Loving Frank: A Novel
Loving Frank: A Novel book cover

Loving Frank: A Novel

Hardcover – August 7, 2007

Price
$24.94
Format
Hardcover
Pages
384
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345494993
Dimensions
6.75 x 1.25 x 9.75 inches
Weight
1.45 pounds

Description

Amazon Significant Seven, August 2007 : It's a rare treasure to find a historically imagined novel that is at once fully versed in the facts and unafraid of weaving those truths into a story that dares to explore the unanswered questions. Frank Lloyd Wright and Mamah Cheney's love story is--as many early reviews of Loving Frank have noted--little-known and often dismissed as scandal. In Nancy Horan's skillful hands, however, what you get is two fully realized people, entirely, irrepressibly, in love. Together, Frank and Mamah are a wholly modern portrait, and while you can easily imagine them in the here and now, it's their presence in the world of early 20th century America that shades how authentic and, ultimately, tragic their story is. Mamah's bright, earnest spirit is particularly tender in the context of her time and place, which afforded her little opportunity to realize the intellectual life for which she yearned. Loving Frank is a remarkable literary achievement, tenderly acute and even-handed in even the most heartbreaking moments, and an auspicious debut from a writer to watch. --Anne Bartholomew From Publishers Weekly Horan's ambitious first novel is a fictionalization of the life of Mamah Borthwick Cheney, best known as the woman who wrecked Frank Lloyd Wright's first marriage. Despite the title, this is not a romance, but a portrayal of an independent, educated woman at odds with the restrictions of the early 20th century. Frank and Mamah, both married and with children, met when Mamah's husband, Edwin, commissioned Frank to design a house. Their affair became the stuff of headlines when they left their families to live and travel together, going first to Germany, where Mamah found rewarding work doing scholarly translations of Swedish feminist Ellen Key's books. Frank and Mamah eventually settled in Wisconsin, where they were hounded by a scandal-hungry press, with tragic repercussions. Horan puts considerable effort into recreating Frank's vibrant, overwhelming personality, but her primary interest is in Mamah, who pursued her intellectual interests and love for Frank at great personal cost. As is often the case when a life story is novelized, historical fact inconveniently intrudes: Mamah's life is cut short in the most unexpected and violent of ways, leaving the narrative to crawl toward a startlingly quiet conclusion. Nevertheless, this spirited novel brings Mamah the attention she deserves as an intellectual and feminist. (Aug.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From The New Yorker In 1904, Frank Lloyd Wright started work on a house for an Oak Park couple, Edwin and Mamah Cheney, and, before long, he and Mamah had begun a scandalous affair. In her first novel, Horan, viewing the relationship from Mamahx92s perspective, does well to avoid serving up a bodice-ripper for the smart set. If anything, she cleaves too faithfully to the sources, occasionally giving her story the feel of a dissertation masquerading as a novel. But she succeeds in conveying the emotional center of her protagonist, whom she paints as a proto-feminist, an educated woman fettered by the role of bourgeois matriarch. Horan best evokes Mamahx92s troubled personality by means of delicately rendered reflections on the power of the natural world, from which her lover drew inspiration: watching her children rapturously observe a squirrel as it pulls apart wheat buds or taking pride in the way the house that Wright built for them in Wisconsin frames the landscape. Copyright © 2007 Click here to subscribe to The New Yorker From Bookmarks Magazine Frank Lloyd Wright never once mentioned Mamah Cheney in his letters or autobiography; still, Nancy Horan managed to extrapolate the love affair from newspaper accounts and Mamah's letters to Ellen Key. If Loving Frank didn't hew so closely to the facts, it would read almost like a bodice ripper. Instead, it realistically depicts the opportunities and repercussions of individuals living outside of society's mores and captures the cultural and artistic philosophies of the time. While Horan reveals Wright's hubris and Mamah's intellectual selfishness, the critics, strangely enough, find both endearing. If their love affair carries a "whiff of the Hallmark section" ( Christian Science Monitor ) or clumsily integrates cultural icons into the narrative, these are minor complaints in this compelling story. Copyright © 2004 Phillips & Nelson Media, Inc. From Booklist In the early 1900s, married architect Frank Lloyd Wright eloped to Europe with the wife of one of his clients. The scandal rocked the suburb of Oak Park, Illinois. Years later, Mamah Cheney, the other half of the scandalous couple, was brutally murdered at Wright's Talliesen retreat. Horan blends fact and fiction to try to make the century-old scandal relevant to modern readers. Today Cheney and Wright would have little trouble obtaining divorces and would probably not be pursued by the press. However, their feelings of confusion and doubt about leaving their spouses and children would most likely remain the same. The novel has something for everyonex97a romance, a history of architecture, and a philosophical and political debate on the role of women. What is missing is any sort of note explaining which parts of the novel are based on fact and which are imagined. This is essential in a novel dealing with real people who lived so recently. Block, Marta Segal Advance praise for Loving Frank“This graceful, assured first novel tells the remarkable story of the long-lived affair between Frank Lloyd Wright, a passionate and impossible figure, and Mamah Cheney, a married woman whom Wright beguiled and led beyond the restraint of convention. It is engrossing, provocative reading.”