Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck
Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck book cover

Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck

Paperback – March 7, 2017

Price
$16.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
432
Publisher
Penguin Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0143109990
Dimensions
1.1 x 5.4 x 8.3 inches
Weight
12 ounces

Description

“This well-written narrative of legal history demonstrates what happens when the powerful and elite in society fail to protect the powerless and poor… Imbeciles combines an investigative journalist’s instinct for the misuse of power, a lawyer’s analytic abilities, and a historian’s eye for detail to tell this compelling and emotional story…[The book]xa0serves as a cautionary tale about what may happen when those who have, or obtain, power use the institutions of government and the law to advance their own interests at the expense of those who are poor, disadvantaged, or of different ‘hereditary’ stock.” — Los Angeles Review of Books “[IMBECILES is] the story of an assault upon thousands of defenseless people seen through the lens of a young woman, Carrie Buck, locked away in a Virginia state asylum. In meticulously tracing her ordeal, Cohen provides a superb history of eugenics in America, from its beginnings as an offshoot of social Darwinism—human survival of the fittest—to its rise as a popular movement, advocating the state-sponsored sterilization of ‘feeble-minded, insane, epileptic, inebriate, criminalistics and other degenerate persons.’”—David Oshinksy, The New York Times Book Review (cover review) xa0 “In this detailed and riveting study, Cohen captures the obsession with eugenics in 1920s America… Cohen's outstanding narrative stands as an exposé of a nearly forgotten chapter in American history.”— Publishers Weekly (starred review)“IMBECILES indicts and convicts any number of villains, albeit with proper judicial restraint. Cohen mostly lets the facts speak for themselves…[and] skillfully frames the case within the context of the early 20th century eugenics movement…[The book’s] considerable power lies in Cohen’s closer examination of the principal actors…Buck v. Bell has never been overturned. But thanks to Adam Cohen, we shall never forget it.” — Boston Globe “Cohen…tells the shocking story of one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in U.S. history…and demonstrates to a fare-thee-well how every step along the way, our system of justice failed…The last chapter of the case of Carrie Buck, Cohen reveals, hasn't been written…IMBECILES leaves you wondering whether it can happen here — again.”— Minneapolis Star Tribune “An important new book…which details the eugenic horror that still haunts the American legal system… Cohen’s narrative of the legal case that enshrined these practices is a page-turner, and the story it tells is deeply, almost physically, infuriating… Cohen reminds us of the simple, shocking fact that while forced sterilizations are rare today, they remain legal because American courts have never overturned Buck v. Bell .”— The New Republic “ Imbeciles is lively, accessible and, inevitably, often heart-wrenching.”— Nature “Searing…In this important book, Cohen not only illuminates a shameful moment in American history when the nation’s most respected professions—medicine, academia, law, and the judiciary—failed to protect one of the most vulnerable members of society, he also tracks the landmark case’s repercussions up to the present.” —Booklist (starred review)“The story of Carrie Buck…illustrates society’s treatment of the poor, of minorities and immigrants, and other populations considered ‘undesirable.’… This thought-provoking work exposes a dark chapter of American legal history.” —Library Journal “ Imbeciles is a revelatory book. Eye-opening and riveting. In these pages, Adam Cohen brings alive an unsettling, neglected slice of American history, and does so with the verve of a master storyteller.” — Alex Kotlowitz, author of There Are No Children Here “Cohen revisits an ugly chapter in American history: the 1920s mania for eugenics…[in this] compelling narrative....He also tells a larger story of the weak science underlying the eugenics cause and the outrageous betrayal of the defenseless by some of the country's best minds…A shocking tale about science and law gone horribly wrong, an almost forgotten case that deserves to be ranked with Dred Scott, Plessy, and Korematsu as among the Supreme Court's worst decisions.”— Kirkus (starred review ) xa0“Adam Cohen knows how to recognize a story and has the gift to tell it with disarming fidelity to facts that make us cringe.xa0In that vein, Imbeciles made me question my longstanding admiration for the mind and character of Oliver Wendell Holmes and my fading hope that the Supreme Court can sometimes save us from ourselves.” — Joseph J. Ellis, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution “‘Three generations of imbeciles are enough’—these are among the most haunting words in the history of the Supreme Court. In Imbeciles , Adam Cohen unearths the secret history of the case that moved Oliver Wendell Holmes to utter that notorious sentence. The book provides a stark portrait of the resilient eugenics movement—and a welcome warning about its sinister appeal.”—Jeffrey Toobin, author of The Oath and The Nine “A powerfully written account of how the United States Supreme Court collaborated in the involuntary sterilization of thousands of poor and powerless women.xa0Cohen’s Imbeciles is that rarest of books—it is a shocking story beautifully told, and also the definitive study of one of the darkest moments in the history of American law.”—John Fabian Witt, author of Lincoln’s Code and The Accidental Republic “Imbeciles is at once disturbing, moving, and profoundly important.xa0 With the zeal of an investigative journalist and a novelist’s insight, Adam Cohen tells the story of an injustice carried out at the highest levels of government, and how it reverberated across history and remains with us today.xa0 Cohen is one of our most gifted writers, and he has turned the story of the Supreme Court and American eugenics into one of the best books I’ve read in decades.”—Amy Chua, John M. Duff, Jr. Professor of Law, Yale Law School, and author of The Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother ADAM COHEN , a former member of the New York Times editorial board and senior writer for Time magazine, is the authorof Nothing to Fear: FDR’s Inner Circle and the Hundred Days That Created Modern America and the forthcoming Supreme Inequality: The Supreme Court's Fifty Year Battle for a More Unjust America .xa0 A graduate of Harvard Law School, he was president of volume 100 of the Harvard Law Review .

