Revolutionary Road (Movie Tie-in Edition) (Vintage Contemporaries)
Revolutionary Road (Movie Tie-in Edition) (Vintage Contemporaries) book cover

Revolutionary Road (Movie Tie-in Edition) (Vintage Contemporaries)

Paperback – November 25, 2008

Price
$5.51
Format
Paperback
Pages
355
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0307454621
Dimensions
5.5 x 1 x 8.5 inches
Weight
9.6 ounces

Description

“Primary and forceful. . . . Revolutionary Road looks straight at us . . . and invites us to pay attention, have a care, take heed, and live life as if it mattered what we do.” —Richard Ford “A powerful treatment of a characteristically American theme…. A moving and absorbing story.”— The Atlantic Monthly “The great Gatsby of my time.”—Kurt Vonnegut“Yates allows his characters to reveal themselves-- which they do with an intensity that excites the reader's compassion [and] interest.”— The New York Times Richard Yates was born in 1926. The author of several acclaimed works of fiction, including Revolutionary Road , Eleven Kinds of Loneliness , Disturbing the Peace , and The Easter Parade , he was lauded during his lifetime a s the foremost novelist of the post-war "age of anxiety". He died in 1992. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. ONEThe final dying sounds of their dress rehearsal left the Laurel Players with nothing to do but stand there, silent and helpless, blinking out over the footlights of an empty auditorium. They hardly dared to breathe as the short, solemn figure of their director emerged from the naked seats to join them on stage, as he pulled a stepladder raspingly from the wings and climbed halfway up its rungs to turn and tell them, with several clearings of his throat, that they were a damned talented group of people and a wonderful group of people to work with."It hasn't been an easy job," he said, his glasses glinting soberly around the stage. "We've had a lot of problems here, and quite frankly I'd more or less resigned myself not to expect too much. Well, listen. Maybe this sounds corny, but something happened up here tonight. Sitting out there tonight I suddenly knew, deep down, that you were all putting your hearts into your work for the first time." He let the fingers of one hand splay out across the pocket of his shirt to show what a simple, physical thing the heart was; then he made the same hand into a fist, which he shook slowly and wordlessly in a long dramatic pause, closing one eye and allowing his moist lower lip to curl out in a grimace of triumph and pride. "Do that again tomorrow night," he said, "and we'll have one hell of a show."They could have wept with relief. Instead, trembling, they cheered and laughed and shook hands and kissed one another, and somebody went out for a case of beer and they all sang songs around the auditorium piano until the time came to agree, unanimously, that they'd better knock it off and get a good night's sleep."See you tomorrow!" they called, as happy as children, and riding home under the moon they found they could roll down the windows of their cars and let the air in, with its health-giving smells of loam and young flowers. It was the first time many of the Laurel Players had allowed themselves to acknowledge the coming of spring.The year was 1955 and the place was a part of western Connecticut where three swollen villages had lately been merged by a wide and clamorous highway called Route Twelve. The Laurel Players were an amateur company, but a costly and very serious one, carefully recruited from among the younger adults of all three towns, and this was to be their maiden production. All winter, gathering in one anther's living rooms for excited talks about Ibsen and Shaw and O'Neill, and then for the show of hands in which a common-sense majority chose The Petrified Forest, and then for preliminary casting, they had felt their dedication growing stronger every week. They might privately consider their director a funny little man (and he was, in a way: he seemed incapable of any but a very earnest manner of speaking, and would often conclude his remarks with a little shake of the head that caused his cheeks to wobble) but they liked and respected him, and they fully believed in most of the things he said. "Any play deserves the best that any actor has to give," he'd told them once, and another time: "Remember this. We're not just putting on a play here. We're establishing a community theater, and that's a pretty important thing to be doing."The trouble was that from the very beginning they had been afraid they would end by making fools of themselves, and they had compounded that fear by being afraid to admit it. At first their rehearsals had been held on Saturdays--always, it seemed, on the kind of windless February or March afternoon when the sky is white, the trees are black, and the brown fields and hummocks of the earth lie naked and tender between curds of shriveled snow. The Players, coming out of their various kitchen doors and hesitating for a minute to button their coats or pull on their gloves, would see a landscape in which only a few very old, weathered houses seemed to belong; it made their own homes look as weightless and impermanent, as foolishly misplaced as a great many bright new toys that had been left outdoors overnight and rained on. Their automobiles didn't look right either--unnecessarily wide and gleaming in the colors of candy and ice cream, seeming to wince at each splatter of mud, they crawled apologetically down the broken roads that led from all directions to the deep, level slab of Route Twelve. Once there the cars seemed able to relax in an environment all their own, a long bright valley of colored plastic and plate glass and stainless steel--KING KONE, MOBILGAS, SHOPORAMA, EAT--but eventually they had to turn off, one by one, and make their way up the winding country road that led to the central high school; they had to pull up and stop in the quiet parking lot outside the high-school