–Scott Turow“It takes great courage to write a novel about historical people, and in particular to give voice to someone as mythic as Frank Lloyd Wright. This beautifully written novel about Mamah Cheney and Frank Lloyd Wright’s love affair is vivid and intelligent, unsentimental and compassionate.”–Jane Hamilton“I admire this novel, adore this novel, for so many reasons: The intelligence and lyricism of the prose. The attention to period detail. The epic proportions of this most fascinating love story. Mamah Cheney has been in my head and heart and soul since reading this book; I doubt she’ll ever leave.”–Elizabeth Berg“Loving Frank is one of those novels that takes over your life. It’s mesmerizing and fascinating–filled with complex characters, deep passions, tactile descriptions of astonishing architecture, and the colorful immediacy of daily life a hundred years ago–all gathered into a story that unfolds with riveting urgency.”–Lauren Belfer Nancy Horan, a former journalist and longtime resident of Oak Park, Illinois, now lives and writes on an island in Puget Sound. From The Washington Post Reviewed By Meg Wolitzer Good ideas for novels sometimes spring nearly fully formed from life. Such is the case with Nancy Horan's Loving Frank, which details Frank Lloyd Wright's passionate affair with a woman named Mamah Cheney; both of them left their family to be together, creating a Chicago scandal that eventually ended in inexplicable violence. It's easy to see why Horan, a former journalist and resident of Oak Park, Ill. -- where Wright was first hired to design a house for Cheney and her husband and which is home to the largest collection of Wright architecture -- found this an excellent subject. Not only are the characters memorable, the buildings are, too. Of course, like all writers of historical fiction, Horan is pinned to the whims and limits of history, which by nature can create a "story" that might easily take undramatic paths or turns. But Horan doesn't seem unduly constrained by the parameters of hard fact, and for long stretches her novel is engaging and exciting. Wright comes across as ardent, visionary and erratic, while Mamah (pronounced May-mah) is a complex person with modern ideas about women's roles in the world. In her diary, Mamah writes out a quote from Charlotte Perkins Gilman: "It is not sufficient to be a mother: an oyster can be a mother." While it might have been hard even for an oyster to be a mother while conducting a love affair with Frank Lloyd Wright, Mamah eventually sees no way to be with him but to abandon her children: "Mamah spoke slowly. 'Now, listen carefully. I'm going to leave tomorrow to go on a trip to Europe. You will stay here with the Browns until Papa arrives in a couple of days. I'm going on a small vacation.' "John burst into tears. 'I thought we were on one.' "Mamah's heart sank. 'One just for me,' she said, struggling to stay calm. . . . Mamah lay down on the bed and pulled their small curled bodies toward her, listening as John's weeping gave way to a soft snore." Horan takes pains to convey her protagonist's maternal guilt and ambivalence, but she also has the children haunt the story like inconvenient, pathetic ghosts. The novel belongs to the feminist genre not only in its depiction of a woman's conflicting desires for love and motherhood and a central role in society, but also through its sophisticated -- and welcome -- focus on the topic of feminism itself. As Mamah says to a friend: "All the talk revolves around getting the vote. That should go without saying. There's so much more personal freedom to gain beyond that. Yet women are part of the problem. We plan dinner parties and make flowers out of crepe paper. Too many of us make small lives for ourselves.' " Mamah wants a big life; for a while she is so captivated by the writings of Swedish writer and philosopher Ellen Key, a leader in what was then referred to as "the Woman Movement," that she becomes her translator. Mamah is as ardent about rights and freedoms as she is about her lover, to whom her thoughts always inevitably circle back: " 'Frank has an immense soul. He's so . . .' She smiled to herself. 'He's incredibly gentle. Yet very manly and gallant. Some people think he's a colossal egoist, but he's brilliant, and he hates false modesty.' " Together Mamah and Frank go off on their European jaunt, which includes appealing period details: "She would walk until her feet were screaming, then rest in cafés where artists buzzed about Modernism at the tables around her." Horan can be a very witty writer; at one point later in the book, she has Frank swatting flies with avidity, naming them before he kills them after critics who once gave him bad reviews: " 'Harriet Monroe!' Whack." But she makes a couple of historically rooted narrative choices that are perplexingly on-the-nose. In a critical scene, Wright says, " 'I'd like to call it Taliesin, if it's all right with you. Do you know Richard Hovey's play Taliesin? About the Welsh bard who was part of King Arthur's court? He was a truth-seeker and a prophet, Taliesin was. His name meant 'shining brow.' I think it's quite appropriate.'" 