Chronic City: A Novel
Chronic City: A Novel book cover

Chronic City: A Novel

Hardcover – October 13, 2009

Price
$8.46
Format
Hardcover
Pages
480
Publisher
Doubleday
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385518635
Dimensions
6.5 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
Weight
1.75 pounds

Description

Amazon Best of the Month, October 2009: Jonathan Lethem, the home-grown frontrunner of a generation of Brooklyn writers, crosses the bridge to Manhattan in Chronic City , a smart, unsettling, and meticulously hilarious novel of friendship and real estate among the rich and the rent-controlled. Lethem's story centers around two unlikely friends, Chase Insteadman, a genial nonentity who was once a child sitcom star and now is best known as the loyal fiancé of a space-stranded astronaut, and Perkus Tooth, a skinny, moody, underemployed cultural critic. Chase and Perkus are free-floating, dope-dependent bohemians in a borough built on ambition, living on its margins but with surprising access to its centers of power, even to the city's billionaire mayor. Paranoiac Perkus sees urgent plots everywhere--in the font of The New Yorker , in an old VHS copy of Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid --but Chronic City , despite the presence of death, politics, and a mysterious, marauding tiger, is itself light on plot. Eschewing dramatic staples like romance and artistic creation for the more meandering passions of friendship and observation, Chronic City thrives instead on the brilliance of Lethem's ear and eye. Every page is a pleasure of pitch-perfect banter and spot-on cultural satire, cut sharply with the melancholic sense that being able to explain your city doesn't make you any more capable of living in it. --Tom Nissley From Publishers Weekly Signature Reviewed by Arthur NersesianJonathan Lethem's work has gone from postapocalyptic sci-fi to autobiographical magical realism. In Chronic City , he weaves these elements together, blending a number of actual recent events to create his own surreal urban landscape. The nearly mythological construction of the Second Avenue Subway spawns a strange destructive tiger that defies capture as it transforms the old city into a scary new one. A pair of eagles illegally squatting on an Upper East Side windowsill are summarily evicted. Best of all is the economic abyss that one once encountered above 125th Street. Here, Lethem has dropped a manmade fjord, a performance art chasm.At the heart of this city is former child star Chase Insteadman. Lately, he is better known as a celebrity fiancé to fatale femme astronaut Janice Strumbull, who is stuck in orbit because of Chinese satellite mines. Lately, though, his greater concern is his friend Perkus Tooth. Perkus is a pauper scholar, a slightly delusional Don Quixote character whose windmills are called chaldrons, imagined vases that bring inner peace. Somewhat like the tragic poet Delmore Schwartz who Saul Bellow fictionally eulogized (and Lethem acknowledges) in Humboldt's Gift , Tooth cuts with equal parts genius and madness. Though he never really rises above a plasterer of broadside rants, he's a recognizable artifact of New York circa 1981. Between bong hits—yes, for you potheads, Chronic is his favorite brand—and downtown cultural references, conspiracy theories hiccup from Perkus's lips. A prevalent notion he has is that our reality is nothing more than a facsimile, a simulation of a hidden reality. Perkus's hyperactive brain only pauses when he lapses into his periodic ellipse—a kind of revelatory break. The only problem is his breaks are gradually increasing in frequency. Inasmuch as Perkus is a personification of the old New York and its highly endangered culture, Insteadman finds a moral duty to protect him. If Perkus is Insteadman's moral conscience, Richard Abneg, an opportunistic politico, is Insteadman's naked ambition. Though Abneg started as an East Village anarchist, through intellect and arrogance he rose to become a powerful aide to Mayor Arnaheim (a Giuliani-Bloomberg hybrid). Now he's dismantling the rent stabilization laws he once championed. Eventually, these two work together to save Perkus.Though Chronic City at times requires patience, it is a luxuriously stylized paean to Gotham City's great fountain of culture that is slowly drying up. Like the city itself, the book sways toward the maximal, but its prose shines like our skyline at sunset. The key to his city lies in the very notion of reality: Chase Insteadman's moniker implies that this former actor is now just a stand-in for a greater (perhaps former) reality. By the conclusion, I found myself wondering if Lethem hadn't originally written a shorter simulacra of Chronic City , when it was just an Acute City. From him I would expect no less. Arthur Nersesian is author of The Sacrificial Circumcision of the Bronx (book two of the Five Books of Moses). His next novel, Mesopotamia , a thriller, is due out next year. Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Bookmarks Magazine Given the offbeat touches in his subject matter—one need look no further than the homicidal, bioengineered kangaroo stalking the author's protagonist in his debut novel, Gun, with Occasional Music —Jonathan Lethem is bound to engender both unbridled admiration from existing fans and more than a few raised eyebrows from critics and new readers. Reviews of Chronic City vary wildly, though Lethem's trademark sense of humor and flights of fancy work here, even when the story and its characters lose steam in some of the more ponderous, "insider" passages and pop-culture references. That Lethem's latest effort elicits so many—and such differing—views, however, suggests his importance as an innovator who constantly expands the boundaries of literary fiction. Here's hoping there's better balance in his next novel. "Astonishing....Knowing and exuberant, with beautiful drunken sentences that somehow manage to walk a straight line.....Turbocharged....Intricate and seamless....A dancing showgirl of a novel, yet beneath the gaudy makeup it's also the girl next door: a traditional bildungsroman with a strong moral compass...." New York Times Book Review "Ch ronic City is a feverish portrait of the anxiety and isolation of modern Manhattan, full of dark humor and dazzling writing....proves both funny and frightening."-- Entertainment Weekly "Exuberant literary revving.....Lethem's vision of New York can approach the Swiftian. It is impressively observant in its detail and scourging in its mocking satire. There are any number of wicked portraits....His comments on New York life are often achingly exact....So pungent and imaginative"-- The Boston Globe "Ingenious and unsettling...Lethem pulls everything together in a stunning critique of our perceptions of reality and our preconceptions of the function of literature."-- San Francisco Chronicle "Exquisitely written...Funny and mystifying, eminently quotable, resolutely difficult, even heartbreaking, "Chronic City" demonstrates an imaginative breadth not quite of this world."-- Cleveland Plain Dealer "A fluid sense of reality pervades these pages, which explore high society, urban politics, avant-garde art, celebrity mania and the dangers of information overload in an age where context is devalued or ignored....the quality of Lethem's prose and the exuberance of his imagination are reasons enough to read it.....When it comes to style, Lethem has few equals."-- Miami Herald "The novel functions much like Manhattan used to – a mad scramble of connections made and, more often, missed…make(s) a reader ache for a city long gone." – Esquire "Entertaining....a prosopographical investigation of New York City by way of a handful of strange, unclassifiable characters (and some remarkable writing)....splendidly observed"-- Wall Street Journal "Brilliant....exquisite wit and dazzling intricacy of every single paragraph......roves he's one of the most elegant stylists in the country, and he's capable of spinning surreal scenes that are equal parts noir and comedy....xa0evocative and engaging....As a reflection on modern alienation and the chronic loneliness that afflicts us in our faux world, this is beautifully, often powerfully done."-- The Washington Post "A sprawling book about pop culture and outer space…realistic and fantastic, serious and funny, warm and clear eyed. One of the new generation's most ambitious writers, Lethem again offers a novel that deals with nothing less important than the difference between truth and lies. And some stories about good cheeseburgers." - The Daily Beast "A stellar, multi-layered novel." – GQ "Lethem has often sought to interweave the realistic and the fantastic; in Chronic City the result is nearly seamless." - New York Magazine "[Lethem is] a writer who resists pigeonholing....it's hard to remain unsusceptible to his euphoria"-- Los Angeles Times "Friction, charisma, unpleasantness, and threat are key to this tale of scintillating misfits.....dizzyingly brilliant urban enigma"-- O Magazine "One of America's finest novelists explores the disconnections among art, government, space travel and parallel realities, as his characters hunger for elusive meaning…… All truths and realities are open to interpretation, even negotiation, in this brilliantly rich novel….Lethem's most ambitious work to date."— Kirkus Reviews, starred "Pow! Letham has done it again. When it comes to brainy adventures full of laughter and heart this master has few equals. What a joy from the first page to the last."—Gary Shteyngart, author of Absurdistan and The Russian Debutante's Handbook "I'm reminded of the well-rubbed Kafka line re: A book must be the axe to break the frozen sea within us. Lethem's book, with incredible fury, aspires to do little less. It's almost certainly his best novel. It's genuinely great."–David Shields, author of The Thing About Life Is That One Day You'll Be Dead JONATHAN LETHEM is the author of seven novels. A recipient of the MacArthur Fellowship, Lethem has also published his stories and essays in The New Yorker , Harper's , Rolling Stone , Esquire , and the New York Times , among others. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. I first met Perkus Tooth in an office. Not an office where he worked, though I was confused about this at the time. (Which is itself hardly an uncommon situation, for me.) his was in the headquarters of the Criterion Collection, on Fifty- second Street and Third Avenue, on a weekday afternoon at the end of summer. I'd gone there to record a series of voice- overs for one of Criterion's high- end DVD reissues, a "lost" 1950s film noir called The City Is a Maze . My role was to play the voice of that film's director, the late émigré auteur Von Tropen Zollner. I would read a series of statements culled from Zollner's interviews and articles, as part of a supplemental documentary being prepared by the curatorial geniuses at Criterion, a couple of whom I'd met at a dinner party.In drawing me into the project they'd supplied me with a batch of research materials, which I'd browsed unsystematically, as well as a working version of their reconstruction of the film, in order for me to glean what the excitement was about. It was the first I'd heard of Zollner, so this was hardly a labor of passion. But the enthusiasm of buffs is infectious, and I liked the movie. I no longer considered myself a working actor. This was the only sort of stuff I did anymore, riding the exhaust of my former and vanishing celebrity, the smoky half- life of a child star. An eccentric favor, really. And I was curious to see the inside of Criterion's operation. This was the first week of September—the city's back- to- school mood always inspired me to find something to do with my idle hands. In those days, with Janice far away, I lived too much on the surface of things, parties, gossip, assignations in which I was the go- between or vicarious friend. Workplaces fascinated me, the zones where Manhattan's veneer gave way to the practical world.I recorded Zollner's words in a sound chamber in the technical swing of Criterion's crowded, ramshackle offices. In the room outside the chamber, where the soundman sat giving me cues through a headset, a restorer also sat peering at a screen and guiding a cursor with a mouse, diligently erasing celluloid scratches and blots, frame by digital frame, from the bare bodies of hippies cavorting in a mud puddle. I was told he was restoring I Am Curious (Yellow) . Afterward I was retrieved by the producer who'd enlisted me, Susan Eldred. It had been Susan and her colleague I'd met at the dinner party—unguarded, embracing people with a passion for a world of cinematic minutiae, for whom I'd felt an instantaneous affection. Susan led me to her office, a cavern with one paltry window and shelves stacked with VHS tapes, more lost films petitioning for Criterion's rescue.Susan shared her office, it appeared. Not with the colleague from the party, but another person. He sat beneath the straining shelves, notebook in hand, gaze distant. It seemed too small an office to share. The glamour of Criterion's brand wasn't matched by these scenes of thrift and improvisation I'd gathered in my behind- the- scenes glimpse, but why should it have been? No sooner did Susan introduce me to Perkus Tooth and give me an invoice to sign than she was called away for some consultation elsewhere.He was, that first time, lapsed into what I would soon learn to call one of his "ellipsistic" moods. Perkus Tooth himself later supplied that descriptive word: ellipsistic, derived from ellipsis . A species of blank interval, a nod or fugue in which he was neither depressed nor undepressed, not struggling to finish a thought nor to begin one. Merely between. Pause button pushed. I certainly stared. With Tooth's turtle posture and the utter slackness of his being, his receding hairline and antique manner of dress— trim- tapered suit, ferociously wrinkled silk with the shine worn off, moldering tennis shoes—I could have taken him for elderly. When he stirred, his hand brushing the open notebook page as if taking dictation with an invisible pen, and I read his pale, adolescent features, I guessed he was in his fifties—still a decade wrong, though Perkus Tooth had been out of the sunlight for a while. He was in his early forties, barely older than me. I'd mistaken him for old because I'd taken him for important. He now looked up and I saw one undisciplined hazel eye wander, under its calf lid, toward his nose. That eye wanted to cross, to discredit Perkus Tooth's whole sober aura with a comic jape. His other eye ignored the gambit, trained on me."You're the actor.""Yes," I said."So, I'm doing the liner notes. For The City Is a Maze , I mean.""Oh, good.""I do a lot of them. Prelude to a Certain Midnight . . . Recalcitrant Women . . . The Unholy City . . . Echolalia . . .""All film noir?""Oh, gosh, no. You've never seen Herzog's Echolalia ?""No.""Well, I wrote the liner notes, but it isn't exactly released yet.I'm still trying to convince Eldred—"Perkus Tooth, I'd learn, called everyone by their last name. As though famous, or arrested. His mind's landscape was epic, dotted with towering figures like Easter Island heads. At that moment Eldred—Susan—returned to the office."So," he said to her, "have you got that tape of Echolalia around here somewhere?" He cast his eyes, the good left and the meanderingright, at her shelves, the cacophony of titles scribbled on labelsthere. "I want him to see it."Susan raised her eyebrows and he shrank. "I don't know where it is," she said."Never mind.""Have you been harassing my guest, Perkus?""What do you mean?"Susan Eldred turned to me and collected the signed release, then we made our farewell. Then, as I got to the elevator, Perkus Tooth hurried through the sliding door to join me, crushing his antique felt hat onto his crown as he did. The elevator, like so many others behind midtown edifices, was tiny and rattletrap, little more than a glorified dumbwaiter—there was no margin for pretending we hadn't just been in that office together. Bad eye migrating slightly, Perkus Tooth gave me a lunar look, neither unfriendly nor apologetic. Despite the vintage costume, he wasn't some dapper retro- fetishist. His shirt collar was grubby and crumpled. The greengray sneakers like mummified sponges glimpsed