American Rebel: The Life of Clint Eastwood
American Rebel: The Life of Clint Eastwood book cover

American Rebel: The Life of Clint Eastwood

Hardcover – October 6, 2009

Price
$19.09
Format
Hardcover
Pages
383
Publisher
Crown
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307336880
Dimensions
6.75 x 1.5 x 9.75 inches
Weight
1.55 pounds

Description

From Publishers Weekly Eliot, biographer of stars ranging from Walt Disney to Bruce Springsteen, tackles the life, career and artistic challenges of Clint Eastwood. In 1954, at age 24, Eastwood was married and working at an Oakland, Calif., gas station when he was brought to Universal by director Arthur Lubin and signed to a learning contract. After years of uncredited appearances and bit parts in B films, he finally got his break when he was cast as Rowdy Yates on CBS's Rawhide , seen for eight seasons (1959–1965). His role as the poncho-clad Man with No Name in Serge Leone's innovative westerns triggered a solid movie career, followed by the popular Dirty Harry series. In 1971, he made his directorial debut ( Play Misty for Me ) and later racked up multiple nominations and awards, including Oscar wins for directing Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby . Updating previous biographies, Eliot analyzes both box-office bombs and successes while also probing the never-ending drama of Eastwood's modus vivendi, his financial empire and his personal relationships. Married twice, Eastwood has seven children by five different women. Although Eastwood did not consent to be interviewed and key sources asked not to be named, Eliot documents a wealth of details in this well-researched, comprehensive biography that will not disappoint Eastwood's fans. (Oct.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. “The story of a man who goes from small-time jazz pianist and gas-station attendant to Hollywood leading man reads like a rich movie plotline. All the sex, brawls, and gunslinging are here.” — Playboy Praise for Reagan: The Hollywood Years "A fascinating portrait." — Newsweek "Eliot' s book is poised to provide something interesting: a fresh look at subject matter well worth dusting off. . . . The genesis of Reagan's later public persona is closely charted here." — New York Times Praise for Jimmy Stewart "It was a wonderful–and long–life, and Eliot . . . covers it all." — USA Today "Elucidates how a skinny guy with zero sex appeal molded himself into an enduring star." — Entertainment Weekly "Stewart deserves critical reassessment and a seat closer to the front row of the film pantheon. Eliot makes a solid case for Stewart's merits, and he gives us a decent, eminently likable man." — Hollywood Reporter Praise for Cary Grant "A fascinating and thorough portrait . . . Eliot does a good job of cracking the screen fantasy." — Esquire "Highly readable . . . Glimpses of the debonair leading man's dark side are the most intriguing elements of this welcome biography." — People (three stars) "Keeping the actor's astonishing career firmly in view, Eliot assembles a portrait that shows the dark shadows behind the gleaming facade, while also revealing Grant' s own shrewdness in maintaining that fictional persona." — Washington Post MARC ELIOT is the New York Times bestselling author of more than a dozen books on popular culture, among them the highly acclaimed biographies Cary Grant and Jimmy Stewart; the award-winning Walt Disney: Hollywood’s Dark Prince ; Down 42nd Street ; what many consider the best book about the sixties, his Phil Ochs biography, Death of a Rebel ; Take It from Me (with Erin Brockovich), Down Thunder Road : The Making of Bruce Springsteen ; To the Limit: The Untold Story of the Eagles ; and Reagan: The Hollywood Years . He has written on the media and pop culture for numerous publications, including Penthouse , L.A. Weekly , and California Magazine . He divides his time among New Yorkxa0City, Woodstock, Los Angeles, and the Far East. From the Trade Paperback edition. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. The boy who would one day become famous for playing the Man with No Name did not have a well-defined self-image or a strong role model to follow growing up. In his formative years his father, forever in search of a steady job during the Great Depression, developed a deceptive California suntan, the mark of a hardworking outdoor laborer trying to avoid poverty rather than a man of sun-worshipping leisure and privilege.Clinton and Francesca Ruth (sometimes recorded as Margaret Ruth, although she only used Ruth as her given name) were two good-looking California kids who met while attending Piedmont High School in Oakland. They dated each other and married young, before the market crashed and took with it their romantic dream of the good life. Ruth's family was Dutch-Irish and Mormon with a long line of physical laborers, including pickup fighters, lumberjacks, sawmill operators, and an occasional local politician. She graduated from Anna Head School in Berkeley, where she had been transferred to from Piedmont just before her senior year—a move that may have been prompted by her parents' concern over an intense relationship she had begun with her high school sweetheart, Clinton Eastwood. Clinton was a popular, well- liked