The Solitary House (Charles Maddox)
The Solitary House (Charles Maddox) book cover

The Solitary House (Charles Maddox)

Hardcover – Deckle Edge, May 1, 2012

Price
$11.88
Format
Hardcover
Pages
352
Publisher
Delacorte Press
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0345532428
Dimensions
6.58 x 1.14 x 9.54 inches
Weight
1.3 pounds

Description

From Booklist *Starred Review* Dickens fans will rejoice upon finding characters from Bleak House performing similar roles in Shepherd’s second historical mystery (following Murder at Mansfield Park, 2010) featuring Charles Maddox, thief-taker (a Victorian detective).This reworking of the masterful classic features crooked lawyer Mr. Tulkinghorn, Inspector Bucket, Lady Dedlock, and the not-quite-right Hester (Esther in Bleak House), who begins her narrative with Dickens’ words, “I have a great deal of difficulty in beginning to write . . . for I know I am not clever.” A labyrinthine plot narrated in three voices reveals the underlying motivations and connections of these characters in a story of pervasive deviance so sinister that even those hardened to London’s nineteenth-century underworld will reel in shock. Maddox is manipulated by Tulkinghorn on behalf of the attorney’s wealthy clients to ferret out those who might expose a nasty secret; as the investigation progresses, Maddox finds himself and everyone he knows in the path of a psychotic killer. Shepherd leaves the reader spellbound by masterfully building suspense, creating a pervasively clammy and befogged atmosphere, and offering a cast of unforgettably peculiar characters, making the most of authentic, period language and a soupçon of subtle humor. Those who haven’t read Bleak House will be ready to have a go, while those looking for contemporary read-alikes should be encouraged to try Sarah Waters’ Fingersmith (2002)or Sara Stockbridge’s Grace Hammer (2009). --Jen Baker Praise for The Solitary House “A Victorian tour de force . . . a must-read.” — Kirkus Reviews (starred review) “Dickens fans will rejoice. . . . [Lynn] Shepherd leaves the reader spellbound.” — Booklist (starred review) “The star of Lynn Shepherd’s intriguing mystery novel is mid-century Victorian London. . . . Her suspenseful story and winning prose ably serve her literary conceit.” —Associated Press “Intellectually enthralling, with dark twists at every turn . . . a haunting novel that will have you guessing until the last pages.” —Historical Novels Review “Lynn Shepherd has a knack for setting literary murder puzzles. . . . This literary magpie-ism is a treat for book lovers, a little nudge-and-a-wink here and there which delights fans of these other works without alienating those who haven’t read them yet. . . . An intelligent, gripping and beautifully written novel.” —The Scotsman “The reader is plunged into a complex but comprehensible labyrinth of deception.” —Publishers Weekly (starred review) Lynn Shepherd is the author of the award-winning Murder at Mansfield Park . She studied English at Oxford and was a professional copywriter for over a decade. She is currently at work on her next novel of historical suspense, A Treacherous Likeness, which Delacorte will publish in 2013. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. one---The Young ManThe young man at the desk puts down his pen and sits back in his chair. The fog has been thickening all afternoon, and whatever sun might once have shone is now sinking fast. The window before him is as blank as if it has been papered over. For all he can see outside, the room might give on the flat expanses of the Essex marshes, or command the ancient forests of the Kentish heights. Or it might—xadas indeed it is—xadbe on the first floor of a London lodging-xadhouse, in a narrow street not far from the British Museum. That fact is significant in itself, as we shall see, and it is not necessary to be a detective (as this young man is) to make a number of other useful deductions about the character of the person who inhabits this space. He is a single man, this Charles Maddox, since the bed is narrow, the room small, and neither is very clean. He is careless of his appearance, to judge by the waistcoat hanging on the wardrobe door and the tangle of shirts spilling from the chest, but there are other things he does care about, for a large black cat has appropriated the best and warmest chair, which looks to have been placed next to the fire for precisely that purpose. He is a sentimental young man, then, but more than anything else he is a curious one. For by his possessions shall ye know him, and this room is a mirror of Charles Maddox’s mind. He has little interest in languages, so has never come across the word wunderkammer, but he has created one nevertheless—xada small but perfect ‘cabinet of wonders’. Every level surface carries its prize—xadmantelpiece, bookcase, desk, even the wash-xadstand. An ostrich egg, and a piece of pale grey stone, slightly granular to the touch, imprinted with the whorl of a perfect ammonite; the blank face of an African mask, bearded with woven fibre, and next to it something black and shrivelled and eyeless that looks