within a janitor's bucket."So," he said again. This "so" of Perkus's—his habit of introducing any subject as if in resumption of earlier talk—wasn't in any sense coercive. Rather, it was as if Perkus had startled himself from a daydream, heard an egging voice in his head and mistaken it for yours. "So, I'll lend you my own copy of Echolalia , even though I never lend anything. Because I think you ought to see it.""Sure.""It's a sort of essay film. Herzog shot it on the set of Morrison Groom's Nowhere Near . Groom's movie was never finished, you know. Echolalia documents Herzog's attempts to interview Marlon Brando on Groom's set. Brando doesn't want to give the interview, and whenever Herzog corners him Brando just parrots whatever Herzog's said . . . you know, echolalia . . .""Yes," I said, flummoxed, as I would so often later find myself, by Tooth's torrential specifics."But it's also the only way you can see any of Nowhere Near . Morrison Groom destroyed the footage, so the scenes reproduced in Echolalia are, ironically, all that remains of the film—"xa0 Why "ironically"? I doubted my hopes of inserting the question."It sounds incredible," I said."Of course you know Morrison Groom's suicide was probably faked."My nod was a lie. The doors opened, and we stumbled together out to the pavement, tangling at every threshold: "You first—""Oops—" "After you—" "Sorry." We faced each other, mid-Wednesday Manhattan throngs islanding us in their stream. Perkus grew formally clipped, perhaps belatedly eager to show he wasn't harassing me."So, I'm off.""Very good to see you." I'd quit using the word meet long ago, replacing it with this foggy equivocation, chastened after the thousandth time someone explained to me that we'd actually met before."So—" He ground to a halt, expectant."Yes?""If you want to come by for the tape . . ."I might have been failing some test, I wasn't sure. Perkus Tooth dealt in occult knowledge, and measured with secret calipers. I'd never know when I'd crossed an invisible frontier, visible to Perkus in the air between us."Do you want to give me a card?"He scowled. "Eldred knows where to find me." His pride intervened, and he was gone. For a phone call so life- altering as mine to Susan Eldred, I ought to have had some fine reason. Yet here I was, dialing Criterion's receptionist later that afternoon, asking first for Perkus Tooth and then, when she claimed no familiarity with that name, for Susan Eldred, spurred by nothing better than a cocktail of two parts whim and one part guilt. Manhattan's volunteer, that's me, I may as well admit it. Was I curious about Echolalia , or Morrison Groom's faked suicide, or Perkus Tooth's intensities and lulls, or the slippage in his right eye's gaze? All of it and none of it, that's the only answer. Perhaps I already adored Perkus Tooth, and already sensed that it was his friendship I required to usher me into the strange next phase of my being. To unmoor me from the curious eddy into which I'd drifted. How very soon after our first encounter I'd come to adore and need Perkus makes it awfully hard to know to what extent such feelings were inexplicably under way in Susan Eldred's office or that elevator."Your office mate," I said. "They didn't recognize his name at the front desk. Maybe I heard it wrong—""Perkus?" Susan laughed. "He doesn't work here.""He said he wrote your liner notes.""He's written a couple, sure. But he doesn't work here. He just comes up and occupies space sometimes. I'm sort of Perkus's babysitter. I don't even always notice him ... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • The acclaimed author of
  • Motherless Brooklyn
  • and
  • The Fortress of Solitude
  • returns with a roar with this gorgeous, searing portrayal of Manhattanites wrapped in their own delusions, desires, and lies.
  • Chase Insteadman, a handsome, inoffensive fixture on Manhattan's social scene, lives off residuals earned as a child star on a beloved sitcom called
  • Martyr & Pesty
  • . Chase owes his current social cachet to an ongoing tragedy much covered in the tabloids: His teenage sweetheart and fiancée, Janice Trumbull, is trapped by a layer of low-orbit mines on the International Space Station, from which she sends him rapturous and heartbreaking love letters. Like Janice, Chase is adrift, she in Earth's stratosphere, he in a vague routine punctuated by Upper East Side dinner parties.Into Chase's cloistered city enters Perkus Tooth, a wall-eyed free-range pop critic whose soaring conspiratorial riffs are fueled by high-grade marijuana, mammoth cheeseburgers, and a desperate ache for meaning. Perkus's countercultural savvy and voracious paranoia draw Chase into another Manhattan, where questions of what is real, what is fake, and who is complicit take on a life-shattering urgency. Along with Oona Laszlo, a self-loathing ghostwriter, and Richard Abneg, a hero of the Tompkins Square Park riot now working as a fixer for the billionaire mayor, Chase and Perkus attempt to unearth the answers to several mysteries that seem to offer that rarest of artifacts on an island where everything can be bought: Truth.Like Manhattan itself, Jonathan Lethem's masterpiece is beautiful and tawdry, tragic and forgiving, devastating and antic, a stand-in for the whole world and a place utterly unique.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(62)
★★★★
25%
(52)
★★★
15%
(31)
★★
7%
(14)
23%
(47)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

