An Amazon Best Book of September 2019: Light-as-air but free of fluff, this funny, moving book plunges the reader into the life of identical twins Laurel and Daphne, “two names for the same minor Greek goddess.” From an early age, the parents are bewildered by their closeness and word play, which the sisters turn like a double-barreled shotgun on their psychiatrist uncle who finds them altogether unnerving: “’We revolt you.’ Laurel said, running past him. ‘We are revolting,’ Daphne said. ‘Against you,’ she added.” The first half of the book, when Laurel and Daphne are always together, is just plain fun. The second half reminds you that the real pleasure here is the author’s heartfelt but unsentimental portrayal of how relationships change over time: the interior experience of growing apart from the person you love best, how a mother can go from an amiable stranger to a friend. The sibling rivalry between the girls' father and his brother is also spot-on and affecting. While the novel ends just as you’re in full thrall to the characters, this lithe slip of a story is too complete a pocket universe to regret it’s not longer. --Katy Ball Named one of the best books of 2019 by Vanity Fair and a Kirkus Reviews' Best Fiction of 2019 selection "Schine's warmth and wisdom about how families work and don't work are as reliable as her wry humor, and we often get both together . . . This impossibly endearing and clever novel sets off a depth charge of emotion and meaning." ― Kirkus Reviews (starred review) "Schine's sparkling latest [is] both a fizzy exploration of the difficulties of separating from one's closest ally and a quirky meditation on the limits of language for understanding the world." ― Publishers Weekly "Captivating . . . written with the tender precision and clarity of a painting by Vermeer . . . [a] wry and elegant novel." ―Ann Levin, Associated Press "A delightful new novel . . . Schine takes her readers on deep philosophical dives but resurfaces with craft and humor; her tone is amused and amusing." ―Susan Dominus, The New York Times Book Review “The mother of the beguilingly unusual twins whose lives unfold in this sublime comic novel could not adore them more than I do. A singular delight for anyone who has ever marveled at the quirks and beauties and frustrations of English grammar, and a fascinating portrait of the passions and dramas of fierce familial love.” ― Sigrid Nunez , National Book Award–winning author of The Friend "This tale of twins who "elbow each other out of the way in the giant womb of the world" is smart, buoyant and bookish ― in the best sense of the word." ―Heller McAlpin, NPR "Cathleen Schine’s new novel, The Grammarians , is a rich study of the factions that attempt to define how language should be used."―Lauren Leibowitz, The New Yorker "Cathleen Schine’s marvelous new novel is a book besotted with words . . . But you don’t need to be a writer or editor to fall under Schine’s spell. The Grammarians is about family, the ebb and flow of our deep and tenuous connections to the people who make us who we are." ―Connie Ogle, Star Tribune “One might well expect a novel about dictionary-obsessed identical twins to throw off one clever, coruscating observation or bit of wordplay after another, like a kind of literary Catherine wheel. And The Grammarians certainly does that, and does it wonderfully well. Yet as I read on I found myself not only fascinated and amused―because, I must underline, it’s often hugely funny―but deeply moved, because this is also a novel of great and often aching feeling.” ― Benjamin Dreyer , New York Times –bestselling author of Dreyer’s English "Schine’s latest page-turning charmer is a warm, witty, and weird ode to sisterhood and language."― Entertainment Weekly “This is an utterly charming book, and yet more than that. It is a book of real people and their relationship―both to language and to each other. Fresh as a white sheet of paper, it is clean and lovely; an absolutely delightful read.” ― Elizabeth Strout , Pulitzer Prize–winning author Cathleen Schine is the author of The Grammarians , The Three Weissmanns of Westport , and The Love Letter , among other novels. She has contributed to the New Yorker , the New York Review of Books , the New York Times Magazine , and the New York Times Book Review . She lives in Los Angeles. Read more
Features & Highlights
An enchanting, comic love letter to sibling rivalry and the English language.
From the author compared to Nora Ephron and Nancy Mitford, not to mention Jane Austen, comes a new novel celebrating the beauty, mischief, and occasional treachery of language.
The Grammarians
are Laurel and Daphne Wolfe, identical, inseparable redheaded twins who share an obsession with words. They speak a secret “twin” tongue of their own as toddlers; as adults making their way in 1980s Manhattan, their verbal infatuation continues, but this love, which has always bound them together, begins instead to push them apart. Daphne, copy editor and grammar columnist, devotes herself to preserving the dignity and elegance of Standard English. Laurel, who gives up teaching kindergarten to write poetry, is drawn, instead, to the polymorphous, chameleon nature of the written and spoken word. Their fraying twinship finally shreds completely when the sisters go to war, absurdly but passionately, over custody of their most prized family heirloom:
Merriam Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition
. Cathleen Schine has written a playful and joyful celebration of the interplay of language and life. A dazzling comedy of sisterly and linguistic manners, a revelation of the delights and stresses of intimacy,
The Grammarians
is the work of one of our great comic novelists at her very best.
