The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East
The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East book cover

The Great War for Civilisation: The Conquest of the Middle East

Price
$13.79
Format
Paperback
Pages
1136
Publisher
Vintage
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-1400075171
Dimensions
6.08 x 1.88 x 9.2 inches
Weight
2.26 pounds

Description

"A magisterial report from the shifting front lines of the Middle East. It deserves to be read by all those concerned with what is happening in Iraq today." — The Boston Globe “A stimulating and absorbing book, by a man who . . . has met the leading players, from bin Laden to Ahmad Chalabi. . . . A formidable production.” — The New York Times Book Review “Vivid, graphic, intense. . . . A book of unquestionable importance. . . . [Fisk’s] experience of war is unmatched, [as is] his capacity to convey that experience in concrete, passionate language.” — The Washington Post Book World “Fisk’s magnum opus. . . . Seals [his] place as a venerable, indispensable contributor to informed debate in and about the Middle East.” — The Nation “Powerful . . . Mr. Fisk is a gifted writer and an accomplished storyteller . . . his love affair with the region and the glamorous profession of being a foreign correspondent finds expression on every page.” — The Economist Bestselling author and journalist Robert Fisk holds more British and international journalism awards than any other foreign correspondent.xa0Fisk is currently the Middle East correspondent of The Independent , based in Beirut. He has lived in the Arab world for more than 40 years, covering Lebanon, five Israeli invasions, the Iran-Iraq war, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Algerian civil war, Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, the Bosnian and Kosovo wars, the American invasion and occupation of Iraq and the 2011 Arab revolutions.xa0He has been awarded the British International Journalist of the Year Award seven times and has also received the Amnesty International UK Press Award twice.xa0Robert Fisk received a Ph.D. in Political Science from Trinity College, Dublin and was The Times 's (London) Belfast correspondent from 1971-1975 and its Middle East correspondent from 1976-1987.xa0He is also the author of Pity the Nation , a history of the Lebanese war, and The Age of the Warrior , an anthology of his ‘Comment’ pieces from the Independent . Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. CHAPTER ONE“One of Our Brothers Had a Dream . . . ” "They combine a mad love of country with an equally mad indifference to life, their own as well as others. They are cunning, unscrupulous, and inspired."—“Stephen Fisher” in Alfred Hitchcock’s Foreign Correspondent (1940)I knew it would be like this. On 19 March 1997, outside the Spinghar Hotel in Jalalabad with its manicured lawns and pink roses, an Afghan holding a Kalashnikov rifle invited me to travel in a car out of town. The highway to Kabul that evening was no longer a road but a mass of rocks and crevasses above the roaring waters of a great river. A vast mountain chain towered above us. The Afghan smiled at me occasionally but did not talk. I knew what his smile was supposed to say. Trust me. But I didn’t. I smiled back the rictus of false friendship. Unless I saw a man I recognised—an Arab rather than an Afghan—I would watch this road for traps, checkpoints, gunmen who were there to no apparent purpose. Even inside the car, I could hear the river as it sloshed through gulleys and across wide shoals of grey stones and poured over the edge of cliffs. Trust Me steered the car carefully around the boulders and I admired the way his bare left foot eased the clutch of the vehicle up and down as a man might gently urge a horse to clamber over a rock.A benevolent white dust covered the windscreen, and when the wipers cleared it the desolation took on a hard, unforgiving, dun-coloured uniformity. The track must have looked like this, I thought to myself, when Major-General William Elphinstone led his British army to disaster more than 150 years ago. The Afghans had annihilated one of the greatest armies of the British empire on this very stretch of road, and high above me were villages where old men still remembered the stories of great-grandfathers who had seen the English die in their thousands. The stones of Gandamak, they claim, were made black by the blood of the English dead. The year 1842 marked one of the greatest defeats of British arms. No wonder we preferred to forget the First Afghan War. But Afghans don’t forget. “ Farangiano ,” the driver shouted and pointed down into the gorge and grinned at me. “Foreigners.” “ Angrezi .” “English.” “ Jang .” “War.” Yes, I got the point. “ Irlanda ,” I replied in Arabic. “ Ana min Irlanda .” I am from Ireland. Even if he understood me, it was a lie. Educated in Ireland I was, but in my pocket was a small black British passport in which His Majesty’s Principal Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs required in the name of Her Majesty that I should be allowed “to pass freely without let or hindrance” on this perilous journey. A teenage Taliban had looked at my passport at Jalalabad airport two days earlier, a boy soldier of maybe fourteen who held the document upside down, stared at it and clucked his tongue and shook his head in disapproval.It had grown dark and we were climbing, overtaking trucks and rows of camels, the beasts turning their heads towards our lights in the gloom. We careered past them and I could see the condensation of their breath floating over the road. Their huge feet were picking out the rocks with infinite care and their eyes, when they caught the light, looked like dolls’ eyes. Two hours later, we stopped on a stony hillside and, after a few minutes, a pick-up truck came bouncing down the rough shale of the mountain.An Arab in Afghan clothes came towards the car. I recognised him