auditorium."Hi!" the Players would shyly call to one another."Hi! . . ." "Hi! . . ." And they'd go reluctantly inside.Clumping their heavy galoshes around the stage, blotting at their noses with Kleenex and frowning at the unsteady print of their scripts, they would disarm each other at last with peals of forgiving laughter, and they would agree, over and over, that there was plenty of time to smooth the thing out. But there wasn't plenty of time, and they all knew it, and a doubling and redoubling of their rehearshal schedule seemed only to make matters worse. Long after the time had come for what the director called "really getting this thing off the ground; really making it happen," it remained a static, shapeless, inhumanly heavy weight; time and again they read the promise of failure in each other's eyes, in the apologetic nods and smiles of their parting and the spastic haste with which they broke for their cars and drove home to whatever older, less explicit promises of failure might lie in wait for them there.And now tonight, with twenty-four hours to go, they had somehow managed to bring it off. Giddy in the unfamiliar feel of make-up and costumes on this first warm evening of the year, they had forgotten to be afraid: they had let the movement of the play come and carry them and break like a wave; and maybe it sounded corny (and what if it did?) but they had all put their hearts into their work. Could anyone ever ask for more than that?The audience, arriving in a long clean serpent of cars the following night, were very serious too. Like the Players, they were mostly on the young side of middle age, and they were attractively dressed in what the New York clothing stores describe as Country Casuals. Anyone could see they were a better than average crowd, in terms of education and employment and good health, and it was clear too that they considered this a significant evening. They all knew, of course, and said so again and again as they filed inside and took their seats, that The Petrified Forest was hardly one of the world's great plays. But it was, after all, a fine theater piece with a basic point of view that was every bit as valid today as in the thirties ("Even more valid," one man kept telling his wife, who chewed her lips and nodded, seeing what he meant; "even more valid, when you think about it"). The main thing, though, was not the play itself but the company--the brave idea of it, the healthy, hopeful sound of it: the birth of a really good community theater right here, among themselves. This was what had drawn them, enough of them to fill more than half the auditorium, and it was what held them hushed and tense in readiness for pleasure as the house lights dimmed.The curtain went up on a set whose rear wall was still shaking with the impact of a stagehand's last-minute escape, and the first few lines of dialogue were blurred by the scrape and bang of accidental offstage noises. These small disorders were signs of a mounting hysteria among the Laurel Players, but across the foot-lights they seemed only to add to a sense of impending excellence. They seemed to say, engagingly: Wait a minute; it hasn't really started yet. We're all a little nervous here, but please bear with us. And soon there was no further need for apologies, for the audience was watching the girl who played the heroine, Gabrielle.Her name was April Wheeler, and she caused the whispered word "lovely" to roll out over the auditorium the first time she walked across the stage. A little later there were hopeful nudges and whispers of "She's good," and there were stately nods of pride among the several people who happened to know that she had attended one of the leading dramatic schools of New York less than ten years before. She was twenty-nine, a tall ash blonde with a patrician kind of beauty that no amount of amateur lighting could distort, and she seemed ideally cast in the role. It didn't even matter that bearing two children had left her a shade too heavy in the hips and thighs, for she moved with the shyly sensual grace of maidenhood; anyone happening to glance at Frank Wheeler, the round-faced, intelligent-looking young man who sat biting his fist in the last row of the audience, would have said he looked more like her suitor than her husband."Sometimes I can feel as if I were sparkling all over," she was saying, "and I want to go out and do something that's absolutely crazy, and marvelous . . ."Backstage, huddled and listening, the other actors suddenly loved her. Or at least they were prepared to love her, even those who had resented her occasional lack of humility at rehearsals, for she was suddenly the only hope they had.The leading man had come down with a kind of intestinal flu that morning. He had arrived at the theater in a high fever, insisting that he felt well enough to go on, but five minutes before curtain time he had begun to vomit in his dressing room, and there had been nothing for the director to do but send him home and take over the role himself. The thing happened so quickly that nobody had time to think of going out front to announce the substitution; a few of the minor actors didn't e... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • In the hopeful 1950s, Frank and April Wheeler appear to be a model couple: bright, beautiful, talented, with two young children and a starter home in the suburbs. Perhaps they married too young and started a family too early. Maybe Frank's job
  • is
  • dull. And April never saw herself as a housewife. Yet they have always lived on the assumption that greatness is only just around the corner. But now that certainty is about to crumble.With heartbreaking compassion and remorseless clarity, Richard Yates shows how Frank and April mortgage their spiritual birthright, betraying not only each other, but their best selves.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(817)
★★★★
25%
(681)
★★★
15%
(408)
★★
7%
(191)
23%
(625)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

