Boom!: Talking About the Sixties: What Happened, How It Shaped Today, Lessons for Tomorrow
Boom!: Talking About the Sixties: What Happened, How It Shaped Today, Lessons for Tomorrow book cover

Boom!: Talking About the Sixties: What Happened, How It Shaped Today, Lessons for Tomorrow

Paperback – October 14, 2008

Price
$12.46
Format
Paperback
Pages
662
Publisher
Random House Trade Paperbacks
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0812975116
Dimensions
5.52 x 1.52 x 8.26 inches
Weight
1.36 pounds

Description

About the Author Tom Brokaw is the author of seven bestsellers: The Greatest Generation, The Greatest Generation Speaks, An Album of Memories, Boom!, The Time of Our Lives,A Long Way from Home, and A Lucky Life Interrupted . A native of South Dakota, he graduated from the University of South Dakota, and began his journalism career in Omaha and Atlanta before joining NBC News in 1966. Brokaw was the White House correspondent for NBC News during Watergate, and from 1976 to 1981 he anchored Today on NBC. He was the sole anchor and managing editor of NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw from 1983 to 2005. He continues to report for NBC News, producing long-form documentaries and providing expertise during breaking news events. Brokaw has won every major award in broadcast journalism, including two DuPonts, three Peabody Awards, and several Emmys, including one for lifetime achievement. In 2014, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He lives in New York and Montana. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 A Loss of Innocence I felt everyone else wanted to be in our world. We were the last generation to be cooler than our kids. —Tom McGuane There’s a big “what if” over the Sixties. . . .Who knows what would have happened if King and Kennedy were alive? —Tom Hayden In 1968 America was deeply divided by a war in Southeast Asia and it was preparing to vote in a presidential election in which the choices were starkly different. The country was in the midst of a cultural upheaval unlike anything experienced since the Roaring Twenties. Everyone wondered whether America could regain its balance.Forty years later, another war, this one in the Middle East, was deeply dividing the United States. Republican and Democratic candidates for president were laying out starkly different scenarios for the country’s future. The place of America in the world was hotly debated. The popular culture was again an issue.The eve of 2008 was not exactly the Sixties all over again, but we still have a lot to learn from that memorable, stimulating, dangerous, and maddening time in American life forty years ago.I arrived in Los Angeles to join NBC News in 1966, and by then, Charles Dickens’s opening lines in A Tale of Two Cities had never seemed so prophetic. Were these the best or the worst of times? I wish I could say I felt the tremors of seismic change beginning and spreading out across the political and cultural landscape, but I was mostly trying to find my way. I was a twenty-six-year-old pilgrim from the prairie heartland, raised with the sensibilities of a Fifties working-class family. I was the father of a toddler with another child on the way.I fit the prototype of the typical young white male of the time. I had been a crew-cut apostle of the Boy Scouts, reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag, attending Sunday school and church, drinking too much beer in college but never smoking dope; marijuana in the Fifties and early Sixties was the stuff of jazz musicians and hoodlums in faraway places.Before I married the love of my life, my high school classmate Meredith, we had never spent a night together. In those days, parked cars and curfews were the defining limits of courtship.We were married in 1962, when Meredith was twenty-one and I was twenty-two, in a traditional Episcopal church wedding with a reception at our hometown country club. We left the next day with all our worldly possessions, including the five table cigarette lighters we had received as wedding presents, in the backseat of the no-frills Chevrolet compact car her father had given us as a wedding present.We were eager to see a wider world, but only one step at a time. California was still four years away. Our first stop was Omaha, Nebraska, which then was an unimaginative and conservative midsize city a half day’s drive down the Missouri River from our hometown. We could barely afford ninety dollars a month to rent a furnished apartment, but when we went looking, in the stifling heat of a Great Plains August, I was dressed in a jacket and tie, and Meredith was wearing part of her honeymoon trousseau, including a girdle and hose. Five years later, I rarely wore a tie except on television, and Meredith was freed not only of girdles but also of hose and brassieres on California weekends.In 1962, I had an entry-level reporter’s job at an Omaha television station. I had bargained to get a salary of one hundred dollars a week, because I didn’t feel I could tell Meredith’s doctor father I was making less. Meredith, who had a superior college record, couldn’t find any work because, as one personnel director after another told her, “You’re a young bride. If we hire you, you’ll just get pregnant before long and want maternity leave.”In retrospect, the political and cultural climate in the early Sixties seems both a time of innocence and also like a sultry, still summer day in the Midwest: an unsettling calm before a ferocious storm over Vietnam, which was not yet an American war. