In the span of five violent hours on August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina destroyed major Gulf Coast cities and flattened 150 miles of coastline. Yet those wind-torn hours represented only the first stage of the relentless triple tragedy that Katrina brought to the entire Gulf Coast, from Louisiana to Mississippi to Alabama.
First came the hurricane, one of the three strongest ever to make landfall in the United States -- 150-mile-per-hour winds, with gusts measuring more than 180 miles per hour ripping buildings to pieces.
Second, the storm-surge flooding, which submerged a half million homes, creating the largest domestic refugee crisis since the Civil War. Eighty percent of New Orleans was under water, as debris and sewage coursed through the streets, and whole towns in south-eastern Louisiana ceased to exist.
And third, the human tragedy of government mis-management, which proved as cruel as the natural disaster itself. Ray Nagin, the mayor of New Orleans, implemented an evacuation plan that favored the rich and healthy. Kathleen Blanco, governor of Louisiana, dithered in the most important aspect of her job: providing leadership in a time of fear and confusion. Michael C. Brown, the FEMA director, seemed more concerned with his sartorial splendor than the specter of death and horror that was taking New Orleans into its grip.
In
The Great Deluge
, bestselling author Douglas Brinkley, a New Orleans resident and professor of history at Tulane University, rips the story of Katrina apart and relates what the Category 3 hurricane was like from every point of view. The book finds the true heroes -- such as Coast Guard officer Jimmy Duckworth and hurricane jock Tony Zumbado.
Throughout the book, Brinkley lets the Katrina survivors tell their own stories, masterly allowing them to record the nightmare that was Katrina.
The Great Deluge
investigates the failure of government at every level and breaks important new stories. Packed with interviews and original research, it traces the character flaws, inexperience, and ulterior motives that allowed the Katrina disaster to devastate the Gulf Coast.
Customer Reviews
Rating Breakdown
★★★★★
60%
(230)
★★★★
25%
(96)
★★★
15%
(58)
★★
7%
(27)
★
-7%
(-27)
Most Helpful Reviews
★★★★★
5.0
AFOGCBBWI7PM4D7ARDWU...
✓ Verified Purchase
New Orleans Filmmaker Concurs with Many Accounts in Book
I have been filming a documentary regarding Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath entitled "New Orleans Story." We interviewed Mr. Brinkley when he was writing his very first chapter of The Great Deluge. Douglas was very engaged in the investagative process and was eager to learn all that we had discovered and were discovering during our one on one interviews with key players to this historical disaster. We also interviewed Douglas Brinkley a few days before he released his book to the public.
Having now read the book, I must verify through our own on-camera interviews with many of the same individucals (such as Mayor Nagin, Governor Blanco, former Fema Director Michael Brown), that Douglas' reported accounts have merit. The information was taken directly from those who were in the best position to opine. Yes it is true that others have different perspectives, but we have yet to see any evidence that dispute the accruracy of the content of The Great Deluge.
As a fellow New Orleanian who also worked to chronical the events in as much of a contemporaneous manner as possible, I wish to congradulate Douglas Brinkley on his efforts. I further strongly recommend The Great Deluge.
51 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AF4DXYKLZKVZGKIF6FE4...
✓ Verified Purchase
Incorrect
I was deployed with a FEMA urban search and rescue task force to Katrina and spent two weeks after the storm working in New Orleans. The author of this book relies on reporters mostly to gather his data. The parts of the book that describe events that I was personally involved with are grossly inaccurate and obviously written by someone who wasn't there and instead relied on an account of someone who didn't understand what was happening. Save your money. The book is too inaccurate to be considered a history lesson.
41 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AGK5KM6KX5ELXVRVHRS2...
✓ Verified Purchase
An objective account of an American tragedy
Brinkley succeeds at honestly and objectively recounting what happened, what went right, and what went wrong during what will long be remembered as a moment when government at all levels failed us, but ordinary citizens rose to the occasion. Nobody who deserves criticism is spared, and that is how it should be.
The opening portion of the book describes how the Louisiana SPCA efficiently evacuated hundreds of animals well in advance of the storm. The subtle message? A small private organization made up mostly of volunteers had a coherent and effective evacuation plan, but the government did not.