From the Horse's Mouth - A Review Co-written By My Dad

Hurry and read this book before the movie comes out!

I loved this book for a number of reasons. Who knew that there was so much of this type of thinking in the fifties? I think the main characters might have been the first hippies if they followed their initial instincts - but they didn't. This is a disturbing novel - a lot goes wrong for all these people. This is also probably the booziest novel I've ever read.

My dad worked for IBM for his entire career, beginning in the early sixties (somewhat after the time in which this novel occurs) so I felt a little voyeuristic reading this. But I can't imagine his IBM, and the people he worked with, were like the people in this book. But then again, to quote Cheap Trick:

Then I woke up, Mom and Dad
Are rolling on the couch
Rolling numbers, rock and rolling
Got my Kiss records out

I recommended the book to my dad and he read it and enjoyed it, but pointed out that it wasn't like that for him. Here is a quote from an email from my dad after he had read the first fifty pages:

>>I just walked in here to send you a note of how awed I am having read the
first fifty pages or so of "Revolutionary Road," plus Ford's prolog that
describes the plot and suggests the meanings of the book. Wow. And I
start thinking, after Ford's descriptions and your queuing this up as being
something like my own life, this can't be me, and us. And it isn't, so far
anyway. We were so happy, and scared, when we learned that Marlee was
pregnant with you .. with me jobless and full time in grad school, and
here making $300-something or less in a huge insurance office, and both of
us little more than big children ourselves .. nothing like the
self-absorbed Wheeler parents. But I was reminded of my relationship with
my Dad and I am sure there's lots more connections to come. This is
marvelous writing and I am so glad you put me on to it.>"Revolutionary Road" was a wonderful experience. He was a master at
flicking back and forth to what characters were saying and what they were
thinking at the time, seamless. He was talking about IBM, for sure, but he
had it quite wrong. My stay began just after the heyday of punched card,
wired board systems and right at the start of commercial computer usage by
business. He was right about the mystical aura of 'headquarters' and the
managers there, whether it was a district, region a or corporate setting.
But at IBM in my on-the- street days (1963-1969, 1973-1993) there were no
people doing the "no work" jobs that the novel's hero described. I did see
some of that in the staff workers, which is what turned me off and got me
to threaten to leave if they didn't let me back on the street. The "old
boy" ambiance was real. In my first branch office there were two women
SEs and zero salespersons or managers. IBM worked very hard to change
that throughout my life and the balance seemed pretty good to me by the
end; males still outnumbered females in the sales ranks by 2-to1 but the
SEs were closer and the managers were about equal. Of the 35 or so
managers that I worked for in IBM, two of the top four, by my view, were
women.