boy with strong American roots; his ancestors were pre– Revolutionary War Presbyterian farmers and men who sold goods by traveling from town to town, their carts bearing inventory samples such as women's underwear and soap used to elicit orders from their customers. In the days before mail-order catalogs, most goods were sold this way outside the big American cities.Despite Ruth's parents' attempts to put some distance between her and the economically deficient Clinton, upon graduating from high school they were married, on June 5, 1927, in a ceremony held at Piedmont's interdenominational church. Both newlyweds were lucky enough to find enough work to keep them going during the first years of their marriage. Ruth eventually landed a job as an accountant for an insurance company, and Clinton found one as a cashier. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, they clung to these jobs tenaciously.Almost three years after their marriage, on May 31, 1930, Clinton Jr. was born. The boy weighed a whopping eleven pounds, six ounces, and was nicknamed "Samson" by all the nurses at San Francisco' s St. Francis Hospital.At about this time Clinton Sr. managed to land a job selling stocks and bonds. At a time when stocks and bonds had been rendered all but worthless, Clinton was following the family tradition; he was now a glorified cart-man, weaving from town to town looking for those few elusive customers with enough cash to invest in their own future and therefore in his. That he got by at all was likely due to his natural charm and good looks.But even those could only get him so far, and soon Clinton was selling refrigeration products for the East Bay Company, a position whose long-range prospects were little better than those of a seller of stocks and bonds. People had to have enough money to buy food before they could invest in ways to keep it cold. So in 1934, after the birth of their second child, a girl they named Jeanne, Clinton took to a more itinerant life, moving the family by car to wherever he could find pickup work. In a couple of his earliest recollections, Clint later said of those times:Well, those were the Thirties and jobs were hard to come by. My parents and my sister and myself just had to move around to get jobs. I remember we moved from Sacramento to Pacific Palisades just [so my father could work] as a gas station attendant. It was the only job open. Everybody was in a trailer, one with a single wheel on one end, and the car, and we were living in a real old place out in the sticks?.?.?.My father was big on basic courtesies toward women. The one time I ever got snotty with my mother when he was around, he left me a little battered.The attendant job was at a Standard Oil station on Sunset Boulevard and Pacific Coast Highway, near a stretch of Malibu beach that was rapidly becoming the suburb of choice for the nouveau riche of the Hollywood film industry—one of the few businesses that actually benefited from the Depression. Films were both cheap and fanciful, the ultimate escape for those who could not afford to live out the American dream themselves but loved watching others do it for them on- screen. Those who lived in this part of town drove big cars that used a lot of gas, so Clinton had plenty of work. For the time being it was a good enough living if not exactly a great life. From the money he made he was able to rent a small house in the lush, hilly Pacific Palisades.On his off days Clinton and Ruth took their children to one of the public beaches adjacent to Malibu for an afternoon of sun and swimming. One day Clinton, who was an excellent swimmer, dove into a wave with Clint sitting in the saddle of his shoulders. Big Clint came back up but little Clint didn't. After a few heart-stopping moments Ruth saw her boy's foot sticking up and bobbing in the water. She screamed. With some help from alert nearby swimmers, Clinton was able to pull him up. Afterward Ruth sat in the cool muddy turf with her little Clint and splashed him playfully to make sure he wouldn't become afraid of the surf.A year later, in 1935, the gas station job dried up, and the Eastwoods were once more on the move. They gave up the house in Pacific Palisades and took a smaller one for less rent in Hollywood, a few miles farther inland. Soon afterward they swung back north to Redding, then to Sacramento, then to the Glenview section of the East Bay of San Francisco. Finally they settled back down in the Oakland- Piedmont area, where Clinton worked a series of dead-end jobs. Clint, by now, had attended several schools, necessitated by the family's continual relocations. "I can't remember how many schools I went to," he later recalled. "I do remember we moved so much that I made very few friends." In 1939, after their long loop through the tough times of California, the family settled long enough for young Clint, now nine, to enroll in Piedmont Junior High School.Following the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, America' s entry into World War II brought new defense-driven work. Clinton managed to secure a draft-exempt job in the shipyards with Bethlehem Steel, and Ruth found day work at the nearby IBM center.On the brink of adolescence, six-foot Clint was the tallest boy in his class; he