Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety (ALA Notable Books for Adults)
Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety (ALA Notable Books for Adults) book cover

Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety (ALA Notable Books for Adults)

Hardcover – September 17, 2013

Price
$38.20
Format
Hardcover
Pages
656
Publisher
Penguin Press
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1594202278
Dimensions
6.65 x 2 x 9.5 inches
Weight
2.15 pounds

Description

From Booklist Nuclear bombs must be handled with the proper care, yet that is not always the case. Mentioning harrowing mishaps in the history of the American atomic arsenal, Schlosser singles out one for detailed dramatization, the explosion in 1980 of a Titan II missile. Some airmen were killed and injured, but since the warhead didn’t detonate, the safety system appeared to have worked. Color Schlosser skeptical, for, as he recounts this accident, which began with a mundane incident—a dropped tool that punctured the missile—he delves into nuclear weapon designs. Those are influenced by the requirement that the bomb must always detonate when desired and never when not. Citing experts in the technology of nuclear weaponry who have pondered the “never” part of the requirement, Schlosser highlights their worry about an accidental nuclear explosion. Underscored by cases of dropped, burned, and lost bombs, the problem of designing a safe but reliable bomb persists (see also The Bomb, 2009, by weapons engineer Stephen Younger). Well researched, reported, and written, this contribution to the nuclear-weapons literature demonstrates the versatility of Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation (2001). --Gilbert Taylor ***A New York Times Notable Book of 2013*** Time magazine: “A devastatingly lucid and detailed new history of nuclear weapons in the U.S. … fascinating. ” (Lev Grossman) Jonathan Franzen, The Guardian : “ Schlosser's book reads like a thriller, but it's masterfully even-handed, well researched, and well organised. Either he's a natural genius at integrating massive amounts of complex information, or he worked like a dog to write this book. You wouldn't think the prospect of nuclear apocalypse would make for a reading treat, but in Schlosser's hands it does.” Associated Press : “Gripping... A real-life adventure that’s every bit as fascinating as a Tom Clancy thriller... Schlosser is clearly on top of his game with Command and Control . His stories of nuclear near-misses inspire trepidation, and his description of Cold War political machinations provide hints about the conversations Pentagon officials must be having nowadays when they review the country’s war strategies.” Financial Times : “ Command and Control ranks among the most nightmarish books written in recent years; and in that crowded company it bids fair to stand at the summit. It is the more horrific for being so incontrovertibly right and so damnably readable. Page after relentless page, it drives the vision of a world trembling on the edge of a fatal precipice deep into your reluctant mind... a work with the multilayered density of an ambitiously conceived novel… Schlosser has done what journalism does at its best when at full stretch : he has spent time – years – researching, interviewing, understanding and reflecting to give us a piece of work of the deepest import.” Los Angeles Times : “Deeply reported, deeply frightening… a techno-thriller of the first order.” The Guardian : “The strength of Schlosser's writing derives from his ability to carry a wealth of startling detail (did you know that security at Titan II missile bases was so lapse you could break into one with just a credit card?) on a confident narrative path.” San Francisco Chronicle : "Perilous and gripping… Schlosser skillfully weaves together an engrossing account of both the science and the politics of nuclear weapons safety… The story of the missile silo accident unfolds with the pacing, thrill and techno details of an episode of 24 ." The New Yorker : “An excellent journalistic investigation of the efforts made since the first atomic bomb was exploded, outside Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, to put some kind of harness on nuclear weaponry. By a miracle of information management , Schlosser has synthesized a huge archive of material, including government reports, scientific papers, and a substantial historical and polemical literature on nukes, and transformed it into a crisp narrative covering more than fifty years of scientific and political change . And he has interwoven that narrative with a hair-raising, minute-by-minute account of an accident at a Titan II missile silo in Arkansas, in 1980, which he renders in the manner of a techno-thriller… Command and Control is how nonfiction should be written. ” (Louis Menand) New York Times Book Review : “ Disquieting but riveting… fascinating … Schlosser’s readers (and he deserves a great many) will be struck by how frequently the people he cites attribute the absence of accidental explosions and nuclear war to divine intervention or sheer luck rather than to human wisdom and skill. Whatever was responsible, we will clearly need many more of it in the years to come.” Mother Jones : “ Easily the most unsettling work of nonfiction I've ever read , Schlosser's six-year investigation of America's ‘broken arrows’ (nuclear weapons mishaps) is by and large historical—this stuff is top secret, after all—but the book is beyond relevant. It's critical reading in a nation with thousands of nukes still on hair-trigger alert... Command and Control reads like a character-driven thriller as Schlosser draws on his deep reporting, extensive interviews, and documents obtained via the Freedom of Information Act to demonstrate how human error, computer glitches, dilution of authority, poor communications, occasional incompetence, and the routine hoarding of crucial information have nearly brought about our worst nightmare on numerous occasions.” Vanity Fair : “ Eric Schlosser detonates a truth bomb in Command and Control , a powerful expose about America’s nuclear weapons.” Dallas Morning News : “Eric Schlosser’s Command and Control is a sobering