Pastoralia
Pastoralia book cover

Pastoralia

Paperback – June 1, 2001

Price
$14.49
Format
Paperback
Pages
188
Publisher
Riverhead Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1573228725
Dimensions
5.13 x 0.6 x 8 inches
Weight
5.9 ounces

Description

"Artful and sophisicated... truly unusual. Imagine Lewis's Babbitt thrown into the backseat of a car going cross-country, driven by R. Crumb, Matt Groening, Lynda Barry, Harvey Pekar, or Spike Jonze." xa0— The New York Times "Saunders is a provocateur, a moralist, a zealot, a lefty, and a funny, funny writer, and the stories in Pastoralia delight. We're very luck to have them." —Esquire “Intoxicating.” — Time Out “Exuberantly weird . . . brutally funny” — The New York Times “Compulsively swallowed, sweetly addictive” — San Francisco Bay Guardian “Demands to be reread immediately” — The Wall Street Journal “Hilarious and heartrending” — The Village Voice “Breathtaking . . . a masterpiece” — San Diego Union Tribune “Riveting” — U.S. News and World Report “Screamingly funny” — Time “Saunders is a provocateur, a moralist, a zealot, a lefty, and a funny, funny writer, and the stories in Pastoralia delight. We’re very lucky to have them.” — Esquire “Breathtaking, brutally hilarious satire, a savage skewering not only of the American workplace, but of the American character itself. . . . Pastoralia is a masterpiece of unsettling comedy.” — San Diego Union Tribune “Artful and sophisticated. . . .truly unusual. Imagine Lewis’s Babbitt thrown into the back seat of a car going cross-country, driven by R. Crumb, Matt Groening, Lynda Barry, Harvey Pekar or Spike Jonze. That’d be a story Saunders could tell.”— The New York Times “The short-story collection of the year . . . Pastoralia does everything a gathering of tales is supposed to do: It touches the reader but also provokes reflection, mirth, and pain.” — Kansas City Star “Dazzling . . . Saunders’s misfits confront their degradations with heroic optimism; rarely have the comic nuances of suffering been tracked with such precision. These stories, injected with Saunders’s highly original blend of irony and tenderness, ride you down spirals of the absurd and fling you back to your own life, startled.” — Men’s Journal “A master of distilling the disorders of our time into fiction.” — Salon “Fiercely funny . . . [Saunders is] a master of the self-flagellating interior monologue.” — The Boston Globe George Saunders is the Man Booker Prize-winning author of Lincoln in the Bardo; Tenth of December ; In Persuasion Nation ; The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil ; Pastoralia ; CivilWarLand in Bad Decline ; The Braindead Megaphone ; and a children's book, The Very Persistent Gappers of Frip . His work appears regularly in the New Yorker , Harper's and GQ . In 2006, he was awarded a MacArthur Foundation "genius grant." In 2000, The New Yorker named him one of the "Best Writers Under 40."xa0 He is a 2013 National Book Award Finalist for Fiction. He teaches at Syracuse University. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. 1. I have to admit I’m not feeling my best. Not that I’m doing so bad. Not that I really have anything to complain about. Not that I would actually verbally complain if I did have something to complain about. No. Because I’m Thinking Positive/Saying Positive. I’m sitting back on my haunches, waiting for people to poke in their heads. Although it’s been thirteen days since anyone poked in their head and Janet’s speaking English to me more and more, which is partly why I feel so, you know, crummy. “Jeez,” she says first thing this morning. “I’m so tired of roast goat I could scream.” What am I supposed to say to that? It puts me in a bad spot. She thinks I’m a goody-goody and that her speaking English makes me uncomfortable. And she’s right. It does. Because we’ve got it good. Every morning, a new goat, just killed, sits in our Big Slot. In our Little Slot, a book of matches. That’s better than some. Some are required to catch wild hares in snares. Some are required to wear pioneer garb while cutting the heads off chickens. But not us. I just have to haul the dead goat out of the Big Slot and skin it with a sharp flint. Janet just has to make the fire. So things are pretty good. Not as good as in the old days, but then again, not so bad. In the old days, when heads were constantly poking in, we liked what we did. Really hammed it up. Had little grunting fights. Whenever I was about to toss a handful of dirt in her face I’d pound a rock against a rock in rage. That way she knew to close her eyes. Sometimes she did this kind of crude weaving. It was like: Roots of Weaving. Some-times we’d go down to Russian Peasant Farm for a barbecue, I remember there was Murray and Leon, Leon was dating Eileen, Eileen was the one with all the cats, but now, with the big decline in heads poking in, the Russian Peasants are all elsewhere, some to Administration but most not, Eileen’s cats have gone wild, and honest to God sometimes I worry I’ll go to the Big Slot and find it goatless. 