'Taliesin.' She tried the word in her mouth as she studied the house in the distance." Historical novels sometimes bump right up against the problem of how to render moments that foreshadow events of great significance. In choosing to dwell on the naming of Taliesin, in this instance, Horan gives the moment a nudge and a self-conscious emphasis. It would have been subtler and more effective to refer to the naming of the house in passing, and instead to focus on another, more muted moment of intimacy involving the creation of Taliesin. Loving Frank is a novel of impressive scope and ambition. Like her characters, Horan is going for something big and lasting here, and that is to be admired. In writing about tenderness between lovers or describing a physical setting, she uses prose that is is knowing and natural. At other times, she allows us a glimpse of the hand of fact guiding the hand of art, taking it places where it might not necessarily have chosen to go. Copyright 2007, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1907Chapter 1••Mamah Cheney sidled up to the Studebaker and put her hand sideways on the crank. She had started the thing a hundred times before, but she still heard Edwin’s words whenever she grabbed on to the handle. Leave your thumb out. If you don’t, the crank can fly back and take your thumb right off. She churned with a fury now, but no sputter came from beneath the car’s hood. Crunching across old snow to the driver’s side, she checked the throttle and ignition, then returned to the handle and cranked again. Still nothing. A few teasing snowflakes floated under her hat rim and onto her face. She studied the sky, then set out from her house on foot toward the library.It was a bitterly cold end-of-March day, and Chicago Avenue was a river of frozen slush. Mamah navigated her way through steaming horse droppings, the hem of her black coat lifted high. Three blocks west, at Oak Park Avenue, she leaped onto the wooden sidewalk and hurried south as the wet snow grew dense.By the time she reached the library, her toes were frozen stumps, and her coat was nearly white. She raced up the steps, then stopped at the door of the lecture hall to catch her breath. Inside, a crowd of women listened intently as the president of the Nineteenth Century Woman’s Club read her introduction.“Is there a woman among us who is not confronted—almost daily—by some choice regarding how to ornament her home?” The president looked over her spectacles at the audience. “Or, dare I say, herself?” Still panting, Mamah slipped into a seat in the last row and flung off her coat. All around her, the faint smell of camphor fumes wafted from wet furs slung across chair backs. “Our guest speaker today needs no introduction . . .”Mamah was aware, then, of a hush spreading from the back rows forward as a figure, his black cape whipping like a sail, dashed up the middle aisle. She saw him toss the cape first, then his wide-brimmed hat, onto a chair beside the lectern.“Modern ornamentation is a burlesque of the beautiful, as pitiful as it is costly.” Frank Lloyd Wright’s voice echoed through the cavernous hall. Mamah craned her neck, trying to see around and above the hats in front of her that bobbed like cakes on platters. Impulsively, she stuffed her coat beneath her bottom to get a better view.“The measure of a man’s culture is the measure of his appreciation,” he said. “We are ourselves what we appreciate and no more.”She could see that there was something different about him. His hair was shorter. Had he lost weight? She studied the narrow belted waist of his Norfolk jacket. No, he looked healthy, as always. His eyes were merry in his grave, boyish face.“We are living today encrusted with dead things,” he was saying, “forms from which the soul is gone. And we are devoted to them, trying to get joy out of them, trying to believe them still potent.”Frank stepped down from the platform and stood close to the front row. His hands were open and moving now, his voice so gentle he might have been speaking to a crowd of children. She knew the message so well. He had spoken nearly the same words to her when she first met him at his studio. Ornament is not about prettifying the outside of something, he was saying. It should possess “fitness, proportion, harmony, the result of all of which is repose.”The word “repose” floated in the air as Frank looked around at the women. He seemed to be taking measure of them, as a preacher might.“Birds and flowers on hats . . .” he continued. Mamah felt a kind of guilty pleasure when she realized that he was pressing on with the point. He was going to punish them for their bad taste before he saved them.Her eyes darted around at the plumes and bows bobbing in front of her, then rested on one ersatz bluebird clinging to a hatband. She leaned sideways, trying to see the faces of the women in front of her.She heard Frank say “imitation” and “counterfeit” before silence fell once again.A radiator rattled. Someone coughed. Then a pair of hands began clapping, and in a moment a hundred others joined in until applause thundered against the walls.Mamah choked back a laugh. Frank Lloyd Wright was converting them—almost to the woman—before her very eyes. For all she knew five minutes ago, they could just as well have booed. Now the room had the feeling of a revival tent. They were getting his religion, throwing away their crutches. Every one of them thought his disparaging remarks were aimed at someone else. She imagined the women racing home to strip their overstuffed armchairs of antimacassars and to fill vases with whatever dead weeds they could find still poking up through the snow.Mamah stood. She moved slowly as she bundled up in her coat, slid on the tight kid gloves, tucked strands of wavy dark hair under her damp felt hat. She had a clear view of Frank beaming at the audience. She lingered there in the last row, blood pulsing in her neck, all the while watching his eyes, watching to see if they would meet hers. She smiled broadly and thought she saw a glimmer of recognition, a softening around his mouth, but the next moment doubted she had seen it at all.Frank was gesturing to the front row, and the familiar red hair of Catherine Wright emerged from the audience. Catherine walked to the front and stood beside her husband, her freckled face glowing. His arm was around her back.Mamah sank down in her chair. Heat filled up the inside of her coat.On her other side, an old woman rose from her seat. “Claptrap,” she muttered, pushing past Mamah’s knees. “Just another little man in a big hat.”Minutes later, out in the hallway, a cluster of women surrounded Frank. Mamah moved slowly with the crowd as people shuffled toward the staircase.