and frightening yet fascinating account of the unbelievable peril posed by repeatedly mishandled American nuclear weapons….The tale is riveting from start to finish. In the first few chapters, I found myself so repeatedly astounded by Schlosser’s recounting of accidents in the early 1950s, I thought: Certainly, it can’t get any worse than this. But it kept getting worse—so much so that I started folding the corners of each page that contained what seemed like the most egregious examples of nuclear mishaps and horrors. I now have a 632-page book with roughly a quarter of the pages folded over for reference. Command and Control is truly a monumental, Pulitzer-quality work.” Bloomberg : “The book alternates between sections describing the accident with sections on the history of nuclear weapons in the U.S.xa0 Schlosser’s excellent eye for detail, which he displayed in his first book, Fast Food Nation , is also in evidence here....epic pop history." Publishers Weekly (starred): "Nail-biting... thrilling... Mixing expert commentary with hair-raising details of a variety of mishaps , [Eric Schlosser] makes the convincing case that our best control systems are no match for human error, bad luck, and ever-increasing technological complexity." Kirkus Reviews (starred): " Vivid and unsettling.. . An exhaustive, unnerving examination of the illusory safety of atomic arms." Lee H. Hamilton, former U.S. Representative; Co-Chair, Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future; Director, the Center on Congress at Indiana University: “The lesson of this powerful and disturbing book is that the world’s nuclear arsenals are not as safe as they should be.xa0 We should take no comfort in our skill and good fortune in preventing a nuclear catastrophe, but urgently extend our maximum effort to assure that a nuclear weapon does not go off by accident, mistake, or miscalculation.” Eric Schlosser is the author of The New York Times bestsellers Fast Food Nation and Reefer Madness . His work has appeared in The Atlantic Monthly , Rolling Stone , The New Yorker , Vanity Fair , and The Nation . Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. On September 18, 1980, at about six thirty in the evening, Senior Airman David F. Powell and Airman Jeffrey L. Plumb walked into the silo at Launch Complex 374-7, a few miles north of Damascus, Arkansas. They were planning to do a routine maintenance procedure on a Titan II missile. They’d spent countless hours underground at complexes like this one. But no matter how many times they entered the silo, the Titan II always looked impressive. It was the largest intercontinental ballistic missile ever built by the United States: 10 feet in diameter and 103 feet tall, roughly the height of a nine-story building. It had an aluminum skin with a matte finish and U.S. AIR FORCE painted in big letters down the side. The nose cone on top of the Titan II was deep black, and inside it sat a W-53 thermonuclear warhead, the most powerful weapon ever carried by an American missile. The warhead had a yield of 9 megatons—about three times the explosive force of all the bombs dropped during the Second World War, including both atomic bombs. Day or night, winter or spring, the silo always felt the same. It was eerily quiet, and mercury vapor lights on the walls bathed the missile in a bright white glow. When you opened the door on a lower level and stepped into the launch duct, the Titan II loomed above you like an immense black-tipped silver bullet, loaded in a concrete gun barrel, primed, cocked, ready to go, and pointed at the sky The missile was designed to launch within a minute and hit a target as far as six thousand miles away. In order to do that, the Titan II relied upon a pair of liquid propellants—a rocket fuel and an oxidizer—that were “hypergolic.” The moment they came into contact with each other, they’d instantly and forcefully ignite. The missile had two stages, and inside both of them, an oxidizer tank rested on top of a fuel tank, with pipes leading down to an engine. Stage 1, which extended about seventy feet upward from the bottom of the missile, contained about 85,000 pounds of fuel and 163,000 pounds of oxidizer. Stage 2, the upper section where the warhead sat, was smaller and held about one fourth of those amounts. If the missile were launched, fuel and oxidizer would flow through the stage 1 pipes, mix inside the combustion chambers of the engine, catch on fire, emit hot gases, and send almost half a million pounds of thrust through the supersonic convergent-divergent nozzles beneath it. Within a few minutes, the Titan II would be fifty miles off the ground. The two propellants were extremely efficient—and extremely dangerous. The fuel, Aerozine-50, could spontaneously ignite when it came into contact with everyday things like wool, rags, or rust. As a liquid, Aerozine-50 was clear and colorless. As a vapor, it reacted with the water and the oxygen in the air and became a whitish cloud with a fishy smell. This fuel vapor could be explosive in proportions as low as 2 percent. Inhaling it could cause breathing difficulties, a reduced heart rate, vomiting, convulsions, tremors, and death. The fuel was also highly carcinogenic and easily absorbed through the skin. The missile’s oxidizer, nitrogen tetroxide, was even more hazardous. Under federal law, it was classified as a “Poison A,” the most deadly category of man-made chemicals. In its liquid form, the oxidizer was a translucent, yellowy brown. Although not as flammable as the fuel, it could spontaneously ignite if it touched leather, paper, cloth, or wood. And its boiling point was only 70 degrees Fahrenheit. At temperatures any higher, the liquid oxidizer boiled into a reddish brown vapor that smelled like ammonia. Contact with water turned the vapor into a corrosive acid that could react with the moisture in a person’s eyes or skin and cause severe burns. When inhaled, the oxidizer could destroy tissue in the upper respiratory system and the lungs. The damage might not be felt immediately. Six to twelve hours after being inhaled, the stuff could suddenly cause headaches, dizziness, difficulty breathing, pneumonia, and pulmonary edema leading to