Features & Highlights

  • Longlisted for the 2016 National Book Award for NonfictionOne of America’s great miscarriages of justice, the Supreme Court’s infamous 1927
  • Buck v. Bell
  • ruling made government sterilization of “undesirable” citizens the law of the land
  • In 1927, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling so disturbing, ignorant, and cruel that it stands as one of the great injustices in American history. In
  • Imbeciles
  • , bestselling author Adam Cohen exposes the court’s decision to allow the sterilization of a young woman it wrongly thought to be “feebleminded” and to champion the mass eugenic sterilization of undesirable citizens for the greater good of the country. The 8–1 ruling was signed by some of the most revered figures in American law—including Chief Justice William Howard Taft, a former U.S. president; and Louis Brandeis, a progressive icon. Oliver Wendell Holmes, considered by many the greatest Supreme Court justice in history, wrote the majority opinion, including the court’s famous declaration “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”
  • Imbeciles
  • is the shocking story of
  • Buck v. Bell
  • , a legal case that challenges our faith in American justice. A gripping courtroom drama, it pits a helpless young woman against powerful scientists, lawyers, and judges who believed that eugenic measures were necessary to save the nation from being “swamped with incompetence.”  At the center was Carrie Buck, who was born into a poor family in Charlottesville, Virginia, and taken in by a foster family, until she became pregnant out of wedlock. She was then declared “feebleminded” and shipped off to the Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded.
  • Buck v. Bell
  • unfolded against the backdrop of a nation in the thrall of eugenics, which many Americans thought would uplift the human race. Congress embraced this fervor, enacting the first laws designed to prevent immigration by Italians, Jews, and other groups charged with being genetically inferior.  Cohen shows how Buck arrived at the colony at just the wrong time, when influential scientists and politicians were looking for a “test case” to determine whether Virginia’s new eugenic sterilization law could withstand a legal challenge. A cabal of powerful men lined up against her, and no one stood up for her—not even her lawyer, who, it is now clear, was in collusion with the men who wanted her sterilized.In the end, Buck’s case was heard by the Supreme Court, the institution established by the founders to ensure that justice would prevail. The court could have seen through the false claim that Buck was a threat to the gene pool, or it could have found that forced sterilization was a violation of her rights. Instead, Holmes, a scion of several prominent Boston Brahmin families, who was raised to believe in the superiority of his own bloodlines, wrote a vicious, haunting decision upholding Buck’s sterilization and imploring the nation to sterilize many more. Holmes got his wish, and before the madness ended some sixty to seventy thousand Americans were sterilized. Cohen overturns cherished myths and demolishes lauded figures in relentless pursuit of the truth. With the intellectual force of a legal brief and the passion of a front-page exposé,
  • Imbeciles
  • is an ardent indictment of our champions of justice and our optimistic faith in progress, as well as a triumph of American legal and social history.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(131)
★★★★
25%
(109)
★★★
15%
(65)
★★
7%
(31)
23%
(100)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

ONLY the Catholic Church spoke out against eugenics. Everyone else was afraid to.