The real and the surreal clash in Lethem's Manhattan

If Seinfeld was "the show about nothing," then Chronic City just may be the novel about nothing. It's beautifully written, but very little happens in the course of its 480 pages. To keep my comparison alive, you'd find your "Jerry" in protagonist Chase Insteadman--one of the many unusual names we'll discuss in a moment. The book's jacket copy describes him like this:

"Chase Insteadman, a handsome, inoffensive fixture on Manhattan's social scene, lives off residuals earned as a child star on a much-beloved sitcom called Martyr & Pesty. Chase owes his current social cachet to an ongoing tragedy much covered in the tabloids: His teenage sweetheart and fiancée, Janice Trumbull, is trapped by a layer of low-orbit mines on the International Space Station, from which she sends him rapturous and heartbreaking love letters."

Within the novel's text, Chase describes himself: "My distinction (if there is one) lies in the helpless and immersive extent of my empathy. I'm truly a vacuum filled by the folks I'm with, and vapidly neutral in their absence." In other words, a hard character to really care about.

Chase is surrounded by a group of equally oddly-named friends. Foremost among them is Perkus Tooth, the "Kramer" of the bunch. Perkus is long past quirky and deep into weird territory. He's a largely sequestered social critic who spends his days and nights getting high and sharing semi-coherent rants with a selected few. Perkus's life-long friend, Richard Abneg, a city bureaucrat, can be our "George." And their long-time associate, and Chase's secret lover, Oona Laszlo, rounds out our quartet as "Elaine."

My comparison with this long-dead television show is a little ridiculous, but at the same time, it's not crazy at all. These are caricature New Yorkers, doing their thing. Chase is the least objectionable of the bunch, but none of them are all that likeable. By far, the most sympathetic character is Janice Trumball, trapped in space and pining for her man. Her letters home were my favorite part of the novel, but they were few and far between.

So, I mentioned the names. To those already listed add Strabo Blandiana, Laird Noteless, Georgina Hawkmanjani, Anne Sprillthmar, and many others. The crazy names certainly weren't randomly selected, and it's no casual mistake when Chase is erroneously addressed as "Chase Unperson," and Perkus is later referred to as "Mr. Pincus Truth." Lethem winks at his readers with this passage:

"His name is Stanley Toothbrush."
"See, now you're definitely making fun of me, because that's idiotic."
"Stanley would be awfully hurt if he heard you. You have no idea how often people laugh in his face."
"Toothbrush... that's just a little hard to swallow."
"No more so than stuff you swallow every day."

The New York setting is as much, if not more, of a character than any of the others. (And the title references not only Manhattan, but a grade of marijuana. Did I mention the characters spend interminable portions of the novel getting high and having only vaguely comprehensible conversations?) Lethem's Manhattan is immediately recognizable; I've eaten at the burger joint the characters frequent. At the same time, it's a sort of bizarro Manhattan where the city and the citizens have to deal with tigers run amok, a pervasive scent of chocolate, and can choose to read the "War-Free Edition" of the Times. Muppets are Gnuppets, and are referenced constantly. WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

I don't think anyone but Jonathan Lethem will ever understand what it all means, but by the end I understood what he was getting at. I just didn't care. As terrific as some of the writing is, the novel as a whole is rather tedious, and ultimately unsuccessful. I can't honestly recommend reading it unless, perhaps, you're a pothead with an extraordinary vocabulary.
15 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Tiresome

I loved Lethem's "Motherless Brooklyn" and enjoyed "Fortress of Solitude", but this attempt really misses the mark. The main characters are has beens on the periphery of art, fame, money and high society in New York City. Their lives are boring and pointless, but they spend their time together to mutually reinforce their false sense of importance. The book moves at a dreadfully slow pace, or perhaps it just seems that way because the story and characters are so uninvolving. This book is a real dud.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

High (Brow)

A cursory reading of CHRONIC CITY is likely to disappoint. On the surface, the book is about nothing more than a handful of stoned Manhattanites who seem to have way too much time on their hands. The central character is a child star living off of his sitcom's residuals and his lingering good looks; his name -- Chase Insteadman -- reveals most of what there is to say about him, although his friends rarely hesitate to call him out for what he is: a wandering ghost of half-hearted urges, most of them sexual.

At the start of the book, Chase befriends a free-lance social critic named Perkus Tooth, who then introduces him to a New York of dying cultural import. Like all over-educated stoners, Perkus often ricochets his line of thought down the paths of conspiracy, meta-meaning, and the power of symbols, but his ramblings are so persistent and self-righteous, no one pays close enough attention when one or more of them turn out to be right. Perkus and Chase live in a Manhattan of the future, where war is a constant presence (at least in the newspapers that Chase never reads), a huge gray fog has subsumed half of the city, a post-modern artist goes about installing huge craters in the city, the air sometimes smells like chocolate, and some kind of sentient presence (that may or may not be a tiger) occasionally destroys a building. Oh, and Chase has a fiance named Janice, an astronaut who is stranded in a space station high above the earth.

Ill be the first to say that what Lethem has done here is brilliant (as usual), although I'm also certain that (not living in New York), I didn't "get" much of what he alluded to. This is, basically, a book about living in a book. It's about solipsism, about the meaning of life, about -- in plainer terms -- what constitutes existence. All of the pot smoking seemed like a contrivance when I first read the book, but now it's clear that Lethem is suggesting something else. Socrates said that the unexamined life is not worth living, and pot smokers are notorious for relentless examination of even the most disparate of life's minutiae, even if they also fail to do any actual living. Whether pot leads to any actual insight or clarity is up for debate by the good people at NORML and DARE. At the very least, Lethem seems to say, it does take the mind out of its own grooves.