Customer Reviews
Rating Breakdown
★★★★★
30%
(461)
★★★★
25%
(384)
★★★
15%
(230)
★★
7%
(108)
★
23%
(353)
Most Helpful Reviews
★★★★★
2.0
AGKGSC3DQXXYACV4XEKY...
✓ Verified Purchase
Great title; Great concept; Disappointing book.
I was drawn to this novel by the title and the cover design (I will admit, I am a sucker for cover design). As a great admirer of English grammar - actually, grammar in general - I was very much looking forward to reading this book. Alas, I agree with many of the critical reviews here: no plot, no style, no interesting characters. It was a real struggle getting to the end of this novel, the last fifty pages of which, I will admit, are much better than the first two hundred pages. Why would an author introduce main characters, who are unlikeable shrews, pedantic and self-righteous? It was difficult getting past that problem, but, as I hate to drop a book without finishing it, I plodded on.
It seems hard for me to believe the fulsome praises of many of the five-star reviewers; they seem a tad too enthusiastic to be credible. This is the last Cathleen Shine book I will read, but I do give her extra-points for the following:
Thank you, Ms Shine, for correctly using "nauseating" (p. 230).
- It was great to see "Miss Crabtree" of Little Rascals fame enter the literary world (page 70). That character is a true American icon.
- How is this, for a positive doozy: "Grammar is good. I mean ethically good. If you think of all these words just staggering around, grammar is their social order, their government" (page 86)? I am not sure she meant this without irony, but I like the thought very much.
- Thanks for the shout-out for Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn (page 139). My great-great-uncle, book illustrator Charles Grunwald, Jr. (1867-1910), is buried there in an unmarked grave. It is truly one of the nation's great cemeteries.
- How about this political bombshell: "What people call 'standard' English is really just the dialect of the elite" (209)? This is a great observation, seems a bit obvious to me, but I enjoyed being reminded of the dynamic between language and socio-politics.
- A book that is partially dedicated to celebrating words rightly affirms this truism: "The dictionary held the world between its covers" (241). I share the characters' love of the dictionary and words in general.
- Finally, Shine's casual aside that "relativism is slowly eating away at the very foundations of the culture" (page 243) seems to be especially true in the world of grammar. Although I am totally in agreement with their social and political struggle, I remain dubious when it comes to supporting folks who insist on inventing pronouns or decide that "they" is a singular and not a plural pronoun.
I began the book, full of anticipation, but, as the reading wore on, I became discouraged and disappointed by a great concept mishandled and bungled. Good try; failed execution.
52 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AEBH7YKMB5E4L4WLOJER...
✓ Verified Purchase
Word nerds unite!
What a clever book, I loved this one. Laurel and Daphne are identical twins, the kind that are almost one unit as children and speak a secret language. But early on (age 5) they also become fascinated with the English language when their father brings home a Webster's dictionary. Their love of language unites them but in adulthood causes some problems between them. I enjoyed the characters and the story was engaging but some of the best parts were the parts that dealt with language, grammar, and words. It appealed to the word nerd in me and I've also been known to read the dictionary. Each chapter is headed with a word and definition from "A Dictionary of the English Language" by Samuel Johnson--a fun touch.
Too often when a book grabs me in the beginning I am disappointed with the ending--so many don't seem to hold up. But not this one, I very much liked how the author wrapped up the story.
I think any lover of words, word origins, grammar, English majors, teachers, or librarians would find this one entertaining. And the cover is certainly eye-catching.
22 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AG5CWKM4ELS37AJPQNXW...
✓ Verified Purchase
Disappointing Waste of Time
I have enjoyed Cathleen Schine's previous novels and looked forward to her latest, The Grammarians, which received positive reviews. What a disappointing book this is! As others, I can't understand the glowing praise it's received. There is no plot, the characters are uninteresting and annoying, and the dialogue feels flippant and ridiculous. The chronology of their lives seems to move in fits and starts, very uneven. I forced myself to finish this because I kept hoping there would be some redeeming value but I didn't find any. If this is a novel about words, I have a few: tedious, dull, uneven, boring, contrived, mediocre, uninteresting and tiresome. I will not be recommending this book.
12 people found this helpful
★★★★★
3.0
AHDFQEDPLY56SD4R2SH2...