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., was confronting racism in the South and getting a good deal of exposure on The Huntley-Brinkley Report on NBC and The CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite, the two primary network newscasts, each just fifteen minutes long.In the fall of 1963, first CBS and then, shortly after, NBC expanded those signature news broadcasts to a half hour. As a sign of the importance of the expansion, Cronkite and Huntley and Brinkley were granted lengthy exclusive interviews with President Kennedy. ABC wouldn’t be a player in the news major leagues until the 1970s, when Roone Arledge brought to ABC News the energy and programming approach he had applied to ABC Sports. Kennedy, America’s first truly telegenic president, was a master of the medium, fully appreciating its power to reach into the living rooms of America from sea to shining sea.During our time in Omaha, John F. Kennedy was not a local favorite. The city’s deeply conservative culture remained immune to Kennedy’s charms and to his arguments for social changes, such as civil rights and the introduction of government-subsidized medical care for the elderly. I’m sure many of my conservative friends at the time thought I was a card short of being a member of the Communist Party because I regularly championed the need for enforced racial equality and Medicare.One of the most popular speakers to come through Omaha in those days was a familiar figure from my childhood, when kids in small towns on the Great Plains spent Saturday afternoons in movie theaters watching westerns. Ronald Reagan looked just like he did on the big screen. He was kind of a local boy who had made good, starting out as a radio star next door in Iowa and moving on to Hollywood, before becoming a television fixture as host of General Electric Theater.Reagan’s Omaha appearances were part of his arrangement with GE, which allowed him to be an old-fashioned circuit-riding preacher, warning against the evils of big government and communism, while praising the virtues of big business and the free market. He was every inch a star, impeccably dressed and groomed. But those of us who shared his Midwestern roots were a bit surprised to find that although he was completely cordial, he was not noticeably warm. That part of his personality remained an enigma even to his closest friends and advisers throughout his historically successful political career.In Omaha the only time he lightened up in my presence was when I noticed he was wearing contact lenses and I asked him about them. He got genuinely excited as he described how they were a new soft model, not like the hard ones that could irritate the eyes. He even wrote down the name of his California optometrist so Meredith could order a pair for herself. (Later, when he became president, I often thought, “He’s not only a great politician, he’s a helluva contact lens salesman.”)President Kennedy also passed through Omaha, but only for a brief stop at the Strategic Air Command headquarters there. In those days, SAC was an instantly recognized acronym because the bombers it comprised—some of which we could see because they were always in the air ready to respond in case of an attack—were a central component of America’s Cold War military strategy.More memorable for me was a visit to SAC by the president’s brother Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. The younger Kennedy was a striking contrast to the president, who had been smiling and chatty with the local press and even more impressive in person than on television. Unlike the president, who was always meticulously and elegantly dressed, the attorney general was wearing a rumpled suit, and the collar on his blue button-down shirt was frayed. He was plainly impatient, and his mood did not improve when I asked for a reaction to Alabama governor George Wallace’s demand that JFK resign the presidency because of his stance on school desegregation. Bobby fixed those icy blue eyes on me and said, as if I were to blame for the governor’s statement, “I have no comment on anything Governor Wallace has to say.”I was on duty in the newsroom a few weeks later when the United Press International wire-service machine began to sound its bulletin bells. I walked over casually and began to read a series of sentences breaking in staccato fashion down the page:three shots were fired at president kennedy’s motorcade in downtown dallas . . . flash—kennedy seriously wounded, perhaps fatally by assassin’s bullet . . . president john f. kennedy died at approximately 1:00 pm (cst).John F. Kennedy, the man I had thought would define the political ideal for the rest of my days, was suddenly gone in the senseless violence of a single moment. In ways we could not have known then, the gunshots in Dealey Plaza triggered a series of historic changes: the quagmire of Vietnam that led to the fall of Lyndon Johnson as president; the death of Robert Kennedy in pursuit of the presidency; and the comeback, presidency, and subsequent disgrace of Richard Nixon.On that beautiful late autumn November morning, however, my immediate concern was to get this story on the air. I rushed the news onto our