You Shall Know Our Velocity
You Shall Know Our Velocity book cover

You Shall Know Our Velocity

Paperback – July 1, 2003

Price
$13.89
Format
Paperback
Pages
368
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1400033546
Dimensions
5.15 x 0.74 x 7.99 inches
Weight
12 ounces

Description

“Headlong, heartsick and footsore.... Frisbee sentences that sail, spin, hover, circle and come back to the reader like gifts of gravity and grace.... Nobody writes better than Dave Eggers about young men who aspire to be, at the same time, authentic and sincere.” — The New York Times Book Review " You Shall Know Our Velocity! is the work of a wildly talented writer.... Like Kerouac's book, Eggers's could inspire a generation as much as it documents it." — LA Weekly "There's an echolet of James Joyce there and something of Saul Bellow's Chinatown bounce, but we're carried into the narrative by a fluidity of line that is Eggers's own." — Entertainment Weekly "Eggers is a wonderful writer, bold and inventive, with the technique of a magic realist." — Salon "An entertaining and profoundly original tale." — San Francisco Chronicle “Eggers ’s writing really takes off -- his forte is the messy, funny tirade, stuffed with convincing pain and wry observations.” — Newsday “Often rousing ... achieves a kind of anguished, profane poetry.” — Newsweek “The bottom line that matters is this: Eggers has written a terrific novel, an entertaining and imaginative tale.” — The Boston Globe “There are some wonderful set-pieces here, and memorable phrases tossed on the ground like unwanted pennies from the guy who runs the mint.” — The Washington Post Book World “Powerful.... Eggers’s strengths as a writer are real: his funny pitch-perfect dialog; the way his prose delicately captures the bumblebee blundering of Will’s thoughts; ... and the stream-water clarity of his descriptions.... There is genius here.... Who is doing more, single-handedly and single-mindedly, for American writing?” — Time In his first novel, Dave Eggers has written a moving and hilarious tale of two friends who fly around the world trying to give away a lot of money and free themselves from a profound loss. It reminds us once again what an important, necessary talent Dave Eggers is. DAVE EGGERS is the author of many books, among them The Circle, The Eyes and the Impossible,xa0The Monk of Mokha,xa0A Hologram for the King,xa0What Is the What , and The Museum of Rain . He is the cofounder of 826 Valencia, a youth writing and tutoring center which has inspired dozens of similar nonprofit organizations around the world, and the founder of McSweeney's, an independent publisher. He has been a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, the National Book Award, and the National Book Critics Circle Award, and is the recipient of the Dayton Literary Peace Prize, the Muhammad Ali Humanitarian Award for Education, and the American Book Award. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. EVERYTHING WITHIN TAKS PLACE AFTER JACK DIED AND BEFORE MY MOM AND I DROWNED IN A BURNING FERRY IN THE COOL TANNIN-TINTED GUAVIARE RIVER, IN EAST-CENTRAL COLOMBIA, WITH FORTY-TWO LOCALS WE HADN'T YET MET. IT WAS A CLEAR AND EYEBLUE DAY, THAT DAY, AS WAS THE FIRST DAY OF THIS STORY, A FEW YEARS AGO IN JANUARY, ON CHICAGO'S NORTH SIDE, IN THE OPULENT SHADOW OF WRIGLEY AND WITH THE WIND COMING LOW AND SEARCHING OFF THE JAGGED HALF-FROZEN LAKE. I WAS INSIDE, VERY WARM, WALKING FROM DOOR TO DOOR. I was talking to Hand, one of my two best friends, the one still alive, and we were planning to leave. At this point there were good days, good weeks, when we pretended that it was acceptable that Jack had lived at all, that his life had been, in its truncated way, complete. This wasn't one of those days. I was pacing and Hand knew I was pacing and knew what it meant. I paced like this when figuring or planning, and rolled my knuckles, and snapped my fingers softly and without rhythm, and walked from the western edge of the apartment, where I would lock and unlock the front door, and then east, to the back deck's glass sliding door, which I opened quickly, thrust my head through and shut again. Hand could hear the quiet roar of the door moving back and forth on its rail, but said nothing. The air was arctic and it was Friday afternoon and I was home, in the new blue flannel pajama pants I wore most days then, indoors or out. A stupid and nervous bird the color of feces fluttered to the feeder over the deck and ate the ugly mixed seeds I'd put in there for no reason and lately regretted--these birds would die in days and I didn't want to watch their flight or demise. This building warmed itself without regularity or equitable distribution to its corners, and my apartment, on the rear left upper edge, got its heat rarely and in bursts. Jack was twenty-six and died five months before and now Hand and I would leave for a while. I had my ass beaten two weeks ago by three shadows in a storage unit in Oconomowoc--it had nothing to do with Jack or anything else, really, or maybe it did, maybe it was distantly Jack's fault and immediately Hand's--and we had to leave for a while. I had scabs on my face and back and a rough pear-shaped bump on the crown of my head and I had this money that had to be disseminated and so Hand and I would leave. My head was a condemned church with a ceiling of bats but I swung from this dark mood to euphoria when I thought about leaving."When?" said Hand."A week from now," I said."The seventeenth?""Right.""This seventeenth.""Right.""Jesus.""Can you get the week off?""I don't know," Hand asked. "Can I ask a dumb question?""What?""Why not this summer?""Because.""Or next fall?""Come on.""What?""I'll pay for it if we go now," I said. I knew Hand would