at once from our last meeting in a ruined village. “I am sorry, Mr. Robert, but I must give you the first search,” he said, prowling through my camera bag and newspapers. And so we set off up the track that Osama bin Laden built during his jihad against the Russian army in the early 1980s, a terrifying, slithering, two-hour odyssey along fearful ravines in rain and sleet, the windscreen misting as we climbed the cold mountain. “When you believe in jihad, it is easy,” he said, fighting with the steering wheel as stones scuttered from the tyres, tumbling down the precipice into the clouds below. From time to time, lights winked at us from far away in the darkness. “Our brothers are letting us know they see us,” he said.After an hour, two armed Arabs—one with his face covered in a kuffiah scarf, eyes peering at us through spectacles, holding an anti-tank rocket-launcher over his right shoulder—came screaming from behind two rocks. “Stop! Stop!” As the brakes were jammed on, I almost hit my head on the windscreen. “Sorry, sorry,” the bespectacled man said, putting down his rocket-launcher. He pulled a metal detector from the pocket of his combat jacket, the red light flicking over my body in another search. The road grew worse as we continued, the jeep skidding backwards towards sheer cliffs, the headlights playing across the chasms on either side. “Toyota is good for jihad,” my driver said. I could only agree, noting that this was one advertising logo the Toyota company would probably forgo.There was moonlight now and I could see clouds both below us in the ravines and above us, curling round mountaintops, our headlights shining on frozen waterfalls and ice-covered pools. Osama bin Laden knew how to build his wartime roads; many an ammunition truck and tank had ground its way up here during the titanic struggle against the Russian army. Now the man who led those guerrillas—the first Arab fighter in the battle against Moscow—was back again in the mountains he knew. There were more Arab checkpoints, more shrieked orders to halt. One very tall man in combat uniform and wearing shades carefully patted my shoulders, body, legs and looked into my face. Salaam aleikum , I said. Peace be upon you. Every Arab I had ever met replied Aleikum salaam to this greeting. But not this one. There was something cold about this man. Osama bin Laden had invited me to meet him in Afghanistan, but this was a warrior without the minimum courtesy. He was a machine, checking out another machine.It had not always been this way. Indeed, the first time I met Osama bin Laden, the way could not have been easier. Back in December 1993, I had been covering an Islamic summit in the Sudanese capital of Khartoum when a Saudi journalist friend of mine, Jamal Kashoggi, walked up to me in the lobby of my hotel. Kashoggi, a tall, slightly portly man in a long white dishdash robe, led me by the shoulder outside the hotel. “There is someone I think you should meet,” he said. Kashoggi is a sincere believer—woe betide anyone who regards his round spectacles and roguish sense of humour as a sign of spiritual laxity—and I guessed at once to whom he was referring. Kashoggi had visited bin Laden in Afghanistan during his war against the Russian army. “He has never met a Western reporter before,” he announced. “This will be interesting.” Kashoggi was indulging in a little applied psychology. He wanted to know how bin Laden would respond to an infidel. So did I.Bin Laden’s story was as instructive as it was epic. When the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan in 1979, the Saudi royal family—encouraged by the CIA—sought to provide the Afghans with an Arab legion, preferably led by a Saudi prince, who would lead a guerrilla force against the Russians. Not only would he disprove the popularly held and all too accurate belief that the Saudi leadership was effete and corrupt, he could re-establish the honourable tradition of the Gulf Arab warrior, heedless of his own life in defending the umma , the community of Islam. True to form, the Saudi princes declined this noble mission. Bin Laden, infuriated at both their cowardice and the humiliation of the Afghan Muslims at the hands of the Soviets, took their place and, with money and machinery from his own construction company, set off on his own personal jihad.A billionaire businessman and himself a Saudi, albeit of humbler Yemeni descent, in the coming years he would be idolised by both Saudis and millions of other Arabs, the stuff of Arab schoolboy legend from the Gulf to the Mediterranean. Not since the British glorified Lawrence of Arabia had an adventurer been portrayed in so heroic, so influential a role. Egyptians, Saudis, Yemenis, Kuwaitis, Algerians, Syrians and Palestinians made their way to the Pakistani border city of Peshawar to fight alongside bin Laden. But when the Afghan mujahedin guerrillas and bin Laden’s Arab legion had driven the Soviets from Afghanistan, the Afghans turned upon each other with wolflike and tribal venom. Sickened by this perversion of Islam—original dissension within the umma led to the division of Sunni and Shia Muslims—bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia.But his journey of spiritual bitterness was not over. When Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, bin Laden once more offered his services to the Saudi royal family. They did not need to invite the United States to protect the place of the two holiest shrines of Islam, he argued. Mecca and Medina, the cities in which the Prophet Mohamed received and recited God’s message, should be defended only by Muslims. Bin Laden would lead his “Afghans,” his Arab mujahedin, against the Iraqi army inside Kuwait and drive them from the emirate. King Fahd of Saudi Arabia preferred to put his trust in the Americans. So as the U.S. 82nd Airborne Division arrived in the north-eastern Saudi city of Dhahran and deployed in the desert roughly 500 miles from the