“May-mah!” he called when he spotted her. He pushed his way over to where she stood. “How are you, my friend?” He grasped her right hand, gently pulled her out of the crowd into a corner.“We’ve meant to call you,” she said. “Edwin keeps asking when we’re going to start that garage.”His eyes passed over her face. “Will you be home tomorrow? Say eleven?”“I will. Unfortunately, Ed’s not going to be there. But you and I can talk about it.”A smile broke across his face. She felt his hands squeeze down on hers. “I’ve missed our talks,” he said softly.She lowered her eyes. “So have I.”On her walk home, the snow stopped. She paused on the sidewalk to look at her house. Tiny iridescent squares in the stained-glass windows glinted back the late-afternoon sun. She remembered standing in this very spot three years ago, during an open house she and Ed had given after they’d moved in. Women had been sitting along the terrace wall, gazing out toward the street, calling to their children, their faces lit like a row of moons. It had struck Mamah then that her low-slung house looked as small as a raft beside the steamerlike Victorian next door. But what a spectacular raft, with the “Maple Leaf Rag” drifting out of its front doors, and people draped along its edges.Edwin had noticed her standing on the sidewalk and come to put his arm around her. “We got ourselves a good times house, didn’t we?” he’d said. His face was beaming that day, so full of pride and the excitement of a new beginning. For Mamah, though, the housewarming had felt like the end of something extraordinary.“Out walking in a snowstorm, were you?” Their nanny’s voice stirred Mamah, who lay on the living room sofa, her feet propped on the rolled arm. “I know, Louise, I know,” she mumbled. “Do you want a toddy for the cold you’re about to get?”“I’ll take it. Where is John?”“Next door with Ellis. I’ll get him home.”“Send him in to me when he’s back. And turn on the lights, will you, please?”Louise was heavy and slow, though she wasn’t much older than Mamah. She had been with them since John was a year old—a childless Irish nurse born to mother children. She switched on the stained-glass sconces and lumbered out.When she closed her eyes again, Mamah winced at the image of herself a few hours earlier. She had behaved like a madwoman, cranking the car until her arm ached, then racing on foot through snow and ice to get a glimpse of Frank, as if she had no choice.Once, when Edwin was teaching her how to start the car, he had told her about a fellow who leaned in too close. The man was smashed in the jaw by the crank and died later from infection.Mamah sat up abruptly and shook her head as if she had water in an ear. In the morning I’ll call Frank to cancel.Within moments, though, she was laughing at herself. Good Lord. It’s only a garage. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • I have been standing on the side of life, watching it float by. I want to swim in the river. I want to feel the current.
  • So writes Mamah Borthwick Cheney in her diary as she struggles to justify her clandestine love affair with Frank Lloyd Wright. Four years earlier, in 1903, Mamah and her husband, Edwin, had commissioned the renowned architect to design a new home for them. During the construction of the house, a powerful attraction developed between Mamah and Frank, and in time the lovers, each married with children, embarked on a course that would shock Chicago society and forever change their lives. In this ambitious debut novel, fact and fiction blend together brilliantly. While scholars have largely relegated Mamah to a footnote in the life of America’s greatest architect, author Nancy Horan gives full weight to their dramatic love story and illuminates Cheney’s profound influence on Wright. Drawing on years of research, Horan weaves little-known facts into a compelling narrative, vividly portraying the conflicts and struggles of a woman forced to choose between the roles of mother, wife, lover, and intellectual. Horan’s Mamah is a woman seeking to find her own place, her own creative calling in the world. Mamah’s is an unforgettable journey marked by choices that reshape her notions of love and responsibility, leading inexorably ultimately lead to this novel’s stunning conclusion. Elegantly written and remarkably rich in detail,
  • Loving Frank
  • is a fitting tribute to a courageous woman, a national icon, and their timeless love story.
  • Advance praise for
  • Loving Frank:
  • Loving Frank
  • is one of those novels that takes over your life. It’s mesmerizing and fascinating–filled with complex characters, deep passions, tactile descriptions of astonishing architecture, and the colorful immediacy of daily life a hundred years ago–all gathered into a story that unfolds with riveting urgency.”–Lauren Belfer, author of
  • City of Light
  • “This graceful, assured first novel tells the remarkable story of the long-lived affair between Frank Lloyd Wright, a passionate and impossible figure, and Mamah Cheney, a married woman whom Wright beguiled and led beyond the restraint of convention. It is engrossing, provocative reading.”——Scott Turow“It takes great courage to write a novel about historical people, and in particular to give voice to someone as mythic as Frank Lloyd Wright. This beautifully written novel about Mamah Cheney and Frank Lloyd Wright’s love affair is vivid and intelligent, unsentimental and compassionate.”——Jane Hamilton“I admire this novel, adore this novel, for so many reasons: The intelligence and lyricism of the prose. The attention to period detail. The epic proportions of this most fascinating love story. Mamah Cheney has been in my head and heart and soul since reading this book; I doubt she’ll ever leave.”–Elizabeth Berg