say yes because for five months we hadn't said no. There had been some difficult requests but we hadn't said no."And you owe me," I added."What? For--Oh Jesus. Fine.""Good.""For how long again?" he asked."How long can you get off?" I asked."Probably a week." I knew he would do it. Hand would have quit his job if they refused the time off. He had a decent arrangement now, as a security supervisor on a casino on the river under the Arch, but for a while, in high school, he'd been the Number Two- ranked swimmer in all of Wisconsin, and he expected that kind of glory going forward. He'd never focused again like he'd focused then, and now he was a dabbler, with some experience as a recording engineer, some in car alarms, some in weather futures (true, long story), some as a carpenter--we'd actually worked on one summer gig together, a porch on an enormous gingerbread-looking place on Lake Geneva--but he left any job where he wasn't learning or when his dignity, however defined, was anywhere compromised."Then a week," I said. "We'll do what we can in a week."I lived in Chicago, Hand in St. Louis, though we were both from Milwaukee, or just outside. We were born there, three months apart, and our dads bowled together, before mine was gone the first time, before his started playing drums, wearing suspenders and leather vests. We didn't talk about our fathers.We called the airlines that offered single-fare tickets with unlimited travel. The tickets allowed unrestricted flying as long as you kept going one direction, once around the globe without turning back. You usually have twelve months to complete the circuit, but we'd have to do it in a week. They cost $3,000 each, a number out of the reach of people like us under normal circumstances, in rational times, but I had gotten some money about a year before, in a windfall kind of way, and had been both grateful and constantly confused by it. And now I would get rid of it, or most of it, and believed purging would provide clarity, and that doing this in a quick global flurry would make it . . . I really don't know why we combined these two ideas. We just, blindly and without self-doubt, figured we would go all the way around, once, in a week, starting in Chicago, ideally hitting Saskatchewan first, then Mongolia, then Yemen, then Rwanda, then Madagascar--maybe those last two switched around--then Siberia, then Greenland, then home. Easy."This'll be good," said Hand."It will," I said."How much are we getting rid of again?""I think $38,000.""Is that including the tickets?""Yeah.""So we're actually giving away what--$32,000?""Something like that," I said."How are you going to bring it? Cash?""Traveler's checks.""And then we give it to who?" he asked."I don't know yet. I think it'll be obvious when we get there."And if we kept traveling west, we'd lose very little time. We could easily make our way around the world in a week, with maybe five stops along the way--the hours elapsed would in part be voided by the crossing, always westerly, of time zones. From Saskatchewan we'd get to Mongolia, we figured, having lost only two or three hours riding the Arctic Circle. We would oppose the turning of the planet and refuse the setting of the sun.The itinerary changed on each of the four days we had to decide, on the phone, with me consulting a laminated pocket atlas and Hand in St. Louis with his globe, a huge thing, the size of a beach ball, which spun wildly between poles--he'd bumped into it one late night and it was no longer smooth--and which dominated his living room.So first:Chicago to Saskatchewan to MongoliaMongolia to QatarQatar to YemenYemen to MadagascarMadagascar to RwandaRwanda to San Francisco to Chicago.We liked that one. But it was too warm, too concentrated in one latitude. The next one, with adjustments:Chicago to San Francisco to MongoliaMongolia to YemenYemen to MadagascarMadagascar to GreenlandGreenland to SaskatchewanSaskatchewan to San Francisco to Chicago.We'd solved the warmth problem, but went too far the other way. We needed better contrast, more back and forth, more up and down, while always heading west. The third itinerary:Chicago to San Francisco to MicronesiaMicronesia to MongoliaMongolia to MadagascarMadagascar to RwandaRwanda to GreenlandGreenland to San Francisco to Chicago.That one had everything. Political intrigue, a climactical buffet. We began, separately at home, plugging the locations into various websites listing fares and timetables.Hand called."What?""We're fucked."There was something wrong with the timetable. He'd entered in the destinations, but every time we left San Francisco--we had to stop there en route from Chicago--we'd end up in Mongolia not a few hours later, but two damned days later."How can that be?""I figured it out," Hand said."What?""You know what it is?""What?""I'm going to lay it on you.""Tell me.""Ready?""Fuck yourself.""The international date line," he said."No.""Yes.""The international date line!""Yes.""Fuck the international date line!" I said."Can we do that?" he asked."I don't know. How does it work again?""Well, New Zealand is the farthest point, time-wise, in the world. They see the new year first. Which means that if we're traveling west from Chicago, we're doing pretty well in terms of saving time all the way until New Zealand. But once we get past there, we're a day ahead. A full day ahead.""We lose a whole day.""If we leave Wednesday, we land Friday.""So it won't help to be going west," I said."Not much. Not at all, really."We called an airline representative. She thought we were assholes. If we wanted to get around the world in a week, she said, we'd be in the air seventy percent of the trip. Even if we followed the sun, we'd still be hemorrhaging hours all over the Pacific."We