disconcertingly like a human head; a wooden box of old coins, and a blue jar filled with shells and pieces of coral; a case of stuffed birds feathered in primary colours that cannot be native to these drab shores; and a scimitar blade with a worn and battered handle that clearly once boasted jewels. There are maps, and prints, and charts of the voyages of the great explorers. And one whole wall is lined with bookshelves, many not quite straight, so that the volumes lean against the slope like dinghies in a wind. We are beginning to form a picture of this young man, but before you smile indulgently at the hopeless clutter, and dismiss him as a mere dilettante, remember that this is the age of the gifted amateur. Remember too, that in 1850 it is still possible—xadjust—xadfor an intelligent man to span the sciences and still attain a respectable proficiency in them all. If, of course, he has money enough, and time. If, in short, he is a gentleman. It is the right question to ask about Charles Maddox, but it does not come with an easy answer.Nor, it appears, does the task he is presently embarked upon. There is nothing scientific about this, it seems. He stirs, then sighs. London is full of noises, but today even the barrel-xadorgan on the corner of the street is stifled and indistinct, as if being played underxadwater. It’s hardly the afternoon for such an unpromising task, but it can be postponed no longer. He picks up his pen with renewed determination, and begins again. So engrossed is he—xadso intent on finding words that will keep hope in check but keep it, nonetheless, alive—xadthat he does not hear the knock at the door the first time it comes. Nor the second. It is only when a handful of grit patters against the glass that Charles pushes back his chair and goes to the window. He can barely make out the features of the man standing on the steps, but he does not need to know the name, to know the uniform. He pulls up the sash.“What is it?” he calls, frowning. What business has Bow Street here?The man steps back and looks up, and Charles finds he recognises him after all.“Batten—xadis that you? What do you want?”“Message for you, Mr Maddox. From Inspector Field.”“Wait there—xadI’m coming down.”The message, when Charles gets it, is no more than two scrawled lines, but such brevity was only to be expected from such a man, and in such circumstances.“The Inspector thought you’d like to see for y’self, sir,” says Batten, stamping his feet against the cold, his breath coming in gusts and merging into the fog. “Before we do the necessary. Seeing as you’re taking such an interest in the Chadwick case.”“Tell Inspector Field that I am indebted to him. I will be there directly.”“You know where it is—xadTom-xadAll-xadAlone’s? I’d take you m’self, only I’m on my way home and it’s the opposite way.”“Don’t worry—xadI’ll find it.”Charles gives the man a shilling for his trouble, and returns to his room for his coat and muffler. The former is over the back of the chair, the latter—xadit turns out—xadunder the cat. There is the customary tussle, which ends in its customary way, and when Charles leaves the house ten minutes later the muffler remains behind. There is probably nothing for it but to buy another one; when he can afford it. He turns his collar up against the chill, and disappears from sight into the coaly fog.There’s no lamp at the corner of the street, just the little charcoal-xadfurnace of the chestnut-xadseller. It throws a red glow up at her face, and onto the drawn features of four dirty little children clustered around her skirts. Not for the first time, the woman has a swollen black bruise around one eye. As he steps off the kerb, Charles only just avoids being trampled under an omnibus heaving with people that veers huge out of the dense brown haze into the path of an unlit brewer’s dray. He springs back in time, but not fast enough to avoid a spatter of wet dung from hip to knee. It’s not an auspicious start, and he hurls a few well-xadhoned insults at both ’bus driver and crossing-xadsweeper before dodging through the traffic to the other side and heading south down an almost deserted Tottenham Court Road. No street-xadsellers tonight, and the only shop still open is Hine the butcher, who runs no risk of thieving raids in the lurid glare of his dozen jets of gas. A couple of old tramps are warming their faces against the glass, but paying customers are sparse. The afternoon seems suspended between day and dark, and the circles of milky light cast by the gas-xadlamps dispel the gloom no more than a few feet around. A gaggle of raggedly link-xadboys follow him hopefully for a while, tugging at his coat-xadtails and offering him their torches, “Light you home for sixpence!” “Darn’t listen to ’im—xadI’ll do it for a joey—xadwhatcha say, mister? Can’t say fairer than that.” Charles eventually shakes them off—xadliterally, in one case—xadand smiles to himself when one lad calls after him asking if he can see in the dark, “u2009’cause yer going to need’ta.” Even in daylight, the city changes character every dozen yards. A fog like this plays tricks with the senses, blanking out