2. This morning I go to the Big Slot and find it goatless. Instead of a goat there’s a note: Hold on, hold on , it says. The goat’s coming, for crissake. Don’t get all snooty . The problem is, what am I supposed to do during the time when I’m supposed to be skinning the goat with the flint? I decide to pretend to be desperately ill. I rock in a corner and moan. This gets old. Skinning the goat with the flint takes the better part of an hour. No way am I rocking and moaning for an hour. Janet comes in from her Separate Area and her eyebrows go up. “No freaking goat?” she says. I make some guttural sounds and some motions meaning: Big rain come down, and boom, make goats run, goats now away, away in high hills, and as my fear was great, I did not follow. Janet scratches under her armpit and makes a sound like a monkey, then lights a cigarette. “What a bunch of shit,” she says. “Why you insist, I’ll never know. Who’s here? Do you see anyone here but us?” I gesture to her to put out the cigarette and make the fire. She gestures to me to kiss her butt. “Why am I making a fire?” she says. “A fire in advance of a goat. Is this like a wishful fire? Like a hopeful fire? No, sorry, I’ve had it. What would I do in the real world if there was thunder and so on and our goats actually ran away? Maybe I’d mourn, like cut myself with that flint, or maybe I’d kick your ass for being so stupid as to leave the goats out in the rain. What, they didn’t put it in the Big Slot?” I scowl at her and shake my head. “Well, did you at least check the Little Slot?” she says. “Maybe it was a small goat and they really crammed it in. Maybe for once they gave us a nice quail or something.” I give her a look, then walk off in a rolling gait to check the Little Slot. Nothing. “Well, freak this,” she says. “I’m going to walk right out of here and see what the hell is up.” But she won’t. She knows it and I know it. She sits on her log and smokes and together we wait to hear a clunk in the Big Slot. About lunch we hit the Reserve Crackers. About dinner we again hit the Reserve Crackers. No heads poke in and there’s no clunk in either the Big or Little Slot. Then the quality of light changes and she stands at the door of her Separate Area. “No goat tomorrow, I’m out of here and down the hill,” she says. “I swear to God. You watch.” I go into my Separate Area and put on my footies. I have some cocoa and take out a Daily Partner Performance Evaluation Form. Do I note any attitudinal difficulties? I do not. How do I rate my Partner overall? Very good. Are there any Situations which require Mediation? There are not. I fax it in. 3. Next morning, no goat. Also no note. Janet sits on her log and smokes and together we wait to hear a clunk in the Big Slot. No heads poke in and there’s no clunk in either the Big or Little Slot. About lunch we hit the Reserve Crackers. About dinner we again hit the Reserve Crackers. Then the quality of light changes and she stands at the door of her Separate Area. “Crackers, crackers, crackers!” she says pitifully. “Jesus, I wish you’d talk to me. I don’t see why you won’t. I’m about to go bonkers. We could at least talk. At least have some fun. Maybe play some Scrabble.” Scrabble. I wave good night and give her a grunt. “Bastard,” she says, and hits me with the flint. She’s a good thrower and I almost say ow. Instead I make a horselike sound of fury and consider pinning her to the floor in an effort to make her submit to my superior power etc. etc. Then I go into my Separate Area. I put on my footies and tidy up. I have some cocoa. I take out a Daily Partner Performance Evaluation Form. Do I note any attitudinal difficulties? I do not. How do I rate my Partner overall? Very good. Are there any Situations which require Mediation? There are not. I fax it in. 4. In the morning in the Big Slot there’s a nice fat goat. Also a note: Ha ha! it says. Sorry about the no goat and all. A little mix-up. In the future, when you look in here for a goat, what you will find on every occasion is a goat, and not a note. Or maybe both. Ha ha! Happy eating! Everything’s fine! I skin the goat briskly with the flint. Janet comes in, smiles when she sees the goat, and makes, very quickly, a nice little fire, and does not say one English word all morning and even traces a few of our pictographs with a wettened finger, as if awestruck at their splendid beauty and so on. Around noon she comes over and looks at the cut on my arm, from where she threw the flint. “You gonna live?” she says. “Sorry, man, really sorry, I just like lost it.” I give her a look. She cans the English, then starts wailing in grief and sort of hunkers down in apology. The goat tastes super after two days of crackers. I have a nap by the fire and for once she doesn’t walk around singing pop hits in English, only mumbles unintelligibly and pretends to be catching and eating small bugs. Her way of saying sorry. No one