighteen, 'a stupid-looking lad', according to one local newspaper, and Daniel Oliver, forty-nine. Both lived in the neighbouring village of Beckington. A week earlier Samuel Kent had turned down Alloway's request for a pay rise, and the young man had given his notice. On this, his penultimate afternoon in the Kents' employ, he was sent by the cook to see whether James Fricker, a plumber and glazier in the village, had finished fitting Mr Kent's square candle-lantern with a new pane of glass. Alloway had already called for it four times that week, but it had not been ready. This time he was successful: he brought the lamp back and put it on the kitchen dresser. A local girl of fourteen, Emily Doel, was also at work in the house. She helped Gough, the nursemaid, with the children from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. each day. Samuel Kent was in the library, drafting his report on a two-day tour of local wool mills from which he had returned the previous night. He had been employed as a government sub-inspector of factories for twenty-five years, and had recently applied for a full inspectorship, in support of which he had gathered signatures from two hundred West Country worthies - Members of Parliament, magistrates, clergymen. A wide-browed, scowling man, Kent was unpopular in the village, particularly with the inhabitants of the 'cottage corner', a slummy clutch of houses just across the lane from Road Hill House. He had banned the villagers from fishing the river near his house, and prosecuted one for taking apples from his orchard. Saville, Samuel's three-year-old son, came into the library to play while the nursemaid cleaned the nursery. The child doodled on the government report - he made an 'S' -shaped pothook and a blot - and his father teased that he was a 'naughty boy'. At this Saville clambered onto Samuel's knee for a 'romp'. He was a strong, well-built child with pale yellow curls. That Friday afternoon Saville also played with his half-sister, Constance. She and her other brother, William, had been home from their boarding schools for nearly a fortnight. Constance took after their father - muscular and plump, with squinty eyes in a broad face - while William resembled their mother, the first Mrs Kent, who had died eight years earlier: he had lively eyes and a delicate build. The boy was said to be timid, the girl sulky and wild. The same afternoon Constance walked over to Beckington, a mile and a half away, to pay a bill. She met William there, and the two came home together. In the early evening Hester Holley, a washerwoman who lived in the cottages next to the house, called to return the Kents' clothes and linen, which she had laundered each week since they moved to Road five years earlier. The older Misses Kent - Mary Ann and Elizabeth - took the clothes from the baskets and sorted them out for distribution to the bedrooms and cupboards. At 7 p.m. the three gardeners and Emily Doel, the assistant nursemaid, left Road Hill House for their own homes. Holcombe locked the garden door from the outside as he went, and returned to his cottage across the lane. Samuel Kent locked the garden gate once all the live-out servants had gone. Twelve people were left in the house for the night. Half an hour later Gough carried Eveline up to the nursery, and put her in the cot next to her own bed, opposite the door. Both the children's cots were made of thick cane backed with fabric, and set on wheels. Gough then went downstairs to give Saville a laxative, under Mrs Kent's supervision. The boy was recovering from a mild illness and the family doctor, Joshua Parsons, had sent a messenger to Road Hill House with an 'aperient' - the term was derived from the Latin for 'uncover' or 'open' - which took effect after six to ten hours. The pill 'consisted of one grain of blue pill and three grains of rhubarb', said Parsons, who had prepared it himself. Saville was 'well and happy' that evening, said the nursemaid. At 8 p.m. she put him in his cot, in the right-hand corner of the nursery. The five-year-old Mary Amelia was put to bed in the room that she shared with her parents, across the landing. The doors to both bedrooms were left ajar, so that the nursemaid could hear if the older girl woke, and the mother could look in on her drowsing infants. Once the children were asleep Gough tidied the nursery, restoring a stool to its place under her bed, returning stray objects to the dressing room. She lit a candle and sat down in the dressing room to eat her supper - that night she had only bread, butter and water. Then she joined the rest of the household downstairs for evening prayers, led by Samuel Kent. She also took a cup of tea with Kerslake in the kitchen. 