would reach his full height, six four, by the time he graduated from high school. He was also, by all accounts, one of the best-looking students. He had inherited his father's strong, broad shoulders, rugged good looks, and seductive half-closed eyes. He had a finely shaped, aristocratically turned-up nose and a thick bush of brown hair that fell in a curly dip over his forehead. The look was tough, but he was shy, likely the product of his family's vagabond journey through the Depression years. Being left-handed also made him feel like an outsider, as his teachers forced him to use his right hand.He enjoyed playing high school sports—his height made it easy for him to excel at basketball—but that did little for his social skills. His teachers warned his parents that he had to be brought out of his shell if he was to make something of himself. One of them, Gertrude Falk, who taught English, had the class put on a one-act play and cast a reluctant young Clint in the lead. He was less than thrilled.I remember Gertrude Falk very well. It was the part of a backward youth, and I think she thought it was perfect casting?.?.?. she made up her mind that I was going to play the lead and it was disastrous. I wanted to go out for athletics; doing plays was not considered the thing to do at that stage of life—especially not presenting them before the entire senior high school, which is what she made us do. We muffed a lot of lines. I swore [at the time] that that was the end of my acting career.Clint also didn't do well academically, and his schoolmates and teachers considered him something of a "dummy." Besides sports, the only other subject that held any interest for him was music—not the kind of big-band sound that was popular with the older kids, but jazz. He liked to play it on the piano, something that he correctly believed enhanced his attractiveness to girls. He even learned the current pop tunes that he had no use for but that made them flock around him.When I sat down at the piano at a party, the girls would come around. I could play a few numbers. I learned a few off listening to records and things that were popular at that era. I thought this was all right, so I went home and practiced?.?.?. I would lie about my age and go to Hambone Kelly's. I'd stand in the back and listen to Lu Watters and Turk Murphy play New Orleans jazz?.?.?. I grew up listening to Ella Fitzgerald and Nat King Cole?.?.?. Lester Young, Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Miles Davis, Clifford Brown, Fats Navarro, Thelonious Monk, Erroll Garner.And he loved cars. For $25 Clint's father bought him a beat-up 1932 Chevy to help him keep his paper route job. Clint nicknamed it "the Bathtub" because of its missing top. Its best accessory was, of course, the girls. The Chevy, which didn't last very long, was only the first of a long line of his beat-up cars. To pay for them all and the gas and repairs, Clint took extra after-school jobs on top of his paper route. He worked at the local grocery and as a caddy at the golf course; he baled hay on a farm in nearby Yreka, cut timber near Paradise, and was a seasonal forest firefighter. All these jobs were purely physical, the type of work he could forget about as soon as he punched out. But they were time consuming and exhausting, even for a young and strong teenage boy. They left him even less time for his studies at Piedmont High, and when his parents and school authorities realized he wasn't going to graduate with a regular academic degree, he transferred to t... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • As an actor, he seduces us with his tough-guy charm. As a director and producer, he amazes us with his artistry and technical savvy. As a Hollywood icon, Clint Eastwood, one of film's greatest living legends, represents some of the finest cinematic achievements in the history of American cinema. In
  • American Rebel
  • , bestselling author and acclaimed film historian Marc Eliot examines the ever-exciting, often-tumultuous arc of Clint Eastwood's life and career. Unlike past biographers, Eliot writes with unflinching candor about Eastwood's highs and lows, his artistic successes and failures, and the fascinating, complex relationship between his life and his craft. Eliot's prodigious research reveals how a college dropout and unambitious playboy rose to fame as Hollywood' s "sexy rebel," eventually and against all odds becoming a star in the Academy pantheon as a multiple Oscar winner. Spanning decades,
  • American Rebel
  • covers the best of Eastwood' s oeuvre, films that have fast become American classics–
  • Fistful of Dollars, Dirty Harry, Unforgiven, Mystic River, Million Dollar Baby
  • , and
  • Gran Torino.
  • Filled with remarkable insights into Eastwood's personal life and public work,
  • American Rebel
  • is highly entertaining and the most complete biography of one of Hollywood's truly respected and beloved stars–an actor who, despite being the
  • Man with No Name
  • , has left his indelible mark on the world of motion pictures.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(225)
★★★★
25%
(187)
★★★
15%
(112)
★★
7%
(52)
23%
(173)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The good, the bad... (well, somebody had to say it)