pokes their head in. 5. Once, back in the days when people still poked their heads in, this guy poked his head in. “Whoa,” he said. “These are some very cramped living quarters. This really makes you appreciate the way we live now. Do you have call-waiting? Do you know how to make a nice mushroom cream sauce? Ha ha! I pity you guys. And also, and yet, I thank you guys, who were my precursors, right? Is that the spirit? Is that your point? You weren’t ignorant on purpose? You were doing the best you could? Just like I am? Probably someday some guy representing me will be in there, and some punk who I’m precursor of will be hooting at me, asking why my shoes were made out of dead cows and so forth? Because in that future time, wearing dead skin on your feet, no, they won’t do that. That will seem to them like barbarity, just like you dragging that broad around by her hair seems to us like barbarity, although to me, not that much, after living with my wife fifteen years. Ha ha! Have a good one!” I never drag Janet around by the hair. Too cliché. Just then his wife poked in her head. “Stinks in there,” she said, and yanked her head out. “That’s the roasting goat,” her husband said. “Everything wasn’t all prettied up. When you ate meat, it was like you were eating actual meat, the flesh of a dead animal, an animal that maybe had been licking your hand just a few hours before.” “I would never do that,” said the wife. “You do it now, bozo!” said the man. “You just pay someone to do the dirty work. The slaughtering? The skinning?” “I do not either,” said the wife. We couldn’t see them, only hear them through the place where the heads poke in. “Ever heard of a slaughterhouse?” the husband said. “Ha ha! Gotcha! What do you think goes on in there? Some guy you never met kills and flays a cow with what you might term big old cow eyes, so you can have your shoes and I can have my steak and my shoes!” “That’s different,” she said. “Those animals were raised for slaughter. That’s what they were made for. Plus I cook them in an oven, I don’t squat there in my underwear with smelly smoke blowing all over me.” “Thank heaven for small favors,” he said. “Joking! I’m joking. You squatting in your underwear is not such a bad mental picture, believe me.” “Plus where do they poop,” she said. “Ask them,” said the husband. “Ask them where they poop, if you so choose. You paid your dime. That is certainly your prerogative.” “I don’t believe I will,” said the wife. “Well, I’m not shy,” he said. Then there was no sound from the head-hole for quite some time. Possibly they were quietly discussing it. “Okay, so where do you poop?” asked the husband, poking his head in. “We have disposable bags that mount on a sort of rack,” said Janet. “The septic doesn’t come up this far.” “Ah,” he said. “They poop in bags that mount on racks.” “Wonderful,” said his wife. “I’m the richer for that information.” “But hold on,” the husband said. “In the old times, like when the cave was real and all, where then did they go? I take it there were no disposal bags in those times, if I’m right.” “In those times they just went out in the woods,” said Janet. “Ah,” he said. “That makes sense.” You see what I mean about Janet? When addressed directly we’re supposed to cower shrieking in the corner but instead she answers twice in English? I gave her a look. “Oh, he’s okay,” she whispered. “He’s no narc. I can tell.” In a minute in came a paper airplane: our Client Vignette Evaluation. Under Overall Impression he’d written: A-okay! Very nice. Under Learning Value he’d written: We learned where they pooped. Both old days and now . I added it to our pile, then went into my Separate Area and put on my footies. I filled out my Daily Partner Performance Evaluation Form. Did I note any attitudinal difficulties? I did not. How did I rate my Partner overall? Very good. Were there any Situations which required Mediation? There were not. I faxed it in. — Reprinted from Pastoralia by George Saunders by permission of Riverhead, a member of Penguin Putnam Inc. Copyright © 2001, George Saunders. All rights reserved. This excerpt, or any parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without permission. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A stunning collection including the story "Sea Oak," from the #1
  • New York Times
  • bestselling author of the Man Booker Prize-winning novel
  • Lincoln in the Bardo
  • and the story collection
  • Tenth of December
  • , a 2013 National Book Award Finalist for Fiction.
  • Hailed by Thomas Pynchon as "graceful, dark, authentic, and funny," George Saunders gives us, in his inventive and beloved voice, this bestselling collection of stories set against a warped, hilarious, and terrifyingly recognizable American landscape.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(305)
★★★★
25%
(254)
★★★
15%
(152)
★★
7%
(71)
23%
(233)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Looking for happiness in all the usual, wrong places