More than just a recitation of what happened, Brinkley describes at length the history of New Orleans, particularly with respect to more than a century of attempting to protect the city from flooding. He also covers the gradual coastal erosion that made New Orleans much more vulnerable to catastrophic flooding. This helps the reader better understand why the city flooded when Katrina hit.
As the title notes, Brinkley also covers the Mississippi Gulf Coast, which was so often lost in media reports at the time, partly due to lack of access to those areas and also due to the large scale drama unfolding at the same time in New Orleans.
This is an important book. The details of this chapter in American history need to be accurately recorded for ourselves and for future generations. Brinkley has succeeded in doing just that.
27 people found this helpful
★★★★★
5.0
AFRRHLZAWX6WRPOGALTS...
✓ Verified Purchase
New Orleanians need to face reality, they are the problem.
I am a native New Orleanian who has left and returned to the city on several occasions after living in Mexico City, Chicago, and Los Angeles. I love New Orleans. But, the citizens, from the poorest residents in the "projects" to the blue-blood "uptowners" in the Garden District have been in a state of delusion and denial for 30 years now, New Orleans was, is, and unless something dramatically changes (it doesn't seem that Katrina was enough after looking at the recent Mayor's race and the lack of any real progress in the rebuilding effort)it will continue to be a dysfunctional place built on the waining days of the Port and Oil businesses and the intoxifying but destructive Tourism Industry. With all the talk of "culture" and "our food" and "Gumbo" it is painful knowing that these are substituted for any real work ethic and effort to rebuild from it's citizens. Another festival, another lassez faire approach to serious issues and no preparation for a better day, another hurricane season approaches without any real leadership in sight; from political, business, or civic leaders, par for the course in NOLA. Douglas Brinkely captures this prideful but blind "culture" that permeates and continues to bring decay to our beloved city brilliantly. Like many in New Orleans, I understand that the problems of New Orleans began long before Katrina. We sold our soul to drunken college students and sleazy tourists from all parts of America to visit New Orleans, get drunk, expose themselves in our streets a' la' "Girls Gone Wild", then get back on planes and in cars after a decadent weekend all the while telling themselves how "crazy" New Orleans is and how we "party" and "whatever happens in New Orleans stays in New Orleans". Unfortunately, that last part is true, we allow ourselves to be denigrated by these "visitors" and are left with the trash, poor reputation, and the 'civic hangover' from offering ourselves up as America's one night stand.
Do us a favor, stay home. Not that the tourists are the ones who brought the problems upon us - it is our fault. However, in order to truly recover from Katrina and "fix" the city, we need to hit rock bottom first. Like an alcoholic in denial, as long as we have a little bit money in our pocket we'll spend it on vice and not make any real changes to clean ourselves up. New Orleans needs tough love. Tourists need to keep thier dollars lest we never learn our lesson. Doug Brinkley references these issues in his book. He understands the "soul" of New Orleans, both good and bad. If we don't mend our ways we'll continue to be America's Tijuana. I don't want this for my city. Stay home, let the slothful, gluttonous head-in-the-sand New Orleanians hit rock bottom. Hurricanes are the least of our problems. Like many on the streets of New Orleans have said since the storm, in many ways, Katrina is the best thing that ever happened to New Orleans. In other words, we had to destroy the city to save it!
26 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AERS4QVHQR5QPJ6YNJFU...
✓ Verified Purchase
Why one star? because Amazon wouldn't let me give less.