familiar landmarks and shrinking distances to no farther than the eye can see. Having patrolled these streets for the best part of a year, Charles should know them, if anyone does, but there is something else at work here—xadan ability he has to render the map in his head to the ground under his feet, which explains the assurance of his step. A modern neurologist would say he had unusually well-xaddeveloped spatial cognition combined with almost photographic memory function. Charles has more than a passing interest in the new advances in daguerreotyping, so he might well understand the meaning of those last words even if not the science behind them, but he would most certainly smile at the pretension. As far as he’s concerned, he’s been doing this since he was a little boy, and thinks of it—xadin so far as he thinks of it at all—xadas little more than a lucky and very useful knack.Once past St Giles Circus the line of shops peters out and the road narrows. A few minutes later Charles stops under a street-xadlamp before turning, rather less confidently this time, down a dingy side lane. It’s unlit, with alleys branching off left and right. He stands for a moment, allowing his eyes to adjust to the dark, and wonders if he should have hired one of those boys after all. He rates his chances well enough against a lone footpad, but for a year or more this part of London has been notorious for a spate of garrotting attacks, and the men who use these miserable backwaters for cover ply that trade in threes and fours. No-xadone but a fool or a foreigner would venture willingly into such a maze of dilapidated houses, seeming blind and yet teeming behind, as Charles well knows, with a desperate human detritus that has no choice but to call the vile haunts of Tom-xadAll-xadAlone’s home. Even the fog seems more malevolent here. It funnels down from the main thoroughfare, and eddies ghostily into archways and casements. Charles takes a deep breath and starts off again, his ears suddenly attentive to the whispers and creakings of the crumbling tenements on either side. Half a dozen times in as many months the ground round here has been shaken by a sudden crash as one of these structures has subsided, throwing a tower of dust into the dirty London sky. The last was barely three weeks before, and when the scavengers moved in to rake the wreckage they found more than two dozen bodies—xadmen, women, and children—xadhuddled together for warmth half naked, in a ro... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • Lynn Shepherd’s first acclaimed novel of historical suspense,
  • Murder at Mansfield Park,
  • brilliantly reimagined the time of Jane Austen. Now, in this spellbinding new triumph, she introduces an unforgettable duo of detectives into the gaslit world of Dickens.
  • London, 1850. Charles Maddox had been an up-and-coming officer for the Metropolitan police until a charge of insubordination abruptly ended his career. Now he works alone, struggling to eke out a living by tracking down criminals. Whenever he needs it, he has the help of his great-uncle Maddox, a legendary “thief taker,” a detective as brilliant and intuitive as they come. On Charles’s latest case, he’ll need all the assistance he can get. To his shock, Charles has been approached by Edward Tulkinghorn, the shadowy and feared attorney, who offers him a handsome price to do some sleuthing for a client. Powerful financier Sir Julius Cremorne has been receiving threatening letters, and Tulkinghorn wants Charles to—discreetly—find and stop whoever is responsible. But what starts as a simple, open-and-shut case swiftly escalates into something bigger and much darker. As he cascades toward a collision with an unspeakable truth, Charles can only be aided so far by Maddox. The old man shows signs of forgetfulness and anger, symptoms of an age-related ailment that has yet to be named. Intricately plotted and intellectually ambitious,
  • The Solitary House
  • is an ingenious novel that does more than spin an enthralling tale: it plumbs the mysteries of the human mind.
  • Praise for
  • The Solitary House
  • “A Victorian tour de force . . . a must-read.”
  • Kirkus Reviews
  • (starred review)
  • “Dickens fans will rejoice. . . . [Lynn] Shepherd leaves the reader spellbound.”
  • Booklist
  • (starred review)
  • “The star of Lynn Shepherd’s intriguing mystery novel is mid-century Victorian London. . . . Her suspenseful story and winning prose ably serve her literary conceit.”
  • —Associated Press
  • “Intellectually enthralling, with dark twists at every turn . . . a haunting novel that will have you guessing until the last pages.”
  • —Historical Novels Review
  • “Lynn Shepherd has a knack for setting literary murder puzzles. . . . This literary magpie-ism is a treat for book lovers, a little nudge-and-a-wink here and there which delights fans of these other works without alienating those who haven’t read them yet. . . . An intelligent, gripping and beautifully written novel.”
  • —The Scotsman
  • “The reader is plunged into a complex but comprehensible labyrinth of deception.”
  • —Publishers Weekly
  • (starred review)