death. pPowell and Plumb were missile repairmen. They belonged to Propellant Transfer System (PTS) Team A of the 308th Strategic Missile Wing, headquarters was about an hour or so away at Little Rock Air Force Base. They’d been called to the site that day because a warning light had signaled that pressure was low in the stage 2 oxidizer tank. If the pressure fell too low, the oxidizer wouldn’t flow smoothly to the engine. A “low light” could mean a serious problem—a rupture, a leak. But it was far more likely that a slight change in temperature had lowered the pressure inside the tank. Air-conditioning units in the silo were supposed to keep the missile cooled to about 60 degrees. If Powell and Plum didn’t find any leaks, they’d simply unscrew the cap on the oxidizer tank and add more nitrogen gas. The nitrogen maintained a steady pressure on the liquid inside, pushing downward. It was a simple, mundane task, like putting air in your tires before long drive. Powell had served on a PTS team for almost three years and knew the hazards of the Titan II. During his first visit to a launch complex, an oxidizer leak created a toxic cloud that shut down operations for three days. He was twenty-one years old, a proud “hillbilly” from rural Kentucky who loved the job and planned to reenlist at the end of the year. Plumb had been with the 308th for just nine months. He wasn’t qualified to do this sort of missile maintenance or to handle these propellants. Accompanying Powell and watching everything that Powell did was considered Plumb’s “OJT,” his on-the-job training. Plumb was nineteen, raised in suburban Detroit. Although an oxidizer low light wasn’t unusual, Air Force technical orders required that both men wear Category I protective gear when the silo to investigate it. “Going Category I” meant getting into a Rocket Fuel Handler’s Clothing Outfit (RFHCO)—an airtight, liquidproof, vaporproof, fire-resistant combination of gear designed to protect them from the oxidizer and the fuel. The men called it a “ref-co.” A RFHCO looked like a space suit from an early-1960s science fiction movie. It had a white detachable bubble helmet with a voice-actuated radio and a transparent Plexiglas face screen. The suit was off white, with a long zipper extending from the top of the left shoulder, across the torso, to the right knee. You stepped into the RFHCO and wore long johns underneath it. The black vinyl gloves and boots weren’t attached, so the RFHCO had roll-down cuffs at the wrists and the ankles to maintain a tight seal. The suit weighed about twenty-two pounds. The RFHCO backpack weighed an additional thirty-five and carried about an hour’s worth of air. The outfit was heavy and cumbersome. It could be hot, sticky, and uncomfortable, especially when worn outside the air-conditioned silo. But it could also save your life. The stage 2 oxidizer pressure cap was about two thirds of the way up the missile. In order to reach it, Powell and Plumb had to walk across a retractable steel platform that extended from the silo wall. The tall, hollow cylinder in which the Titan II stood was enclosed by another concrete cylinder with nine interior levels, housing equipment. Level 1 was near the top of the missile; level 9 about twenty feet beneath the missile. The steel work platforms folded down from the walls hydraulically. Each one had a stiff rubber edge to prevent the Titan II from getting scratched, while keeping the gap between the platform and the missile as narrow as possible. The airmen entered the launch duct at level 2. Far above their heads was a concrete silo door. It was supposed to protect the missile from the wind and the rain and the effects of a nuclear weapon detonating nearby. The door weighed 740 tons. Far below the men, beneath the Titan II, a concrete flame deflector shaped like a W was installed to guide the hot gases downward at launch, then upward through exhaust vents and out of the silo. The missile stood on a thrust mount, a steel ring at level 7 that weighed about 26,000 pounds. The thrust mount was attached to the walls by large springs, so that the Titan II could ride out a nuclear attack, bounce instead of break, and then take off. In addition to the W-53 warhead and a few hundred thousand pounds of propellants, many other things in the silo could detonate. devices were used after ignition to free the missile from the thrust mount, separate stage 2 from stage 1, release the nose cone. The missile also housed numerous small rocket engines with flammable solid fuel to adjust the pitch and the roll of the warhead midflight. The Titan II launch complex had been carefully designed to minimize the risk of having so many flammables and explosives within it. Fire detectors, fire suppression systems, toxic vapor detectors, and decontamination showers were scattered throughout the nine levels of the silo. These safety devices were bolstered by strict safety rules. Whenever a PTS team member put on a RFHCO, he had to be accompanied by someone else in a RFHCO, with two other people waiting as backup, ready to put on their suits. Every Category I task had to be performed according to a standardized checklist, which the team chief usually read aloud over the radio communications network. There was one way to do everything—and only one way. Technical Order 21M-LGM25C-2-12, Figure 2-18, told Powell and Plumb exactly what to do as they stood on the platform near the missile. “Step four,” the PTS team chief said over the radio. “Remove airborne disconnect pressure cap.” “Roger,” Powell replied. “Caution. When complying with step four, do not exceed one hundred sixty foot-pounds of torque. Overtorquing may result in damage to the missile skin.” “Roger.” As Powell used a socket wrench to unscrew the pressure cap, the socket fell off. It struck the platform and bounced. Powell grabbed for it but missed. Plumb watched the nine-pound socket slip through the narrow gap between the platform and the missile, fall about seventy feet, hit the thrust mount, and then ricochet off the Titan II. It seemed to happen in slow motion. A moment later, fuel sprayed from a hole in the missile like water from a garden hose. “Oh man,” Plumb thought. “This is not good.” Read more

