David Ignatius , bestselling author of Body of Lies and The Increment and prize-winning columnist for the Washington Post , has been covering the Middle East and the CIA for more than twenty-five years. He lives in Washington, DC. --This text refers to the audioCD edition. Another brilliant thriller from the Dean of International Intrigue. Deception, deceit, and dishonor The Director doesn't let up and absolutely doesn't disappoint! I loved this book! --Brad Thor, #1 New York Times best-selling author of Hidden Order"The best part of The Director is watching Ignatius grab the history of American intelligence and use it to divine our technological future. Here's your chance to see inside the CIA. Sculpted with an insider's eye, The Director shows you real people, real espionage, and the real threats to our national security. --Brad Meltzer, best-selling author of The Fifth Assassin"[A] frighteningly convincing spy thriller. "As a writer, Ignatius doesn t know how to tell a bad story. His unparalleled understanding of the intelligence world propels his work so far above others who dabble in the field that there's little comparison. "Ignatius has given readers another compelling and enlightening look at what might happen next month. Must-read twenty-first-century espionage fiction. " --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title. From Booklist *Starred Review* Ignatius is now far better known for his novels (including Bloodmoney, 2011) than for his decades of insightful commentary on foreign affairs and the CIA. But his reporting and commentary, as well as his contacts at Foggy Bottom and Langley, always inform his fiction. This time his subject is the CIA and evidence that Agency computers have been hacked. It falls to a CIA director only a week into his tenure to deal with the crisis. Graham Weber has been hired to shake up an institution that has become sclerotic and is still reeling from WikiLeaks and Snowden’s revelations. To confront both crises, Weber turns to the Agency’s top computer savant, who is a former world-class hacker, while he confronts the myriad intrigues and intransigences inside the CIA and the vast national intelligence network. Ignatius is on new ground here. The hacker culture and ethos is an insular world, but he does a fine job in portraying it through the rollicking sketch of Def Con, the annual hacker convention that is a prime intel recruitment site. He’s similarly successful with Morris, the CIA computer savant: Morris is überbrilliant, a bit kinky, and spectacularly devious. Ignatius even effectively outlines a plausible hack that rocks the entire world economy. He’s given readers another compelling and enlightening look at what might happen next month. Must-read twenty-first-century espionage fiction. --Thomas Gaughan --This text refers to the hardcover edition. Read more
Features & Highlights
A
New York Times
Bestseller.
“If you think cybercrime and potential worldwide banking meltdown is a fiction, read this sensational thriller.”—Bob Woodward,
Politico
Graham Weber has been the director of the CIA for less than a week when a Swiss kid in a dirty T-shirt walks into the American consulate in Hamburg and says the agency has been hacked, and he has a list of agents' names to prove it. This is the moment a CIA director most dreads. Like the new world of cyber-espionage from which it's drawn,
The Director
is a maze of double dealing, about a world where everything is written in zeroes and ones—and nothing can be trusted.
Customer Reviews
Rating Breakdown
★★★★★
30%
(955)
★★★★
20%
(637)
★★★
15%
(478)
★★
7%
(223)
★
28%
(891)
Most Helpful Reviews
★★★★★
1.0
AGVAL2JKAUKPIFICOLXX...
✓ Verified Purchase
Is this a hoax? Some guy publishing a terrible book and using David Ignatius' name?
I'm dumbfounded. I've always been a huge fan of David Ignatius, but this book is awful. It's inexcusably dull and awkwardly written. Worse, for a reporter of Ignatius' experience and reputation, some of the financial details that drive the plot, and that are explained in greater detail than any novel really needs, are just plain wrong. Gotta be an outright hoax. I refuse to believe Ignatius could write a book this bad.
14 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AF5GPMEH75DNDHNKIPXN...
✓ Verified Purchase
intiguing
Probably David ignatius is right, and most spies will operate in cyberspace in the future. While I miss the cloak and dagger suspense of old spy novels, this is an excellent journey into a new world.
13 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AGVQZGSHKIDLLEJNZNB4...
✓ Verified Purchase
Inconsistent
Two things especially stopped my reading of this book: the characterizations melted together and could not be distinguished from each other, and the style shifted radically when in the underworld of Germany. I admired Ignatius for his political observations on TV. However, thoughtful literary style eludes him, and this book is a disappointment. It's as if he has picked a number of details about life and then thinks that crowding diverse scenes with this kind of detail will make for realistic and/or interesting narrative. It doesn't.
12 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AEZB4B4C2ZEMP4VLFBLL...
✓ Verified Purchase
a ''minus'' star if I could
I'm still mad that I read until the end. I seriously question whether Ignatius actually wrote the book. Among the many flaws is it's boring. If you're thinking of buying this book I strongly recommend you take advantage of the sample feature first.
10 people found this helpful
★★★★★
3.0
AHDJP5VLJ2ZEI7GKLKC7...
✓ Verified Purchase
Good idea, could've been a good story. poor characters
After the unfortunate passing of my 2 favorite spy thriller writers (Tom Clancy and Vince Flynn), I stumbled upon this book. I found the book particularly intriguing since I have an interest in coding and the tech world as a hobby, and I thought that this is where the author would let me down. Surprisingly Ignatius was well researched and explained many details in the world of hacking. The book started off intriguing, halfway through the plot seemed to drag, the ending was fast paced and exciting, and the ultimate finale was lackluster.