noon broadcast, and as I was running back to the newsroom, one of the station’s Kennedy haters said, “What’s up?”I responded, “Kennedy’s been shot.”He said, “It’s about time someone got the son of a bitch.”Given the gauzy shades of popular memory, the invocations of Camelot and JFK as our nation’s prince, it may be surprising to younger Americans to know that President Kennedy was not universally beloved.Now Kennedy was gone, and this man was glad. I lunged toward him, but another coworker pulled me away.The rest of the day is mostly a blur except for one riveting memory. As I was speeding out toward SAC headquarters to see what restrictions they were putting on the base, I began to talk aloud to myself. “This doesn’t happen in America,” I said, still a child of the innocence of the Fifties. And then I distinctly remember thinking, “This will change us. I don’t know how, but this will change us.” And of course it did.It was November 22, 1963, and it was, in effect, the beginning of what we now call the Sixties. Kennedy’s death was stunning not just because he was president. He was such a young president, and his election just three years before had kindled the dreams and aspirations of the young generation he embodied and inspired. His death seemed to rob us of all that was youthful and elegant, cool and smart, hopeful and idealistic. Who now would stir our generation by suggesting we ask “not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country”?No political pundit or opposition strategist could have anticipated how JFK’s death would be the beginning of the unraveling of the Democratic coalition that had been forged by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932 and had formed the party’s electoral base ever since. When Lyndon Johnson emerged from Air Force One as the new president after the flight back from Dallas and stood somberly in the glare of the television lights at Andrews Air Force Base, he was already a familiar figure to most Americans. It would be hard to imagine a greater contrast to JFK than LBJ, the large, ambitious Texan with the thick drawl and the great thirst for whiskey, women, and power. Now he seemed humbled and earnest as he looked into the cameras and said, “I ask for your help—and God’s.”With LBJ we were back to business as usual with the old backroom pols, the men who wore hats and had spreading waistlines. To be sure, there was a lot about Kennedy we had not known then or had ignored— such as his chronic illnesses, his reckless ways with women, his Cold Warrior inclinations toward Vietnam, and his temporizing approach to the civil rights struggle.In June 2007, when the Central Intelligence Agency opened many of its files to the public—those known as “the family jewels”—there were pages devoted to JFK’s enthusiastic authorization of a CIA surveillance campaign against a well-known New York Times military affairs reporter who had published stories involving classified material. When Richard Nixon became president and authorized a similar leak-plugging operation, it was seen as the first step toward Watergate.But in the wake of President Kennedy’s violent death, America was in a state of shock, and the flaws or failings that were known to us only seemed to make him more human and his loss more deeply felt.He became the prince of Camelot who left behind a widow whose beauty could not be compromised by grief, a woman not yet forty years old who would remain a part of our lives, in admiration and controversy, until she died in the closing days of the century. And their children, Caroline and John, Jr., now belonged to the nation as surely as the offspring of royalty.Slowly, the rest of us went back to our ordinary lives, trying to absorb and understand the deep wounds we had sustained and the unimaginable loss we had suffered—and blissfully unaware of all the tragedy and tumult that lay not far ahead. My wife, Meredith, finally found a job teaching English at Central High School in Omaha. We rented a better apartment; this one even had access to a swimming pool, which seemed to us the height of luxury. We watched The Dick Van Dyke Show and Gunsmoke on our new black-and-white television. We bought our first set of furniture—sofa and matching chair, coffee table, dining room table and chairs, and two lamps—for four hundred dollars.In the summer of 1964, we drove east to visit Washington, D.C., and New York City on vacation, a couple of Midwesterners curious about life over the horizon from the Great Plains. In Washington, as luck would have it, we were in the press gallery when the House passed the historic Civil Rights Act, outlawing discrimination in jobs and public accommodations. Reporters were shouting into telephones and banging away at typewriters. We saw Roger Mudd, the CBS news correspondent who had been tracking the legislation nightly on the CBS Evening News, and Bob Abernethy of NBC News on the phone filing a radio report. I felt like a kid from the sticks who somehow managed to wander into Yankee Stadium while the World Series was under way.We were thrilled, but a friend who worked for the congressman from Omaha was not; his boss had voted against the act. Another conservative friend from the Midwest insisted, “You can’t legislate morality.”Huh? “What about murder?” I asked. “It’s immoral to kill someone. If I’m not mistaken, we’ve passed laws to deal with that.”

