Take This Bread: A Radical Conversion
Take This Bread: A Radical Conversion book cover

Take This Bread: A Radical Conversion

Paperback – February 5, 2008

Price
$10.99
Format
Paperback
Pages
320
Publisher
Ballantine Books
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345495792
Dimensions
5.28 x 0.7 x 7.95 inches
Weight
8.8 ounces

Description

Advance praise for Take This Bread“A love song to the feast at the altar and the feast of a food pantry written with grit, authority and integrity.”–Nora Gallagher, author of Changing Light“Sara Miles’s joy, confusion, and passion for the Christian life, together with her skill as a professional journalist and the fullness of her own humanity, have produced what has to be the finest confession of faith I’ve read in years. Take This Bread is a good, tight, absorbing read.”–Phyllis Tickle, author of The Divine Hours and former Religion Editor for Publishers Weekly“This book is a stunner. Beautifully and simply written, it is a wonderfully straightforward account of a life and a conversion which will leave many readers, as it left me, tingling with longing that such signs and wonders might emerge in and through our own stories. Sara has come by the great truths of the Christian faith honestly. The story of how people grow through becoming empowered to be givers, and not mere receivers of handouts is a wonderful glimpse at a true emergence of Church.”–James Alison, Catholic theologian, priest, and author of Faith Beyond Resentment“Some books you can’t put down, some you shouldn’t–this one’s both. Sara Miles’s story of spiritual nourishment recalls Patch Adams, but she’s also a writer like John Muir or Jane Addams, a gifted stylist whose passion translates to vivid storytelling. Take This Bread is necessary reading, I would think, for anyone who’s ever taken a bite out of anything.”–J. C. Hallman, author of The Devil is a Gentleman Sara Miles is the author of How to Hack a Party Line: The Democrats and Silicon Valley and co-editor of Directed by Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan and the anthology Opposite Sex: Gay Men on Lesbians, Lesbians on Gay Men. Her work has appeared in The New York Times Magazine, The New Yorker, The Progressive, La Jornada, and Salon, among others. She has written extensively on military affairs, politics, and culture. She lives in San Francisco with her family. Visit the her website at www.saramiles.net . Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. My first year at St. Gregory’s would begin, and end, with questions. Now I understand that questions are at the heart of faith, and that certainties about God can flicker on and off, no matter what you think you know. But back then I thought “believers” were people who knew exactly what they believed, and had nailed all the answers. My first set of questions was very basic. I covertly studied the faces of people at St. Gregory’s when they took the bread, trying to guess what they were feeling, but I was too proud and too timid to ask either priests or congregants the beginner’s queries: Why do you cross yourselves? What are the candles for? How do you pray? And, more seriously: do you really believe this stuff? My next question was not about God or church: it was nakedly about me, and my fears. What would my friends think? In America I knew exactly one person who was a Christian. It turned out that my friend Mark Pritchard, an introverted writer with a tongue piercing, attended a Lutheran church with wooden pews where he sang old-fashioned hymns every Sunday. So I took some walks with Mark, trying to draw him out, but despite his orange Mohawk and wild sexual politics, he was a fairly Lutheran guy, not much given to discussing his emotions or spiritual life. “Sure, well, I believe in first principles,” Mark said to me, cautiously, when I probed him about his beliefs. He might as well have been speaking Greek. “Oh,” I said. I didn’t know anyone else who went to church. Poor people certainly believed in God. San Francisco might be the least church-going city in the nation, but there were still plenty of churches within the run-down blocks around my house –the left-wing Chicano Catholic parish with its gorgeous altar to the Virgin of Guadalupe; the “Temple of the Lyre of the Valley,” an evangelical Salvadoran storefront; the black Pentecostal dive, the santeria chapel, the cruddy white-trash Assembly of God building with its dirty curtains. Poor people said “God bless you” and crossed themselves and stood on street corners singing loud, bad hymns; they bought their little girls frothy First Communion dresses; they buried their dead gangbanger brothers with incense and Scripture.Nationally, middle-class Christians –even though many seemed to enjoy portraying themselves as a picked-on, oppressed