The drinking at work never happened at IBM. As at Notre Dame, you got
caught having a drink , you're gone. IBM loosened that to the point by the
1990s that you could have a drink with a customer at lunch if they
initiated the action but you were obliged to go directly home afterward
and could not return to their office or yours. Some few people did ignore
the rule, but they were very, very rare.

The snobbery towards the intellectual sterility was a hot topic in print at
the time. But I never felt that way in our home. I thought we were
surrounded by people with common goals, focussed on raising good kids,
largely Catholic but including other mainstream religions too, though not
much on our block, and answering the bell every day to go to work and do
your best. We were short on intellectual discussions but after the kid and
work thing, there really wasn't a lot of time or energy left to pursue
knowledge or seek inner growth. Maybe there should have been, but once you
start having kids, for most people that stuff is over. C'est le vie.

So thanks for turning me on to this book and I will pursue his work and
Ford's as well.
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Well written with strong contemporary themes

Yates's novel did not sell well when it first appeared in 1961, and it still may be too dark or "boring" for many contemporary readers. The characters are unheroic and selfish; often Yates refers to them as "children". Although on the outside they may appear to be the perfect couple -- two beautiful kids, a fine house, a good job in the city -- underneath they are unhappy and restless. These characters don't know who they are and never figure it out. So why read it?

Many modern readers will be able to identify with the trapped feeling of ever diminishing possibilities that comes with growing older. Many people wake up after 30 or 40 years to discover that their life is not how they imagined it. We also see how much and how little we've changed over the decades. With many people, these themes run deep. If you've ever felt a pang of existential angst, this book will satisfy.

It's beautifully written, with clear, polished prose, and some of the best dialogue I've ever read. It sounds like people talk, but, of course, condensed, honed to sharp points, and full of conflict. It's easy to see Yates's influence on later writers like Andre Dubus -- Yates is a writer's writer.

Still, this is a dark novel and many won't like it. Unlike Updike who gives us clear protagonists and antagonists, this book does not. Who's right in this story? Who's wrong? Who can we root for? From the start we get the feeling things are going to end badly, and they do. People usually read for entertainment, for fun. This might be too dark to be fun, but it certainly has a lot to say if you're up for it.
11 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Profound and painfully realistic

I picked up Revolutionary Road as my commute read immediately after the joltingly abrupt end to my love affair with Stephenie Meyer's Twilight Series. And so, Revolutionary Road became my rebound book. I couldn't have picked a book more different from Twilight.

It took me awhile to get into the story and the characters. Yates' writing is carefully constructed and the storyline is well-structured. In other words, reading his words require some actual brain power. For instance, one of his writing techniques is to use lots of flashback to provide background information. It took me a few chapters before I got used to this style of storytelling; at first, I simply got lost.

His main characters, Frank and April Wheeler, are painfully realistic. We all know at least one couple just like them. As an outside observer into their world, I constantly wanted to be their mediator, counselor, or friend. Their good intentions and love were so obvious to me, but not to them. I desperately wanted to help them, but all I could do was helplessly continue reading about their hapless lives.

The book isn't of the plot-driven variety. In fact, looking back on it, the plot is quite ordinary, reflective of any one of our lives. And that's the point. This is a story that could be about your next door neighbors.

Much of the book seems timeless, but some parts of it are not. It is a book that could not be written in today's world with the same impact. It is set in 1955 and was published in 1961. It is interesting to see how the times have changed, and also, how they have not. I did not know exactly when the book was written when I began and found myself looking up the publication date before I reached the end.