I have always been interested in the history of eugenics in America, because of how it affected my great aunt in the 1920s, who was removed from my great grandmother's care through deceit by the state, and placed into Pennhurst, though she was only a mild epileptic. This book is must reading for anyone who wonders if what the Nazis did could ever happen here. In one sense, it did, and we're the ones the Nazis got the ideas from.

THANK GOD for the Catholic Church! They were just about the ONLY organization that spoke out against forcibly sterilizing mentally disabled people.
16 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

the author misses the opportunity to become a best seller because he tells way more than anyone wants ...

the content of the book is both interesting and timely given the conservative scotus - some shocking revelations in the book... however, the author misses the opportunity to become a best seller because he tells way more than anyone wants to know about the individual lawyers who prosecuted the case... too bad because it is a story that is pertinent and we all should be aware of when analyzing actions take by the courts
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great read for those interested in Eugenics in America

Great read for those interested in Eugenics in America. I used this as my primary reference in my American Eugenics essay for my History of Science class, and it provided almost all the information I needed. The way the book is set up makes it more interesting to read as some parts are set up in a sort of narrative, following people's lives, but also has interesting facts so it isn't just a biography of four people, but illustrates their impact on the Buck v. Bell case and Eugenics as a whole. Reveals some evil things that Americans try to brush under the rug of history.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The eugenics movement was shameful and I'm happy to educating myself on the history but I think ...

The book is interesting but it seems very repetitive and dry. I've moved onto something a little "lighter" but I plan on finishing it. The eugenics movement was shameful and I'm happy to educating myself on the history but I think the book could have been edited more.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Good history of Eugenics in the US, but politically biased

When asked where the eugenics movement began, most people would probably guess Nazi Germany. That's wrong. Decades before Nazi Germany's Sterilization Act of 1933, the United States passed the first eugenics laws in the world, laws which were cited by the Germans at the Nuremberg Trials as an inspiration for the Third Reich. Those same laws were upheld at the Supreme Court in 1927 and until today have never been overturned.

In Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck, former New York Times editor Adam Cohen sheds light on this disturbing yet largely forgotten chapter in American history: the origins of the eugenics movement and sterilizations laws during the Progressive Era.

In the Progressive Era (which lasted from approximately 1880 to 1930) many American doctors and scientists were learning about the new revolutionary ideas coming from Europe, especially those of Charles Darwin. Closely related to Evolution was the pseudo-science of "Eugenics," a new discipline founded by Darwin's half-cousin, Francis Galton, who also coined the term. The eugenicists believed that humanity, through selective breeding (and in some cases, sterilization) could improve its genetic stock and eliminate inheritable diseases. With a little coercive help from the government, man could, in effect, direct his own evolution.

Emerging alongside these revolutionary new biological theories were new political ideas. These ideas were rooted in Liberalism and the principles of 1789 and sought to create a "perfect system." These "progressives" saw society as Darwin saw mankind: an organism in need of a guiding hand to direct its development towards perfection. They saw the need for an army of technocrats and professionals to use the power of the state to abolish social evils and build a perfect society based on science.

During the Progressive Era, a small but dedicated group of doctors and scientists organized to promote the pseudo-science of eugenics and popularize it among the general public. Thanks to a sustained effort, eugenicists successfully lobbied individual state legislatures to pass eugenics laws, beginning with Indiana in 1911. Some of these were struck down by the Supreme Court, while others were poorly worded or insufficient for the purposes of the eugenics movement.

The real coup came in 1927. A small group of doctors and lawyers in Virginia led by Dr. Albert Priddy used a poor white woman named Carrie Buck as a legal test to take the recently passed Virginia eugenic law, the Virginia Sterilization Act of 1924, all the way to the Supreme Court. They claimed that Buck, who was also a single mother, was "feebleminded" and therefore unfit to give birth to children who would pass on her bad genes and, they claimed, be a financial burden on the state. The law was carefully crafted to pass muster and to serve as a model for other states.

The plan worked. In Buck vs. Bell, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that Virginia had the Constitutional right to sterilize "feebleminded" citizens against their will. Writing the Court decision, Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. infamously declared that "three generations of imbeciles is enough." A few days after the decision, Carrie Buck was sterilized at the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded near Lynchburg.