✓ Verified Purchase
Vivid Characters, lacking Plot
While Cathleen Schine's The Grammarians lacked a singular plot- it shone through in terms of word-geekery and characters so real you could feel them breathing through the pages. I found it hard to follow along and stay interested, as I never knew quite what was happening in a book that spans a majority of two sibling's lives- the pacing was a nightmare in itself, but I found myself invested in the lives of two linguaphile twins and their family.
The Grammarians starts with a phone call- a husband telling his wife (I honestly don't know which- I never mastered the art of telling them apart, despite their differences and reading the entire book) that he has a message from some writer regarding her sister- he told her no, since she refuses everything regarding her sister. As she listens to her husband talk, the wife pauses to think how she and her sister haven't spoken in years.
Then we literally rewind back to the main characters as infants- two twins side by side in the crib, babbling back to one another in their own language. We're privy to this babbling, and see that despite being too young to speak, they have an excellent vocabulary. One twin calls her sister "An insufferable pedant". WHILE THEY ARE LITERALLY IN THEIR CRIBS. This kind of contrary attitude continues between the two girls the entire book, and while it's almost insufferable at times, the way they push and shove and try to hold onto one another, and then eventually rip completely in two is very... sister-like. While it's frustrating, it makes sense-- while the girls are both very intelligent, and linguistic geniuses, they fall into the trope of being book smart but not street smart. Every single mistake the girls make throughout the book is completely and utterly frustrating and could be avoided through better communication- creating the real irony of the book, that two sisters who fancy themselves as masters of word are unable to speak their true feelings to each other, ending in disaster and a shattered family.
The book leads up to the fracturing of the sisters at a nearly insufferable pace- thankfully, the characters are enough to keep things going. The side characters are the true gems here- such as poor, delightful Miranda, who seems to be only referred to as 'The Flower Girl' for the second book, or the husbands Michael and Larry, who carry on their friendship long after the sisters stop speaking. Daphne and Laurel themselves would not have been tolerable on their own- but with the colorful cast of characters in their lives, the book was manageable. It was slightly jarring how quickly it ended- the book spends an awful long time building the girls up through their childhood, their young adult years-- and then suddenly with a few chapters left their parents and husbands are dying. And still, they continue their feud.
It sounds like I don't like them-- but I do. They're not great people, but they're good enough, and they're real- even if they are obnoxious. I just wish there had been more to the book than them growing up and growing apart.
I got my copy of The Grammarians for free from Macmillan with another book they sent- intended for review purposes. My review is still honest and my thoughts are my own.
6 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AEVTTG7EWIPVLMOF2J3D...
✓ Verified Purchase
Disappointing
As a longtime & enthusiastic fan of Cathleen Schine’s work I was so excited to see this book in the bookstore. Unfortunately it turned out to be a huge disappointment. The twins were unlikable & frankly, boring. I never felt like I knew them and failed to see what caused the fascination & admiration others felt for them. Worst of all, I was bored.
Maybe next time, Cathleen Schine! Maybe next time.
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
3.0
AHLJ7GWIA6KYU5X47DCV...
✓ Verified Purchase
Didn't work for me
I had a problem getting into this, and it didn't work for me. It may be that I've gotten tired of family disruptions and am looking for other subject matter. For those into that, it may work out for them.
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
4.0
AH43ILG2DRPKGJIF7773...
✓ Verified Purchase
Quick, Easy Read
The Grammarians is the story of identical twins, Laurel and Daphne, who are both obsessed with words; they even speak their own language to each other which frustrates their mom to no end.
I really enjoyed this quick, easy to read story as it followed Laurel and Daphne from newborns to the end of their lives. Laurel and Daphne's lives revolve around words but when words take them on different paths, can they find their way back to each other? You'll have to read this story to find out, and you, like me, might learn a new word or two along the way.
Thank you to the publisher for the advanced copy won in a Goodreads giveaway; all opinions are my own.
5 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AFWQRCL2KLY33BOGGQJV...
✓ Verified Purchase
Myeh
One reviewer called this book humorous and its author the next Nora Ephron. Perhaps I just wasn't in the mood to read this book, but I did not find funny, or clever, or even terribly interesting. The characters seemed to be meandering through life with no particular motivations, and the author provided few clues on why she felt they were important. I would not recommend this book.
4 people found this helpful
★★★★★
3.0
AENWGCXI4G7Y23XBMXIM...
✓ Verified Purchase
Thought Provoking, but can be tedious
Synopsis- The lives of highly intelligent, identical twin girls who tend towards the pedantic. We see their story played out via the help of an archaic dictionary that their doting father brought them home as a gift. The novel takes place in the second half of the twentieth century in New York City and its surrounding suburbs. It would be classified as General Fiction.