Features & Highlights

  • **The upcoming documentary
  • Command and Control
  • , directed by Robert Kenner, finds its origins in Eric Schlosser's book and continues to explore the little-known history of the management and safety concerns of America's nuclear aresenal.**
  • The New Yorker
  • “Excellent... hair-raising
  • ... Command and Control
  • is how nonfiction should be written.” (Louis Menand)
  • Famed investigative journalist Eric Schlosser digs deep to uncover secrets about the management of America’s nuclear arsenal. A ground-breaking account of accidents, near-misses, extraordinary heroism, and technological breakthroughs,
  • Command and Control
  • explores the dilemma that has existed since the dawn of the nuclear age: how do you deploy weapons of mass destruction without being destroyed by them?  That question has never been resolved--and Schlosser reveals how the combination of human fallibility and technological complexity still poses a grave risk to mankind.   Written with the vibrancy of a first-rate thriller,
  • Command and Control
  • interweaves the minute-by-minute story of an accident at a nuclear missile silo in rural Arkansas with a historical narrative that spans more than fifty years.  It depicts the urgent effort by American scientists, policymakers, and military officers to ensure that nuclear weapons can’t be stolen, sabotaged, used without permission, or detonated inadvertently. Schlosser also looks at the Cold War from a new perspective, offering history from the ground up, telling the stories of bomber pilots, missile commanders, maintenance crews, and other ordinary servicemen who risked their lives to avert a nuclear holocaust.  At the heart of the book lies the struggle, amid the rolling hills and small farms of Damascus, Arkansas, to prevent the explosion of a ballistic missile carrying the most powerful nuclear warhead ever built by the United States.    Drawing on recently declassified documents and interviews with men who designed and routinely handled  nuclear weapons,
  • Command and Control
  • takes readers into a terrifying but fascinating world that, until now, has been largely hidden from view.  Through the details of a single accident, Schlosser illustrates how an unlikely event can become unavoidable, how small risks can have terrible consequences, and how the most brilliant minds in the nation can only provide us with an illusion of control.  Audacious, gripping, and unforgettable,
  • Command and Control
  • is a tour de force of investigative journalism, an eye-opening look at the dangers of America’s nuclear age.
  • Time
  • magazine
  • “A devastatingly lucid and detailed new history of nuclear weapons in the U.S.... fascinating.” (Lev Grossman)
  • Financial Times
  • “So incontrovertibly right and so damnably readable... a work with the multilayered density of an ambitiously conceived novel… Schlosser has done what journalism does at its best."
  • Los Angeles Times
  • “Deeply reported, deeply frightening… a techno-thriller of the first order.”

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(2.3K)
★★★★
25%
(969)
★★★
15%
(581)
★★
7%
(271)
-7%
(-271)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Riveting account of America's gamble with nuclear weapons

Think America's nuclear arsenal has always been pristinely safe? Thing again. In this riveting and meticulously researched book Eric Schlosser gives us a report card on accidents with nuclear weapons that have been periodically taking place since the weapons were introduced into a warring world in 1945. The book centers its narrative around the Damascus accident of 1980 in which an explosion in a Titan II ICBM housed in Damascus, Arkansas killed one and injured about twenty others. In Schlosser's capable hands, the event becomes a lens through which we can view the inherent frailty and risk in complex engineering endeavors masked by layers of bureaucracy. The volume is a real page turner which kept me awake late into the night. It is superbly researched and is packed with fascinating details about the workings of both nuclear weapons and the very human command and control infrastructure which oversees them. Some of the reviewers here are not too happy about the digressions, but in my opinion the digressions do a great job of recreating the history and the times leading up to the event. In addition all the facts are supported by an extensive bibliography running to more than a hundred pages.

This book is really two books in one, and both parts are equally gripping. The first part describes the Damascus accident in gory technical and human detail, starting from the time that a dropped socket blew a hole in the skin of the Titan II missile, spraying fuel around the missile and creating a dangerous buildup of fuel and oxidizer. What is scary is that the accident resulted from an honest, relatively trivial mistake that anybody could have made; in the parlance of systems engineers it was only a "normal accident". Schlosser goes into great detail describing the cast of characters, from military generals and newspaper reporters to engineers and missile maintenance personnel who were involved in monitoring the event and preventing it from getting out of hand. Many of the younger technicians were straight out of high school, and while they were patriotic, brave and dedicated, one of the points that Schlosser makes is that not all of them were trained sufficiently to appreciate the nuances of maintaining one of America's nuclear linchpins. The accident itself was emblematic of what can easily go wrong with a complex system that may work well 99% of the time but can turn potentially catastrophic even if it suffers a 1% error rate. The exact details of the incident were not disclosed to the public but the account makes it clear that the explosion could have been much worse and led to a dispersal of the nuclear material in the warhead into the countryside. In fact the theme of unnecessary and pervasive secrecy is a constant thread through the book, and it's worth thinking about how the government and private corporations have constructed a potentially calamitous system funded by taxpayer dollars whose failures are concealed and successes are exaggerated.