'I don't usually have any tea at all,' Gough said afterwards, 'but I did that day take a cup from the general family teapot.' When she went back up to the nursery, she said, Saville was lying 'as he usually did, with his face to the wall, with his arm under his head'. He was wearing a nightdress and a 'little flannel shirt'. He was 'a very heavy sleeper, and had not been to bed in the daytime that day, and so slept all the sounder'. She had been busy cleaning the room in the afternoon, when he usually had his nap. The nursery, as Gough described it, was a place of softness, hushed and muffled with fabric: 'The room is carpeted all over. The door opens very noiselessly, it is bound round with list to make it do so, that I might not wake the children.' Mrs Kent agreed that the door opened and closed quietly, if pushed and pulled with care, though the handle squeaked a little when turned. Later visitors to the house detected the rattle of a metal ring on the door, and the creak of the latch. Mrs Kent came in to kiss Saville and Eveline goodnight, and then went upstairs to look out for the comet that was passing through the skies that week. In The Times , the newspaper her husband took, sightings were being reported each day. She called Gough to join her. When the nursemaid appeared Mrs Kent remarked on how sweetly Saville was sleeping. The mother and the nursemaid stood together at a window and watched the sky. At 10 p.m. Mr Kent opened the yard door and unchained his black Newfoundland guard dog, a big, sweet-tempered creature that had been with the family for more than two years. At about 10.30 William and Constance made their way up to bed, carrying their candles. Half an hour later Mary Ann and Elizabeth followed. Before going to sleep Elizabeth left her room to check that Constance and William had put out their lights. On seeing that their rooms were dark, she stopped at a window to watch for the comet. When she retired for the night her sister locked their bedroom door from within. Two floors below, at about 10.45 p.m., Cox fastened the windows in the dining room, the hall, the drawing room and the library, and locked and bolted the front door and the doors to the library and the drawing room. The drawing-room shutters 'fasten with iron bars', she said later, 'and each has two brass bolts besides; that was all made secure'. The drawing-room door 'has a bolt and a lock, and I bolted it and turned the key of the lock'. Kerslake locked the kitchen, laundry and back doors. She and Cox went up to bed by the back stairs, a spiral staircase used mainly by the servants. In the nursery at eleven, Gough tucked the bedclothes around Saville, lit a nightlight and then closed, barred and bolted the nursery windows before climbing into bed herself. She slept deeply that night, she said, exhausted by cleaning up after the sweep. When Mrs Kent went to bed a little later, leaving her husband downstairs in the dining room, she pushed the nursery door gently shut. Samuel Kent went out to the yard to feed the dog. By 11.30, he said, he had checked that every door and window on the ground floor was locked and bolted against intruders, as he did each evening. As usual, he left the key in the drawing-room door. By midnight, everyone in the house was in bed, the knot of the new family on the first floor, the stepchildren and servants on the second. Shortly before I a.m. on Saturday, 30 June, a man named Joe Moon, a tilemaker who lived alone on Road Common, was laying a net out to dry in a field near Road Hill House - he had probably been fishing by night to elude Samuel Kent - when he heard a dog bark. At the same time Alfred Urch, a police constable, was walking home after his shift when he heard the dog give about six yelps. He thought little of it, he said: the Kents' dog was known to bark at the slightest thing. James Holcombe heard nothing that night, even though there had been occasions in the past when he had been woken by the Newfoundland ('it kicked up a terrible noise') and had gone back to the courtyard to hush it. The heavily pregnant Mrs Kent was not disturbed by barking that night either, though she said she slept lightly: 'I awoke frequently.' She heard nothing out of the ordinary, she said, apart from 'a noise as of the drawing-room shutters opening' in the early morning, soon after dawn had broken - she imagined that the servants had started work downstairs. The sun rose two or three minutes before 4 a.m. that Saturday. An hour later Holcombe let himself into the grounds of Road Hill House - 'I found the door safe as usual.' He chained up the Newfoundland and went to the stable. At the same time Elizabeth Gough woke and saw that Eveline's bedclothes had slipped off. She raised herself on her knees to pull them back over the girl, whose cot was drawn up to the bed. She noticed, she said, that Saville was not in his cot across the room. 'The impression of the child was there as if he had been softly taken out,' Gough said. 'The clothes were smoothly put back as if his mother or myself had taken him out.' She assumed, she said, that Mrs Kent had heard her son crying and taken him to her own room across the hall. Sarah Kerslake said she also woke briefly at 5 a.m., then went back to sleep. Just before six she woke again and roused Cox. The two rose, dressed and headed down to start work - Cox took the front stairs and Kerslake the back. When Cox went to unlock the drawing-room door, she was surprised to find it already open. 'I found the door a little way open, the shutters unfastened, and the window a little way up.' This was the middle of three floor-to-ceiling windows in the semi-circular bay at the back of the house. The bottom sash was raised by six inches or so. Cox said she supposed that someone had opened it to air the room. She closed it. John Alloway walked over from his home in Beckington and at 6 a.m. found Holcombe in the Road Hill House stable, tending to the Kents' chestnut mare. Daniel Oliver arrived fifteen minutes later. Holcombe sent Alloway to water the plants in the greenhouse. The boy then fetched a basket of dirty knives - including two carving knives - from the kitchen, where Kerslake was at work, and two pairs of dirty boots from the passage. He took them to a shed in the yard known as the 'shoe-house' or the 'knife-house', turned the knives out onto a bench and started cleaning the boots - one pair belonged to Samuel Kent, one to William. 