The story of Eastwood's personal life is well done, but I would have appreciated more on Eastwood's creative life as an actor and auteur. Most of his groundbreaking 1960s-1970s films receive a few pages of surface details but almost no analysis (Eastwood's or the author's) of his work or the creative process behind it. Surely a whiole book could be written about Eastwood's participation in those early Sergio Leone films. Presumably Eastwood had some thoughts about the characters, the scripts, the cinematic style? How about Eastwood participation in the box-office dud, "Paint Your Wagon"? The film is mentioned almost in passing, but the book's list of Eastwood-related musical recordings omits any reference to Clint's three songs on the soundtrack to the film, and the film is not even included in the book's index. The book is worth reading but it's not the definitive biography I had hoped for.
28 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Swift and Thorough Biogrpahy of Clint

Eliot does a good overall job giving us Clint Eastwood the young actor with the struggles and conflicts that future legends must endure to make it. I learned a lot more about Rawhide especially in how the network used his contract to keep him from taking movie work even during hiatus. That struggle led to Clint doing Spaghetti Westerns, something the network figured wouldn't compete with his Rowdy Yates persona. Although Eliot doesn't address it, the reader can surmise that the network conflict gave him an opportunity of a lifetime. Maybe Clint never would have clicked in a conventional Hollywood career.

I had always considered Don Siegel a mentor to Eastwood, and although that is mostly true in Eliot's account, Clint was always itching to direct himself and other than their first pairing it was Clint that chose Siegel rather than the other way around. By their last teaming, they were no longer on the same page and their friendship was hurt as a result.

Eliot also has another contention that I had never heard. Eastwood was resistant to working with other big name actors, especially actresses, because he didn't like to be overshadowed. His pairing with Burt Reynolds was a power struggle between them both and Blake Edwards. Eliot suggests that his all-star cast in UNFORGIVEN was an all-out attempt at Oscar nominations. To me it didn't seem like Clint cared about such things back then making weak efforts like THE ROOKIE, and PINK CADILLAC. But in the last ten years it does seem like nearly every movie is directed squarely at the Academy so maybe Eliot is on to something.

I always heard that Eastwood shoots are lean, but I was surprised at how many movies, even long ones, that he shot in 30 days. It's one of the reasons he can make so many films at an advanced age.

I think Eliot has written the most thorough biography of Clint Eastwood yet, better than [[ASIN:0679429743 Clint Eastwood: A Biography]] by Richard Schickel and [[ASIN:B000FA5TYM Clint: The Life and Legend]] by Patrick McGilligan when it comes to his overall life although Schickel does a better job on the actual films. The downside is that he spends too much time on his private life especially the Sandra Locke saga.
26 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Clint Remains a Mystery

Ideally a biography of a contemporary artist should evaluate three areas: The facts of a human life, the artist's practical management of his career and the success or failure of the artist's creative efforts. Eliot's book on Cary Grant had success in all three areas, and convincingly penetrated Grant's mind sufficiently to say some cogent things about how Grant approached his art as he became the quintessential movie actor. Eliot does not succeed nearly so well with Eastwood.

Eliot recites the facts of Eastwood's life, mostly garnered from the public record (except for his obsessive enumeration of Eastwood's love affairs). Eliot's chronicle of Eastwood's efforts as manager of his own career is the strongest part of the book and the least complementary to Eastwood (the words "self-centered" and "ruthless" leap to mind).