The Damascus accident however is only one of the two themes running through the book, and the chapters on it alternate with others. The second equally fascinating part takes us on a journey through America's nuclear weapons complex, describing the weapons that were deemed to be so necessary to maintain the peace. It is necessary to understand this history in order to put the Damascus accident into context. Many topics are covered exceedingly well; among them, the safing and arming mechanisms in bombs, the history and progress of the Strategic Air Command (SAC) as the centerpiece of America's nuclear policy, the roles of a few key individuals and laboratories (Sandia National Laboratory is especially singled out) in recognizing and addressing flaws in weapons designs, the development of novel strategic and tactical nukes and their delivery systems, the ever-changing nuclear policies orchestrated by politicians and civilian bureaucrats and - in what's a ubiquitous theme in the book - the constant bickering between the different branches of the military regarding ownership of nuclear weapons. The Air Force especially comes out looking bad, constantly angling for nuclear ownership and opposing safety measures like locks for fear of malfunction.

But the most disturbing part of the book concerns a litany of nuclear accidents going back all the way to the dawn of the atomic age. Some "accidents" simply related to human error that could have led to destruction; there are examples of important messages being entrusted to bike messengers during the Cuban Missile Crisis, rocket launches being mistaken for nuclear missile launches and lower-level officers failing to convey important notifications from rival countries to higher-ups. The stories all underscore how much can go wrong with a complex technical and human system. The Damascus event itself came on the heels of an even worse Titan II fire in 1965 that killed 53 people. The rogues' gallery of nuclear accidents involved everything from scientists dying during tests of criticality of nuclear materials to dozens of incidents involving the accidental detonation of the explosives surrounding a nuclear core, most often when the package was jettisoned from a malfunctioning bomber. Some of the scarier stories include warheads burning in crashed airplane fires for hours and being reduced to melted slag. There are also cases where people lost track of the number and locations of nuclear weapons for various time periods. In addition many bombs and missiles were woefully unsecured during the early parts of the Cold War, especially in NATO countries where they were often guarded by lone guards toting rifles. It took until the 60s when secure locks were finally installed on many of these devices. Thankfully none of these lapses let to the detonation of an actual nuclear core (and this is a record the country should be proud of), but the key message that Schlosser sends is that the gap between what was and what could have been was frighteningly thin. As officials themselves admitted, catastrophic accidents were prevented by dumb luck as much as anything else.

Schlosser ends the book with an account of America's contemporary nuclear arsenal which still includes thousands of bombs and hundreds of missiles on alert. The end of the Cold War has led in some cases to lackluster management of an aging nuclear complex. It is also increasingly hard to find the kind of well-trained technicians and engineers that were a mainstay of the nuclear weapons buildup during the Cold War. But the real question that Schlosser asks is why all this is necessary, if it's worth having so many thousands of nukes when the nature of conflict has radically changed. In researching the book Schlosser has talked to hundreds of technicians, engineers, defense officials and politicians and almost all of them think that the nuclear arsenal should be much smaller than what it is. The real take home message here is that when an exceedingly complicated technical system becomes wrapped in layers of bureaucracy, accidents are just waiting to happen, especially when there is a perfect requirement for safety entrusted to imperfect human beings. President Kennedy really captured the gist of the matter when he talked about a "nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness". In connecting these memorable words to the Damascus accident, Schlosser's book tells us why we should get rid of this sword as soon as we can.
144 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An interesting read, disorganized, full of flaws, and a flawed premise

I was in the SAC special weapons business for a lot of years.

Mr. Schlosser is an excellent writer. This book is very well researched.Unfortunately, writing about this subject matter relies on the recollections of many people who have individual axes to grind, since many of the facts of nuclear weapons incidents remain classified. As a result, many things stated as fact are not so.

The organization of the book, with the Damascus accident interwoven with a history of other incidents, makes the book difficult, but not impossible, to follow.

I am left asking myself why this book was written? A person entering this area of knowledge with no prior experience will exit partially informed, yet unaware that much that is in this book is not exactly true. The entire issue of safety of nuclear weapons cannot be understood without an understanding of nuclear weapon design. The smattering of information about weapon design in this book merely scratches the surface, since the details are classified and remain inaccessible to the public.

My biggest takeaway from this book is, despite many incidents and accidents involving US nuclear weapons, safety measures have worked and no weapon has ever detonated accidentally.

The train of logic seems to be, "If the safety devices and procedures had not worked, there would have been a nuclear yield." This is exactly like saying, "If the brakes on my car had not worked, I would have plowed into that overpass." The fact remains, the safety devices and procedures (like the brakes) do work. What is the issue?

Books like this entice the reader by posing a scare scenario that is unrealistic and not supported by facts and experience.