If you give this book any kind of deeper examination, you're bound to close it with the hazy idea that you just learned something seriously important (and interesting) and then promptly forgot it again. Lethem arranges the "plots" -- they are as fragile and inter-related as snowflakes spiraling down from the sky -- so that they clump together at precisely the point when they also melt. The characters search for meaning that is just as elusive -- in particular a collection of spiritually unsettling ceramics known as "chaldrons" -- and perhaps just as real. The fact that almost all of it has to do with an on-line reality game called YET ANOTHER WORLD is also no coincidence.

I'm getting off track. Maybe. It's hard to tell. The interweaving of a treacherous blizzard (how fitting), a ghostwriter (no, she's not an actual ghost...I don't think), and Marlon Brando adds to the cluttered, blue-smoke bluster of the book. It's the closest you can get to being high without injesting anything other than words. Unfortunately, just like most artificial highs, this book leaves behind blanks that you could've sworn were already filled in. By the end of the novel, New York appears to be cranking away under a perpetual snowfall. Just as streets and sidewalks are cleared for use, just as it's certain to where they lead, the faceless sky erases them away -- even just for a moment -- under a blanket of white, and all of the New Yorkers must trudge out and find their way again.

Chase, among all of them, narrates the tale (Lethem cheats several times, narrating a few chapters without Chase's help, a move that is puzzling and detracts from the book, even if it's also necessary) as if it were a handbook on how to live without knowing it. By the end, Chase, like most readers are bound to be, is aware that something larger (sinister?) is going on, but he hasn't the faintest idea what it is or how to deal with it. Mostly he does what everyone else does, and occupies his part of it. The final moment of the book I love, love, loved. The chaldrons mentioned earlier are prized, Chase says, because of their "thingliness," their purity of being. In the last paragraphs, only finally (and maybe, just like a pothead, only vaguely and sweetly) does Chase realize that even if life is confusing, disturbing, and beyond all human scope, it is at least touchable, embraceable, and frameable.
13 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

struggle and complicity

Saying that Chronic City is a book about male friendship is like saying 2001 A Space Odyssey is a movie about an expedition to Jupiter, meaning not really. Chronic City is actually about representation, about what things "stand for," and about the illusions that result from the late-capitalist infotainment/political industry disruption of the representational framework. Because it is set in an alternative Manhattan full of historical characters and fictional events, locating the real within the pages of Chronic City isn't difficult, it's effing impossible, and that's the point.

The object of the book's and JL's desire is the Manhattan of the late 70s: the innocent rebellion of Patti Smith and Robert Mapplethorpe; the theoretical and political maturation of pop music critics; the street art of Jean-Michel Basquiat and Keith Haring. It's nostalgic for a Manhattan that still had within its borders the means to resist the onslaught of the corporate symbolic order. That said, there's no way to prepare yourself for the onslaught of JL's anger, curiosity, and sadness for the world that didn't materialize (or did) from that historic moment of critique. The writing is dazzling: from theoretical discussions on the nature of meaning to grand set pieces with dozens of characters to a narrative so perfectly paced and constructed, its surprise ending will keep you awake for days.

There IS a male friendship in Chronic City: between an actor (a walking, talking, VERY sexual imaginary) and a cultural critic (sorry cultural critics: we're talking ABSOLUTE-ZERO sex), but all the characters in the book participate to the degree to which they interact with the basic relationships of representation and real, truth and big-other power. The story within the story within the story is that reality exists only as we construct it through struggle. Illusion isn't the natural state of things but the measure of our complicity with the world constructed by the powers that be. Unfortunately, it's not that simple and the true accomplishment of Chronic City is how JL imagines the relationship of struggle and complicity as a vast, complex totality, an all-too-human ecosystem of good intentions and lost opportunities. Chronic City is replete with postmodern cynicism and lit in-jokes, but it is also infused with sympathy and generosity for those who seek and fail and continue seeking. In this, JL provides more than a call to arms, he provides a measure of grace, without which the struggle for reality would be neither possible nor worth the effort.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A puzzle

I did finish this, but mostly because I wanted to prove to myself that I could. I know that we weren't supposed to like the characters, that they were supposed to show us something or other, but they all sort of blended together, especially the women. The only REAL character-- Janice-- turns out, of course, to be a construct and unreal, while the real woman, Oona, ho-hum. The characters were all types, like he'd decided "a ghost-writer would be cool, someone who writes someone else's life and doesn't live her own," rather than developing a person who is a ghost-writer. They're all sort of stand-ins for something Lethem wants us to "get". Okay, that's the way this sort of book is-- I shouldn't read this hoping for characters to care about. The problem is, nothing else was all that impressive. Some of the ideas that Perkus and Chase riff off are sort of intriguing (though none stuck in my mind). But the sentences the NYTimes reviewer marvelled at were just LONG. I mean, even the ones he quoted weren't impressively precise or sprawlingly descriptive. One had a huge slamming dangling participle, which is almost always a sign that a writer isn't paying attention to what the sentence is saying. These "brilliant" sentences were really just precious and ornate and often poorly constructed. But they were long, and that makes for a "tour de force," I guess.