Eliot has nothing to say, however, about Eastwood's artistic achievement. His coverage of the films consists mostly of plot summaries with little analysis. Much of the critical commentary, such as it is, is quoted from various reviewers and writers ranging from putative heavyweights such as Kael, Sarris and Crist to lesser lights such as Rex Reed. Eliot's own proffered insights are not enlightening (to say that many of Eastwood's films are about angry loners and that this may be linked to Eastwood's own loner personality is not a stunning revelation).

I do not suggest that analysis of Eastwood's artistry is easy or simple. Eastwood's career has been prolific, long and varied and any analysis must consider all of its aspects (acting, directing and producing) over time. Not only has Eastwood's technical ability evolved into mastery, but the artistic stance of "Million Dollar Baby," "Mystic River," and "Gran Torino" seem, on the surface at least, utterly different from "Dirty Harry," "The Outlaw Josey Wales" and "Coogan's Bluff." But Eliot seems to find the body of work impenetrable.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Mixed bag which concerns itself more with Clint's personal life than his films...

I'm always interested in anything about Clint Eastwood, so I was very happy when this book came out. Unfortunately, it's a mixed bag. It has several factual errors and the author seems to have an agenda. Marc Eliot seems more interested in the sordid aspects of Clint's personal life, and quite often skims over his actual films to obsess (and obsess) about Clint's many girlfriends, especially the Sondra Locke story. Clint is not a perfect person by any stretch of the imagination, but this book often reads like a sleazy, tabloid story in which the author is more interested in the salacious rather than the substance of Eastwood's remarkable, diverse, and epic career (which is still going strong, and going stronger now more than ever).

The factual errors that I found were the following:

1. Unforgiven was not shot in less than a month, as stated by the author, but in 52 days.
2. Clint's character in The Eiger Sanction wasn't a member of the clergy, but an art professor/dealer.
3. Sergio Leone, at first, wasn't enthusiastic about Eastwood in the lead for A Fistful of Dollars. Leone wanted Charles Bronson and/or James Coburn, but Coburn was too expensive, and Bronson couldn't make heads or tails of the script, which was in badly translated English. While Leone liked Clint, he eventually had to warm up to him, but Leone did.

Eliot writes that Clint's career is on the decline in several spots in the book. Clint has had a few films bomb, but he's never been really that down and out like Eliot portrays him as. Everytime Clint was down, he got back up right away. It seems that Marc Eliot is reluctant to admit that Clint is really a great film artist, even though Eliot does mention that Clint outshines his contemporaries by miles.

Overall, this book is decent, but it hardly touches on Clint's actual filmmaking. While Clint's personal life should be touched upon, here it's an obsession of the author, and it negates the impact of the book.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Lacks critical insight

I would be lying if I said Marc Eliot's detailed biography "American Rebel: The Life of Clint Eastwood" was boring. I was comfortably immersed for a couple of days and rarely put it down. There's some great information and, I must admit, I was not aware of Eastwood's numerous affairs and children out of wedlock. No matter. It's the man's career that fascinates.

As Eliot recounts Eastwood's first marriage to Maggie Johnson and his rocky affair with Sondra Locke, I toiled along waiting for the return to his films. I essentially grew up on Eastwood, with vivid memories of [[ASIN:B00008CMT4 Two Mules for Sister Sara]] (1970) at the drive-in, [[ASIN:B001BGS16M The Outlaw Josey Wales]] (1976) at the neighborhood theater, even [[ASIN:0790751569 Bronco Billy]] (1980) the day it opened at the beginning of a very long teenage summer. Having recently seen [[ASIN:B001KVZ6F2 Gran Torino (Widescreen Edition)]] (2008) at the theater, I realized Clint had grown old before my eyes. Here was an actor (and director and producer and composer) who had continued to work during my entire lifetime, and it was deeply comforting to know some things still existed from childhood.