have to go east," said Hand."Maybe we go east, then west," I said."We can't. We have to keep going the same direction to get the fare."The next itinerary:Chicago to New York to GreenlandGreenland to RwandaRwanda to MadagascarMadagascar to MongoliaMongolia to SaskatchewanSaskatchewan to New York to Chicago."But we're losing time each flight," I said. "Each flight is basically double the time this way.""Hell. You're right.""We have to drop the destinations down to four maybe. Or make them shorter.""This blows," Hand said. "We have a whole week and we have to drop Mongolia. These planes are too fucking slow. When did planes get so slow?"Next:Chicago to New York to GreenlandGreenland to RwandaRwanda to MadagascarMadagascar to QatarQatar to YemenYemen to Los Angeles to Chicago.But there were no flights from Greenland to Rwanda. Or Rwanda to Madagascar."Bullshit," I said."I know, I know."Or Madagascar to Qatar. There was one from Saskatchewan to New York. And one from Mongolia to Saskatchewan. But nothing from Greenland to Rwanda. We were bent. Why wouldn't there be a flight from Greenland to Rwanda? Almost everything, even Rwanda to Madagascar, had to go through someplace like Paris or London. We didn't want to be in Paris or London. Or Beijing, which is where they wanted us to stop en route to Mongolia."This is like the Middle Ages," Hand said."I had no idea," I said.We had to scale back again. We started over."Let's just go," said Hand. "We get the big ticket and then make it up as we go. We don't have to plan it all out.""Good," I said.But no. The airline insisted on knowing the exact airports we'd visit along the way. We didn't need to provide precise dates or times, but they needed the destinations so they could calculate the taxes."The taxes?" Hand said."I didn't know they could do that."We decided to skip the pre-planned round-the-world tickets. We'd start in Mongolia and just go from there. We'd land and then just hit the airports when we were ready to leave. Or better yet, we'd land, and while still at the airport, get our tickets out. The new plan felt good--it was more in keeping with the overall idea, anyway--that of unmitigated movement, of serving any or maybe every impulse. Once in Mongolia, we'd see what was flying out and go. It couldn't cost all that much more, we figured. How much could it cost? We had no idea. All I needed was to get around the world in a week, make it through Mongolia at some point, and be in Mexico City in eight days, for a wedding--Jeff, a friend of ours from high school, was marrying Lupe, who only Jeff called Guad, whose family lived in Cuernavaca. Huge wedding, I was told."You were invited?" Hand said."You weren't?" I said.I don't know why Hand wasn't invited. Could I bring him? Probably not. We'd done that once before, at another friend's wedding, in Columbus--we figured maybe they just didn't have his address, so I brought him--and only once we arrived did we realize why Hand hadn't been given the nod in the first place. Hand was blond and tall and dark-eyed, I guess you'd say doe-eyed, was well-liked by women and for better and worse had a ceaseless curiosity that swung its net liberally over everything from science to even the most sensitive and trusting women. So he'd slept with too many people, including the bride's sister Sheila, soft-shouldered and romantic--and it hadn't ended well, and Hand, being Hand, had forgotten it all, the connection between Sheila and the bride and so it was awkward, that wedding, so clumsy and wrong. It was my fault, then and as it always is, in some uncanny way, every time Hand's combination of lust--for women, for arcana and conspiracy and space travel--and plain raw animal stupidity brings us, inevitably, in the path of harm and ruin.But did we really have to get around the world? We decided that we didn't. We'd see what we could see in six, six and a half days, and then go home. We didn't know yet where exactly to start--we were leaning toward Qatar--but Hand knew where to end."Cairo," he said, sending the second syllable through a thin long tunnel of breath, the o full of melancholy and hope."Why?""We finish the trip on the top of Cheops," he said."They still let you climb the pyramids?""We bribe a guard early in the morning or at sunset. I read about this. Everyone in Giza is bribable.""Okay," I said. "That's it then. We end at the pyramids.""Oh man," Hand said, almost in a whisper. "I always wanted to go to Cheops. I can't believe it."I called Cathy Wambat, my mom's high school friend, a travel agent with a name that spawned a hundred crank calls. They'd been raised in Colorado, she and my mom, in Fort Collins, which I'd never seen but always pictured with the actual fort, hewn from area lumber and still walling the pioneers from the natives. Now Cathy Wambat lived in Hawaii, where apparently all the travel agents who matter now lived. After hearing the plan, she thought we were assholes too, though in a cheerful way, and made the reservations--two one-way flights from Cairo, Hand's continuing from New York to St. Louis and mine to Mexico City. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • An “entertaining and profoundly original” (
  • San Francisco Chronicle
  • ) moving and hilarious tale of two friends who fly around the world trying to give away a lot of money and free themselves from a profound loss. •  From the bestselling author of
  • The Circle
  • .
  • “Nobody writes better than Dave Eggers about young men who aspire to be, at the same time, authentic and sincere.” —
  • The New York Times Book Review
  • "
  • You Shall Know Our Velocity!
  • is the work of a wildly talented writer.... Like Kerouac's book, Eggers's could inspire a generation as much as it documents it." —
  • LA Weekly