minority, ceaselessly battling secular humanist regimes –weren’t exactly an endangered species, either. People who called themselves Christians comprised 85% of the population. Christian rock music alone was a billion-dollar a year enterprise; there were more than a hundred and fifty million Christian Web sites, and there had never been a non-Christian United States president. But my own friends weren’t poor urban believers or smug God-talking suburbanites. My own friends, at the most, read about Buddhism or practiced yoga. They tended to be cynical, hilarious, and over-educated, with years of therapy and contemporary literature behind them, and I was afraid to mention that I was slipping off to church and singing about Jesus on Sundays instead of sleeping late, cooking brunch, and reading the New York Times Book Review as I’d been raised to do. I couldn’t tell them about communion, or that I had started to read the Bible I’d bought, furtively, at a used-book store. It would be years before I’d meet Paul Fromberg——a funny, profane priest who would become my closest friend. He believed that “the craziest thing about Jesus is that church life never gets in the way of feeling close to him,” and would teach me about the ironies of religion. At the time, though, I had no idea that I could be pals with anyone who described himself, unabashedly, as both “a big fag” and “Jesus’ man.” My social circle was shocked when I first shyly broached the subject of church. An activist lawyer I knew sputtered. “Are you kidding?” he said. He launched a litany of complaints about the Church that I’d come to hear over and over: it was the most reactionary force in the world, anti-Semitic, misogynist, homophobic….the Vatican…the Crusades…Jerry Falwell…child-molesting priests…Ralph Reed… I’d hated, during the 1980s, being expected to defend left movements or revolutionary parties, even when they were screwed up. I had no interest in defending another more fabulously corrupt institution. “It’s not about the Church,” I said. “It’s about .. .” “Good deeds?” the lawyer asked, incredulously. My desire for religion just didn’t make sense to him. He worked harder than anyone I’d ever met, spending fourteen hours a day defending Haitian refugees and Muslim political detainees and the victims of war and empire. He’d listened to prisoners on Guantánamo sob as they described Christian jailers destroying the Koran; he had represented a Nicaraguan woman raped by evangelical soldiers who sang hymns as they took turns with her on a dirt floor. Whatever faith drove him forward in his vocation, it had nothing to do with the Almighty God so readily invoked at prayer breakfasts in Washington.But the Christianity that called to me, through the stories I read in the Bible, scattered the proud and rebuked the powerful. It was a religion in which divinity was revealed by scars on flesh. It was an upside-down world in which treasure, as the prophet said, was found in darkness; the hungry were filled with good things and the rich sent out empty; in which new life was revealed through a humiliated, hungry woman and an empty, tortured man. It was a picture that my friend Jose Suarez, who’d left his Cuban Baptist family in Texas to become a psychiatrist, had also glimpsed——but only briefly. Devout as a child, saved as a teenager at a Billy Graham rally, Jose made it through a year at a conservative Christian college before he began to feel “betrayed” by the inauthenticity of religion. “I’d go to services,” he said, “and it was all very social, unexamined, class-bound. I mean, didn’t they read the words of Jesus?” But the hypocrisy and insincerity of church, what had driven my own parents away, was only part of it. “I was actively listening,” Jose said. “I really wanted to hear God. Pingxadxad –nothing. Ping–nothing. I couldn’t find it. I’d drive out this highway into the country at night, lie back on the hood of my car and look at the stars, and have these arguments with God. It was like: say something, show me, give me a sign, some sort of experience. I’d watch the stars move across the sky, but I couldn’t find it inside. The container didn’t contain anymore.”And so Jose had been wary, though curious, when I told him I was going to church: I was the first friend he’d had since high school who was anything close to a believer. It was talking with him that I was able to articulate, for the first time, something about what prayer meant to me: what I was searching for, beyond the psychological, with all my questions about faith.Jose and I met for lunch at a small café with outdoor tables one afternoon, when he was in the middle of an excruciating breakup. We sat on the patio and talked, picking at some complicated California sourdough-and-vegetable sandwiches while the fog came in. Jose