city of Medina—the place of the Prophet’s refuge and of the first Islamic society—bin Laden abandoned the corruption of the House of Saud to bestow his generosity on another “Islamic Republic”: Sudan.Our journey north from Khartoum lay though a landscape of white desert and ancient, unexplored pyramids, dark, squat Pharaonic tombs smaller than those of Cheops, Chephren and Mycerinus at Giza. Though it was December, a sharp, superheated breeze moved across the desert, and when Kashoggi tired of the air conditioning and opened his window, it snapped at his Arab headdress. “The people like bin Laden here,” he said, in much the way that one might comment approvingly of a dinner host. “He’s got his business here and his construction company and the government likes him. He helps the poor.” I could understand all this. The Prophet Mohamed, orphaned at an early age, had been obsessed by the poor in seventh-century Arabia, and generosity to those who lived in poverty was one of the most attractive characteristics of Islam. Bin Laden’s progress from “holy” warrior to public benefactor might allow him to walk in the Prophet’s footsteps. He had just completed building a new road from the Khartoum–Port Sudan highway to the tiny desert village of Almatig in northern Sudan, using the same bulldozers he had employed to construct the guerrilla trails of Afghanistan; many of his labourers were the same fighters who had been his comrades in the battle against the Soviet Union. The U.S. State Department took a predictably less charitable view of bin Laden’s beneficence. It accused Sudan of being a “sponsor of international terrorism” and bin Laden himself of operating “terrorist training camps” in the Sudanese desert.But when Kashoggi and I arrived in Almatig, there was Osama bin Laden in his gold-fringed robe, sitting beneath the canopy of a tent before a crowd of admiring villagers and guarded by the loyal Arab mujahedin who fought alongside him in Afghanistan. Bearded, silent figures—unarmed, but never more than a few yards from the man who recruited them, trained them and then dispatched them to destroy the Soviet army—they watched unsmiling as the Sudanese villagers lined up to thank the Saudi businessman who was about to complete the road linking their slums to Khartoum for the first time in history.My first impression was of a shy man. With his high cheekbones, narrow eyes and long brown robe, he would avert his eyes when the village leaders addressed him. He seemed ill-at-ease with gratitude, incapable of responding with a full smile when children in miniature chadors danced in front of him and preachers admired his wisdom. “We have been waiting for this road through all the revolutions in Sudan,” a bearded sheikh announced. “We waited until we had given up on everybody—and then Osama bin Laden came along.” I noticed how bin Laden, head still bowed, peered up at the old man, acknowledging his age but unhappy that he should be sitting at ease in front of him, a young man relaxing before his elders. He was even more unhappy at the sight of a Westerner standing a few feet away from him, and from time to time he would turn his head to look at me, not with malevolence but with grave suspicion.Kashoggi put his arms around him. Bin Laden kissed him on both cheeks, one Muslim to another, both acknowledging the common danger they had endured together in Afghanistan. Jamal Kashoggi must have brought the foreigner for a reason. That is what bin Laden was thinking. For as Kashoggi spoke, bin Laden looked over his shoulder at me, occasionally nodding. “Robert, I want to introduce you to Sheikh Osama,” Kashoggi half-shouted through children’s songs. Bin Laden was a tall man and he realised that this was an advantage when he shook hands with the English reporter. Salaam aleikum . His hands were firm, not strong, but, yes, he looked like a mountain man. The eyes searched your face. He was lean and had long fingers and a smile which—while it could never be described as kind—did not suggest villainy. He said we might talk, at the back of the tent where we could avoid the shouting of the children.Looking back now, knowing what we know, understanding the monstrous beast-figure he would become in the collective imagination of the world, I search for some clue, the tiniest piece of evidence, that this man could inspire an act that would change the world for ever—or, more to the point, allow an American president to persuade his people that the world was changed for ever. Certainly his formal denial of “terrorism” gave no hint. The Egyptian press was claiming that bin Laden had brought hundreds of his Arab fighters with him to Sudan, while the Western embassy circuit in Khartoum was suggesting that some of the Arab “Afghans” whom this Saudi entrepreneur had flown to Sudan were now busy training for further jihad wars in Algeria, Tunisia and Egypt. Bin Laden was well aware of this. “The rubbish of the media and embassies,” he called it. “I am a construction engineer and an agriculturalist. If I had training camps here in Sudan, I couldn’t possibly do this job.” Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A sweeping and dramatic history of the last half century of conflict in the Middle East from an award-winning journalist who has covered the region for over forty years,
  • The Great War for Civilisation
  • unflinchingly chronicles the tragedy of the region from the Algerian Civil War to the Iranian Revolution; from the American hostage crisis in Beirut to the Iran-Iraq War; from the 1991 Gulf War to the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. A book of searing drama as well as lucid, incisive analysis,
  • The Great War for Civilisation
  • is a work of major importance for today's world.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
60%
(717)
★★★★
25%
(299)
★★★
15%
(179)
★★
7%
(84)
-7%
(-84)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Two words: Biased and Inaccurate