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(1.5K)
★★★★
25%
(1.3K)
★★★
15%
(757)
★★
7%
(353)
23%
(1.2K)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Fascinating look at the internal life of Wright and his lover

I have studied the work and bio of Frank Lloyd Wright for many years, even traveling to his Western headquarters, Taliesen West, and touring homes he built in four cities. I was well aware of his strengths and faults, but little has been published about the women in his wife, other than his domineering, smothering mother and his strident, domineering third (and last) wife. (I'm counting Mamah Borthwick, his lover for about a half-dozen years, as a second wife, since they would have married if his first wife had granted him a divorce; he and Borthwick lived together for several years).

Wright's towering ego is well known and well documented. By choosing to look at Wright and his work through the eyes of Mamah, his lover, in this fictionalized historical tale, Horan brings new insight into the demons and angels that inspired his vision. Wright's well-documented narcissism and inability to control himself personally is examined as well, but not as the fatal flaws offered by most biographers, but as components of an immensely complex and genius personality.

Mamah's (first) husband was first to see Wright's vision but Mamah was the one to embrace it wholly as Wright set about building them a home in Oak Park, not far from his own house. Wright was a star on the rise at that time, accepting commissions almost faster than he could manage them, but the affair he and Mamah embarked upon, which caused her to abandon her children, led to considerable scandal and major setbacks to his business.

Mamah was a recognized scholar and intellect until she was subsumed into a loveless marriage by the conventions of the time. In Wright she found the outlet for her passions and the independence she longed for, and the support and acceptance to rebuild her professional life, which became linked with that of the feminist Swedish scholar Ellen Keyes. Mamah's story, and that of the feminists of her time, is largely lost to history, and for reminding us of those seminal and important figures alone Horan deserves a deep bow.

Horan's work also exumes many litle-known facts about Wright and his times: his love for rural Wisconsin, where he grew up; his fascination with Japan and business in buying and selling Japanese antiguities; and his admiration for the classic Tuscan homes of northern Italy. As this book documents the times in which Wright was shaping his own vision with the help and guidance of Mamah, we can better understand the architecture for which he became so famous.

For those familiar with Wrights biography, the tragic end to his and mamah's affair is well known. For others, it will come as a shock. Horan is simply masterful in describing the events as they must have occurred.

I enjoyed the book tremendously, but I have one major quibble: Horan offers little documentation for her narrative for the reader who might want to learn as much as she does. As one generally familiar with the story I find it authemtic, but an appendix elaborating on the sources Horan used would add to the book's credibility.
447 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Astonishingly fresh and riveting novel

No matter your allegiance to the narcissistic genius who was Frank Lloyd Wright, it is Mamah Cheney who will mesmerize you with her intelligence, sensitivity and straightforward innocence. To dare to write such a complicated true story and to succeed so masterfully is a feat few authors can achieve. Nancy Horan is a remarkably gifted writer who brings you close to the complex love affair between Mamah and Frank and grips you with her elqouent prose. I have not enjoyed a book as much in a very long time. I recommend this book to anyone who wants to dive into an extremely satisfying novel and not emerge from its spell until you turn the last page.
188 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Ones need to fulfill intellectual and physical desires trumps matrimonial and maternal responsibilities

seems to be the mantra of Mamah Borthwick, linguist, intellectual, translator, wife, mother of two, and mistress of Frank Lloyd Wright. The author created this work of fiction by piecing together historical facts from newspaper articles, the writings of Mr. Wright (on architecture), and of Ms. Borthwick (translations of Swedish feminist Ellen Key's works) as well as the content of ten letters written by Borthwick to Key. Although there is little to complain about in the writing save a few clichés: Maymah's thoughts about Frank (p 25), "I am putty in your hands, so quickly," feelings about him (p 34), "She loved him with every cell in her body," and Frank's words to her (p 128), "You make me want to be a better man," Maymah's thoughts and actions are so self-centered and self-serving that this book reads like one long lesson on the consequences of a life selfishly-lived. In one of few moments of clarity, she wonders how she has become so accepting of her own improper behavior considering (p 32), "She had always thought herself a deeply moral person," yet agrees with a passage of Charlotte Perkins Gilman's (p 33), "It is not sufficient to be a mother; an oyster can be a mother." Her disdain for motherhood comes in spite of the fact that her children are cared for by a nanny, so much so that when her daughter becomes sick during a train trip, she thinks (p 58) "What would Louise do?" The book jacket states that she is "forced to choose between the roles of a mother, wife, lover and intellectual." She chooses the roles of lover and intellectual, and abandons her three-year-old daughter and almost seven-year-old son at a friend's house with whom they've been visiting, to be with Wright, telling the children (p 83), "I'm going on a small vacation...One just for me." The children don't see their mother again for two years. She ponders explaining her choice to her children as (p 140) "not...a cruel self-indulgence" but "an act of love for life" and believes that the kids might end up "...better off, with four happy parents." Late in the novel after a fight with Wright, she tells him (p 302), "The children are what matters now." Yeah, right. What transpires during the children's next visit to Mamah's and Frank's home, Taliesin, may never had happened had she made different choices. This story of a woman who chooses fling over family is, frankly, fluff. Better: Mountains Beyond Mountains by Tracy Kidder, There is No Me Without You by Melissa Fay Greene and Three Cups of Tea by Greg Mortenson and David Oliver Relin.
58 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I Hated This Book!

I hated this book for so many reasons; I'm not certain where to begin.

I suppose I can start with the premise. Well educated, well read mother and wife, feels she's not living up to her potential; not living authentically; feels there's more out there; wants to discover who she is. This premise has been examined countless times and I'm confident today there are many educated, well read mothers (particularly stay at home moms) and wives that have experienced those same feelings. However most of us do not fall into an affair with a lying egoist (okay, so he's considered a genius) and proceed to abandon our children under the guise of having to find out who we really are. Mamah's story would have been more captivating had she struck out on her own as opposed to taking up with another man and a married man at that. The story would have also seemed more credible, had her husband been stifling in some way. He was depicted as being nothing but encouraging.

Second, I could barely stomach Mamah's deference to FLW regarding her translation of a poem. There she is a woman with a master's degree in languages; an experienced translator and she's asking the architect, what he thinks.

Mamah's surprise at how she was depicted in the press was the point at which my expectations for this book plummeted. A woman of that time would have known exactly what she was in for. There would have been no doubt she would be painted with a "scarlet letter" and become a social pariah. Her curling up in bed with her bottle of cough syrup with just stupid.