Features & Highlights

  • In
  • Boom!
  • , Tom Brokaw, one of America’s premier journalists and the acclaimed author of The Greatest Generation, gives us an epic portrait of another defining era in America: the tumultuous Sixties. The voices and stories of both famous people and ordinary citizens come together in this “virtual reunion” as Brokaw takes us on a memorable journey through a remarkable time, exploring how individuals and the national mood were affected by a controversial era and showing how the aftershocks of the Sixties continue to resound in our lives today. In the reflections of a generation, Brokaw also discovers lessons that might guide us in the years ahead. Race, politics, war, feminism, popular culture, and music are all delved into here. Brokaw explores how members of this generation have gone on to bring activism and a Sixties mindset into individual entrepreneurship , as we hear stories of how this formative decade has shaped our perspectives on business, the environment, politics, family, and our national existence. Remarkable in its insights, wonderfully written and reported, this revealing book lets us join in these frank conversations about America then, now, and tomorrow.
  • Praise for
  • Boom!
  • “Tom Brokaw does an excellent job of capturing an exciting, controversial period in American history and
  • Boom!
  • is a worthy addition to his growing canon.”
  • –New York Post
  • “[Tom Brokaw] approaches this magnum opus with warmth, curiosity and conviction, the same attributes that worked so well for his
  • Greatest Generation.
  • ”–The New York Times“[A] verbal scrapbook of the Sixties . . . [
  • Boom!
  • shows] that the era’s core issues–racism, women’s rights, a nation-dividing war–remain central today, and that the values boomers championed haven’t yet gone bust.”–
  • People
  • (four stars)“Packed with memorable people, places, events . . . A ‘virtual reunion’ of 1960s folks telling what they did back then, where they’ve been since and how they assess that tumultuous decade.”–
  • Chicago Tribune
  • “Genuinely fascinating recollections . . . plenty of memorable anecdotes.”–
  • The Wall Street Journal

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(102)
★★★★
25%
(85)
★★★
15%
(51)
★★
7%
(24)
23%
(79)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Boring, biased, biographical sketches

It was a real effort to get through this book. Tom's liberal bias shows through loud and clear. The short biographical sketches of people he deems influential during the 60's (like Warren Beatty, Nora Ephron and Tommy Smothers???) are disjointed and there is no real central theme. Save your money!!
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Brokaw misses the whole point!

Boom! is completely worthless. Brokaw has no idea of what was really happening in America in the sixties. He just looked down on it from the disconnected perspective of his own sheltered journalistic world. He was not one of us; he was one of them. For a more authentic look at the era from someone who actually lived *in* it rather than *above* it, try [[ASIN:0965517926 Die at the Right Time! A Subjective Cultural History of the American Sixties]].
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

If you want to hear from the "winners" and not the "whiners"...

Then this is your book. Want to hear from those who actually fought in Vietnam - great! Vietnam war heroes (Chuck Hagel, Jim Webb) are allowed to give their views. But I would never count them as ever wanting to win the war. This is really not a review. I bought the book more than a year ago and still have not finished. I was in Vietnam for three tours. After that I supervised the DoD database ov Vietnam casualties and personally cataloged all the autopsy pictures. The reality of the war keeps slowing my completion of the platitudes of the war.

Perhaps in a few years I will come back and give you a review.

But if you were on the winning side, you will love this book. Otherwise - read it anyway. We all have to learn.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Boom ignores/underplays many important 60's developments

To me, Boom is most notable for the 60's developments that Brokaw ignored or underplayed. It was also written with the typical liberal bias that is a Brokaw trademark. The most significant topic he ignored was the human potential movement and its offshoot, the New Age movement, that were the seeds of so many new ways that people relate to one another. A main aspect of this is the merging of Eastern religion, philosophy, and health care practices into America's mainstream: e.g.. the counseling techniques developed at Esalen Institute and the Naropa Institute, vegetarianism, Yoga, meditation, the body movement modalities that had been around a long time but were popularized or reintroduced under different names in the 60's, including Hakomi therapy, Rolfing, Feldenkrais; the birth of running and other daily health routines.

I think Brokaw underplayed the strong influence that LSD and pot had on creative thinkers. Not every person who used these drugs became so fried that they did not make a difference in their communities.

He also underplayed and dismissed the role of communes Sure, most did not work but the people who experienced them brought the positive experiences into their relationships and their work.