As an avid scholar of the Middle East and as somebody who has spent several years living and working there, I picked up this book with high hopes. I knew from leafing through this hefty tome that it was likely not going to be a neutral or objective book, but I decided to go ahead with it anyhow. Anyway, 1038 pages later I felt like I had given birth. Boy was I glad to be done with this book.

It's a real shame that Fisk, somebody with a profound level of experience in the Middle East, has to taint his commentary (not journalism - but commentary; an important distinction) with such copious amounts of bias. Fisk's writing is so heavily and shamelessly opinionated that it totally detracts from whatever serious reporting he is attempting to impart. This is a shame because this book had such potential -- the section on the Iran-Iraq war was, for example, some of the best first hand coverage of that conflict I have yet read. Fisk's desire to ruin what would otherwise have been one of the best books on recent Middle East history with his copious amounts of skewed commentary is sadly akin to the old adage of ruining a perfectly good pizza by placing anchovies on it. BTW, I think I've only given a 1-star rating once before -- I don't do that lightly.

Also noteworthy: As this book drags on (interminably, it sometimes seems), and as Fisk delves into topics with which I am personally familiar, factual errors (lots of them) become apparent. Although some of these may be nitpicky, since Fisk gets such easily fact-checkable things wrong, it casts a shadow of doubt over the veracity of all of the information is his book. For example:

- Page 704, 1st paragraph (hardback edition): Fisk writes that the Port of Umm Qasr is "Iraq's only access to the waters of the (Persian) Gulf." Iraq actually has five ports: Umm Qasr, Al Basra, Al Faw, Khawr Al Amaya, and Mina Al Bakr. They all access the Gulf.

- Page 712, 4th paragraph: Fisk mentions the deployment of U.S. troops from the 1st Cavalry Division back to Kuwait circa January 1993. Fisk writes that a US Army Public Affairs Officer named Captain Lackey stood on the tarmac of an "Iraqi Airbase" issuing instructions to reporters as the 1st Cavalry was about to arrive by plane. Considering the U.S. troops were returning to Kuwait to help stave off another Iraqi invasion, I'm pretty sure this scene really took place at a Kuwaiti airbase vice an Iraqi one.

- Page 828, 1st paragraph: Fisk mentions that following the assassination of Ahmed Shah Massoud (Afghan Northern Alliance leader) on 09Sep01, that "overnight, American cruise missiles had it Kabul." To the best of my knowledge there was no U.S. strike on anybody following Massoud's death.

- Page 930, 3rd paragraph: Fisk says "Al-Qaeda ... came into existence in 2000." While dates vary among scholars, 20 August 1988 is commonly regarded as AQ's foundation date.

- Page 941, 3rd paragraph: Fisk mentions US cruise missiles hitting Baghdad in 2003, "courtesy of the USS Kitty Hawk." The USS KITTY HAWK (CV-63) was an aircraft carrier and could not launch cruise missiles.

- Page 941, 6th paragraph: Fisk mentions the Republican Palace was hit by missiles and "burned for twelve hours" in the opening salvoes of Operation Iraqi Freedom. In fact, the Republican Palace was not hit and never burned (I've personally been in this Palace about 100+ times). Strangely, Fisk himself later ignores his own mistakes as he describes walking around inside the largely undamaged palace marveling at the gold toilets and bizarre Baath Party murals on the walls.

- Page 945: Read the footnote at the bottom of the page and you will see that Fisk is the only person on the planet who actually believed casualty reports issued by Mohamed Saeed al-Sahaf, the infamous and delusional Iraqi Information Minister.

- Page 963, 2nd paragraph: Fisk writes of "Apache helicopters that would disgorge Special Forces troops on the road to Karbala." The Apache is a two-seat attack helicopter that can't disgorge anybody. Earlier in the book (I forget the page), Fisk mentions actually riding in an Apache with "about a half-dozen" other personnel. He seriously needs to spend about two minutes on the Internet to figure out what type of helo he is referring to; it wasn't an Apache in either case.

- Finally, on several pages throughout his coverage of OIF, he mentions US Marines taking the western half of Baghdad, across the Tigris River from the Palestine Hotel in which Fisk was staying. That was actually the US Army's 3rd Infantry Division he was seeing; the US Marines took the eastern half of Baghdad (where Fisk was).