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(62)
★★★★
20%
(42)
★★★
15%
(31)
★★
7%
(15)
28%
(58)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Charles DIckens & Wilkie Collins Amusement Park Ride

How can I rate a book I disdain as contrived, poorly narrated and trying too hard to be clever? It would be a clear case for one star, except that in this instance it was almost compulsively readable. Every time I threw it across the room in annoyance I had to go pick it up and keep on reading. That ability to make a woman as lazy as I am get up from a position of comfort earns Shepherd's second novel a second star (and a half if I could give half stars).

A literary mash-up of "Bleak House" and "The Woman in White", Lynn Shepherd's well-plotted mystery inevitably suffers by comparison to its progenitors. While she does a good job of evoking the energy and squalor of London in 1850, she strains to fit her plot into the interstices between Dickens' and Collins' far better novels. Virtually every character of note from both books gets a least a cameo in "The Solitary House," making the novel feel a bit like a hollywood spectacle from the '50s or '60s -- trotting out every available star for a characteristic walk on bit. Yes, is is fun to realize who everyone is, but aside from the looming figure of Mr. Tulkinghorn and the more ambiguous character of Inspector Bucket, most of the familiar figures are curiosities, not characters. There is also a parallel, oblique second narrative written by one Hester, clearly modeled on Esther Summerson from Bleak House, which is the subtlest and eeriest writing in the book and another good reason to award the extra star.

Literary rebirths aside, the focal point of the story is Charles Maddox, a disgraced ex-policeman struggling to make ends meet as a consulting detective when he gets what appears to be a simple and lucrative commission from the powerful and shady lawyer, Tulkinghorn. Charles is a bit of a hot-headed youngster, but as the case begins to deepen he takes up residence with his great-uncle Maddox, a legendary thief taker who's career (partially chronicled in Shepherd's first book "Murder at Mansfield Park") flourished before the founding of the Metropolitan Police. Sadly, the elder Maddox is clearly slipping into a form of dementia, though in his rare moments of lucidity he provides invaluable assistance to his great-nephew.

Readers will easily infer that Maddox's disease is intended to be Alzheimer's or another form of senile dementia, though these disorders were not so named during the 1850s. Shepherd foolishly opts to makes the connection obvious using a heavy-handed omniscient narrator who intrudes with 21st century perspectives on a story that is unfolding in the present tense in 1850. For example, when we are first getting to know Charles and it becomes clear he has a talent for finding his way through London's fog befuddled streets the narrator breaks in with: "A modern neurologist would say he had unusually well-developed spatial cognition combined with almost photographic memory function." It's a bit like a voice over in a History Channel documentary telling us something we can already see clearly for ourselves. Without this this narrative voice this book would have been much, much stronger. Because of it, the book feels clunky and schoolmarmish despite a tone that is intended to signal that the author and the reader share the same inside jokes.