Two stars for being an interesting read, and filling in some of the details on the incidents described, even if incomplete and sometimes wrong. No more than two stars, because the book makes the previously-uninformed reader believe he now knows more than he actually does.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great Topic and Good Presentation

Command and Control addresses an interesting and still vitally important topic. Namely, it examines nuclear weapons control and safety. We all too often fail to remember that the prime job of the Secretary of Energy is not electric cars but management and oversight of the nuclear weapons development and distribution. This book presents a diorama of many of the events surrounding the deployment and control of such weapons.

However, as many other reviewers had noted, the style of the book can be very frustrating at times. The author uses the Damascus incident as an ongoing connector to other historical tale recounting the development of nuclear weapons control and the mistakes that have occurred over the decades. After a while this approach becomes not only distracting but an annoyance. For example the author will take the Damascus Incident, an incident when the maintenance on a liquid fuel Titan II resulted in a damaged fuel tank by a Tech who was apparently not following protocol, and then ultimately exploding, as a metaphor for each of the Chapters which are interspersed. Thus one is supposed to be drawn to see mistakes in the small and mistakes in the large. Nice idea but it just does not seem to work. In addition we are led through the lives of each of the players in the Damascus incident and at time this is less than a lucid presentation and often more confusing. One often asks why this detail is necessary. On the one hand the approach does lend context, on the other hand it may just be too much context.

Now, I will discuss the text in toto. If one can work around the style, the book tells a compelling tale. It begins at the beginning, Los Alamos, and then proceeds to detail the many developments in the evolution of nuclear weapons. There are excellent discussions of the political in-fighting and the pros and cons of military control over the weapons. LeMay plays a key role during this early period as well he should. LeMay was a pivotal player whose world view of war was massive total destruction. LeMay viewed war as a total destruction of the enemy, as he had done in Europe and in the Pacific. Lemay in a sense was the driving force for military use and deployment.

The author does an excellent job in developing the issue of who control nuclear weapons, by going over the various ways in which the weapons flowed into military hands. The design and building of the weapons was done under AEC and then DoE aegis with the support of such places as Sandia Labs in Albuquerque. Sandia was managed by AT&T under a Government contract and was a massive facility adjacent to Kirkland AFB which itself was adjacent to the airport at Albuquerque. Sandia developed various weapons and weapon security systems. Tests of the weapons were often done by DoE or its predecessor the AEC. The author integrates these efforts into the text. It would have been interesting to have developed the significant interplay between DoE and DOD as weapons systems evolved.

The author interweaves many other near miss events into the text in a chronological basis between the evolving tale of the Damascus event. Such near misses as the explosion of a B-52 over North Carolina and the loss of 2 H bombs over Span and but a few.

The author does a reasonable job in describing the safety procedures employed but it would possibly have been more enlightening to have some first-hand descriptions. Many "fail-safe" procedures had been developed but as the author states each time an improvement to a fail-safe was done it potentially impeded the effectiveness of the weapon.

There are several areas, in my opinion, which the author has missed or touched lightly upon and should have been included or expanded upon:

1. Soviet Nuclear Weapons: On almost a one to one basis the Soviets matched the US for weapons of vast killing power. The Soviets often played games of chicken with US SAC forces and this would frequently be at the risk of deployment of weapons, especially tactical weapons. In addition the use of the nuclear submarine fleet and the games played there also presented dramatic threats. It would have been useful to have had this interplay discussed somewhat. The classic Triad of aircraft, submarines and missiles would also have been useful to draw together. Understanding Soviet capability and control would have made an excellent counterpoint.

2. Tactical Weapons and Special Weapons Depots: Tactical weapons were always considered just a step above a large non-nuclear weapon, and early on not w real nuclear weapon. The author does discuss the Davy Crockett weapons but in reality there were hundreds of Special Weapons Depots, SWD, across the globe which contained these types of weapons. The SWDs were reasonably well guarded but their very number often gave one concern not just because of what they contained but often because one could not reasonably expect to get the best personnel at this many locations. They also were DOD controlled and thus were subject to the change of staff which raised the risk of failure to follow protocols. Thus the proliferation of Tactical weapons, 1KT ranges, were in reality a serious byproduct of the enthusiasm early on for nuclear solutions.

3. Other National Weapons Controls: The British, French, Chinese, Israelis, Pakistanis, Indians, and South Africans as well as North Korea and Iran all have dabbled in nuclear weapons and many have collections in their arsenals.

4. Nuclear Weapons Treaties: There were many discussions between the US, UK and Soviets from time to time. They typically dealt with testing and proliferation. I spent the latest 70s as an advisor to ACDA and the CTBT during the Carter Administration and dealt with the Soviets firsthand. I also had the opportunity to spend many trips to Sandia and other facilities. Neither side trusted the other, yet side conversations between the parties were about children and grandchildren. Thus, although both sides were prepared for ultimate destruction, both sides also had a view of the humanity of the others. The author discusses Professor Pipe's works at that time, and I knew Pipes well, and as a refugee from Poland Pipes knew firsthand the Soviets. Thus somehow there had to be a convergence of interests. MAD and Reagan's efforts, in my opinion, on pushing what "could happen" did eventually get the sides to stand down, somewhat. The author discusses this issue but it could have been more fully developed.