All of these warm memories come into play when reading Eliot's recent biography published in 2009. In some ways, I know each of Eastwood's films by heart, just as I know the works of other icons of the era including Paul Newman, Robert Redford and Jane Fonda. There are interesting perspectives to be discovered in Eliot's well-written book. His take on Eastwood's controlling nature when making films and his reluctance to work with other major stars is enlightening. His critical stance on the sexist nature of many of Eastwood's films goes against the grain of general critical opinion ([[ASIN:0823230139 Clint Eastwood and Issues of American Masculinity]]), but it's an interesting argument.

Eliot's long passages devoted to Sondra Locke ([[ASIN:068815462X The Good, the Bad, and the Very Ugly: A Hollywood Journey]]) are interesting in that, the affair was an epic mess nearly destroying both careers. I never understood the teaming, as Locke was a limited actress and usually a glaring weakness in Eastwood's films. But she was a major part of his life, and Eliot's book does make sense of this murky drama.

What "American Rebel" substantially lacks is proper critical insight and analysis of his films. A glaring example (and this fault is repeated multiple times) is his coverage of [[ASIN:B00006RCOA A Perfect World]] (1993), one of Eastwood's finest films. He devotes two paragraphs of brief plot synopsis, but otherwise ignores the work entirely as if rushing towards a difficult deadline. In addition to the stunning lack of analysis, there's a peculiar, though modern, fascination with how well the movies performed at the box office combined with unnecessary detail of Academy Award presentations where Clint was in the running for the top prize. While I'm glad Eastwood was eventually acknowledged by the Academy (and it was a long time coming), I'm more interested in his individual films combined with his unparalleled progression from TV actor to action star to one of Hollywood's most gifted and unique directors.

[[ASIN:B00009N83V Honkytonk Man]] (1982), granted one of Eastwood's lesser known efforts, was one of the earliest signs of the actor/director stretching his vision and attempting films away from the action genre. It is noteworthy for several reasons, but like [[ASIN:B00009N83Z White Hunter, Black Heart]] (1990), is brusquely brushed off by Eliot as being a box office failure and practically forgotten. Who cares how well it performed at the multiplexes? Artistically, it revealed early clues to Eastwood's maturation and dramatic expansion. Sadly, "American Rebel" is a by-the-numbers account of much of Eastwood's work, lacking an understanding of the progression of an overall career. I wanted more depth and less emphasis on the glitz of Oscar broadcasts.

Eastwood's career is so gargantuan, comparable in many ways to John Wayne's ([[ASIN:1589793323 The Quotable John Wayne: The Grit and Wisdom of an American Icon]]), it has consumed gossip, affairs and petty ego struggles. From decade to decade, Eliot should have devoted as much toil to the substantial evolution rather than catering to modern audiences obsessed with receipts and bed-hopping. An adequate work best suited for the unfamiliar.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Life of a Hollywood Icon

Clint Eastwood has long been a favorite actor of mine, so when I heard about the new biography, I was anxious to read more about this amazing man. Boy did I learn a lot too! Despite the fact that Clint Eastwood was a womanizer, probably a lousy husband and a not very involved father, no one could say that the man did not have talent and that he worked hard to accomplish what he did in his 50 years on screen. Probably one of the most iconic stars in Hollywood, he starred in westerns, thrillers, drama, romance and comedies. Some other interesting facts for me were:

* He was married to just two women: Maggie Johnson (former swimsuit model) from 1953 - 1984) and his present wife Dina Ruiz (a former anchor woman and 35 years younger than him) from 1996 - present.
* He has (7) children from (5) different women: (2) from his first wife, (1) from his present wife, (2) from airline stewardess, Jacelyn Reeves, (2) with Frances Fisher, a British born American actress, and (1) by former exotic dancer Roxanne Tunis.
* He also had a (14 year) relationship with Sondra Locke who starred in several movies with him.
* Nominated for 5 Academy Awards and acted in more than 40 films.