I recommend this book to adults who do not mind reading about painful realities. If you are looking for fast-paced or light-hearted entertainment, do not pick up this book. If you are looking for a thoughtful social commentary on America during the post World War II era, then I whole-heartedly recommend this book to you.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Simply boring

I couldn't relate to this book at all. Although it has a plot that I can relate to, understand, I just couldn't care less what happens with Frank and April. The book was simply boring, and I had high expectations (the book I'd finished reading before this one was Richard Russo's "Nobody's fool" - and that's what I call masterpiece).
How can anyone sympathize with April after the play failed when afterwards she was acting like a spoiled schoolgirl and not an adult women? How can someone feel sorry for Frank when he has intentionally chosen the job he knew would bore him to death?
Reading this book was like reading about your boring neighbors, who think they're so special but have nothing to prove that with. They think something extraordinary is waiting for them just around the corner, but are willing to put no effort to reach for it. They don't even try to do anything and still think the world owns them something. Would you care what happens with such ordinary, cowardly but yet very snobbish people? Well, I couldn't.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Desolation rows

I borough this book from the library because of the movie and wanted to read it before the DVD release.

It doesn't start bad with that amateur play and from the beginning we are exposed to Yates' wit and criticism. He had a comment for everything. There is a comment when someone drinks a cocktail, reads a magazine, walks on the carpet, lights up a cigarette and so on. Without these comments, this book would have been at least 1/4 of its size. Everything is overanalyzed. I thought that this narrative would take me somewhere. We were introduced to the Wheelers. I couldn't wait to know them better and live their lives.

However, the story doesn't unfold. These characters couldn't be more one-dimensioned. The guy loves a job that he hates; the girl is nothing. What does she do all day long? What is her relationship with the kids? She is nothing. She loves a guy that she hates. There is nothing there.

Yates probably carried a lot of bitterness. This is a very negative and pessimistic book written during the 60s. This seems to be trendy during that time. I recently read "The spy who came from the cold" and that's also a very cynical story telling. However, on that book, the author doesn't really take sides (or at least doesn't try to) and the characters are really characters. On "Revolutionary Road", there is nothing. Everything is gratuitous and meaningless. The basic intent is for the reader to be as bored towards life as Yates.

This is a book that didn't age well. I was going to give two stars just for the style, but it doesn't deserve. One star or less. Recommended for those that are not afraid to depress themselves. I have no problem with sad and/or critical stories, however have some hope! If you think that nothing is worth living, why becoming an author? Yates should have been a salesman for IBM or something like that.

I'm still curious to see the DVD and how will the actors bring life out of these characters.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The Original Mad Men

Revolutionary Road is the original [[ASIN:B000YABIQ6 Mad Men]] and a cultural prequel to [[ASIN:0393322572 The Feminine Mystique,]] told mainly from the husband's point of view. The novel is profoundly sad, and also full of sharp, perceptive observations, and funny at times. This is a skillfully-written novel in which one should not confuse what the characters think and say with what the author means to convey.

Revolutionary Road is set in 1955, and was published in 1961, which is a key to its brilliance. This is a story of that moment, written before anyone knew what would come next. Frank and April Wheeler are caught in the trap of the stultifying Connecticut suburbs, and their prescribed roles as breadwinner and mother. At age 30, they are dying inside, wondering "is this all there is?"

They can't know they are nearing a threshold of cultural revolution. Frank works in business machines, which seems incredibly boring, but is about to transform into a new age of computers. April yearns for a job, to be the breadwinner, to have control of her life. April's dream of moving the family to Paris would create a situation in which she would work, Frank would pursue his intellectual interests, and they'd have caregivers for their children. The move is framed as a chance for Frank to "develop his true potential," but it's even more vital as April's escape. This plan is exotic and threatening to the status quo of all around them. In 1963, Betty Friedan would write The Feminine Mystique and the next wave of feminism would begin, making it more acceptable for middle-class women to have careers.

I found this all the more poignant given that author Richard Yates could not have foreseen all of these future developments, yet he presciently points his finger in these directions. The book holds up very well over time and is a sad reflection on how hopelessly constricting being a housewife and mother could feel, and how the constant care and feeding of the male ego was just one more part of woman's work. None of the characters are totally sympathetic, but they are illuminating and fully human.