Unfortunately once I begin a book I have to finish it. I pushed on just to get it read since it is our book club selection for this month. I wish I hadn't. Did Horan's publisher say "hey, you have to wrap this up" because the ending of this book came out of nowhere. All of a sudden (within a few pages) there's racial conflict between employee's, a dismissal and then the dismissed party goes crazy and kills several people. Is it just me, or was some character/scene development warranted there?

Finally, historical fiction is tough and I would think the first thing an author has to do is be firmly planted in the era about which they write. That wasn't the case here. The main character seemed naive about the time in which she lived and at times seemed to "think" with the mind of a 21st century woman.

Obviously I was very disappointed. I would suggest taking a pass on this one.
51 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The compelling tale of The Other Woman

It happens every day: two individuals fall in love, though each is married to another. Secrets are discovered, lives change, families are broken apart. But when one of the two is a local celebrity, the affair also makes daily headlines. What must Life be like when you are true to your heart, but the whole world seems to be conspiring against you and your partner? Why must your every move be broadcast to the American public?

This fictionalized account -- for we'll never know the complete real-life particulars -- documents the relationship of Frank Lloyd Wright and Mamah Borthwick Cheney. Mamah is a dutiful wife and mother of two, a University of Michigan graduate and a socially active and intelligent woman. When she and her husband decide to build their own house in Oak Park, Illinois, they hire local architect Frank Wright to design their prairie-style home. In the process, Mamah and Frank begin to spend time together, sharing meaningful conversations that turn into something quite different. Frank is married and has six children of his own, and his wife refuses to grant him a divorce. The two lovers travel to Europe and eventually return to settle down near Wright's first home in Spring Green, Wisconsin. While Frank focuses on architecture, Mamah writes and translates Swedish feminist philosophy into American English. They see their children from time to time. Discounting some financial difficulties, they seem to have created an idyllic existence together. For a time.

I toured the Taliesin grounds (but not the residence) in Wisconsin, in the late 1990s. I vaguely remember being told about what happened there in 1914, but only in general terms. It's such a beautiful place -- too restful to be associated with such a horrible tragedy. Now that I have read "Loving Frank," I'd like to go back. That trip will be more contemplative than my initial visit was.

This is a powerful story, told in satisfying prose. Portions of this book will stay with me forever. Thank you, Ms. Horan, for your diligence in researching the details of this story and sharing them so astutely with us. We surely look forward to your next assignment!
45 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Richly imaginative

In 1972, I attended a conference at Frank Lloyd Wright's famous house, Taliesin, and I've carried a vision of it ever since: its startlingly flat planes, the Oriental lines of its roofs, the way it snugs into the side of a Wisconsin hill. And indoors, the Zen-like simplicity of furnishings, the wide windows that open onto green landscape, and the glowing walls that seem to shimmer with their own inner light. I can understand why Mamah Borthwick Cheney fell in love with its architect and loved him with an outrageous passion until she died. I may have been a little in love with him myself when I left that remarkable house.

Loving Frank is a fictional recreation of the true story of the adulterous affair with Wright that pulled Mamah Cheney away from her young children, her husband, and their prosperous, comfortable life in Oak Park, Illinois. Wright himself was married, the father of six children, and a rising young architect. The two were drawn together in 1903 when Wright designed a house for the Cheneys.

Mamah Borthwick was a scholar and feminist when she married Edwin Cheney, and one of the things Nancy Horan does best in this tumultuous novel is to show how the egotistical, charismatic Wright reawakens her desire to be more than simply a mother and wife-to dream dreams impossible for those whose existences are constrained by convention. Horan also brings to life Mamah's terrible dilemma: how to create and sustain a life based on passion when that means giving up her two children, whom she also deeply loves. And Horan tellingly illuminates the conflicted relationship between Mamah and Ellen Key, a Swedish feminist and writer whose liberal ideas about sex, marriage, and child-care were far ahead of her time.

Loving Frank is all the more remarkable because it is Nancy Horan's first novel. The pace and intensity may lag a bit in the middle and drop off after the tragic events of 1914. And I might have wished for a more detailed documentation of sources. Still, these are minor reservations about what is overall a fine achievement, a rich, compellingly imaginative work that allows us to see into the private emotional lives of two intriguing people: the man who significantly influenced American architecture for over fifty years, and the woman who loved him. It's a book that will be remembered.

Susan Wittig Albert is the author of several historical novels, including [[ASIN:0425210391 Death on the Lizard (Robin Paige Victorian Mysteries, No. 12)]]. A longer version of this review may be read on the Story Circle Book Review website.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

History As Fiction

Willie Stark. Charles Foster Kane. Shaw and Morgan.

These enduring fictional characters from three classic works of American literature and film have given people more insight into the characters of Huey Long, William Randolph Hearst, and Leopold and Loeb than any biography or history ever could.

In choosing to fictionalize their stories of historical figures, Robert Penn Warren (All The King's Men), Orson Welles (Citizen Kane) and Alfred Hitchcock (Rope) were able to engage in extensive studies of motivation and character development without being mired down by the narrative limitations of a straightforward historical account. By choosing this technique, Warren, Welles and Hitchcock each created a masterpiece of aesthetic truth even if the historical facts were not quite as described in those works.