There are plenty of other errors to be sure, plus the usual, worn out diatribes about how the Iraq War was done for the sake of oil, how Bin Laden worked for the CIA in the 1980s, etc. You get the point. Anyway, please avoid this book, fellow readers. I would recommend anything by the far more experienced and far less biased Vali Nasr and/or Judith Miller when it comes to contemporary scholarly/journalistic coverage of the Middle East. Thank you for your time and consideration in reading this review.
82 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Best book about the Middle East, not even close

The Great War for Civilization should be mandatory for anyone in Foreign Affairs, and I would go beyond, for anyone seeking an understanding of the Middle East and the world. Fisk's perception and interpretation of events is built on his personal experience living and covering the Middle East as a reporter for almost three decades (now almost four, but the book stops in 2006).

Each chapter of the book reveals one or many "surprising" facts. "Surprising" to me because I didn't know about it, I didn't hear about it or I didn't explore it enough before, in large part because of my ignorance, but also because our traditional media outlets are incredibly deficient or subscribed to a particular view of the world. Fisk talks about the terrible consequences of the First World War, the history of aggression to the Afghan people by Brits, Russians and Americans, the conflict between the urban and rural sides of Afghanistan, the Western-sponsored coup d'etat that overthrew the only Iranian President ever elected in a fair democratic process, the world support to the invader and user of chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq war, the gruesome history of the Algerian civil war, the conversations between the Nazis and the Palestinians during World War II, the massacres at the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Chatila in the Lebanon, the contamination of water and soil and increased cancer rates in Iraq due to depleted uranium, just to name a few terrible facts. This is definitively not a "feel good" book, but rather a raw description of the events in an area of the world ravaged by war and vengeance. You will feel sad. You will feel frustrated. You will feel anger, especially at the intervention of the foreign powers in the region (UK, France, US, Russia, even Germany and Italy). But suddenly, you will realize that the marathon effort of going through more than 1,300 pages is one of your best investments of time. Very highly recommended.
56 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A waste of time

Do not waste your time on this Book. Fisk had an interesting life as a journalist in the Middle East; unfortunately, he is woefully inadequate at telling the story. First, regardless of the title, this is not a history but rather a rambling memoir that is hopelessly chaotic in structure. Fisk would have benefitted greatly from a heavy editing to cut the length down to 400 pages or there about. Second, Fisk clearly dislikes ALL government leaders from all countries and is unrelenting in his criticisms and second-guessing of policies and actions. For those who enjoy basing the USA you will find Fisk a kindred soul, as he reserves his strongest venom for the USA. These criticisms would be interesting if he presented viable alternative solutions. He does not. He castigates everyone except for his favorite hero, himself.
18 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Jealous gods

Jealous Gods

How will it ever end, this "Great War for Civilization"? It will end when the peoples of the Middle East stop fighting each other and fight their common enemy. Their common enemy is the Lord of the Limbic System, Ruler of the Reptilian Brain, aka god. Just imagine what would be possible in that beautiful and fertile land were it not for their bronze age religions.

Fisk asks why a Jewish child in the Wall Street Cafe had to have her eyes blown out, or why the citizens of Deir Yassin had to be massacred. After 1368 pages of interviews and reporter's dispatches he still doesn't get it. Funny, I understand it, as does anyone who has read the Bible and the Koran. "Idolatry is worse than carnage" (Koran 2 :193). "Make war upon them until idolatry shall cease and Allah's religion shall reign supreme" (Koran 8:40). ... "When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them." (Koran 9:4) . "Fight against such of those to whom the Scriptures were given as believe neither in Allah nor in the Last day, who do not forbid what Allah and His apostle have forbidden, and do not embrace the true faith, until they pay tribute out of hand and are utterly subdued" (Koran 9:26). "We renounce you: enmity and hate shall reign between us until you believe in Allah only.(Koran 60:2)" "The only true faith in God's sight is Islam" (Koran 3:19). The god of Moses is no better: [for those who obstruct your passage] ..." kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known a man by lying with him. But all the women children that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves" (Moses, Numbers, 31.17/18). ..[in the promised land] .."thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth" (Moses, Deuteronomy 20.16). "....for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous god" (Exodus 34:14). Get it now? Idolatry is worse than carnage. With gods like that who needs devils? At Nuremberg their gods would have been hanged. A Gandhi, a Mandela, a Martin Luther King will not spring from this soil.

Who would undertake to write a book of 1368 pages on the Middle East without reading the Koran? Fisk waxes indignant about Hamas' references to Jews as sons of pigs and monkeys (p579), not knowing that this comes directly from the Limbic Lord Himself (Koran 2:266, 5:261, 7:167). And no, the first words of the Koran are NOT "there is no god but god..." (p758), and Cyrus ended the Babylonian captivity, not Artaxerses. He dates the Armenian genocide from 1915, and he wants the West to share the blame (p.xxiii). Read The Burning Tigris (http://www.amazon.com/The-Burning-Tigris-Armenian-Genocide/dp/0060558709) to learn that it started in 1894, and was as much jihad as politics. He covers the Iran Iraq war without understanding of the great Shia Sunni schism.