5. Strategists: The influence of Herman Kahn and thinks like him also has an overpowering role to play. Kahn is recognized as the promoter of the MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction strategy. Namely if both sides are rational and both sides have so much excess nuclear capabilities then no side would rationally start a first strike. Kahn started out at Rand and ended at the Manhattan Institute but it would have been useful to integrate these efforts a bit more including the many such efforts at Rand.

6. Technological Elements: The WWMCCS discussion was lightly approached and in a sense it could have been a section unto itself. The whole concept of command, control, communications and intelligence came out in this period. However these were massively complex systems with detailed methods and procedures and whose very structure could very well have overburdened any rational response capability. The author's example of the Burroughs computers is but one simple example of grand technological ideas and ideals supported by antiquated technical implementations.

Overall the book contains some relevant materials that explain a world in the past. The current environment, however, with proliferation of such weapons, dramatically changes the landscape. For example, would the US try a MAD strategy on a rouge state nuclear capable nation the effect may be de minimis. Thus how would one address such factors? Here the past may only be partly prologue to the future. Thus the book is well worth the read even if at times it can be a bit off-putting in style.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great book, but one flaw

This is a fascinating book with a lot of information about the development and safety incidents with nuclear weapons. Many of the stories are of amazingly close calls that make you see how near we got to absolute disaster. The book is well written. I love the history and pertinent details of this obscure yet important topic.

My only reservation about this book is that the author weaves all of this history around the story of a particular incident that occurred at a missile silo during the 1980's. While the incident is also noteworthy, it is extremely difficult to start and stop reading about it as each piece of the story is separated by the overall history and other stories about nuclear weapons safety. The book is introduced by this particular incident, which then gets interrupted to go into the history of nuclear weapons and other incidents. This incident is then resumed in later chapters, one piece at a time. I found this very irritating. I had to try to remember the various names and facts that were discussed several chapter earlier and it just broke the other smooth flow of the overall story.

The book is a great book. I still think it's a fantastic story. But I recommend reading the chapters about the missile silo incident sequentially, skipping the intervening chapters, and read the rest of the book separately from that story.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Worst is Yet to Come

Schlosser beautifully captures the critical dilemma of cold war nuclear policy: the nukes had to be instantly deployable in critical and confused circumstances to be an effective deterrent, but we had to guard against disastrous mistakes or misuse. This posed a daunting challenge in constructing a command and control system. In the end, we erred on the side of deployability. This led to B-52s hanging out on the runways of major American airports loaded with live hydrogen bombs, to a series of amazing accidents with live bombs, and to Titan missiles with complex liquid propellant systems that were a disaster waiting to happen. We really were irresponsible clowns during the Cold War, and I'm not convinced we're all that much better now.

Schlosser keys in on the 1980 explosion of a Titan missile with a live warhead, but he also tells the tale of many accidents as well as of the command and control system that evolved after World War II. A number of nukes were burnt or exploded conventionally without ever producing an unintended nuclear explosion. Does that mean these weapons are fool proof? Hardly. We were just lucky and these systems are so complex that an accident is inevitable.

The most chilling accident was not the Titan explosion at Damascus, Arksansas that forms the focus of the book, but another accident with a crashed B-52 in Maryland that deployed its 4 megaton hydrogen bomb -- which would have detonated except for one little switch that, fortunately, was not thrown in the cockpit. Had it been thrown, or had there been an untimely electronic pulse, the weapon would have led to fallout in Washington, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and New York. This would have been a disaster many times worse than Chernobyl.

I'm not sure that the Damascus accident was so compelling as to merit being the focus of this book. There are so many illustrative accidents, and perhaps the book would have benefited from an expanded treatment of the half dozen most compelling accidents -- and less focus on Damascus.

An excellent book -- and one that should convince us that regarding nuclear accidents, the worst is yet to come.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Interesting but needs a rewrite.

This book is really three books combined and intertwined, and I did not like this jumping back and forwards between these books which I think distracted from argument. I prefer a steady path starting at A and going to B.

The first book is about the Damascus Accident, when an industrial accident caused the fuel in a nuclear-armed missile to explode at a missile launch facility in Damascus, Arkansas. What happened was quite interesting. It would make a good movie.

The second book is a fascinating account of nuclear strategy. While reading it, I realized that much I learnt about nuclear strategy, in particular, flexible response with its counter force and counter city was probably an illusion. The command and control systems could not handle it once a serious nuclear conflict broke out. Nuclear war was going to be all out affair if it launched. I would very much like to read more about this.

The last book is terrible. It's a list of every conceivable accident that could have happened with the nuclear weapons and operations. The nuclear deterrence system was a huge investment in money and people. Much could have gone wrong and sometimes did. While reading through this list, I kept thinking to myself; we are talking if we include the former USSR, the US, China, France and others over 30,000 nuclear bombs and not one bomb was stolen, not one accidentally or deliberately set off by some crank went off despite some of the claims, this authors makes that it was so close. This speaks a lot about the quality and professionalism of the people on all sides of the conflict that looked after these nuclear weapons. They obviously did much right.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Perfect. Absolutely.