Brokaw touched on things like organic gardening but did not show how they influenced the smart growth and sustainable community movements of today. He does not mention things like recycling and community food co-ops and alternative schools that continue to influence communities positively.

There were too many interviews with Viet Nam veterans saying the same thing, and I recall that Brokaw was one of the media responsible for NOT honoring returning veterans.

How can a biased member of the liberal mainstream media that few trusted in the 60's, and few trust now, give an accurate portrait of that time? He was too old then, and too mainstream, to be part of any 60's activist inner circle.

Some things should also be said about the music he left out -- that says a whole lot. Mostly the music he talks about was folk or bubble gum rock, not the stuff the activists listened to.

He also ignored so very many positive things the environmental activists were doing -- how about the Clearwater sloop Pete Seeger organized to raise awareness of the Hudson River's pollution?

Other issues he did not address in the depth they deserved: technology, fine art, theater, land use planning, community designs, Native American activism, what people who refused induction or registered as conscientious objectors are doing today; why people are not protesting Iraq as much as he thinks they should.

Some of the chapters seem to have been written from notes and others from taped interviews. Some of the writing was fresh, some stale. His editor should have worked on that so it was more even. It sounded like an old reporter trying to make something new out of his old files.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Remembering a Pivotal Decade

Tom Brokaw's Boom! is a look back at the 1960's through the eyes of those who lived at the center of the decade. The first half of the book provides a good overview of the history of the period as it recalls several of the seminal events as seen through the eyes of people directly involved. This half of the book was particularly interesting to me, especially the sections about Vietnam, giving the perspective both of those who served and those who avoided service.

The second half of the book fell flat for me as it was a series of vignettes from mostly well-known personalities of the 60's who seek to understand the meaning of the 60's for today. This part of the book was more like a celebrity who's who than a real look into the history of the period. Predictable themes emerged from this section as many of the people profiled struggled with the aftermath of the 60's, battling drugs, depression, failed marriages while at the same time excelling professionally and learning to live with success while maintaining the spirit of the turbulent decade which gave wing to their dreams. The best insights about the positive and negative aspects of the decade came from Brokaw. He could have recounted the history of the first section with a concluding chapter discussing the implications of the decade for us today and had, in my view, a much better book.

Boom! could have been a much more powerful book at 300 pages than it was at 600 pages.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

How To Make A Mountain Out Of A Dung Hill

It isn't fair of me to compare Boom! to The Greatest Generation, since the topics are dissimilar and few subjects contain the power and scope of a discussion of World War Two. That said, Boom! was not on the same plane as Brokaw's earlier book, and frankly this one bored me, which came as a surprise. I only mention The Greatest Generation in the same context as Boom! because Mr. Brokaw and many others did before me. To be blunt, Boom! rode on Generation's coat tails.

I suppose I can point out two main problems with Boom!--subject matter and tone.

Firstly, admittedly, I did not intensely care about its subject matter or (with some exceptions) the people whose stories Boom! contained. Several hundred pages on the causes of the 1960's divide in American society does not make for compelling or uplifting reading, and the players in those times were frequently unworthy of enshrining. The opportunities Brokaw gave his interviewees to reflect too often became acts of glorifying what to them was a time of great personal meaning: more often than not their "glory days." Add to this the simple truth that I found myself disliking most of those about whom I was reading, disapproving of Brokaw's closed-mindedness once he had decided which side he would come down supporting (c'mon does he have to use the word "redneck" so readily?) and feeling that too many of those re-telling the story of the "real" (as opposed to the calendar) 1960's weren't worthy of the star treatment they were getting.

Yes, I was disappointed in Boom! and finished it knowing less about the zeitgeist of the era than about the egos of those who were there. Brokaw was able to use his personal fame and street cred from The Greatest Generation to get a bloated book published when a less famous writer would have had her manuscript cut to ribbons by a less fawning editor. After Boom! I....find myself not liking Tom Brokaw that much anymore.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Tom Brokow

Good read on the 60's.
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

A great book about what happened in the 60s and how it affects today, some incredible insights.
✓ Verified Purchase

Good Book Bonus DVD is nice too.

Actually purchased this as a gift. He really enjoyed it.
✓ Verified Purchase

Really took me back in time... I ...

Really took me back in time... I could read this100 times & still learn more about how the 60's shaped my life!