Still to Shepherd's credit, I read every page, though I threw it against the wall one last time when she blatantly advertised that her next book, or one in the near future, will return to the early days of the first Maddox and his encounter with Percy Bysse Shelley, Mary Wollstencraft Shelley and Frankenstein. I'm going to try not to read it, though I'm ashamed to admit I might have to borrow a copy from the library.
91 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I tried to like this, but couldn't

In Lynn Shepherd's latest, "The Solitary House", the author tries hard to emulate the writing style of Charles Dickens. In some ways she succeeds, and in others she fails. The overly wordy descriptive passages that I have difficulty plowing through in Dickens' work are present in "The Solitary House", as is the gloomy and gritty feel of Victorian London. However, unlike my feelings for many Dickens' characters, I just did not really care about Charles Maddox, his uncle, or anyone else in the book.

This was a difficult book for me to finish-it took almost a month to force myself to finally get through the last several chapters. It is not the author's writing that is at fault, or not completely, but rather the fact that I did not care about anyone in the story. The characters did not connect with me, and in fact I found many of them irritating, and I didn't feel the urge to find out who was doing what with whom, or why there were dead babies in the same hole on the periphery of the cemetery.

The first person narrative (well, sort of, since there are asides that pulled me out of the story) combined with the narrative of Hester, and those asides, made it hard for me to remain in the story. Other readers may not have the same issue with this (these?) narrative constructions that I did. I cannot truly recommend this book for anyone looking for a straightforward mystery, nor for someone looking for a Dickens-like read. This is, of course, my opinion only, and others likely have very different viewpoints.
46 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Not a fan

I have never read Dickens (gasp) and found this book to be not the most enjoyable read. It was quite irritating to not"get" portions that were alluded or patterned off of Dickens. I was especially annoyed with the ending and the whole part about Mary - I still have no idea who she was other than Maddox Senior's love. I read "Death at Pemberly" without having read "Pride and Prejudice" and was still able to be involved in the plot. I was disappointed by "The Solitary House" and will definitely think twice before purchasing or reading this author again.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

More gimmick than substance

Former constable Charles Maddox is following in his renowned uncle's footsteps by becoming a "thief-taker" - more of a private investigator, really. Although his law enforcement career ended in ignominy, his sharp scientific mind suggests a bright future. While working on a hopeless missing person case, he's summoned to meet one of the most prestigious and powerful attorneys in London, Edward Tulkinghorn. A wealthy, powerful banker has been receiving threatening correspondence. Maddox is asked to find out who wrote the letters and is paid handsomely for his services. With little to go on, and quite intimidated by his new client, Maddox feels acute pressure to succeed. With the help of his great-uncle and name-sake, he may uncover a lot more than he bargained for, including clues to his other case. That's if he can survive the investigation.

The novel quite intentionally owes a great deal to Dickens' "Bleak House" (and not this work or this author alone). Unfortunately, in sharing characters, structure, and setting, it begs comparison to Dickens' writing as well which is an unenviable position to be in. Shepherd's prose doesn't, perhaps can't, compare favorably. What was natural for Dickens is ostentatious and self-indulgent here. It's a harshly distorted echo of the authentic voice of Dickens at best.

The writing suffers on several other counts. The dialogue is cringe-worthy at times. This may be owing to stilted, awkward exposition in the guise of dialogue or to affected accents and colloquial speech. The all-knowing conversational narrator, also borrowed from Dickens, was intrusive and distracting. The voice was distinctly feminine to a fault. The overly sentimental description of the protagonist resembled the gushing of a crushing school girl. Maddox's relationship with his cat and his reaction to the naked female form also suggested a certain lack of testosterone.