was in analysis then, and seeing a dozen patients, and serving as the medical director at a community mental health clinic, and writing scholarly papers on Freud, and doing energetic yoga for hours every morning, and generally overachieving, but he couldn’t fill every minute, and whenever he paused, the heartbreak would pour in. “Maybe I should go sit at the Zen center again,” Jose said. He was a small, handsome man with wiry hair and little glasses and perfect posture. His eyes were wet. “I’m not sleeping so well anyway, I might as well get up at five, what the hell.” We finished lunch and I took his hand. “Jose,” I said, “you should pray.”As soon as I said it I felt like an idiot –worse, like a proselytizing busybody who knows, without ambiguity, what’s right for everyone else. Jose looked genuinely surprised. Then he put on his analyst face. “Hmm,” he said. “What do you mean?”What did I mean by prayer? I didn’t mean asking an omnipotent being to do favors; the idea of “answered prayers” was untenable for me, since millions of people prayed fervently for things they never received. I didn’t mean reciting a formula: I loved the language of some of the old prayers that were chanted at St. Gregory’s, but I didn’t think the words had magical power to change things. I didn’t mean kneeling and looking pious, or trying to make a deal with God, or even praying “for” something. What was I telling him?“Um, well,” I said. I was embarrassed. Then I looked at Jose again, and the word “tender” filled my mind –tender as in sore to the touch and compassionate, at the same time. After my father had died, Jose had listened to me cry with the deepest empathy and patience, not trying to “comfort” me, but just being present. As tenderly as I could, I said to him, “I really don’t know. I don’t know what I believe, or who I’m talking to. Sometimes I just try to stay open, sort of. Especially when it hurts. And I try to, I know this is corny, but I try to summon up thankfulness.” “When you told me to pray,” Jose would remember later, “it was incredibly earnest. You said prayer was like having this intense, profound longing that you just had to be with. That you put the longing in the hands of God, in a certain way. That it was important to be receptive to the unfulfilled, and not fill it, or deny it.”I had to be receptive, or go crazy: because even as I kept going to church, the questions raised by the experience only multiplied. Conversion was turning out to be quite far from the greeting-card moment promised by televangelists, when Jesus steps into your life, personally saves you and becomes your lucky charm forever. Instead, it was socially and politically awkward, as well as profoundly confusing. I wasn’t struck with any sudden conviction that I now understood the “truth.” If anything, I was just crabbier, lonelier, and more destabilized. All that grounded me were those pieces of bread. I was feeling my way toward a theology, beginning with what I had taken in my mouth, and working out from there. I couldn’t start by conceptualizing God as an abstract “Trinity,” or trying to “prove” a divine existence philosophically. It was the materiality of Christianity that fascinated me, the compelling story of incarnation in its grungiest details, the promise that words and flesh were deeply, deeply connected. I reflected, for example, about Katie, and about what it was like to be both a mother and a mother’s child. The entire process of human reproduction was, if I considered it for a minute, about as “intolerable” as the apostles said communion was. It sounded just as weird as the claim that God was in a piece of bread you could eat. And yet it was true. I grew inside my mother, the way Katie grew inside me. I came out of her and ate her, just as Katie ate my body, literally, to live. I became my mother in ways that still felt, sometimes, as elemental and violent as the moment when I’d been pushed out from between her legs in a great rush of blood. And it was the same with my father: he had helped make me, in ways that were wildly mysterious and absolutely powerful. Like Jesus, he had gone inside somebody else’s body and then become a part of me. The shape of my hands, the way I cleared my throat, the color of my eyes: my parents lived in me – body and soul, DNA and spirit. That was like the bread becoming God becoming me, in ways seen and unseen. I tried to remember my own passionate spiritual feelings as a child, when I had no religion and no language to understand them. There had been one early spring afternoon, raw and chilly, when I lay by myself in the muddy backyard in my snowsuit examining a fallen log, looking and looking and looking. There were patches of snow on the wet wood, and around it spears of onion grass just beginning to poke up, and I