This, sadly to say, is the first book that I've ever had to quit reading. My blood pressure couldn't take it. This is the most biased, slanted thing that I've ever read that was to be taken as factual. I was a Registered Nurse in La at the time of Katrina. Most of my first responders were pulled to New Orleans during the flood, as well as several of the doctors and other nurses that I worked with volunteering to go to help. (I was unavailable to go because my son was just born in April.) The first-hand stories from those medical personel simply do not match the second-hand stories that Mr Brinkley wrote about in the book. It's disgusting that a supposed pre-eminent historian took it upon himself to re-write history. Factual errors aside, it wasn't well written. The book takes a whiney tone and is soooo repetitious. Exactly how many young, professional black men gave up multi-million dollar careers in other parts of America to come back to New Orleans to "give back to the community"? I quit counting at three. These saintly men really never did "give back", they just ran around New Orleans telling people that they "got a bad feeling about this one." Something else disturbing is the unnecessarily flattering revision of Govenor Blanco, who's incompteance in real life killed hundreds if not thousands in Louisiana, when she rescinded Nagin's evacuation order stating that he didn't have the authority to give it, but wouldn't give one herself. To Brinkley, Nagin's incompetent, and Blanco's the hero. As for Bush, America watched Blanco go on tv multiple times a day and cry instead of turning the matter over to the federal government, but still, Brinkley hammered Bush. I voted for Blanco, I voted against Bush twice, and I'd have never voted for Nagin, so it's not just that my politics blinds me, and let me say Bush's greatest sin in this whole episode is callousness, not incompetence as Brinkley stated. In short, talk to the people who were there, which Brinkley didn't seem to do, and you'll realize that this book is garbage.
25 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AGWMGODUBZML6N6XR3QP...
✓ Verified Purchase
Judge, Jury and Executioner - David Brinkley
It's a good thing we live in a free society, because if we didn't - no way a guy like Brinkley would get away with publishing such an unspeakable abomination as this book.
The first thing that prospective readers need to know about this abomination is that it was released just days before the New Orleans mayoral elections. There can be little doubt that inflicting political damage at all levels of government, but especially against George W. Bush and Mayor Ray Nagin was a chief objective of this work. That the citizens of New Orleans relected Nagin against a crowded field, and relected Governor Blanco, despite the appaling distortions spewed out by the author stands as an eternal refutation and rebuke against this work, this man, and the Democratic National Committee, for which he obviously wrote.
Below I list just some of the abominations spewed out by this hack:
1.) Black Democrat Mayor Ray Nagin, is really more of white than a black, and more of a Republican than a Democrat.
2.) The "slow" federal response to Katrina was definitely because of racism. If the same had happened to rich whites in Boston, MA, the response would have been swift and effective.
3.) The root cause of the horrific looting wasn't the perpetrators themselves, it was the cops and the federal governement, who through their actions and inactions spawned the lawless behavior.
4.) Karl Rove was behind the "slow" response of the federal government because Lousiana governor Blanco is a Democrat.
If you want to read a book about one of the most devastating natural disasters to ever stike American shores, this isn't it. Not more than 20 to 30% of this book is devoted to the actual weather event itself and the attendant consequences. No, most of the book is about assinging political blame, and laying the foundation (mostly with lies and distortions) to do it. You see to Brinkley, it isn't God or the weather who devastated New Orleans, it was Republicans.
There is only one unshakable hero presented in this book - jounalists. Never once are they presented in a poor light in this book. Doctors also fare well. They are the heros that step into the breach to fill the alleged compassion vacumm left by George Bush. Notably absent is almost ANY mention in this book of the tremedous, vital, critical help that was proferred by churches and other faith-based organizations during and after Katrina. Brinkley is correct, the government was not up to handling a crisis of this magnitude. So, the churches stepped up to help fill the breech, and they get no credit from Brinkley. This book is all about attack and hate. The author is to filled with hate too see the truth.
Ironcially, near the end, the author warns about what revisionists will do the history of Katrina. This guy probably had revisionist tataooed to his armpit when he was born. A born liar - Douglas Brinkley.
24 people found this helpful
★★★★★
1.0
AEYMZI5ULTPR3RJZLKMU...
✓ Verified Purchase
The Great Audacity
Professor Brinkley! New Orleans! WOW! How can y'all have stood wide-eyed and frozen in the headlights of a monster that has been bearing down on you for THIRTY YEARS and afterward blame us? How can you have been hit over the head by a Katrina-sized sledgehammer and still not take responsibility for yourselves when you LIVE BELOW SEA LEVEL IN A HURRICANE ALLEY? I know how hard you want to slap someone. Reach out your dominant hands and slap yourselves silly.
How can you have sat through countless town hall meetings and never raised that dominant hand and suggested that since the federal government will predictably be busy managing federal issues, maybe y'all ought to table the casino discussions for a bit and dust off and update and verify and publish and test and re-test and re-test again and market so ferociously your emergency storm evacuation plan that every tourist coming into NO has it memorized, let alone the citizens who actually live there, let alone the people in the plan responsible for executing it, let alone your elected leaders?