In addition to the immorality of forced sterilization, the whole case around Carrie Buck was based on lies. Carrie Buck did not have "the mental capacity of a child" as the eugenicists claimed. Everyone who knew her, including her teachers for the short time she went to school, remembered her as a normal girl with a normal intelligence. Her child was conceived through rape by the nephew of the family for which she worked as a housekeeper, not through her "immorality." And the very term "feebleminded" is a pseudo-scientific word without any clear, universally recognized definition.

Adam Cohen is an excellent writer and storyteller. However, as a modern liberal sympathetic to the Progressive era, he condemns eugenics but also tries to make a distinction between the "bad progressives" and the "good ones." I think that eugenics was the natural consequence of Progressive thought. The Supreme Court at the time had several famous Progressives. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was a war hero and one of the most well-known men of his time. Chief Justice William Howard Taft had previously served as President. The court also had its first Jewish justice, Louis Brandeis. All three were staunch Progressives and all supported the eugenics law.

It's noteworthy that the lone dissenter on the Supreme Court in Buck vs. Bell was also the court's only Catholic, Pierce Butler. Cohen admits that Catholics were, in fact, among the staunchest opponents of eugenics and the main reason why the eugenics movement failed to pass eugenics laws in states with large Catholic populations such as Massachusetts. In my opinion, Cohen doesn't give them enough credit for this opposition.

To call eugenics as simply a "racist" movement is a cheap and lazy argument that fails to get the root. It was the fruit of a utopian ideology that came directly from the Progressive movement, which in turn emerged from nineteenth-century utopian, evolutionist, and socialist thought. Much of the socialist and totalitarian ideology of the twentieth century shares much in common with it. The gene-editing movement that has emerged with the invention of CRISPR-Cas9 echoes many of the same promises of eugenics. Without God and morality, such powerful tools - the likes of which were unimaginable in the 1920s - are likely to lead us to even worse crimes than what happened to Carrie Buck.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Cautionary Tale for Our Time

Few people remember the rise of the eugenics movement in the U.S. during the 1920's. Yet many progressive leaders bought into the psuedoscientific idea that "feeblemindedness" is inherited and could be eliminated from society by sterilizing men and women so afflicted. The opinion of the Supreme Court in Buck vs. Bell upholding Virginia's sterilization law ranks along with Dred Scott and Plessy vs.Ferguson among its most egregiously misguided decisions. As a result eugenic sterilization found support among many physicians, lawyers, sociologists, and politicians of the time and thousands of victims-yes they were victims-submitted to salpingectomy or vasectomy, especially the former. Adam Cohen provides us with a masterful, wide-ranging review of the circumstances that led up to this infamous decision and its consequences and in doing so provides us with a cautionary tale for our time as the prospect of gene editing for inherited defects emerges.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

interesting book. I wish there was more about Carrie ...

interesting book. I wish there was more about Carrie Buck throughout. There are points in the book where she disappears as the author talks about all of the men who were part of the court decision.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Awful Legacy of Eugenics in America

Superb book about a gross miscarriage of justice and one of the worst decisions issued by the US Supreme Court. The author well describes the characters and issues involved in the case and crafts a compelling and powerful conclusion.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The strong should not harm the weak

The author writes about Buck vs. Bell, the 1927 supreme court decision on Virginia sterilization law as a blatant violation of the fundamental purpose of the law, "the strong should not harm the weak" He presents scientific, political, historical and cultural context of the law, and influential persons and their personal history. The author points out the common theme of moralizing diseases by the people of prestigious, upper, elitist classes, and selectively ignoring of socio economic factors in public health concerns, and the opportunistic and condescending attitudes by the powerful. Surprisingly the decision has never been overturned and as of 2010, in California, over 100 female inmates were sterilized. The lives of Carrie Buck and her mother, sister, and her daughter did not count to the powerful, they were just means to their professional conviction or personal glory, however, they, the powerless, lived as kind and loving people. (this reminded me of a scene from a movie, Philomena, a great scene about her persevering character against evil done to her).
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Five Stars

Excellent research on the ethical problems associated with the Eugenics movement. I use this book in my Ethics course.
1 people found this helpful