My biggest problem was the end. I mean, here I hung on all through all those Perkus rants and Chase nods (does anyone really believe that supposedly brilliant Perkus and totally vapid Chase would ever hang out?), and through all those indistinguishable secondary characters with the funny names (Was it Oona or Hawkmanji in the dress? Laird or that guy who worked for the mayor? They really didn't seem much different). And then the end. 400 pages of tigers and three-legged dogs and labored puns, and then, rather than actually have the plot work out and Chase discover what was going on, Chase just tells us everything (spoiler: It's a fake) in the last few pages. In fact, he tells us that Oona told him. It's the most static ending I think I've ever seen in a major novel. No action, no scenes, no change. Just a recitation of "what really happened" which made me wonder why I read the previous 400 pages.

I did enjoy some of the insights, and Perkus made me think deep thoughts like, "Hey, his posters are like blogs... will anyone do posters now that we have Facebook? Cool." But reading this is a lot like sitting with a group of smart undergraduates who are getting really stoned and won't share their dope with you. They think they're more profound than you think.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A favorite's debacle

It's hard to confront the spectacle of a favorite writer's apparent meltdown into derivative and self-parodying writing. Jonathan Lethem has been a favorite contemporary writer, with his Motherless Brooklyn sitting securely in my list of the best novels of the past 20 years. I opened Chronic City with anticipation and excitement, but it took almost no time--fewer than 100 pages--to dismiss my potential enthusiasm and force me into a hopeful slog through the 300 more pages of the book, hoping all the way that it would be redeemed, that Lethem would pull one of his magic tricks and the whole thing would fall into place. Instead, we have a soggy and droopy "aftermath of 9/11" novel, much worse than Don DeLillo's similarly disappointing effort.

Lethem creates an alternative history of the aftermath of the fall of the towers, replete with lowgrade satire of the Manhattanites of wealth and power, evocations of the artistic rebels of the '60s surviving as disillusioned sellouts or demented fantasists. It's a novel with a narrator who is a man of no character, NOT to be confused with a segment of Robert Musil. Insteadman is an empty shell, which can be an interesting point of reference when surrounded with others who presume to characterize him, as the others in this novel do; the problem here is that Insteadman is not just devoid of character, as he tells us ad nauseam, but he is also unbelievably boring. None of the quirky or sinister or pathetic characters he encounters, none of the odd "alternative events" that signal to us we are in a parallel "New York" (with a dense fog over southern Manhattan instead of a deep crater being re-constructed into a 9/11 memorial), can relieve the tedium of his narrative. Even a couple of shifts of p.o.v. fail to help. The femme fatale, Oona, is almost immediately identifiable as the agent of deceptions that surround Insteadman in an entirely familiar "this is a constructed world and you are merely a pawn playing your role in it" plot. The names dropped are just dropped; the supposed mysteries that create ambiguity or uncertainty are merely trivial, as they are supposed to be. The novel is 420 pages of flaccid prose which even a rogue tiger wandering loose in Manhattan cannot render interesting.

And there are borrowings, which perhaps Lethem fully expects us to recognize. The most blatant: Janice Trumbull, supposedly Chase Insteadman's lover, is a female astronaut stranded in a space station surrounded by Chinese explosive devices; she sends back letters to Chase that are published in the NYTimes, keeping a fascinated audience involved in their doomed romance and making him a celebrity who is on everyone's invitation list. Surely Lethem knows that many will think of Walt Dangerfield, the astronaut in Philip K. Dick's Dr. Bloodmoney, circling the earth in orbit, playing popular music that is broadcast back to earth, keeping in touch as he rotates toward death. Others have written, as well, about the commodification of art and the manipulation of celebrity to control and distract a curious public. Others have written better about it, including Philip K. Dick and Don DeLillo, not to mention William Gaddis.

I wish I were not so deeply disappointed in this novel. I still admire Lethem and trust that we will have more great work from him. This should never have left his hard drive.
12 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Philip K. Dick refuted on The Thirteenth Floor

The book is (in part) a Philip K. Dick paranoid conspiracy theory novel, and other reviewers have pointed out that they're so used to this kind of thing that they guessed the plot in advance, were bored by the device, and so on.

But Lethem adds a point that Dick and movies like THE THIRTEENTH FLOOR leave out: "conspiracies" cannot help but reduce themselves to interactions of human beings: those who conspire against you may be your friends and lovers, REALLY, even as their conspiracy continues.

This is new and interesting--but dry, best illustrated in the rather cold, self-mocking way which Lethem uses, and which negative reviewers here have commented on. Lethem has pointed out in his personal essays how he was drawn to a colder, more cerebral and more comic book-like art than his father produced.

Many reviewers have noted that the book's narrator, Chase Insteadman, is an uninteresting character. But so are we all. It would take novelistic trickery to make us interesting, and most novelists would not be interested enough in us to bother. Neither is Lethem, but he's interested in our situation. What should uninteresting people do? Dream of being at the center of a conspiracy? But would being a victim, or even being a conspirator, make them any more interesting?