'There was nothing unusual about the boots that morning,' he said. Ordinarily he cleaned the knives as well, but today Holcombe took over the task so that the boy could be ready sooner: 'I want you in the garden,' he told him, 'to help me about some manure. I will clean the knives if you will clean the boots.' Holcombe used a knife-cleaning machine in the shed. As far as he could tell, he reported later, none of the knives was missing or bloodied. He took the clean cutlery to the kitchen at about 6.30. With Alloway, he then spread the mare's manure. Soon after 6 a.m., Elizabeth Gough said, she rose, dressed, read a chapter of the Bible and said her prayers. The nightlight had burnt out, as usual, after six hours' use. Saville's cot was still empty. At 6.45 - she noticed the time on the clock that sat on the nursery mantelpiece - she tried Mr and Mrs Kent's room. 'I knocked twice at the door, but obtained no answer.' She claimed that she didn't persist because she was reluctant to wake Mrs Kent, whose pregnancy made it difficult for her to sleep. Gough returned to the nursery to dress Eveline. In the meantime Emily Doel had turned up for work. She entered the nursery carrying the children's bath shortly before 7 a.m., and took it to the adjoining dressing room. As she brought in buckets of hot and cold water with which to fill the tub she noticed Gough making her bed. They didn't say anything to one another. Gough again knocked on Mr and Mrs Kent's bedroom door. This time it was opened - Mary Kent had got out of bed and put on her dressing gown, having just checked her husband's watch: it was 7.15. A confused conversation ensued, in which each woman seemed to assume Saville was with the other. 'Are the children awake?' Gough asked her mistress, as if she took for granted that Saville was in his parents' bedroom. 'What do you mean by children?' asked Mrs Kent. 'There is only one child.' She was referring to Mary Amelia, the five-year-old, who shared her parents' room. 'Master Saville!' said Gough. 'Isn't he with you?' 'With me!' returned Mrs Kent. 'Certainly not.' 'He is not in the nursery, ma'am.' Mrs Kent went to the nursery to see for herself, and asked Gough if she had left a chair against the crib, by means of which Saville might have climbed out. The nursemaid said not. Mrs Kent asked when she had first noticed that he was gone. At five o'clock, Gough told her. Mrs Kent asked why she had not been roused immediately. Gough replied that she thought Mrs Kent must have heard the child crying in the night, and taken him to her room. 'How dare you say so?' said the mother. 'You know I could not do it.' The day before, she reminded Gough, she had mentioned that she could no longer carry Saville, he being a 'heavy, strong boy' of nearly four, and she being eight months pregnant. Mrs Kent sent the nursemaid upstairs to ask her stepchildren if they knew where Saville was, then told her husband: 'Saville is missing.' 'You had better see where he is,' replied Samuel, who had, he said, been woken by Gough's knock. Mrs Kent left the room. When she returned with news that Saville had not been found, her husband got up, dressed, and headed downstairs. (Continues...) Excerpted from The SUSPICIONS of MR. WHICHER by KATE SUMMERSCALE Copyright © 2008 by Kate Summerscale. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In June of 1860 three-year-old Saville Kent was found at the bottom of an outdoor privy with his throat slit. The crime horrified all England and led to a national obsession with detection, ironically destroying, in the process, the career of perhaps the greatest detective in the land. At the time, the detective was a relatively new invention; there were only eight detectives in all of England and rarely were they called out of London, but this crime was so shocking, as Kate Summerscale relates in her scintillating new book, that Scotland Yard sent its best man to investigate, Inspector Jonathan Whicher. Whicher quickly believed the unbelievable-that someone within the family was responsible for the murder of young Saville Kent. Without sufficient evidence or a confession, though, his case was circumstantial and he returned to London a broken man. Though he would be vindicated five years later, the real legacy of Jonathan Whicher lives on in fiction: the tough, quirky, knowing, and all-seeing detective that we know and love today...from the cryptic Sgt. Cuff in Wilkie Collins's
  • The Moonstone
  • to Dashiell Hammett's Sam Spade.
  • The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher
  • is a provocative work of nonfiction that reads like a Victorian thriller, and in it kate Summerscale has fashioned a brilliant, multilayered narrative that is as cleverly constructed as it is beautifully written.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(399)
★★★★
25%
(332)
★★★
15%
(199)
★★
7%
(93)
23%
(306)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The Verbosity of Ms. Summerscale: A Rambling Text and the Near-Undoing of a Great Biography