sat up after half an hour contemplating the log. The cloudy sky above me was so huge, and I was so small. The phrase “the whole universe” occurred to me. I must have been in third grade, and no amount of papier-maché solar system models had prepared me for the vast, heart-beating calm I felt, or for the inarticulate desire to just stay there, suspended, looking and breathing my tiny puffs of the whole universe’s air, until I had to pee and went inside, shedding my wet mittens.I remembered how I used to pray –there really was no other word for it –when I was six or seven. I’d been reaching for something solemn, obligatory, ritual: wanting God and not even knowing what that was. In an upstairs bedroom in my parents’ home I’d once been taught, by a girl who went to Catholic school, the vaguely sexual language of the Hail Mary. It remained a mysterious, private poem to recite the way I recited, as I walked home from school, lines from other poems: “The breaking waves dashed high/on the stern and rockbound coast.” But I had no framework to understand it as prayer, linked to the same longing I’d feel alone, at night, when I looked at the ceiling and made up words.What would religious instruction have done for me then? What would have sustained me more as a child than my own atheist parents’ love, my father’s soft voice at bedtime as he invented stories for me, my mother’s hand on my back? What would have fed me more than cooking and eating with them, or given me more courage?Food was a lot of what had grounded me before, shaping my family, my work, my relationships. It had meant a five-gallon plastic bucket full of broken eggs. It had meant a generously offered bowl of rice porridge in the jungle. It had meant the thin blue milk leaking from my own breasts. Now food, in the form of communion, was collecting all of those experiences in one place, and adding a new layer of meaning–not on my time, but on God’s.The child I was, protected from religion by her parents, at some point had became the woman crying at the communion table. Those tears weren’t a conclusion, or a happy ending, just part of a motion towards something. It was still continuing. God didn’t work in people according to a convenient schedule, by explaining everything or tying up the loose plot lines of every story. Sometimes nothing was settled.So I sat by myself a lot and mused about God, and my mother, and flesh and blood. I read the Bible. I prayed; I tried to stay open to the questions that flooded me. I didn’t tell anyone I was becoming a religious nut. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Early one morning, for no earthly reason, Sara Miles, raised an atheist, wandered into a church, received communion, and found herself transformed–embracing a faith she’d once scorned. A lesbian left-wing journalist who’d covered revolutions around the world, Miles didn’t discover a religion that was about angels or good behavior or piety; her faith centered on real hunger, real food, and real bodies. Before long, she turned the bread she ate at communion into tons of groceries, piled on the church’s altar to be given away. Within a few years, she and the people she served had started nearly a dozen food pantries in the poorest parts of their city.
  • Take This Bread
  • is rich with real-life Dickensian characters–church ladies, millionaires, schizophrenics, bishops, and thieves–all blown into Miles’s life by the relentless force of her newfound calling. Here, in this achingly beautiful, passionate book, is the living communion of Christ.“The most amazing book.”–Anne Lamott“Engaging, funny, and highly entertaining . . . Miles comments, often with great insight, on the ugliness that many people associate with a particular brand of Christianity. Why would any thinking person become a Christian? is one of the questions she addresses, and her answer is also compelling reading.”
  • –Booklist
  • “Powerful . . . This book is a gem [and] will remain with you forever.”
  • –The Decatur Daily
  • “What Miles learns about faith, about herself and about the gift of giving and receiving graciously are wonderful gifts for the reader.”–National Public Radio“[A] joyful memoir . . . advocates big-tent Christianity in the truest sense . . . a story of finding sustenance and passing it on.”
  • –National Catholic Reporter
  • “Rigorously honest,
  • Take This Bread
  • demonstrates how hard–and how necessary–it is to welcome everyone to the table, without exception.”
  • –San Francisco Chronicle
  • “Moving, delightful and significant.”
  • –The Christian Century
  • Don’t miss the reading group guide in the back of the book.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(335)
★★★★
25%
(140)
★★★
15%
(84)
★★
7%
(39)
-7%
(-40)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