The biggest problem I have is the characters. The primary antagonist's scheme didn't seem to make much sense. Ignatius starts off by building the characters ideology on internet privacy and freedom, yet his plan was to hack the BIS? How does hacking the bank further his aims? I get that characters don't have to be logical especially when they are persuaded by attractive women, but that poses its own problem. The plan was more Ramona Kyle's than his own, and with someone with her intelligence you'd think she'd have a more rational plan. The relationship between the two was poorly developed, and would have made more sense as a romantic attachment rather than a platonic friendship. Ramona seems to disappear from the story altogether about halfway through, just to reappear in the final pages as if the author forgot she was a loose end still out there. Beasley is written as an incredibly stereotypical black man that doesn't fit at all with someone who went to prep school and rose to become head of a directorate at the CIA.
***Mild Spoiler Alert*** you might want to skip the next paragraph
And then there was the ending. Leading up to the end was a great page turner. The pace and the action really picks up. But when the story comes to a conclusion, most of the antagonists get away, and a new director of the CIA is named. The end. Its abrupt, rushed, and unsatisfying. Its almost as if someone told David Ignatius that a deadline is coming "wrap it up".
***END OF SPOILERS***
In the end it was a good read but not great. 3.5 stars.
9 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AH6OZYRY74MIGK34SNCC...
✓ Verified Purchase
Another first
After 25 years on the Washington Post covering the intellegence community Ignatius should know what he is talking about thats what makes this a riviting read. I love all his 8 previous books simply because they come across so believable..theres nothing in this book that is impossible which makes it frightening.
8 people found this helpful
★★★★★
4.0
AG7BOX7LSHKRG37TUNSU...
✓ Verified Purchase
Very good book but weak climax
Mixed feelings on this book and perhaps 4 stars is too generous. What I liked: This is about hacking, and in a sense it is the new frontier for intelligence agencies. Hacking has been around since only days after the Internet was born, but now the hackers are getting better and better. The new director of the CIA has to worry about in-house cyber intrusions as well as invasions of financial institutions which could catastrophically impact global economies. So we learn a lot about the new tools, the lingo, the attacks, the talent pool, defenses, etc. An awful lot. This book is similar in some ways to the recent novel "I Am Pilgrim" in that it staggers the reader with the nightmare, "Hey, this could really happen here." And that is what sticks most with me after reading this book. What I didn't like: Perhaps there was just a bit too much about all the hacking. Towards the end I didn't want to hear anymore about how systems, programs, etc. I also didn't care much for the character of the Director. He came across to me as a bit of a bumbler, someone who was learning learning learning all the way up to the final pages. Though a very successful businessman, he doesn't strike me as someone who could succeed in a different environment than the one he is most familiar with....Is there a message here that success in government leadership positions absolutely requires tons of government experience? Perhaps.... While the Director is ultimately hailed as a hero and someone who brought a new focus to the CIA, I came away with the feeling that the organization would be back to "normal" 24 hours after he leaves. And then there's the climax. It felt to me that the author got tired of the whole thing and just wanted to end it, So he did it in a few brief pages, and not all of those were credible to me.
6 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AG4R4AGSOMKKZ2TNGSWI...
✓ Verified Purchase
Huge Plot Holes
Very disappointed in this book. I like David Ignatius' books generally but not this one. If the action is good and the characters are interesting, I can put up with a few plot holes.
The characters in the book were clichés. The action drags and the plot holes were huge.
So, lets assume that there is one person in the CIA with an IQ of 300 and all the rest have an IQ of 80. Now let's assume that a tough corporate exec, who built his own very successful business, is now magically transformed into an insecure wuss. And forgot to mention that it's another conspiracy theory book (Quick question: how many people can know about a secret conspiracy until it's no longer secret?).
This one seemed like the publisher needed something by next Tuesday. So that's what he got. I'll be more cautious on purchasing Ignatius books in the future.
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AGO4DP4XCDHTSJ6DGYRU...
✓ Verified Purchase
Where was the editor? Where was The Director?
The book starts with intrigue and snared me in. It didn't take long, however, to be frustrated and then ultimately hugely disappointed. Since it is called "The Director" I assumed the book would feature the newly appointed CIA director, Weber, a controversial pick who despite his goals of changing the Agency is almost immediately insecure about his role. Ho is an outsider. He also vanishes for long parts of the book and a sometimes confusing array of other characters are featured. Is is apparent from early on in the novel that one of his employees, Morris, has gone operationally and philosophically rogue, and physically vanishes from the Agency and, apparently, the face of the earth. Weber calls Morris repeatedly but no mention is ever made of Morris noticing Weber's calls amongst all o those he has received from co-workers and others who are looking for him. This is just one example of bad editing. And whie it is understandable why Weber cannot comfortably trust anyone, at least until he does his "sweat tests", there are just too many characters with confusing loyalties and seemingly overlapping duties for there plot to make any sense.
Things are sort of tied up at the end, but not really, and certainly unsatisfyingly. I cannot imagine Weber really felt that good about his accomplishment. And life will just probably go on at the Agency in this book without much change
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AFQMN64FOGWDHGJ3J3YT...
✓ Verified Purchase
Just never embraced it
A new CIA director is named but most if not the whole book focused on characters in the shadows and I didn't see anything the Director did other than ask questions and not really do anything. I definitely did not engage this book as an all-nighter.