The plot was fairly conventional. The mystery was convoluted and very slow to develop. Only 100 pages from the end there was still no resolution in sight. This resulted in a rushed conclusion that relied on several pages of exposition to wrap up the loose ends - and also to hint at developments that could either require a sequel or tie the work into others already penned. A couple subplots, mere threads really, hardly seemed relevant at all. Of course the author relied on frequent improbable coincidences to thicken the plot and advance the investigation.

A reader with affections for the time period, place, and conventional mystery may be entertained by "The Solitary House." A reader desiring an authentic voice and an intelligent mystery should look elsewhere. The author was more preoccupied with literary tie-ins than in crafting a good story. The gimmick may be clever, but the novel really isn't.
20 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

fanfiction garbage

Seems like she is trying (I didn't read it, but that's ok)to get paid for something that should be read for free on fan fiction. Leave Jane Austen's characters alone and come up with your own characters. Maybe that is why you can't sell books...you have to work hard to build up your fan base but there is no room on my shelves for jealous, hateful people. Now excuse me....going to go read something by JKR. Maybe I'll go buy her newest series. See, I didn't even know they existed until I read your article on Huff post....
17 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dickens Style CSI

This book has an interesting premise. It's written in the style of Victorian novels: flowery and very wordy. The author captures the style fairly well, but like books of that era, they are often hard to follow. The plot plods along in a manner similar to the TV show CSI and Law and Order SVU, where we have creepy murder scenes and clues that lead to an even creepier solution. There are several places where she falls out of character in her writing and makes references to contemporary terms that don't fit the genre. It's kind of like when people play Shakespeare for a day on Twitter, attempting to speak in Shakespearean English for all of their tweets. Some get it, some don't, but much of it is contrived to make it work. It feels like a high school assignment where students were challenged to write like Dickens. It is clear that it's Dickensian, but that's really the only good part about the book.
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dickens fans will love this

Charles Maddox is a private detective in Victorian London, an ex police officer whose career was ended unfairly. He is working on several cases, one to identify a blackmailer, and one to find a lost child.

The second case strikes very close to home, since Charles himself had a sister who vanished when she was an infant, and he blames himself beause even though he was a child himself at the time, he had been instructed to watch his sister.

The child he is searching for was born out of wedlock to an upper class girl whose father cast her out when she became pregnant. Later he thought better of his actions, but discovered that his daughter had died and the baby had been sent to an orphanage. Charles has been hired to find and retrieve the child.

The Solitary House of the title is an odd place. The residents, mostly young and female, are all well cared for but have no freedom. It's unclear why they are in this house, and telling more would risk spoiling the story, but it was a gripping mystery and I loved it!

The descriptions of London at the turn of the century felt so real, I could almost see (and smell) the places. I think I need to go re-read some of my favorite Dickens tales now.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

This One Is Fun

This second of Lynn Shepherd's "literary murders," The Solitary House, makes good use of several characters readers will remember from Dickens's Bleak House. Playing prominent roles here are the despicable lawyer, Edward Tulkinghorn, the reliable Inspector Bucket, and a character closely resembling Esther (called Hester this time around). That the novel is written in the style of classic English novels of the period is probably what first will attract most readers to it, but The Solitary House is also a very fine mystery - one with an ending reminiscent of Dennis Lehane's Sutter Island.

The novel's central character, Charles Maddox, was a Metropolitan police officer before he was dismissed for insubordination. Now he is determined to earn his living as a self-employed detective - or as he sometimes calls himself and his famous detective uncle, a "thief taker." Maddox, a man of great curiosity and varied interests, is a natural at the business of detecting, but he is still struggling to build a reputation of his own. For that reason, he is both surprised and flattered when Mr. Tulkinghorn, one of the most powerful lawyers in London approaches him about a job.