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(86)
★★★★
20%
(57)
★★★
15%
(43)
★★
7%
(20)
28%
(80)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Reviews for hardcover are unjust, this is not the same book.

If your reading the reviews of this book and at the bottom it says "Refers to the Hardcover Edition", then you should pay no attention to that review. The actual text of the book is different in the paperback edition than in the hardcover. As you can't actually get the hardcover anymore on Amazon.com, the hardcover review is pretty worthless. This book was originally released under the same title as now, but it was recently rereleased under the name SACRAMENT, but only available through the publisher, McSweeney's. SACRAMENT contained additional text written by a completely different narrator, and it actually turns the novel into something quite different.
Sure, the novel does get to a point where it becomes a series of foils and mishaps in various countries, but it is at that point, about two-thirds of the way into the book, that the new material takes place. This new material provides a completely different context for the actions that take place throughout the rest of the book. In a way, it makes the story more metafictional than I imagine it originally was.
The paperback edition contains the additional text, about twenty pages or so, that was not in the hardcover printing of the novel. So, for those of you who have only read the hardcover edition, I would recommend rereading, since the book is actually quite different than when you probably read it. If you're interested in it and thinking about reading it, I would highly recommend this work.
Eggers is more popularly known nowadays for his skills as a publisher of some of the greatest writing since the turn of the century, and editor of McSweeney's Quarterly, among other things. It's been a long time since his first book, and until I read this I thought his own work would simply be thrown by the wayside. This book proves, however, that he is at the forefront of the best writing being done today, and I would say that this is the most original work I've read in a long time, and I read books for a living. It's greatness in relation to modern fiction is surpassed perhaps only by Jeffrey Eugenides' MIDDLESEX, which is too great for words.
In other words, read this book, it is beautiful and worthy of a religious amount of attention.
57 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I think Eggers is great, but really, this book...