The first story in this book, the title story, grabbed me immediately. I laughed aloud, delighted at the inventiveness of Saunders' depiction of the corporate culture, as seen through the eyes of a poor working stiff in the pre-historic-land exhibit of a theme park. And really, be it a cubicle or a cave, corporate jargon or grunts and gestures, the author reinforces a universal truth: we are a flawed species, and when pressed, we default to some very strange, very typical behavior. His characters are both bizarre and entirely recognizable: so many hapless, imperfect souls stuck in an even more imperfect world, trying to find happiness in spite of themselves--even, in one case, in spite of being dead. As Pogo was known to say, "We have met the enemy, and he is us." Saunders' sense of humor elevates our mundane dance with discontent to a charming, hilarious, sad, familiar but refreshing jig.
Susan O'Neill
Author: Don't Mean Nothing: Short Stories of Viet Nam
(Ballantine Books, 2001)
36 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Quirky, often funny, well written... and oddly unengaging...

I really wanted to like this book. A close friend who shares a lot of my taste in writing (Borges, TC Boyle, ZZ Packer, Lester Bangs, etc.) recommended it as great contemporary short fiction, and since I trust his taste I'll chalk it up to a difference in opinion, but I just couldn't get into "Pastoralia."
I read the book back-to-front, mainly because the last short story, "The Falls," was also the shortest, and I thought a quick read would give me a sense of what Saunders is all about. As it turns out, this was one of my favorite stories in this collection. Saunders effortlessly moves between two very distinct worldviews and creates in Morse a convincing narrator who's paralyzed by his own indecisiveness and self-doubt. The ending left me a little flat, but as a raw writing exercise it was really excellent and left me optimistic about the rest of the book.
On the whole, though, I was really let down. My two biggest criticisms are: 1) Saunders uses the same rambling, stream-of-consciousness style throughout every story. He has a distinct voice and at first I enjoyed getting inside his (neurotic, typically pathetic) character's heads, but after awhile I found the long, run-on sentences and terse writing style (there's almost a complete abscence of anything but the most basic description) to be very tedius. His narrators are all so similar in their overanalysis and cynical worldview that after awhile I couldn't truly distinguish one character for another. I've got to agree with whoever said that Saunders is better at creating caricatures than characters. 2) Saunders stories really lack any emotional heft to them. I've read that his stories are very dark and bleak (agreed) but also that there's a real pathos to his writing, and I fail to see it. His characters are ALL paralyzed by the same trite meaningless of the modern world, and reading about their various neurosis and quirks without any greater understanding of what makes them tick or any attempt to transcend their pathetic existance was about as engaging to me as reading the nutritional information of a McDonald's happy meal. I don't know people like this, I'm glad that I don't, and after 2 or 3 rounds of essentially the same character I found that I cared less and less what happened to them.
I give it two stars because from a completely stylistic point of view, there's some redeeming merit here. Saunders obviously writes well and his best stories, like "The Falls," are a blueprint for subtly moving between points of view. "Winky" was another highlight for me for the same reason. But without any real core theme other than "modern life is trite, meaningless and stupid" (not much of an original thought) this just reads to me like very well-written hyper-realism by somebody who doesn't have much to say.
I've seen Saunders compared to TC Boyle, but for my money Boyle is the much better writer; he creates characters who are flawed and trapped in their own mileau, but characters who are also believable and close enough to reality that their challenges ring true and made me care about the outcome. Saunders reminds me an awful lot more of Frederick Barthelme, another skilled writer who manages to document modern life without ever really making the reader care about it.
24 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Post-Modern Kafka?