To the five-star reviewers, yes. To the one-star reviewers, no. To Lethem ... who knows? But these are some of the points he covers.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An unforgettable story in spite of its annoying post-modern tendencies

In the two weeks since I finished Chronic City, scenes from the novel keep floating up from the tunnels they've dug in my subconscious, forcing me to rethink my original not very high opinion of this book. In spite of his post-modern tics, Lethem has created a story powerful enough to linger, which is my most important criteria for novelistic excellence. I don't know how he does it, because his tricks and tools fail in other authors' hands, but he's managed to create a three-legged pit bull who lives in an apartment for dogs and a dying astronaut who lives on a disintegrating and vegetative space station and a hapless pot-smoking intellectual hero I can't forget. Like Fortress of Solitude, Lethem's earlier novel, Chronic City has rearranged itself in my memory from a slick compendium of the annoying tendencies in modern fiction into one of the best contemporary novels I've read.

My original less flattering review is below:

In Chronic City, Lethem has succumbed to the pot-smoking author's postmodern fallacy, which is that your readers will enjoy your failure to take your characters and story seriously as much as you do. What's left when the narrator's unreliable, your characters are collections of tics and in-jokes, and even your McGuffin (or chaldron, in this case) is revealed to be nothing more than a collection of pixels in a virtual world? Language, sayeth the postmodernists, and since that's all there is in a novel, it had better be enough.

In another recent pot-infused novel, Pynchon's Inherent Vice, it is. Though Lethem's capable of some lovely passages, in Chronic City, it isn't. Pynchon isn't any more serious than Lethem about his plot or his characters, but he does have a reverence for the details of the physical world that infuses his descriptions, and makes them lovely enough to stand on their own. In Chronic City, nothing exists outside the claustrophobic worlds of in-crowd art and political paranoia, and though Lethem makes heroic attempts to move us with the beauty of his artificial world, for me, it isn't working.

By the end of the novel Lethem makes an attempt to lead us back to the tangible by introducing Ava, the three-legged pit bull, who leads the narrator to the iconic flock of actual birds who have long decorated the small and shrinking view from his Manhattan window. Too bad that Lethem obscures Ava with that more traditional symbol of hope and meaning: the birth of human infant. It's way too late in the history of our overpopulated world for human birth to have the resonance Lethem tries to give it. Obscuring emotional content with a collage of signs and symbols is what Chronic City's all about, perhaps symptomatic of marijuana's effect of disengaging intellect from emotion.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Interesting if not always engaging

I was aware of Jonathan Lethem only through one of his previous novels 'Motherless Brooklyn' which I remember being an entertaining read. 'Chronic City' is certainly a lot more abstract, some may say it's mature, but I found it a little wanting to be honest.

For the first 200 pages or so, we meet a collection of characters living in some kind of parallel Manhattan to the one we know and love, what with its strange chocolate smell in the air, giant tiger on the loose, and incessant fog. It's an interesting place, and Lethem throws in many cultural references, some of which I understood, others which passed over my head. Our chief characters however, appear rather selfish and unlikeable -- perhaps that was the point, as they laze around and don't really do anything but celebrate themselves. The only saving grace are the beautifully emotional letters from Janice Turnbull, our lead character Chase Insteadman's estranged fiancee, who finds herself trapped in space. These letters bring a soft touch to proceedings which helped me warm to the novel somewhat.

Just when things seem to be going awry, Lethem produces a major event about halfway through the novel, and all of a sudden, the emotional frailties of most of the main protagonists are finally revealed, and the novel turns from being fairly humdrum to being quite readable. From there on in, we begin to learn more about this strange quasi-real Manhattan, and Perkus Tooth's descent into despair and helplessness is brilliantly written if perhaps not always too well explained.

But this seems to be the key thing with 'Chronic City': Not everything is explained. The fine lines between reality and virtual reality are blurred throughout. What's real and what's an illusion is a constant theme, despite some explanation using the familiar Linden Lab 'Second Life' virtual reality software here entitled "Yet Another World" to help illustrate that we may, indeed, all be just merely part of a simulation and not in control of our own destinies as we like to believe.

I was rarely bored while reading 'Chronic City', but neither was I as engaged as I would've liked. There's no denying that Lethem is a great writer, full of interesting ideas, but the novel seems to work more on a level as a piece of experimentation, rather then a tightly-plotted and exciting story. However, perhaps, that was the point.

I find it hard to recommend this book, hence the three star review, but it is still, strangely enough, well worth reading. How's that for a parallel universe?
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I loved it

I've been reading Jonathan Lethem's books since the science fiction ones, and this is my favorite. Absolutely brilliant! I love Lethem's skill with the English language, and his creative thinking. Both are absolutely brilliant in this novel. In fact, I'm a little worried that he'll burn himself out with this kind of writing. I couldn't read more than a few sections before I would have to stop and take a break from such deeply thoughtful and creative writing. Not as heavy as Gravity's Rainbow, but as creative, and the intelligence comes through as more insightful than pure showy intelligence. And of course easier to identify with. Lethem has thought about things that I haven't thought about thinking about. And it was a pleasure reading his thoughts. And his people were real to me.
4 people found this helpful