How can you complain about federal lethargy when you've been lethargic about the issue forever yourself, and you live there? How did you dare to have hoped that the rest of us had not only built, from far away, but would have been able, from far away, to execute an emergency rescue plan to save yourselves? Why did you expect everyone else to have predicted that you would be so incompetent that you would not only not follow your evacuation plan, you'd not even have one that works?
You condemn FEMA and it will be a long time before many of you could ever trust that department again. How long will that be, a year, maybe two? Don't you understand that YOU SHOULD HAVE NEVER IN THE FIRST PLACE TRUSTED FEMA TO DO WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOING YOURSELF? You all think that "One of the biggest lessons of Katrina was that in times of disaster, bad bureaucracy plus presidential hesitation equals corpses." Is that all you learned? Can't you see, even now, that federal-sized bureaucracies ARE NEVER GOING TO REACT QUICKLY? Of course the federal government was almost completely useless in your situation. Don't you understand your mistake in not understanding that sooner? How can you miss the irony in your being surprised at Bush being surprised by your incompetence?
I'm ashamed for you all when you scream about all the people that your incompetence allowed to die while not being more amazed that the largest and most successful emergency response in the history of our planet saved way more of you than you'd ever yourself have predicted, if you'd have had the gumption to have analyzed your situation beforehand.
Why do you now expect us to want to dump tens of billions of reconstructive dollars into your city before you've proven to us that you've fixed your leaks and that you now understand that you need to manage your geographical, hydrological, and population issues better than you proved you could last time?
Personally, I went to New Orleans one time, looked around and drove away quickly saying "whhheeeewww" once I was above sea level again - and I never went back. How did you live there day after day, year after year and ignore those little hairs scared sh__less and standing up straight on the back of your neck?
Maybe your hangover was numbing your instincts?
Professor Brinkley, why didn't your intelligence and your passion for New Orleans compel you to lend your literary skills toward something more preventative pre-Katrina than something so sadly postmortive? This book is a monument to your apathy. Think about that when you're cashing your royalty checks and lecturing ad nauseam to your students and speaking at your many fancy dinner engagements.
I recommend reading The Great Audacity to anyone desiring to mainline a big-ol' tome of presumption.
24 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AHN4DNVPFWEEMEUPT2AV...
✓ Verified Purchase
Hmm.....
In my business, it's important to scrutinize the factual support for assertions. While I haven't spent my career reviewing the record on how all our govt systems failed in Katrina, I am skeptical that an accurate history can be written quickly on this topic without access to the people actually involved in policy making. Some of the insights in this book are probably correct and well founded, and the emotional appeal of the descriptions is profound. But I think it better to spend more time, interview more of the government insiders and really get a more accurate and careful depiction of what happened inside closed rooms. I just don't think that can be done this quickly, and there is no indication that Mr. Brinkley had access to many of the people he criticizes.
I certainly haven't taken an editor's pen to this work, but even an initial look can identify factual problems. In some instances, Mr. Brinkley has chosen to take confused statements by Mr. Brown at face value. Many of those have also been addressed by the Congressional Committees and identified as inaccurate. I don't personnally know who is right and who is wrong, but I think an author must endeavor to sort that out.
So I'm a bit disappointed that this work is published this soon in this form as a "historical" work. Hopefully a future historian will look at these issues with a bit more time and distance.
24 people found this helpful
★★★★★
2.0
AEZ6V2UB7ZR35G75L3LD...