I've watched Dave Eggers rise to fame from our shared corner of the world, and I thought his first novel was brilliant, but something has happened to Eggers' writing in this novel. What was once quirky and refreshing about his writing seems more like artifice in this book. More often than not, Eggers' writing and plot twists are less profound than they are show-offy. While I was reading the book, I felt like Eggers was a two-year-old prancing around in front of the reading public saying, "Look at me! Aren't I cute? Look at the adorable tricks I can do!"
Admittedly, some of Eggers' literary tricks in this book are cute, and there are moments of touching and hilarious prose. (My favorite line: "I opened my mouth but couldn't think of any way to answer. Someone was using my head to power a coffeemaker.")
But in the end, the plot feels too forced, the writing too self-conscious. Dave Eggers is a good writer. This book doesn't, sadly, fully reflect that. _
47 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

You shall know Dave Eggers

Dave Eggers will win the Nobel Prize someday if they decide to award smugness. He is the master of being self-effacing, and at the very same time self-indulgent. He wants both sympathy and adulation. Dave Eggers should run for political office instead of write.
Eggers engages in what I call "prose babble" which is very common among today's writers. Prose babble is a disease that has brought American Literature to its grave. He does not know how to write well, as much as talk well, and then write down how he talks. So essentially you get a first-person talk-a-thon novel rather than a written novel. Things like economy, vocabulary, and style are gone from these works. But you got a good friend talking to you, but you may not want to hear him go on and on and on.
28 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I've Never Been So Thrilled With an Impulse Purchase!

For those of you that have not seen the hardcover edition, it needs an explanation. The book starts right there on the cover. There is no title, no auther, nothing like that -- just text. Then you open the book and on the inside cover is more text. Never a coverpage or anything, YSKOV speeds right into story.
The story itself is fast-paced and wonderful. Based on this and his previous work (Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius), I believe that Eggers may well prove to be one of the enduring authors in my generation. The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen was heralded as a great American Novel. Don't let publicity fool you: YSKOV is easily its equal. Eggers' writing is extremely smart -- making it all the more enjoyable. Never is he dull.
In YSKOV, the narrator fascinated me for his thought process. Eggers constructs a man who wants to find his place in the world, so he travels it. Yet for all of his travels, he doesn't seem to have any idea what to do when he gets there. As a result, the story is often humourous and often poignant.
While I recommend it to a broad audience, as a gift YSKOV would certainly resonate with the armchair traveler longing for his own whirlwind tour or the young graduate ready to start out in the world. As a final note, if you are considering this as a gift, I strongly suggest the hardback edition. Its presentation aligns nicely with Eggers' draw-you-right-in style, as well as being unique. I believe that the hardback editions were only released to "independent" bookstores -- a fact that may be appreciated by a budding idealist/activist.
However, please note that there have been changes between editions and the hardback and paperback aren't quite the same book. An interesting reason to buy your favorite booklover both editions.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

You Shall Know His Indulgence

Egger'sbook is remarkable mainly because it is so poor. The closest thing to a character in its pages is the voice of the narrator, by turns ironic and cute--but ever prodigal and undisciplined. The rest of the cast are either ciphers, like Hand, the narrator's travel companion, who exists merely as a detached voice mouthing spurts of vapid ping-pong dialogue, or objects appearing on the landscape, there but for the grace of the narrator's self-indulgence. Where most novels have a plot, this one comes with a wad of airline tickets and the excess baggage of a deceased best friend --a nod toward gravity in this otherwise lighter-than-air story. The only thing this book has going for it is its velocity--in the form of a breakneck travel itinery and the narrator's runaway mouth which, however agile and cute and clever, can never outrun its intemperance, or this reader's boredom. Egger's first book was indeed a heartbreaking one of staggering genius, which staggered to the ground half-way through. This one, being more ambitious (or at least in a bigger hurry) crashlands on take off. Wise readers will travel by slow boat.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Eggers gets it right this time...