Fisk thinks its all about politics and colonialism; his history goes back to the British Mandate. His ear is tilted toward the Muslim narrative, which explains and is explained by his extraordinary access to Muslim leaders. Fisk is "locally unbiased", he gives equal time to Schwarzkopf's lack respect for his Saudi counterpart and Iraqi murders and torture in Kuwait. However, he swallows the Muslim victim narrative. If you want to count victims, start at the slave markets in Cairo, Bagdad and Damascus fueled by the Islamic expansion into Africa, Europe and the Indian subcontinent. The prophet himself possessed at least fifty nine slaves. Mirkhond, the Prophet's fifteenth century biographer, names them all in his Rauzat-us-Safa" from K.S,. Lal "The origins of Muslim slave system" in Muslim Slave System in India, New Delhi, Aditya Prakasham, 1994, pp. 9 - 16. Or, read Bin Laden's mentor, the strategist of the Muslim Brotherhood: "When we understand the nature of Islam, ...we realize the inevitability of jihad, or striving for God's cause, taking a military form in addition to its advocacy form. We will further recognize that jihad was never defensive, in the narrow sense that the term 'defensive war' generally denotes today. ...As Islam works for peace, it is not satisfied with a cheap peace that applies only to the area where people of the Muslim happen to live. Islam aims to achieve the sort of peace which insures that all submission is made to God alone. This means that all people submit themselves to God, and none of them takes others for their lords. We must form our view on the basis of the ultimate stage of the Jihad movement, not on the early or middle stages of the prophet's mission (The Sayyid Qutb reader, A.J. Bergesen ed, Routeledge 2008 p.49, 50). Or read Shaikh Abdulla Ghoshah, Chief Judge of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan at an Islamic conference in 1968 under the aegis of the renowned Al-Azhar academy of Islamic research "Jihad is legislated in order to be one of the means of propagating Islam. ...War is the basis of the relationship between Muslims and their opponents unless there are justifiable reason for peace, such as adopting Islam The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic holy war and the fate of non-Muslims Andrew G. Bostom (ed) Prometheus Books, 2008, Amherst, New York.

There are faint positive signals, like the new reading of Tayimya's Mardin fatwa (http://en.islamtoday.net/artshow-416-3601.htm), which alas is drowned out by
"Therefore, since jihad is divinely instituted, and its goal is that religion reverts in its entirety to Allah and to make Allah's word triumph, whoever opposes the realization of this goal will be fought, according to the unanimous opinion of Muslims. ...The wives of infidels must also be reduced to slavery and the possessions of infidels must be confiscated... " (14th century jurist Ibn Tayimya, Cited in Bat Ye'or Islam and Dhimmitude p 44,45).

None of this is relevant for Fisk.

If you covet your neighbor's land there is one morally acceptable option - buy it in a free market. The early Zionists found that the Sultan wouldn't sell to Jews because they descend from apes and pigs. UN security council resolution 242 (unanimously adopted in 1967 after the 6 day war) (1) condemns the acquisition of territory by war and calls on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories, and (2) calls on belligerents to recognize each other. Neither side accepts both. Since non-consenual appropriation other peoples' land is immoral, the only justification is that Lord Limbic, the mother of all ethnic cleansing, demands it. Lord Limbic also prefers carnage to idolatry. Thus, Israelis and Palestinians fiercely contest the moral low ground until god changes his mind, or they find better gods. With the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, Fisk loses his balance. He incessantly blasts the western press for branding Palestinian violence as "terrorism" and Israeli violence as "tragedy" with nary a sigh about the "eastern press" calling murderers of innocent children "martyrs".

Fisk wants to speak truth to power and confront the West with their complicity in this interminable mess. If the problem is political, then we can all do something about it, or feel guilty about not doing enough. However, politics is separate from religion in the West, not the Middle East. So long leveraging minorities worship gods who say carnage is better than idolatry, kill everything that breatheth, Fisk's self-flagellation is just self-indulgence. Speak some real Truth to the real Power, Mr. Fisk.
15 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A waste of talent

I am about two-thirds of the way through "The Great War for Civilisation" and can bear no more. Although I think Mr. Fisk is articulate and intelligent, his bias is exhausting and irritating. I have never read a book where I've actually screamed out loud at it. I decided to go online and read other reactions to the book and was comforted to know I wasn't alone. (I prefer not to read book reviews, but rather form my own opinion, but in this case it was either that or hire a therapist.)