I am sure it will take weeks for the layers of meaning to fully sink in. I saw the film last night after finishing the book. The screen adaptation may not stand up so well on its own because it's such an interior story. However, I thoroughly enjoyed Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio's performances along with the rest of the strong cast. Their two points of view are more equally shown through film, and you could really see April's misery with her marriage and life situation.

In my own work as [[ASIN:1592404553 Mojo Mom]] I write about modern motherhood, and I tell parents they need to have energy, purpose, and direction in their lives. Unfortunately, while Frank Wheeler was perhaps on a path to develop these qualities, life dealt the family a card that caused Frank to become willing to abandon April's dreams in favor of a conventional life, with tragic results. I am profoundly grateful to live in an age where parenthood, career, and personal development are more compatible, though still challenging.
8 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Disturbing with unlikeable characters

Frank and April Wheeler seem to me self centered characters, so much so I don't have much sympathy for their problems. The book was plain disturbing and the ending horrible--supposedly there were psychological underlying causes stemming from the couple's childhoods (which were described) but no reason for April's desperate act at the end of the book. Also, the ending had the main character Frank disappear from the narrative and there is no knowing what becomes of him after what happens to April. I also think the two were very vapid and I didn't see anything sympathetic about either. The lack of morality or any humanity of the couple was just plain jarring.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Chick Lit vs. Wit Lit: The Road to Literary Revolution

[[ASIN:1934572039 Aberrations]]

From my latest Aberration Nation ([...]) blog post:

Last week I had the opportunity to take a 12-hour road trip across Texas with my 66-year-old mother. She talked a lot about the way things used to be when she was growing up in the 1950s. She enjoyed going on about how everyone was so much more polite, well-groomed, and decent. I was surprised to hear that my grandmother required my mom and her siblings to make their beds when they stayed in hotels.

Hotels!

My mother graduated from high school in 1960. Richard Yates' Revolutionary Road was published in 1961. Ironically, I was getting this earful about life in the '50s just as I was finishing Yates' novel. Flying back to Philly from Dallas, I thought about the perfect picture of domestication my mother grew up with, and how she still wishes life could be that way. Truth be told, she wishes I could be that way. (Confession: I rarely make the beds in my own home much less hotels.) I also considered what I'd like to say about Revolutionary Road.

Another detail swirling in my head was the fact that I finally read a novel officially categorized as Chick Lit just prior to reading Revolutionary Road. It was Sophie Kinsella's The Undomestic Goddess. One word to describe my reaction: disappointed. Of course, lots of folks buy Kinsella's novels, and I admit that her work, along with the rest of successful Chick Lit, has its place on the shelf, and probably on sandy beaches everywhere. But I take the word literature seriously ... maybe too seriously.

Before my first Chick Lit experience, I assumed these books were for hip, intelligent women who love literature. Isn't literature supposed to mean something more than hot embraces, palatial homes, awesome shoes, and perfect endings filled with train station embraces? If not, than I was an official chick at eleven. That was the fateful year I discovered the thrill of the harlequin romance. My love lasted about four months--the amount of time it took me to figure out the formula and lose interest.

Now that I'm a woman who can bring home some sort of bacon, I want what I've decided to call, Wit Lit. And yes, Wit Lit can appeal to men as well because although we're apparently from different planets, we share good ole' human nature in all its simple and fascinating complexity--the very element Yates tapped into when he wrote Revolutionary Road in 1961. Yates' novel qualifies as Wit Lit because it's 20-21th century literature that brilliantly provokes relevant, close-to-home thought in the reader. The fact that it was written in 1961 is significant in that the particular questions Yates poses were unexpected and bold within the context of my mother's graduating class. These American kids were poised to waltz out into the world and set up houses with nice white picket fences, swing sets, and husbands who wore suits to work while the girls stayed home and baked to ensure the home smelled yummy for hubby's return. Yates gave them something to think about, and he gives us something to think about today. Thus another criterion for Wit Lit: timeless.