I bought this book with some trepidation after reading Civilwarland in Bad Decline--not because I disliked that book (indeed, I gave it 5 stars and enjoyed it thoroughly), but because I was reluctant to reenter the bizarre, grotesque world Saunders creates. I found it a difficult place to be, however rewarding. There is a bit more optimism in Pastoralia than in Civilwarland--characters, however damaged they may be, do not inevitably make cringe-worthy wrong choices (although plenty get made along the way). The last three stories are truly amazing, and "The End of FIRPO in the World" is truly right-on: strange, honest, touching. This guy's good.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The anti-heroic in the age and place of the hero...

The stories in "Pastoralia" center on eccentricly flawed characters teetering on the brink of making a decision. Much of Saunders' writing consists of the internal monologues of its protagonists. Their humanity, both weaknesses and strengths of character, is directly revealed as they struggle to determine their course of action. Some of the decisions they must contend with are ones that many in society make unconsciously or with very little honest reflection. Should I date this woman whose head is out of all proportion to the rest of her body? Should I rat out my attitudinally challenged co-worker who I have worked beside for years? Should I kick my sister out of the house?
Saunders delivers the goods in a self-effacing and homely manner. His prose is not flowery and often exposes the ugly motives behind actions that may seem noble from the vantage point of a dispassioned observer. He builds the tension through the thoughts of the characters, and his pacing is more concerned with the flowering of fleeting thoughts rather than the juggernaut of actions and events. If you have an affinity for the underdog, a passion for the barely observed, and a patience for moral ambiguity- you just may enjoy this book. I did.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not your standard pastorals

I strongly recommend George Saunders's fiction to anyone that enjoys cynicism dished up with a dollop of hope. The six stories contained in this book are for those who like their stories dark and comical. Here you will find folks living in a theme-park cave for money, a dead aunt returning from the grave to get what she feels she deserved in life, hyper-critical barbers, and hateful children.
Despite all of the depressing characters that one visits while reading this book, the stories resonate because of their humanity and occasional acts of selflessness. Saunders's characters are at their best when they drop their egoism, realize their unhappiness, and address it via minute or drastic means. The gratifying part about all of this is that you become the character telling each of the stories - thinking their thoughts and seeing the world through their first-person narratives. This recurring theme gives the stories a voyeuristic quality that is highly engaging. Read this book in as few sittings as possible - you will not be sorry.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Hit and Miss

Pastoralia has received some pretty wild praise--comparisons to Flannery O'Connor, Kurt Vonnegut, and Nathanial West--and so I was excited to try it. I'll admit, though, that it was sort of his and miss for me. Like a lot of literature today, especially short stories, it tries to use the grotesque and the surreal to reflect back on our culture, to exaggerate and reveal our more destructive traits and deficiencies.