I love the story of this book

Overall, I love the story of this book. But I found it could have been told in much less than nearly 300 pages. I kept waiting for her spiritual conversion, which she did undergo, yet didn't go in depth about how it actually changed her. You could read the back of the book and know everything that was the take away from this book. It took me a week to read it, and I usually go through a book every 3 days. I love the overall story though. It was just a bit hard to take in.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Nice Thought, But A Little Stale

When I purchased Take This Bread, I expected a memoir similar to Faith Unraveled or Spiritual Misfit, both of which I enjoyed. There is some of that present, but mostly it seemed as if Sara Miles converted to love and charity, not Christianity itself.

There is nothing inherently wrong with this. Jesus said to love our neighbors and I see Sara doing that in new and radical ways. Church tradition also often takes our focus from Jesus, which is not a good thing. However, I didn't feel like Sara had an encounter with the Savior. Her encounter seemed more like one with religion itself, not anything specific. We're also well into the book before she discusses any type of food ministry; most of it is just a treatise on communion, food in general, and how we feed each other. Again, all this is interesting, but I wanted to know more about how Jesus Himself changed Sara's life and perspective. Sara seems to think acknowledging God and taking communion makes her a Christian, but doesn't seem to have plumbed the depths of Who gave her the bread of life in the first place.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Its About Community

[[ASIN:0345495799 Take This Bread: A Radical Conversion]]This book is a must read for anyone interested in understanding the community of food! Sara Miles is a writer and was an athiest who came to understand the role of sharing a meal in building community. After a varied career of cooking in restaurant kitchens and serving as an activist in poverty stricken and war torn countries, she comes home to a radical conversion resulting from the simple words: "Take this bread" said to her at a service of Holy Communion. Her conversion leads to growth in understaning the community that God intends for all humankind. Along the way, she is drawn into the community afforded by a food pantry program she starts at her newly found church community.

Its all about the human hunger for belonging and for the meaning that comes from sharing food!

A wonderful book and a quick read!
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Real and powerful: A book for NOW

Sara Miles' book "Take This Bread" is a perfect read for our times. Her realization that feeding others is an ultimate act of goodness came during a worship service. But the real story is what she did next. She went out from that church and created a feeding program when others said it couldn't be done. Then she helped others create feeding programs. I have recommended the book to people of different faiths and political views. They all love it. And even more, they have been inspired to get involved in helping the hungry. The new paperback version contains a Readers' Guide - perfect for book groups.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Take this Bread

"Take This Bread" by Sara Miles is delightful, heartwarming, and a great insight into one spiritual journey. I read it with tears streaming down my cheeks while I laughed out loud at some parts. Truly a gift to those of us who are questioning the Christian Faith and our place in it. The descriptions of St. Gregory's make me want to make a trip from Ohio just to worship with a diverse and interesting congregation. I can feel in inclusiveness of the building and its people, as well as the joy that emanates from them. A book I have ordered in paper in which to write and underline those parts that speak directly to me. Thank you!
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

How You Like this Book May Depend on How You See Religion For

I write this as a Catholic (neither liberal or conservative socially or theologically speaking) so don't take my word for this review.

So I found a copy of this book at a Saver's a few years ago (and today I finally managed to finish it) and I bought it out of nothing but curiosity. You see, I'm usually not interested in conversion stories (even those towards my own faith) as I always have the impression that they're heavily emotionalist testimonies about how the author may or may not have been raised in a particular faith tradition, then fallen away from it, and then through some tragedy/miracle (s)he manages to come back. However, as I soon found out Miles' testimony was hardly anything like that.

I'll try to review without explaining the whole book, but as a memoir we see Miles start by being raised in a rather unconventional family, especially with a non-religious background, and not having a "formal" higher education background either (she went to a college in Mexico that was organized in a rather unorthodox way), working through the food industry in the meantime. Keep in mind that food is one of the central themes of the book, and it is more emphasized as you go along the way.

As the premise says, even though she had a rather good life, starting a family with her partner as well, she for no apparent reason got into a church building to take communion, and that's how everything changed.