Not so Nancy Horan. Her overly-hyped first novel, Loving Frank, is a flat, dry recitation of the story of architect Frank Lloyd Wright's seven-year affair with Mamah Borthwick and of their house, Taliesin, in Wisconsin. Meticulously researched - I would say over-researched - the book is little more than a chronological account of the basic facts of the relationship from its beginnings in 1904 until its tragic end in 1914.

Totally absent from the book is any insight into the characters of Mamah or Frank. Horan is either unwilling or unable to let us learn about her characters other than through continuous exposition - we know that Mamah is a bored, intellectual woman, trapped in a dull marriage totally at variance with her radical ideas about love and marriage only because Horan tells us so. It is a hallmark of good writing when the author can help the reader gain such insights organically, by engaging with the writing, instead of having them spoon-fed as Horan does. Similarly, we learn about the salacious news coverage of the affair because Horan quotes the newspaper articles verbatim at great length. There is nothing at all creative about Horan's too extensive quotation of primary sources. And at 350 pages, Loving Frank's endless virtually identical descriptions of blue skies, colorful flowers and the aesthetics of architecture become tedious. After Mamah runs off with Frank in 1907, there are no major plot developments until the end, and what plot developments there are have a wearying sameness to them; nothing of significance changes and there are no character epiphanies. Even Mamah's relationship with Swedish feminist Ellen Key replicates her relationship with Frank. Key engages Mamah to translate her works for an American audience and then proves, like Wright, to be fast and loose in her interpretation of her commitments to people.

Also, for a novel about a torrid love affair there is almost no eroticism to the story. It is easy enough to understand why a woman like Mamah would be charmed into a brief affair with an eccentric genius such as Wright. But seven years with a pompous, arrogant liar, long after she has seen him for what he was? Of course such relationships exist, but fiction should at least try to explain why people behave this way.

The closest Horan comes to analyzing Mamah's motivation occurs towards the end. Appalled that Frank has once again indulged his obsession to recklessly spend money (in this case, to completely furnish Taliesin, including purchasing not one, not two, but three baby grand pianos), while stiffing his workers on their wages, Mamah leaves him and goes to Chicago. She swears she won't return until he changes. Within days, he appears on her doorstep and apologizes. She returns to him although there is no evidence he has reformed and in fact, he hasn't. Once again, her return is explained entirely by the historical narrative - she must return because the story is about to end.

DISCLAIMER: For those who are fussy about such things, I am about to tell you the ending. Ordinarily, I would not do this in a review of a work of fiction. But Horan sticks so closely to the historical record that you can learn the end of this story just by reading the Frank Lloyd Wright entry on Wikipedia. Indeed, since the ending is a matter of historical record, it would have made more sense to have told the story in flashback. Anyway, given that the ending isn't a surprise, I feel no compunction about discussing it. On the other hand, the ending illustrates both the central weakness of Horan's chosen technique and, ironically, suggests a much better architecture - this is a book about Frank Lloyd Wright, after all - for her narrative.

First, this novel utterly lacks a dramatic climax. Given Horan's approach to the material, there is no dramatic tension involving Mamah and Frank to resolve. Rather, the novel simply ends because of the homicidal intervention of a madman. A mentally unstable worker, Julian Carlton, becomes unhinged after several altercations with his fellow workers that culminate in Mamah's dismissing him while Frank is away. He murders Mamah, her two children, and five co-workers with an ax and sets fire to the residential wing of Taliesin. While historically accurate, this ending in a work that purports to be fiction is in the nature of a dues ex machina.

Also, until Mamah's death, the novel is written from her perspective. Once she is dead, the perspective shifts to Frank. While a shift in perspective is a perfectly valid writing technique, it should result in - well, a change in perspective. That is after all, the whole point. But shifting the perspective to Frank in this novel is merely a necessary device to finish the book; to flesh out the details of the crime, to describe the crafting of the coffins and the funerals, to set forth - again by the verbatim recitation of an actual letter Frank wrote to the editor of the local paper - Frank's reaction to Mamah's death, and finally, to announce Frank's intention to rebuild Taliesin. We learn nothing more about Mamah, Frank or their relationship from Frank's viewpoint than we knew from Mamah's, because in reality, Horan has not told this story from either perspective. She has told it entirely from an historical timeline.

Ironically, the murders suggest an architecture for this story that could truly have enabled the material to soar. Julian Carlton was a madman; Frank Lloyd Wright was a genius. The two are not that far apart; when you read the details of the murder, you realize Carlton was quite intelligent and carefully planned how to attack eight adults without being subdued. How much more interesting this story would have been if told from the perspective of a fictional Julian Carlton. Horan would probably object that the real Carlton worked only briefly for Wright and would not be familiar with the Mamah-Frank relationship. But that is the beauty of fiction. Had Horan chosen to fictionalize the story, there would have been nothing to stop her from making the "Carlton" character a long-time Wright employee.

Frank Lloyd Wright rebuilt Taliesin. For over thirty years until his death in 1959, he lived there with his third wife, the dancer Olgivanna. Together, they established an eclectic artistic community. I would hope that whatever author writes a novel about Wright's relationship with Olgivanna - a relationship that seems more intrinsically interesting than his relationship with Mamah - will emulate Warren, Welles and Hitchcock in writing that story as a work of fiction, and not as a slavishily literal historical novel.
23 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A minority viewpoint

I was ready for a great read when I bought this book. I hadn't even read all the rave reviews, it just seemed so intriguing that there was this huge Frank Lloyd Wright scandal I had never even heard of. But I was truly disappointed.