A couple of these stories do this successfully. The first, "Pastoralia," is about a man working as a Neanderthal in an amusement park that showcases human life from previous times whose humanity is being stripped away by the corporation. It's a sad (they all are), sometimes funny story that lands a couple of blows on its target. "Winky," too, about a man who's inspired by a self-help seminar to kick his crazy sister out of the house is desperate, but also poignant.

For the most part, though, the stories just felt to me lifeless and weird, without offering illumination. Perhaps it's that I read too many contemporary short stories. It seems as though my response to about 80% of today's short stories is, "That was weird." And so what Saunders produced here, despite his ample skill, just failed to seem fresh. To add to that, Pastoralia is largely a one-note book, covering the same emotional ground in each story. It's well-written, but I fear that it's unlikely to be memorable. The best feeling I can muster for it is appreciation.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Bizarre Genius

A very funny, bizarre, and sarcastic/sardonic look at the world, George Saunders' collection of short stories, PASTORALIA, had me laughing out loud and annoying others by my insistence on reading them passages. The title story is as odd and hilarious as anything I've read and as I read I kept wondering, "Who thinks of stuff like this?"
The stories generally are about small people caught in untenable circumstances. Their endings are not uplifting.
Saunders' use of the language, his ultimate pessimism, his keen sense of absurdity, and his humor remind me in varying degrees of Bruce Jay Friedman and of CATCH 22. I actually think Saunders is kind of a creative genius, based on this book, which is the first of his I've read.
It will not be the last.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Rolling on the floor laughing my...

This man is genuinely funny and breaks your heart at the same time. Impeccably crafted prose. Puts all the MFA my-childhood-was-unhappy-and-now-my-thesis-advisor-doesn't-understand-me whiners to shame. Buy, read, laugh, enjoy.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Great stories, but I'd already read them all

If you want to know where short story writing is at the moment, then you have to read this collection by one of the genres stars. The stories read like a perfect combination of TC Boyle and David Foster Wallace, though, underneath, there seems to be more humanity in Saunders writing than in either of the arguably more famous writers' works.
A MAJOR WARNING, though: All of the stories in this collection appeared in The New Yorker. I bought the book thinking I'd find at least four new stories, but I found only small changes-- and I'm not sure they made the stories better. This really bugged me, and, as enjoyable as the collection was, I wondered if the stories didn't read better in the pages of The New Yorker, seperated from each other by a few issues ....
The stories are excellent, but the collection brings nothing new to the table, and brings nothing more from the stories.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Popcorn for Paranoics

A confession: I have been racing through several of Saunders' short story collections and am not sure which came from where. But this collection has "The Barber's Unhappiness," a comic masterpiece that had me laughing out loud more than once, so I vote for this one. As a woman-obsessed bachelor with a Walter Mitty imagination, the barber is one of the most pathetic protagonists I've ever encountered, and proof that Saunders can create great comic riffs with panache, succeeding at one of the most difficult forms of writing.
Most often the weaver of dark tableaux of loony amusement parks and bizarre concentration camps, recounted from the point of view of the inhabitants, Saunders creates metaphors for our social straight jackets equal to anything Beckett ever invented. Influenced by Hemingway when a fledgling writer, he may have thus acquired a brilliant ability to put the reader "in media res" and flesh out one or another bizarre worlds with breathtaking economy. His touch is always light and usually comic, though often paranoia-invoking, since corporate and classist regimes are hardly far removed from our own. He is a writer for our times, or at least if feels so to me. The personal fit—reflective of impending global tragedy, not to mention our American dystopia, of our collective angst confronting a seriously broken society, taken together with my own need to mock the situation, to laugh derisively at our sorry predicament—is amazing. So timely is Saunders for me that it's difficult to say whether he's great literature of just extremely good at what he does. But it's not for me to say anyway, is it?
For those looking for more depth of feeling, "Lincoln in the Bardo" may be the answer. That is Saunders' novel and, tied to history, is furthest from satire. But I prefer Saunders the descendant of Swift and Kafka and Beckett and, as they say, Vonnegut and Pynchon, whose American efforts never impressed me as much as this writer's.
5 people found this helpful