However, things don't just get any easier for her. In fact, like for Paul and the early Christian it actually gets harder. Even though she ends up joining one of the most liberal churches you can think of (the Episcopal Church) some of her secular friends and siblings heavily frown upon that, including her partner and her daughter. She also has to confront with the congregation of St. Gregory's apparent hypocrisy as that church was built upon the idea of inclusiveness, except that when Miles starts feeding people that look and live different than them they start complaining and resist. Even the very people she's trying to feed, that is the poor and homeless of San Francisco, give her a harder time as time goes by, through being lost in translation and realizing that it's never a good idea to romanticize the poor as some of them try to steal and cheat from her pantry.

However, as she emphasizes again and again, she is never alone. You can't be a Christian alone. Along the way are some parishioners, as well as outsiders (most of them just as poor as the people they feed) help her run the pantry, and it is here that she realizes that communion is the fulfilling of the desire of not only feed, but to be fed as well, and it's the basis of going to the pantry not because you want to feel good or you were forced to. If anything that sentence may be the thesis of this book, as she repeats it in the latter chapters.

If anything, what I got out of the book the most is how Progressive Christianity may see itself as and as for, through the idea of helping out the community and the poor, not necessarily through some planning like Liberation Theology tried to do decades ago, but through action that involves meeting people that are not like you.

At the same time, however, if you were to see how I left my copy as you'd find that I left plenty of notes arguing against the author. Maybe because Catholics and Episcopalians/Anglicans may have very different understandings surrounding the Eucharist and Communion, but I also heavily suspect that St. Gregory's in particular has a universalist theology as seen with the fact that the icons within depict plenty of people who were never Christian dancing in heaven, it is named after St. Gregory of Nyssa who was indeed a universalist, and also by how Miles shows an Eucharistic theology of Jesus who never excludes anyone from the Table.

That made me wonder about what she thought about Paul's writing regarding the matter, who clearly says that you can't partake of the Table under sin (1 Corinthians 11:27), but I've seen plenty of liberal Christians ignore him altogether because his writings contradict the loving spirit of Jesus (never mind that it was the latter who first mentions about hell and eternal damnation, the only people who have any convincing argument to me so far are the Unitarian Universalists who don't even believe in the divine origin of the Bible and say that the hell parts were added much later). But, considering that (at the time of writing) she married another woman you might have the answer to that, and in one chapter she implies that she may not even believe in a literal afterlife, so there's that also. In a way, you may wonder if she believes more in the act of communion and feeding people than she does with God, but the same could be said about the fundamentalists she constantly contrasts herself and others with her from that they believe more in the Bible than they do with God.

Last but not least, I found the ending to be a bit, rushed and sudden if I can put it that way.

Forgive me if this review looks more like a rant against the author, but that was never my intention. I still find he life story to be very interesting but there is plenty of points she makes that I can't agree one, even though this is a memoir and not a theological manifesto, so we just have agree to disagree.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Inspirationally challenging, leading to look again at my evangelical ...

Inspirationally challenging, leading to look again at my evangelical perceptions and ask what room do I need to make at the metaphorical table those who truly know Christ, but know him differently than I do?
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Love kind of memoir

You may think you're reading an Eat, Pray, Love kind of memoir, but this is more. Miles grapples with faith, love, community and justice on a concrete, personal level. She makes you think.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

a little slow in the beginning for me but loving ...

a little slow in the beginning for me but loving the spiritual and non-traditional stuff. Well worth a read.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Powerful Personal and Profound

Can you imagine participating in an event without even knowing that it challenges a long held belief and then being radically changed by it? This is what happened to Sara Miles, the atheist, takes communion in a San Fransisco Episcopal church. It changes her life, the life of the church, the life of the community and the individual lives of many needy people.

If you believe, you will be amazed at the power of God to transform us. You will come to a new understanding of the Lord's Supper.

If you don't believe, you will be amazed at the ability of one person to change the world. But you might be prompted to challenge some of your own beliefs.

Regardless, it is a powerful read of a well written book.
1 people found this helpful