If you're interested in nuclear history and you love a good storyteller, this book will be satisfying. The personal attachment that Eric Schlosser brings to this story helps to draw you into the time and place. More so, readers will get a taste for the real mania that swept the world during the cold war. This missile could blow up a mountain. The book does a good job helping you to understand why someone might want to build hundreds of them.

If you liked his other books, this one is the best.:)
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Good reading unless you are the jittery type

Since I grew up in the very center of the nuclear/cold war era, I found this book to be fascinating. I have lived with several reactors right in my backyard and at this time live with the cleanup of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. I always knew there was far more danger to this then we were ever being told, but I just put my faith in God and kept going. It is quite chilling to read about the many close calls with the bombs we built back then, but somehow, we made it through. Good reading unless you are the jittery type. ;o)
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great book, despite the fact it really tries to tell two separate stories

For a rather long work of non-fiction I tore through this book pretty quickly, mostly because it reads like a thriller and leaves the reader turning pages as promptly as if in the thick of an engrossing novel. That's a great credit to the author, a savvy and experienced investigative journalist, and also to the true story of the Damascus Incident itself, where a Titan missile was badly damaged in what at first appeared to be a very simple and rather harmless accident (a socket from a large socket wrench fell tens of feet, bounced off the missile's thrust mount and hit the missile itself) but became a major crisis as a fuel leak developed. Schlosser adeptly tells this story and introduces us to the men who worked fearlessly to keep the missile from exploding (due to this fuel leak, not due to any issue with its nuclear warhead) and also to remove and secure the warhead itself. Weaved in between the chapters telling of the crisis with the Titan missile however, Schlosser also provides a detailed technical history of the American nuclear arsenal, our command and control systems and the theories of how our arsenal would keep the Soviets at bay and, via having deadly nuclear weapons we'd hope never to use, we could win the Cold War. Schlosser includes in this comprehensive history all the major developments from the Manhattan Project up to around 1980 when the Damascus Incident takes place and does a stellar job of getting nuclear weapons technology into layman's terms while yet retaining a lot of interesting and important information often left out of popular accounts.

Schlosser really shines when he is writing about the Air Force missile crews and their work to save the troubled Titan missile from explosion or other ruin after the accident: you really get to know these men page-by-page, their quirks and personalities and how they worked together to deal with a strange and challenging crisis. Like other great journalists doing long-form journalism concerned with historical events, such as Stephen S. Hall or Nathaniel Comfort, Schlosser is adept at making real people come to life via their histories—possibly including plenty of people he never met but got to know through interviews with those who knew them well and via primary source documents. And while you get a feeling that the author believes the massive nuclear weapons enterprise of the Cold War was a fool's errand all in all, he obviously has a great respect for the men who brought about the technological innovations that allowed it to happen and the Air Force officers and enlisted men who actually oversaw and tended to the missiles.

The structure of the book, though, in having a chapter concerning the play-by-play of the Damascus Incident as it unfolds followed by a chapter about, say, the hydrogen bomb or General Curtis LeMay's building of SAC gets a bit confusing and irksome in places but probably was all in all the best approach. The only other means for inclusion of these two related but separate stories (the problem with the Titan missile and the general history of America's nuclear arsenal) would be to divide the book in two sections and have one contain all the chapters on the Titan story while the other contained all the chapters on the general nuclear weapons history, which in fact would more or less leave us with two different books. That said, when you're reading about the problems with the Titan missile only to come to the end of that chapter and encounter one about General LeMay, it becomes irritating.

As I maintain a blog on nuclear science history (entitled "Science & History" and hosted by the nuclear industry site, Nuclear Street) and write elsewhere on nuclear/Cold War history, I knew most of the general story of the Manhattan Project and later weapons development projects covered in Command and Control and I've also read nearly everything that isn't classified on the actual command and control of nuclear weapons during the Cold War, especially Ashton Carter's majestic works. The material presented is at times basic, as expected for a lay-readership, but useful and in general comprehensive. If you don't know already what the Teller-Ulam H-bomb design was or why it came about, you'll learn that; for those who know these basics, you can skip over these passages, however, sometimes there are small gems of personal information about the scientists and engineers involved in the Manhattan Project and early AEC efforts that I've not seen elsewhere and probably came to light via intense research by the author. To that end, it's clear Schlosser has studied up, interviewed the right people, and read the right books to produce this volume—make no mistake about it. No, it's not a technical or policy publication like you'd find from the RAND Corporation, but for a popular book that tells an engaging story while furnishing quality information on the bigger picture of nuclear forces from the 1950s to the fall of the USSR, it could hardly do better than it has.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Scary is what this book is as well as gripping and engrossing

I lived thru the duck and cover age of the cold war. This book makes you realize what a razor-thin edge we were balanced on. I believe in a strong military but like others who have served or paid attention, the military capacity for SNAF or worse is damn near infinite. This book will not dissuade you of this view only give you the chills at the rank incompetence surrounding our nuc.'s. It is also a incredible distillation of the history and development of our "nuc. weapons and strategy"; be that as it may. Strangely, Curtis Lemay emerges as a near hero of this pageant.

I've recommended this book to many friends and recommend it highly to you---as an example of Murphy's law gone nuclear.
1 people found this helpful