Ok, I'm not on the Dave Eggers is the greatest living writer bandwagon. A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius turned me off...indeed, I could not read it. I passed it on to a friend, who I will admit is much smarter than I, and she loved it. Still, it was not for me. Still, when I saw this book in paperback, it was worth a try. I thought the concept was cool. It seems there is additional text in this edition that was not in the hardcover--about 40 pages worth. I'm not sure what the deal is with that--and the whole publishing only through McSweeney's, it is rather beyond me. So, I judge the novel on the "additional" material (assuming that report is indeed correct and it was not in the original).
The book wears on you after awhile. I loved many of Will's internal dialogues, but after awhile they got to me (of course, I read the book in about a day and half, so I did not enhjoy it like a fine wine). Then suddenly, you have this new narrator, for, oh, a tenth of the novel, but this narrator breathes new life into the book. You look at it completely differently. You see more of the metaphor. You see Will's pain in a new light (I'm being purposely vague). The book has some interesting mistakes, which I think are intentional--factual things (was Hand's real name Justin or Francis?), but it makes it seem even better. There are some interesting lessons here and the journey may indeed be the salvation. I'm having trouble describing the book...sort of Brewster's Millions meets Ulysses meets Ronin meets Jack Keroukac? It is worth your time. Flawed and at times brilliant, far better than much of what is published today.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent book, confusing alterations...

I loved this book. I think it is my all time favorite, though I need to give it more time to sink in.

In this review I would rather talk about an issue that deeply confused me when reading this book: there are two versions out.

My first copy, which I purchased new at a Barnes and Noble had 351 pages, my second copy had exactly 400. The difference is a chapter called "An Interruption" narrated by one of the characters, which was about 50 pages long, and goes from page 250 to 300. Many say that this passage severely alters the story, but I believe it is really just affirming that the book is fiction, and making a joke about the connections people make with the book and his personal life. I don't want to say any more because I don't want to spoil it however, I feel that it is not really an important passage either way.

This was especially confusing to me because I believed that all paperbacks had the alteration, however, they don't. Both say "Vintage Books First Edition July 2003" and both books contain a note that the text was altered from the original version; however both do not contain the interruption.

I do not know which version Amazon.com is selling as it claims the book has 368 pages while that number differs from both of my copies.

Either way this is a great book. I read it first without the interruption, and I think it may read best if you skip it, then read it at the end, as another Amazon reviewer suggested. It almost seems as if the tone of that part expects you to have read the whole story. However, it is not my place to question the work of a genius like Eggers so maybe we should read it the way he (eventually) intended.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

suprisingly disappointed

After reading Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius I was expecting this book to be a great entertainment, however, I was greatly disappointed. Even though most people gave it great reviews, I know I am not alone in thinking this book sucked. It was hard for me to finish this book because I was waiting for something interesting to happen. It has plenty of random things in the story that make it somewhat humorous but nothing of substance. I guess the point was to create a book that does not have to say anything (breaking conformity so to speak) but I didn't enjoy it here. So disappointed in fact, that I sold the book immediately after finishing it. I will say it is unique but definitely not interesting to read.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent.

Eggers is a genius. Don't expect this to show up next to Da Vinci Code on a bestseller list though. Apparently nowadays people care quite a bit about plot, and while this book certainly has a plot, and a very good one at that, it is entertaining in a very very different way. This is real literature here, folks. If you like multiple layers of meaning, read this. But if you're stuck on books that read like action films, maybe this isn't for you. Then again, if you enjoy honest, sincere literature that celebrates life and makes tired and mundane things seem new again, maybe you should read this after all.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent "How Not To Write" For Would Be Writers

Seriously, if you're young and you want to write "great literature" get a cheap used copy of this book and read it. Then do you very best to not write anything that remotely resembles the writing in this book.

The reason you'll want to own this book is so you can consult it should you think your writing might have become self indulgently artsy or you're dialog and plotting begin to feel like a "finding-myself-on-the-journey" indie film. Compare your writing to this book. If your writing sounds similar hit DELETE and start again.

Admittedly I only read 108 pages of this before my constant eye rolling made me give up. Maybe the book gets wildly better at page 109. (Actually, I glanced ahead a bit and don't think it does.)

But something else seems possible: Eggers set out to write the worst novel he could get away with actually seeing published. Maybe as a prank. Maybe as a way to reset the bar after AHWOSG made him into a young literary god. With nowhere to go from Olympus but down maybe he decided to go all the way down. Maybe.
8 people found this helpful