Someone is sending threatening letters to a wealthy London banker, and Tulkinghorn wants Maddox to identify and stop the culprit before any harm comes to his client. Tulkinghorn's request seems to be so straightforward that Maddox eagerly accepts the charge despite not having completed his current case, the search for a young woman being sought by the father she has never met. Maddox decides he will work the two cases simultaneously, and he does - until things take a nasty turn that begins him wondering if the two cases are somehow connected. When some of his sources begin to suffer horrible deaths at the hands of a psychotic killer, Maddox realizes that his life - and those of everyone closest to him - are in jeopardy.

Readers of Dickens will feel right at home in the London so meticulously recreated here by Shepherd. But the real core of her story is the relationship between young Charles Maddox and his great uncle, the man to whom Charles turns for advice and insight as his investigation progresses. The old man, one of the pioneering detectives of his day, seems to be suffering from some type of senile dementia and is confined to his home. It is painful (particularly for those readers who have watched their own loved ones go through a similar process, I suspect) to watch the old man struggle with the awareness of what is happening to him. He is still capable of moments of brilliant insight, but is just as likely to lapse into periods of rage and paranoia. Through it all, and despite his own battles, Charles is by his side as they solve the mystery of The Solitary House together. This one is fun.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Dickens or Shepherd?

What chilling mysteries lurk in the streets of Victorian England? The Solitary House is a historical suspense novel based on detective procedure and written to celebrate Charles Dickens' 200th birthday. In 1850, Charles Maddox, dismissed from Scotland Yard for insubordination, is hired by eminent lawyer Tulkinghorn to investigate malevolent letters sent to Lady Dedlock.

Sloshing through dung, sidestepping rats, stench and squalor in cobblestone streets, center us firmly in 19th century London. We move through the red light district to the dealings of the wealthy, shady gentry. Although the setting is Victorian, the author throws in some twenty-first-century observations and anachronisms. Vivid atmospheric writing, gritty scenes and convoluted plot lines coalesce, requiring the utmost concentration.

Much is borrowed from Dickens. Edward Tulkinghorn, a character from Bleak House, figures prominently. The book's title was the first Dickens considered for his own crime classic. Shepherd uses chapter titles from Dickens works. Parallels are extensive, topped off with a first-person narrative by self-effacing Hester, the orphan.

Ms. Shepherd's attempt to mimic Dickens' style is commendable as is her homage to the literary giant. Granted there is original material in The Solitary House, but this reader couldn't help wondering why the author didn't write her own story in her own style.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Wonderful Victorian thriller

I read a lot of historical fiction, and I read a lot of Victorian novels. In thinking about what to write about Lynn Shepherd's marvelous novel, The Solitary House, it struck me that it is actually more a modern Victorian novel than historical fiction. It reads like a Victorian novel, albeit one with a modern editor who didn't purge it of its grit and didn't try to put a pretty face on a sad story.

There's so much that I loved about The Solitary House. First, it is a joy to read--the language, the modern narrator who guides the reader through the story and points out the literary landmarks throughout the story, the two Charles Maddoxes (both heroes in their own way), the present tense, the structure of double narrator, the intelligent plotting and attention to detail, and the compassion and timeless themes of duty, honor, loyalty, and love that drive most great stories.

I really found intriguing how Shepherd was able to use Charles Dickens' Bleak House and Wilkie Collins' The Woman in White as a springboard to create another parallel story that intertwined with both, was able to stand on its own, and yet served as commentary on both as well. I don't think I'll ever be able to read one independent of the others again, and I think the stories in all three novels are enriched in that they reflect each other, in a fun-house mirror sort of way.

I think The Solitary House is one of the most interesting novels I've read, certainly in recent years, because of its relationship to the Dickens and Collins novels that provide its warp and weft. And this relationship also made it, despite the sordid tale it related and the grim world it depicted, a very satisfying read. I enjoyed thinking about what it meant to watch the story of Bleak House unfold again, but with a twist.

I'm really looking forward to reading Shepherd's latest novel, A Fatal Likeness (U.S. title--it's being released as A Treacherous Likeness in the U.K.), which promises to be a "mystery that explores the dark lives and unexplained secrets of the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley, and his wife Mary, author of Frankenstein."
6 people found this helpful