Summerscale had some great ideas for this book, but the execution left something to be desired. While the facts of the Road Hill murder case, the Kent family background, and the history of Jack Whicher, all made for interesting reading, the story was bogged down, as others have noted, by an overabundance of minute detail on EVERY topic. The author used such a dry, bland, scholarly tone, it was hard to tell if she was writing for the general public, aficionados of true crime and/or detective fiction, or a college psychology class. Her somewhat rambling, scattershot approach, digressing at the drop of a hat, ensured that this would not be a 'quick' read, but didn't exactly make me savor every word, either. I felt I did get some good insights into the major players, and perhaps more than I really needed toknow about societal mores of the Victorian era, and tie-ins(relevant or not) to psychological practices, especially Freudian theory.
As an earlier review noted, this book read like four books in one, yet, everything was put in wherever Summerscale felt like putting it. IMO, this diminished the intended 'true crime told in the style of a detective novel' narrative approach.
The final few chapters, summing up the rest of the principal figures' lives, helped make up for the seemingly endless, extraneous middle sections, and, if nothing else, gave me some leads for further reading in the 'vintage detective story' genre.
I can totally understand why some reviewers would be frustrated and give up before finishing this book. However, it was ultimately worth finishing. If you are truly interested in the broad panorama of 19th-century social life, in addition to the gist of the story,especially if you are a college student, give it a try. If you are looking for a straightforward 'true crime' book, and a break from studying, you'll find that here, too, but be prepared to do a lot of skimming.
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