This novel is trite and full of purple prose. For me, Horan never brought this love affair to life, despite pages devoted to predictable exchanges between Mamah and Frank. I wish, I wish Horan would have allowed Mamah one vice -- maybe in real life this intriguing woman was arrogant or rude or even an exhibitionist who enjoyed shocking her turn of the century neighbors. Instead, Horan's Mamah is a cardboard saint set up only to feel guilty about her children when she isn't grappling with one after another of FLW's well known shortcomings. It's a very wearisome literary device but the only real information Horan had to go on since Mamah Cheney was swept under the rug by the Victorian society she rebelled against.

For the critics, I would like to remind them that repeating the events in a novel does not amount to a review and that just because a book purports to be about intellectuals, doesn't make it too "intellectual" to criticize. The question is: How did the book make you feel? Except for the final chapters, which did have tragedy and drama, this book bored me. But then, I started it the day after I finished a really wonderful book, also about love and hate. It was The Book Thief. If you are looking for a well-written novel you won't be able to put down, read that instead.
22 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A work of fiction based on a real event in Frank Lloyd Wright's life and marriage

Because this is a novel, the reader can take for granted that plenty of the details are imagined, as the author could not possibly have been privy to the conversations or situations described here, not to the extent portrayed. But I urge readers NOT to be put off by the fact that this is fiction because it is clear that the author did her research. I found this book to be very interesting, very well written and it revealed a part of Wright's life I hadn't really known about.

Mamah Borthwick Cheney was a married woman who had an affair with Wright, also married at the time. She is credited (if "credit" is the right word) with destroying his first marriage. Anyone expecting to pick up this book and sink into an epic love story should be forewarned - this is NOT the stuff of dreamy romance novels, but the hard, gritty reality of an affair during a time when women weren't expected to break the bonds of convention. It also isn't an easy read at times, as it has some slow passages, which is the main reason I gave it a 4 rating instead of a 5.

Here is the reality behind the fiction: Cheney met Wright when she and her husband commissioned the architect to design a house for them. This is not an airy or stereotypical romance but a portrayal of an independent, educated woman at odds with the restrictions of the early 20th century. Frank and Mamah, both married and with children, met when Mamah's husband, Edwin, commissioned Frank to design a house.

This is what the book focuses on, the affair between the two. But I think there is information potential readers need, information that helps to put things in deeper perspective and perhaps lend a backstory to the events.

For one thing, Wright's own father, a minister, had divorced his wife, citing alienation of affection even though SHE was the one who'd asked him to leave, according to many accounts. I think family history is important, often a key component in shaping one's life, depending on how events are interpreted, the trauma that may be endured and the legacy of pain or resilience left in its wake.

So I'm noting that Wright came from a family that was troubled, had a long history of marital tension before the divorce (his father struggled to make a living). Who knows what part this played in Frank Lloyd Wright's history of flirtations, long before he met Cheney? All of these factors - the divorce within his family, Wright's reputation as a flirt (some say a womanizer) and the fact that he already had 6 children which took up most of his wife's attention may have played pivotal roles in the affair itself. It is certainly important background info.

The author writes very well (most of the time) about the affair itself and events that were considered scandalous, even making headlines: how Wright and Cheney left their families, lived together, traveled overseas and more.

There is more I want to tell but if I do I will absolutely ruin the book for readers who don't know the whole story or haven't heard the complete tale of this affair. The book leads up to stunning event and I don't feel I should spoil the book by revealing more.

I will say that if you are the sort of reader who likes nice, neat and happy endings or romances, then you may feel let down at the end. I was fascinated by the whole saga. This is a major and epic novel, kept from being absolutely superb, in my opinion, by a few pacing issues. Even so, I'd recommend it for the strengths that shine through and for revealing a major episode in the noted architect's life. I'd definitely buy another book by this author, someone I expect to get better as she continues to write. She already has so much talent!

I'd also suggest readers do some research AFTER reading the book if they are interested in Wright's complete life story. If you do too much research beforehand, you'll find out what happens in this book and that may take away from the suspense.
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Compelling and disturbing

"Loving Frank" was riveting from start to finish, both for the insight into Frank Lloyd Wright and the complex dilemma presented of a turn-of-the-century woman longing for 21st century freedoms.

Mamah Borthwick was educated and intelligent, but fell into the trap of marrying Edwin Cheney, a good but boring man. In Wright she felt she had found her intellectual soulmate, but the mores of the time rendered her decisions disastrous. Even from a 21st century perspective, however, I was troubled about her decisions, especially to leave her children with a friend to follow Frank to Europe. Mamah's and Frank's belief that someday their children would appreciate that their parents chose the free life struck me as dangerously naive. One of the great strengths of Horan's novel is that she presents this dilemma in all its complexity, most notably through the character of Lizzie, Mamah's sister.

There was also enough about Wright's architecture in the novel to send me off to the library for photos of his early Chicago houses. They were indeed revolutionary for their time, with long and low lines, capturing space and light in ways never before contemplated. The Cheney home was one of the few smaller prarie houses, of wood and brick melting into the lush greenery that surrounds it. You'll want to see it after you finish this fascinating novel.
16 people found this helpful