In Revolutionary Road, Yates masterfully uses the one certifiably crazy character, John Givings, to deliver truth to a bunch of neighborhood chicks and dudes who, despite their wonderful, intelligent qualities, find themselves caught in the cultural quagmire of the 1950's my mother so misses. This crazy guy, John, seems to have much to give, however lacking the acceptable 1950's social skills, he's been wheeled out of town to an institution. His parents define him as unstable and ill, yet Yates never provides facts to support why he's been classified this way. John actually seems to know what he's talking about in a room full of people struggling to put up all the kinds of fronts that maintain the perfect picture John has escaped.

The Wheelers and main characters, Frank and April, have much to offer to each other, their children, and themselves, but they can't seem to pull past bitter disappointment as they fail to physically escape the Norman Rockwell life they've been pressured to emulate. Yates brilliantly casts an inner pallor over the white picket fences, swing sets, yummy smells, and pressed suits of that stifling world. Frank and April aptly recognize that pallor yet fail to grasp the magnitude of choices within their reach. Frank describes the culture he longs to escape like this:

"Christ's sake, when it comes to any kind of a showdown we're still in the Middle Ages. It's as if everyone'd made this tacit agreement to live in a state of total self-deception. The hell with reality! Let's have a whole bunch of cute little winding and cute little houses painted white and pink and baby blue; let's all be good consumers and have a lot of Togetherness and bring our children up in a bath of sentimentality--Daddy's a great man because he makes a living, Mummy's a great woman because she's stuck by Daddy all these years--and if old reality ever does pop out and say Boo we'll all get busy and pretend it never happened."

However, reality is all around Frank. He falls prey to the sad unreality he longs to escape through his inability to honestly express himself in nearly all his relationships.

He describes his work like this: "I mean the great advantage of a place like Knox is that you can sort of turn off your mind every morning at nine and leave it off all day, and nobody knows the difference," yet he misses opportunities to tap into his intellect at Knox because he's blinded by his own ideas of escape.

The fate of those on Yates' Revolutionary Road shows that revolution comes from within. It doesn't matter what town, road, or home you live in. Yates deftly relays how revolutionary moments, decisions, and actions can be missed if we fail to look inward rather than outward. Interestingly, another character, the Wheeler's neighbor, Shep Campbell, grew up in the sort of high-brow intellectual, arty world to which the Wheelers long to escape. Ironically, Shep spent his younger adult years desperate to break out of that particular mold by settling himself into the cookie cutter world of Revolutionary Road. He comes to realize that he doesn't want to live on the street either--thus we see another character searching outward rather than inward.

In one cool Chick versus Wit moment of the novel, John Givings says to Frank, "I like your girl, Wheeler ... I get the feeling she's female. You know what the difference between female and feminine is? Huh? Well, here's a hint: a feminine woman never laughs out loud and always shaves her armpits. Old Helen (his mom) is feminine as hell. I've only met about half a dozen females in my life, and I think you got one of them here. Course, come to think of it, that figures. I get the feeling you're male. There aren't too many males around, either."

If she existed in 2009, John Giving's mom, Helen, would probably enjoy Sophie Kinsella's work. If, like Helen, you prefer to escape the real world, whether through the purchase of a nice white fence, a corporate job that keeps you too busy to feel, or religious services that don't require real contemplation, stick to reading Chick Lit. In The Undomestic Goddess, Kinsella's characters always say exactly what they're thinking and feeling. Her conflicts are vastly situational rather than internal. The characters may have been quite comfortable on Revolutionary Road back in the `50s. I suspect Kinsella could have nicely resolved Frank and April's issues with a lot of superb communication, and a nice summer trip to the EU. We'd all be smiling with stars in our eyes but somehow less enlightened about the true nature of humanity.

So, if you prefer to open an eye or two to the complexity, inconsistency, creativity, and hidden beauty of reality, pick up Revolutionary Road, and hope that today's emerging writers can perpetuate truth the way Yates did in 1961. Demand more Wit Lit! Walk past the chicks and dudes, and take the train toward being real females and males who search inward for answers rather than grasping at all the turn of the century machinations our society imposes. There are still a heck of a lot of streets like Revolutionary Road in our towns and cities. Just because we may live there, doesn't mean we're trapped.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Haunting Novel Which Makes a Valid Point

With Revolutionary Road coming into theaters, the book is now back on the shelves. Richard Yates first novel, which has been honored with many literary awards. Yet it's surprising that he is an author that is not well known at all. Revolutionary Road is the answer to "Leave it to Beaver." It has well developed characters (though there is no guarantee you'll like them) and carries with it, an idea that some may not always think about when they think of the fifties.