More documentary than whodunit

This is not a novel but rather a documentary-style retelling of the lives and events surrounding the murder of three-year-old Saville Kent in 1860 Wiltshire. Summerscale uses references and quotes rather than typical descriptions and dialogue to paint the picture of the circumstances surrounding the event and its investigation by Inspector Jonathan "Jack" Whicher.

Do not go into this book expecting a crime story narrative; it’s not that. It is a compelling dissection of detective work (which was brand new in 1860) and the pursuit of evidence both physical and circumstantial. Despite its outward dryness, I couldn’t stop reading.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Fascinating non-fiction!!!!! Highly recommended!!!

Excellent non-fiction book. A creepy murder and weird family, and a detective that got it right!!! The book lays out the murder and the clues set in a fascinating time period. The author explains the rise of the position of detective. This a true crime book with the first detective and lets the reader follow the whole story to the very end. Loved reading about the later years of the family and the life of Jonathan Whicher - about all involved. Highly recommended!!!! This book deserves an A+++++++
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Maybe I'm just a geek for detail, but this is the best true crime book I've ever read

This is not a true "review," but I wanted to comment on the reasoning of the negative reviews below.

Uniformly, those disappointed in the book cite the "extraneous detail" from the author. They felt misled by the packaging and marketing of the book as a detective thriller. In that aspect, these readers are correct. On first sight of the cover, subtitle, blurb, reviews, this looks like a straight-up Victorian detective thriller.

But it is so much more than that. If you are looking for a modern, streamlined, James Patterson or even Eric Larson clone, you WILL be disappointed. It's not a beach or airport read. The book would be more accurately marketed as a thoughtful analysis, with scrupulous and wide-ranging research, of all the ramifications of the case -- sociological, literary, even philosophical. This was the first JonBenet Ramsey case and its echoes are still reverberating today.

Personally, I enjoyed each and every discursion from the narrow confines of the straight murder story. Other books have handled the crime itself, though this author even brings new and fascinating light to the "solution." I appreciated what the NYT reviewer perceptively noted: the author takes the trouble to teach us about the world in which the criminal acted, which is fundamental to detection. We need to know what acted on the criminal. As well, she shows us what effects the crime had on the world at large. Murder does not occur in a vacuum, and this is the problem with most detective fiction written as an isolated puzzle. The real world is not so neat and clean. Ultimately, this is the main point she makes: detection itself isolates and sanitizes the crime to the point where the humanity of the story, especially that of the victim, is lost.

Once upon a time, JonBenet Ramsey was a living, breathing little girl, an individual, not a symbol. Saville Kent (the victim in this story) likewise was once his own little person.

The book masterfully brings one to that conclusion without false sentiment, and the whirl of "extraneous" detail leading to that conclusion makes it all the more poignant.

Best true crime book I ever read precisely because of that unique sensitivity.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An interesting tale sopped in heavy research

Summerscale offers up a murder mystery, and a famous detective, that proved to be the inspiration for many other murder stories, from Dickens to James. The heinous slaying of a young child, whose body was found stuffed in the privy. But the drama of the case proves not to be in any high-speed chase of the suspect, or any drawing room speech that identifies the killer. No, the real story here is about fame for a detective who wasn’t seeking it, who meets up with a case complicated with a complex family history and an incompetent local police force, a case that takes years to unfold and pushes a brilliant sleuth out of the public eye out of embarrassment. While the book itself sludges along at times, overladen with goodly research, Summerscale has pinpointed an intriguing story that shows us the problems of trying a case in 5he media, and also shows us the dying breaths of Victorian mores, as a new world of science and evidence encroaches on the world of old-fashioned know-how.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Forgotten Murder Mystery Purportedly Revealed

Suspicions of Mr. Whicher is one of those books that makes me very sad, because of what it could have been. There are so many missed opportunities here, and so many uninteresting threads that are tugged until they snap. Quite a shame given the subject matter - it could have been a cracking read.

In 1860, a three year old boy is murdered within his own home. Mr. Whicher, who is the London detective assigned to the case, has his own suspicions (hence, the title) about who has committed this crime, and they are in opposition to the beliefs of the local constabulary. Working on this case wears him out emotionally, psychologically and physically.