✓ Verified Purchase
Brinkley Misses The Boat
Once again the completely destroyed Mississippi Gulf Coast is ignored in favor of the sordid racially conflicted story of the New Orleans Flood of 2006. The Great Deluge is aptly titled but wrongly claims representing Mississippi. With the exception of some Bay St Louis stories from Mayor Farve, Brinkley prefers the CNN moment of looters, helicopters, 'The Big Dump', the Superdome and countless trips in flat bottom boats. No wonder, Biloxi's Sun Herald dubbed Mississippi's crisis as 'The Invisible Coast'. It's one thing for fleet footed reporters and videographers to grab the easy headlines of New Orleans. But it's quite another thing for a historical authoritative voice to tilt the story toward the mouth of the Mississippi. Brinkley is relentless in his criticism of Nagin and Blanco while only chastising Brown, Bush and Chertoff. Make no mistake, there is plenty of blame to dole out, yet, this historian does seem to be biased. Katrina has three major themes: the hurricane, the flood and the failure of government. Brinkley focuses on the flood almost exclusively. All in all, I am glad that this book exists. At times it is a marvel because the author is clearly talented. I'm simply disappointed that the entire story of Katrina is not being told by such a capable mind. Like so many missed opportunities prior to Katrina, Brinkley missed an opportunity to write a brilliant book. He certainly is able. In what appears to be a 'rush to publish' he has managed to miss the boat.
24 people found this helpful
★★★★★
4.0
AEYWNQK6VWYKZWULQJXJ...
✓ Verified Purchase
Excellent but Flawed Telling of the Hurricane Katrina Story
Douglas Brinkley's "The Great Deluge: Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast" is an excellent, but flawed, telling of the Hurricane Katrina story. Brinkley, a New Orleans resident, wrote this book in the months following the storm. He weaves first-person accounts into this long book (over 600 pages) and freely adds analysis - and blame - into his story.
Brinkley's story is based primarily on contemporary media accounts of the hurricane and its aftermath. Some of his more in-depth stories, though, are based on extensive interviews that he conducted with many of the survivors. Although billed as the story of "New Orleans, and the Mississippi Gulf Coast," this book focuses almost exclusively on New Orleans, especially during the days after Katrina - a "flaw" Brinkley freely admits. There are of course many stories of terror as people rode out the storm or the unexpected flooding following the storm. Brinkley tells how groups of individual citizens - groups such as the "NOLA Homeboys" and the "Cajun Navy," responded immediately to the flooding in New Orleans and began saving people. He tells the personal stories of the impoverished, of doctors, and even of Fats Domino. Brinkley also extols the many corporations that helped with the rescues and recovery efforts, from the local Acadian Ambulance Company that helped rescue hundreds of flood victims to companies like Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, and others that not only contributed millions in immediate aid but guaranteed paychecks (and even provided housing) for their displaced employees.
Brinkley also spent a great deal of effort analyzing what happened and why it did. I found this surprising in a book written so soon after the event and, when I started reading this book, I expected only a rote telling of the story. This is both one of the strengths and one of the weaknesses of the book. Brinkley is critical of almost all levels of government, from Mayor Nagin (who he portrays worse than even the worst critics could have imagined) to Governor Blanco to FEMA/Homeland Security and all the way to President Bush. At times, this analysis is welcome because it adds depth to the story, and fortunately Brinkley does not shy away from trying to assess what went wrong.
However, some of Brinkley's analysis falls apart because he does not appear to understand many of the intricate details, probably because the book was written so quickly after the storm. Brinkley makes factual mistakes about the dynamics of hurricanes. He also does not understand the Posse Comitatus Act, the National Response Plan or seem to understand the National Guard's or Regular Army's role - and limitations - in this plan. He makes no mention of the National Guard Emergency Mutual Assistance Compact, nor does he attempt to explain why FEMA bungled so many things. And finally, while he mercilessly criticizes Nagin and the New Orleans Police Department throughout the book, Brinkley (who wrote a fawning biography of John Kerry during his campaign against President Bush) ultimately concludes the book by laying most of the blame for Hurricane Katrina at the President's feet. In making this conclusion, Brinkley laments that racism and "class-ism" were responsible for many of the Katrina problems. However, recent research has shown that, proportionately, more New Orleans whites than blacks died during Katrina (based on Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals statistics) and that the middle-class died at the same rate that the poor did (based on an analysis done by the Los Angeles Times).
One other glaring problem with the book was the lack of maps. A story such as this is predicated on spatial relationships, and for those not familiar with the intricacies of the New Orleans neighborhoods, canals, highways, and surrounding communities, a decent set of maps would have helped tell the story much, much better.
Despite these criticisms, this is a great book that should be read by every American. Brinkley's great writing is rich in detail and he truly brings the people of New Orleans alive. And more importantly, Brinkley brings to life their stories of struggling, suffering, and survival.