Frank and April Wheeler are, on the outside, your typical suburban family. They're young, happily married and have two beautiful children. Frank does his job at providing for his wife and children while April does her job of being the dependable wife. At least that's how it appears on the outside. On the inside, both of them are screaming. On the inside, Frank and April believe, as so many people often do, that they are better than everyone else. That they are more than what they appear. And as Frank approaches middle age, he comes to realization that he doesn't want to be stuck like this. Not when he could be more. And April agrees with him. They are better than many of the people in their neighborhood. Yet they both do not have a great relationship. In fact, it is built more on dependency than love. In short, they both feel trapped by each other.

To prove that they are better, they decide to embrace a dream of their own. They decide they must go to Paris. It seems so simple to both of them until things begin to change, and they begin to have serious questions.

Part of what works with Revolutionary Road is that it has several well developed characters. Readers will probably not come to like Frank or April Wheeler, but the author does not expect the reader to. In fact, it is clear that Yates expects quite the opposite. The two begin to be so snobby and stuck up in their dream that they even begin to be disliked by their friends who, we learn, didn't exactly think much of them in the first place. Another nice aspect of each character is that they all have something to hide. Yates perfectly captures humanity in his novel. His characters act as though everything is fine on the surface, while revealing that nothing is what it seems on the inside. In short, these aren't characters you'll see on a family sitcom. Rather they come off like real people. Whether or not you'll like these people is subjective. The point, however, is that Yates has created realistic, human characters rather than figureheads. I personally, never grew to like the Wheelers. As the novel carried on I only began to hate them more and more, yet I couldn't help but admit that Yates has perfectly constructed these unlikable characters.

More than anything, however, is that Yates has all around beautiful language. The dialog is quick and snappy and it flows very well. The novel is paced very well. While it gets off to a fairly slow start, when it begins to pick up, it never rushes things forward nor does it stop to make sure you're "getting the message." It keeps plowing forward while sprinkling its own themes and messages along the way to remind the reader why he or she is reading this book in the first place. He crafts it very well.

If you're a fan of happy endings, however, Revolutionary Road isn't for you. It's quite a depressing ending. Believable in every way, but Yates makes sure not to sugar coat anything. He's honest. Almost to a brutal extent. And the real honesty that we are forced to face as readers and as human beings is that sometimes we as individuals are not above the grain. Yates brings this message home in a disturbing way, but it works. This is not the kind of book you read to feel uplifted. Because it won't lift you at all. Not everyone will like the ending or the obvious downfall of the Wheelers.

Yet for what it's worth, it's a very provocative and interesting read. Delightful, in spite of the unlikable characters. There have been several books, movies etc., that have debunked suburban life. Richard Yates novel is among the best of them all.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An empty shell

I don't understand the raves this book gets. It is peopled by amoral characters (both husband and wife engage in meaningless affairs) who stumble aimlessly through an empty narrative to an empty conclusion. Motivations are unclear and arbitrary, with surprising plot-turnarounds (e.g., abortion or not, Paris or not, Pollack job or not, tenderness or violence).

For each character Yates includes a telling "zinger" (e.g., Frank's father plays pocket pool) that serves to drag each of them down. There is not one "sympathetic" character here that I can find.

The author's contempt for the Fifties spawned the conceit that it was a vapid decade filled with grey-flannel people. In actuality, it was the postwar decade where American supremacy, power and global leadership took off. (By comparison, the Sixties and Seventies were just the opposite.) Yates' characters spy disappointment everywhere and seek fulfillness elsewhere (Paris, alcohol, love nests). They don't seem to be able to find personal meaning in their lives, and upon that hangs the story, I guess.
7 people found this helpful