Mr. Fisk has an axe to grind and this is foreshadowed in his reflections on his father-- his way of letting readers know he is a troubled man who was never hugged as a child. His outlet? To champion the causes of his perceived fellow victims. Not saying there are not crimes committed all over the world that should be exposed for their brutality, but tell both sides sir. He rants ad nauseam about how the world (save a few enlightened friends of his) paints Palestinians with a broad brush and dehumanizes them, but has no trouble dismissing Western journalists in toto with one wide stoke of his pen. Double-standard of course, and a consistent theme throughout his rambling, angry tome.

What a waste of talent.
15 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A must read to understand the full middle east story.

I've looked over many other reviews and mostly agree with them, both the positives and negatives of this book.

Up front, I want to say that this is a necessary read to ever have a broad understanding of so many Middle East situations including Israel, Palestine, Iran, Afghanistan, and, of course, Iraq. It also helps considerably in understanding WHY there is "terrorism".

Probably the toughest part of reading the book is when Fisk writes about the many, many innocent people who have been killed or seriously injured over the decades in the Middle East both from war and from limiting the flow of goods into needy countries.. The book points out something we almost never feel and understand in depth It tells us the extent of so-called collateral damage when bombs are dropped from planes and helicopters in the name of getting rid of a single significant leader. It points out how often children are deprived of the nutrition they need as they grow up.

It tells of the tragedy of massive bombing of troops and cities. It raises in my mind the cost of war to human beings.

The book makes one consider the many wars and incidents and the relationship of these to "terrorism". It really takes to task the foreign policy of western governments (USA, UK, especially). It makes me wonder if the people making decisions have any understanding at all of the history of the Middle East..... the things that so many humans have been through, the resentment of western powers interfering in the Middle East in so many ways.

Lastly, as I finished reading this book (and it is a long book but an important read), I asked myself what I have learned. Rather than repeat things I have just written, I will summarize by saying that WAR is not the solution to anything. War is in many ways the easy way out of a situation. It is much easier to start bombing and shooting at perceived enemies than to try to understand the issues on both sides, to talk about them, to respectfully seek alternatives to war.

How many of us have ever really asked "Why the "terrorists" are doing what they do. How have they arrived at this point. How much have we contributed to their current position. "

And I realize how easy it was for the USA to go to war with Iraq making anyone who might question things a "terrorist sympathizer".

All of us need to understand as much as possible so that our votes and voices can be heard advocating solutions other than killing human beings.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A Heavy Book

I had just finished reading "The Great Game" by Peter Hopkirk (excellent!) and was looking for some expanded reading on the Middle East. And so, I picked this book up about 7 months ago, and just finished it last night. It was a *beast* to get through (I will explain why), but I am very happy I read it. Here's why I found this book amazing...

I am 28 years old, and live in Washington DC. When 9/11 happened, I was a freshman in college, at that perfect age where ignorance is bliss. When the US began its responses in Afghanistan, and later Iraq, I remember walking past all the anti-war protesters on campus. My friend was one of them, and he asked me if I would sign a petition saying I was against the war in Iraq. I said I didn't feel comfortable doing so since I didn't know all the facts. Hilarious right? Turns out our our government didn't have any facts either.

Later, I saw a comic in a student newspaper that had two halves. The first half was a cartoon showing the Twin Towers coming down and a family fleeing from it. The second half showed an Afghan family fleeing from an assumed US airstrike. I wondered if there was truth to the metaphor in the cartoon. Turns out there was.

Fisk does a great job of illuminating events that the ordinary person probably does not think about.

This book is a graphic account of "what war does," and just how much pure evil there is in the world. Evil is the only word you can use for some of the scenes that are described in the book. Some reviewers have given this book 1 star because it is sympathetic to Palestinian causes. I think that's childish. I found Fisk's stance on the matter to be refreshing after constant reading of the Washington Post and NY Times. To truly appreciate the costs and consequences of war, one has to see ALL the victims. Since the US media acts as if we can do no wrong as a nation, it is very much necessary to know that we DO, and to SEE IT.

Fisk's experiences over the years as detailed in the book are nothing short of extraordinary. You may disagree with some of his viewpoints, but if you are just out to reinforce your own thinking, you can do that with 1000 other books.

It took me forever to read this due to my age. I got sidetracked frequently to read Wikipedia entries on various historic events that occurred before my time, or when I was very young (such as the Iran-Iraq war). I think for someone in their 40s though, this book would be particularly intriguing.

Overall, a great, and challenging read. Of everything in the book, the thing that sticks with me the most is that when Fisk's mother is dying, he questions how much money governments spend on researching cures for diseases (Parkinsons was the specific one I believe). Whatever sum that was, "defense" spending dwarfed it. It's sad that humanity as a whole spends more resources on trying to kill each other than help each other.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Very important

Works such as this one show us why good journalists who are willing to put themselves at risk to get the real and unvarnished truth are truly so important. If not for men and women like Fisk there would be pages of history that would simply be blank. For filling those pages and giving people a voice and telling their stories, Mr. Fisk should be thanked. This is the most important book I have read in a long time.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Excellent!