It's quite clear that the author had very little to work with, so she padded the tiny amount of data with information such as the origins of words like "clue," "sleuth" and "red herring," rather than providing what readers would be more interested in, like the thoughts and feelings of the family involved.

Other than pointing me in the direction of detective novels that take the Road Hill Murder as their inspiration, and making me interested in Wilkie Collins, I didn't get much out of Suspicions of Mr. Whicher. A tip for other readers would be that, if you don't already know who committed this crime, don't view the photographs before reading the book, because they give the culprit away.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disappointing after the rave reviews

After reading the online reviews, I was very excited about reading this book. However, I found it to be rather pedestrian and not at all as "advertised." It is an interesting story, but hardly a compelling one. I found my mind wandering repeatedly as I plowed through the author's voluminous historical references, to the point that I did not fully appreciate the "surprise" ending.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

What happens when our belief systems meet head-on

The author is a biographer, an archivist and a social historian. But unlike many archivists and historians - who can sometimes sound dull and over-academic, she has at her fingertips an added dimension - the gift of story-telling.
Her style is succinct, fast-moving and direct. But the underlying strength of what she has to say lies not merely in 'reporting' the things that happened at the time, but in her shrewdness in knowing precisely which letters, newspaper quotations or comments to include and which to leave out. And it is this tight way of putting-together the relevant issues and presenting these in her fast and efficient way that gives the story its acceleration and excitement.
However, for me, the over-riding appeal of the book lies particularly in the way Kate Summerscale explains how (we) the public respond to given situations: how we all make unexamined assumptions - from the posse mentality of - 'Hang the first person one finds loitering near the scene of the crime', through to the 'scapegoat' mentality of attempting to satisfy the public in whatever way one deems necessary - i.e. 'Blame someone rather than no one'. So from the fantasy world of unexamined assumptions - that interior cinema of the mind in which anything goes, we ignore fact, then jump to our convenient conclusions. (See Stuart Sutherland's brilliant book, 'Irrationality: The Enemy Within' - think Tony Blair ... think me, you, everyone of us ...)
Given all that, it is little wonder that the approach of dear Mr Whicher - a person who seeks facts through the medium of reason and the exercise of a rational mind, meet head-on with a public whose desire is for a quick-fix solution. It's all a fine example of 'What happens when our belief systems meet head-on'.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Real-Life Victorian Whodunit

This non-fiction book contains all the ingredients of the classic English country-house mystery: a shocking murder, an isolated setting, a finite circle of suspects who all behave suspiciously in order to conceal deep, dark secrets, and the "outsider" detective brought in to figure out "whodunit." Within the covers of this book lie a hundred pages of spellbinding suspense woven through a fascinating backdrop of Victorian society. Unfortunately, this book is three hundred pages long.

The remaining pages are stuffed with repetitious rehashings of various theories stitched together from the scanty threads of evidence, along with a monotonous parade of quotes lifted from newspaper coverage of the time--long on speculation and sensationalism but short on facts. The author also devotes quite a bit of paper to how this infamous case may have influenced the nascent field of detective fiction, including works by such writers as Charles Dickens and Wilkie Collins. Interesting, but difficult to see the relevance of including so many fictional passages in a non-fiction account of a true crime.

As other reviewers have pointed out, this author has clearly done a lot of research. The glimpses we get of the Victorian legal system and the birth of Scotland Yard certainly have a place in this tale. But the narrative wanders off in too many directions, thus unraveling the tension. This is the type of problem it's difficult for an author to be objective about, but where was the editor?

There is much to like in The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher. Just be prepared to sift through the rest.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

SUCH A TERRIBLE BOOK

You would think that the story of a murder and the birth of the first ever detective would be a thriller, but it was a struggle to read a paragraph. The information overload was unnecessary. If you would like to read a captivating and FAST-PACED thriller you will not find it here.
3 people found this helpful