The Ratings
Characters- The main characters in this book are not likable. They come off as rude, condescending and boring. If you want characters that you root for, this book is NOT for you. Rating: 4
Plot- There is really no plotline. We see the girls grow up, and while there is a climax of sort, it's mainly underplayed. You do not wonder what will happen, you wonder if anything ever will happen. If you are plot focused, this book is not for you. Rating: 5
Setting- While there is some colorful New York City in the seventies/eighties references, this is not a lush narrative wherein the location makes the book move along. It could really take place in any urban area with suburbs. If you like highly descriptive novels, this is not for you. Rating: 4
Language- This is the strength of the book. As one would expect with a book titled grammarians, words, and the way that they are used are extremely important. Every section (there are no actual chapters) begins with a word and its archaic definition. There is a clever way that the author makes us look at the word, and the duality of meanings that some words have. If you are entranced by words, you might give this a try. Rating: 8
Structure- The novel is fairly straightforward and in chronological order. It is told third person omniscient, which is a good structure for the novel because we get a peak into each sisters thoughts independently. The novel lacks depth in certain areas, because there are entire parts of their lives that are skipped over. If you want to know EVERYTHING about the characters, it will leave you yearning for more information. While you often get a peak into their souls, there is not much background. Much is left for the reader to imagine or assume what happened. Unfortunately, the reader may not care what the characters are thinking. Rating: 5
Readability- As one could imagine, a book that lacks plot, setting and likable characters is sometimes difficult to get through. If you do not like clever word play and an almost essay like structure, you may have difficulty getting through it. Because of this, I found that I could only read a section or two at a time. There is not an immediate draw to pick up this book and read it. Though only 200 e reader pages, it often seems longer. If you want a page turned, not for you. Rating: 3
Message- This book made me think. While the traditional things on which we base a book are lacking, I still thought that reading this book was a worthwhile experience. There are underlying themes and messages in this book that are highly discussable, and relevant in todays world. After reading the book I was captivated by the thought of what is language, and what does it mean in the greater context of our culture. I will continue to think about this book for awhile, no matter what its shortcomings were, because I think its broader message is that important. Rating: 10
Overall Score: 39/70, which for today we will equate to 3 out of 5 stars.
4 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AFLAPKCHS5SC63WIVLIL...
✓ Verified Purchase
Word-Smithery On Steroids
Oh hell yes. This charming little book had me on the first page, and when it was over, I was sorry to be done. Big thanks go to Net Galley and Farrar, Straus and Giroux for the review copy. This is the first time I have read anything Schine has written, but it cannot possibly be the last. You can buy it now.
We start in the dark; we start behind bars. Happily, it’s because our protagonists are infants, and they’re in a crib. As light streams through the open door, we enter the lives of Daphne and Laurel, who are identical twins. They are brilliant, and they are in love with the written word from the get-go.
At the outset this story seems like a romp, but its success is in the details. As children we see the girls move in lock step; the first one out of the womb is the alpha, and they both understand this. But as they grow up and define their places in the world, there’s tension and at times, competition. In order to develop relationships and families separately, they have to pull away from each other, and when two people are very close, the only way they can become independent is through a hard break. Schine is absolutely consistent in the development of her characters, and this also includes their intellectual gifts.
One aspect of fiction that grates on my nerves is when I see a gifted child protagonist that’s developed in an amateurish way. Some writers want to use a child in their writing, but don’t have any clue about the qualities inherent in a child at the age they have chosen, and so they build giftedness into the character as an excuse, so that they can provide the child with adult-level dialogue and dodge the stages of childhood. Schine doesn’t do that. Instead, she creates completely believable little geniuses that are nevertheless coping with the growing pains, developmental milestones, attitudes and frequent self-centeredness that characterize children and adolescents. Her care and skill result in characters that are entirely believable. I like the side characters a lot also.
The wit and sass shown by Daphne and Laurel as they indulge in their secret twin language as well as word play using standard English is original and makes me laugh out loud more than once, but as they grow older, both twins encounter broader philosophical issues that connect language with class, ethnicity, and other variables, and they must find their way through the ethical slough. They don’t choose the same paths, and their anger and pain toward one another is visceral. But in the end…well. You’ll have to find that out for yourself.
This book is highly recommended to those that have twins in their lives; those that love the English language; and those that want to howl with laughter. However, I don’t recommend it to anyone whose first language isn’t English.
I read several books at a time, and while I was reading this one, it became the reward for finishing a chapter in a less rewarding read. You, however, can reward yourself right now by ordering a copy.