Not wanting to give out too much information about Eastwood and his life, let me just say that, in my opinion, if you are an Eastwood fan and want to find out more details about him and his acting career, this book might be a good biography to start with. My understanding is that Clint Eastwood was not interviewed for this book, so the information contained within came from multiple sources and interviews. I cannot say whether the information is accurate or not since I knew very little about Eastwood prior to reading this book. I liked the book and would RECOMMEND it.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Could have been better

This biog of CLINT EASTWOOD is an interesting read, but could have been better. As stated before, a lot of facts on his films are erroneous. Granted, EASTWOOD is an extraordinary talent, especailly behind the camera, but I would not like to know him. According to Eliot, EASTWOOD seems very egotistical and difficult who was a user of people who woked for him and especailly women. My God, just how many women did EASTWOOD have to conquer. He must be a very insecure of his sexuality. There is definately something wrong with a man who goes from woman to woman. He may have sired seven children, but he certainly wasn't a father. Eliot should have gone more into this aspect of his physic. Would have liked to know more about the kids and what THEY thought of their Dad. Suprised none have them wound up over dosing or self destructive as he did not seem like a "stay-at-home" father. A man whose career comes before anything or anyone should not have children. The relationship between SONDRA LOCKE and himself is incredibly bizzare. They deseved each other. This book really makes EASTWOOD look like a heel. A talented one for sure, but a real heel.
The index in particular is inadequate....just as EASTWOOD is as a human being.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Superficial attempt at biography with errors and spoilers

I am not a big fan of celebrity biographies, but I've enjoyed many Clint Eastwood movies, was impressed with his apparent growth as an artist and his continued productivity. So I got Marc Eliot's purported biography.

It really isn't very good.

Most of the content seems to deal with Eastwood's very active sex life, which apparently included hundreds of women in addition to his wife. Seven children by five women - also including his wife. Lucky Clint - but no so lucky for the reader. It gets boring very, very fast.

Since Eastwood has never been much for interviews or talking about his creative process, there's not much here about Eastwood as an artist.

Eliot seems to have done his research with gossip magazines.

As for Eliot's "critical" analysis of Eastwood's films, forget about it. First of all, Eliot finds it necessary to describe the ending of every Eastwood movie. Talk about spoilers. His plot analyses sometimes contain errors and Eliot projects his beliefs of what Eastwood intended on Eastwood himself. His "analysis" of "Dirty Harry" is hilarious. He imbues the movie with all kinds of sub-texts and alleged deep thinking on Eastwood's part. I remember seeing the movie in Manhattan and I doubt that anyone in the cheering audience at the Upper East Side theatre I saw it would give any credence to Eiot's silly, trite politically correct pretend explanation.

Eliot also makes a major mistake in the plot of "The Unforgiven".

On the whole, if what you want is a collection of factoids about Clint Eastwood that you could garner from gossip and entertainment trade magazines over the decades, you'll be happy. If you want insight into Eastwood the artist, you won't find it here. Eliot is a passable writer, even if he gets his facts wrong occasionally, and that quality keeps this book from being a total disaster. But not by much.

Jerry
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

good clint

I liked this, but there wasn't enough of the subject's views. he's not very talky except to his friends. guess that's why he's lasted this long. that and talent and knowhow. I was not disappointed in this book at all. enjoyed all the stories I hadn't heard before and found the author impressive with all the research he'd done. good book. i'll pass it on.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Very tedious, but insightful nonetheless

Far, that's FAR, too much Hollywood movie minutia. The biographical dimension only gets interesting when the author focuses on Eastwood's long, LONG, LONG, love life. The author vividly shows the difference between a man like Harvey Weinstein and Clint Eastwood; to wit, Eastwood ATTRACTED women and Weinstein did not. There will always be a fundamental difference between seduction and coercion. Eastwood has many notches on his gun; but they all came to him gladly
Eastwood --like other legendary Hollywood womanizers: John Derek, Roger Vadim as examples-- drew women to themselves because they were SUCCESSFUL men with money, power, and influence in an industry addicted to such things, plus, they all were just personally attractive (as themselves) with their physicality, personality, and lavish lifestyle. While Weinstein was equally successful in the industry, he was a fat, sloppy, lethargic, ill kempt slob no matter how often he appeared in an ultra expensive tuxedo at Hollywood affairs and parties.
In the end, this very human component is the driving force in all these human interactions. Simply, bottom line, Eastwood's life proves that for all eternity men go out to conquer the world and acquire wealth.....to spend it on women. And there will always be legions of women willing to play such a game.
2 people found this helpful