I'm delighted to see so many positive reviews of this magnificent book. It took me a long time to get through it - I would read a chapter and then put it aside for a while before continuing.
Robert Fisk is arrogant, self-confident, outraged, and full of righteous anger - all neccessary ingredients for a historical journal like this. Yes, he is a little biased, but this is only because, in some circles, any criticism of Western political and military actions is seen, incorrectly, as biased and unpatriotic. RF is insensed by the hypocracy of far-off governments who have shaped and controlled middle-east history for centuries - British, French, and yes, American. This does not make him anti-American, just anti-injustice. He reserves equal anger for the middle-east governments and regimes who have opressed and exploited their people.
The book is beautifully written and engages the reader from the start, peppered with personal anecdotes and bringing what could be a cold, dispassionate subject to life. Highly recommended.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Robert Fisk's magnum opus

It would perhaps not be an exaggeration to say that Robert Fisk is one of the best international politics journalists alive today, and this book, "The Great War for Civilization", is the crown upon his work. Few people know the Middle East, both in its practice and in its history, as well as Fisk does, who as correspondent for The Times and The Independent has lived and travelled throughout the Middle East for several decades. Even more rare are the people who can write about it with not just such indignation and insight, but also with such style and humanity as Robert Fisk. Though he has been accused often of grandstanding and being a bit too self-righteous, and there may be some truth to that, this book is not just critical of practically every political leader involved in the Middle East, now or in the past, but also of Fisk himself and of the role of journalists in general in the bloody mess.

And Fisk has seen and experienced much. The book covers, in due sequence, his several interviews with Osama Bin Laden (one gets the impression from the book that Bin Laden actually likes Fisk somewhat, a sentiment Fisk hurries to dismiss), the Soviet war in Afghanistan and its followup, the history of Western involvement in Iran with the overthrow of Mossadegh and the support for the Shah, the colonization of Iraq by the British and its failure and successive history, the devastating Iran-Iraq war (which deservedly plays a central role in the book, being much underestimated in its import in journalistic overviews nowadays), the genocide on the Armenians in 1915, the wars between Israel and Palestine as well as their neighbors and the history of the making of Israel, the independence war and subsequent shadowy civil war in Algeria, the First Gulf War and the betrayal of the anti-Saddam Hussein uprisings, the international arms trade, and finally the Second Gulf War and the current occupation of Afghanistan, with in between reports on Syria, Jordan, Saudi-Arabia, Kuweit, the Kurds, Turkey and much more. It is no surprise then that the book is about 1300 pages of actual text; the real surprise is that despite this massive size, the book actually manages to be a page-turner, with never a dull moment as Fisk goes from war to political conference, from interviews with soldiers and locals to historical overviews, from mortal dangers in the desert sands to reflections on the role of journalists from his apartment in Beirut, and from 1918 to 2005.

Indeed, the title "The Great War for Civilization" is not just an irony in referencing the attitude of a multitude of imperial armies descending upon the area ever since the Crusades, but also a reference to the official title given by the British to World War I (before anyone knew there would be a World War II), as inscribed upon the medals given to the surviving participants, among them Fisk's own father, who never got over the experience. This backdrop, the 'war to end all wars' but didn't, and at the same time the period when the doom of the modern Middle East and its political strife was laid upon the area by the decisions of a small number of Western colonial administrators, is Fisk's decor and reference point for describing all the events and people so vividly portrayed in this book. Indeed, the book should not be taken as an all-too-simple anti-Western screed, for Fisk is brutally honest not just about the imperial governments and their support for tyrants in the Middle East (when not operating on their own account), but also about all their opponents in the area's politics, many of whom are just as bloody, cruel and tyrannical as the West's policies have been. Fisk spares nobody and has no preconceived axe to grind, and it is precisely that which makes this book hit harder and cut deeper than any other of its kind that I am aware of. The ideologue, even when correct, is easily dismissed, as he represents politics - not so the vulnerable, doubting, but morally incorruptible critic, who represents all the rest of humanity, who does not rule but observes the rulers.

There is much bloodshed, cruelty and despair in this book, and it is certainly not for the faint of heart, nor for those easily inclined towards depression. Do not expect your mood or sense of hope to be improved from this book. Fisk goes from deadly war to torture chamber and from one mendacious politician to the other while blood colors the sands red. Indeed, the only real criticism the Washington Post reviewer could offer was that things could not possibly be as bleak as Fisk portrays them to be, which seems more based on the desire to maintain a sense of hope about the world than on a factual criticism. Yet precisely because all these things have been seen, because they have not gone unnoticed, because Fisk (with many others) was there to write them down and do them justice, because of that, things are not all dark. A chronicle of this kind can and should never be light reading; as Gibbon wrote, "history is nothing but the register of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind". But the fact that there are those who register, so that we may draw our conclusions, is what makes politics possible beyond despair.
5 people found this helpful