The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan
The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan book cover

The Taliban Shuffle: Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Hardcover – March 22, 2011

Price
$17.80
Format
Hardcover
Pages
320
Publisher
Doubleday
Publication Date
ISBN-13
978-0385533317
Dimensions
5.75 x 1.5 x 8.75 inches
Weight
1 pounds

Description

Kim Barker was The Chicago Tribune 's South Asia Bureau Chief from 2004 to 2009, much of which she spent living in and reporting from Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Taliban Shuffle comprises her recollections of these years, but make no mistake: this is not your parents' war correspondent's memoir. In fact, to hear this charismatic debut author tell of life in war-torn Kabul during these years, you'd think it was a more-or-less non-stop party. Journalism is famously known as a business for which "if it bleeds, it leads," and with a fresh war raging in Iraq, Barker initially faced long stretches of relative quiet. As a result, an absurd, often promiscuous subculture grew up among her fellow reporters. (Think M*A*S*H with a dash of Catch-22 .) Of course, it wasn't all fun, games, and the occasional heavy petting. Barker's reporting eventually brings her into contact with warlords, fundamentalists, and drug kingpins, and she does get blood on her hands (quite literally). As the action heats up and the Taliban begins slowly to regroup, she finds herself reporting on and fending off a host of unsavory types, from anonymous gropers in crowded streets to former Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, who woos her shamelessly, breaking all manner of internationally recognized rules of professional decorum. After five years of these "Strange Days in Afghanistan and Pakistan," Barker finally returns to the States with a one-of-a-kind memoir, a true story that's rife with both black humor and brutal honesty about the absurdities of war. -- Jason Kirk From Booklist War correspondent Barker first started reporting from Afghanistan in 2003, when the war there was lazy and insignificant. She was just learning to navigate Afghan culture, one caught between warring factions, and struggling to get space in her newspaper, the Chicago Tribune. Lulled into complacency, everyone from the U.S. military to the Afghan diplomatic corps to the Pakistani government stumbled as the Taliban regrouped. Very frank and honest, Barker admits a host of mistakes, including gross cultural ignorance that often put her in danger even as she found Afghanistan similar in some ways to Montana, her home state, what with �bearded men in pickup trucks stocked with guns and hate for the government.� She reports a string of characters: an amorous Pakistani former prime minister, a flashy Afghan American diplomat, an assortment of warlords, drug lords, fundamentalists, politicians, and fellow correspondents struck by wanderlust and plagued by messy personal lives�all of them against a backdrop of declining war coverage in declining American newspapers. A personal, insightful look at covering an ambivalent war in a complicated region. --Vanessa Bush Praise for The Taliban Shuffle “What’s remarkable about The Taliban Shuffle is that its author, Kim Barker, has written an account of her experiences covering Afghanistan and Pakistan that manages to be hilarious and harrowing, witty and illuminating, all at the same time… Ms. Barker has discovered a voice in these pages that enables her to capture both the serious and the seriously absurd conditions in Af-Pak (Afghanistan and Pakistan), and the surreal deal of being a female reporter there, with dating problems ranging from the screwball (a boyfriend competing to cover the same story) to the ridiculous (being romantically pursued by the former prime minister of Pakistan). Black humor, it turns out, is a perfect tool for capturing the sad-awful-frequently-insane incongruities of war. The Taliban Shuffle , in fact, reads like a rollicking and revealing mashup of Imperial Life in the Emerald City (Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s devastating 2006 portrait of the unreal world of Iraq’s Green Zone), War Reporting for Cowards (Chris Ayres’s entertaining 2005 account of being a newbie war reporter for The Times of London ) and Robert Altman’s darkly satiric 1970 movie MASH , with a bit of Evelyn Waugh-esque satiric verve thrown in for good measure.” —Michiko Kakutani, The New York Times “ The Taliban Shuffle is part war memoir, part tale of self-discovery that, thanks to Barker's biting honesty and wry wit, manages to be both hilarious and heartbreaking.” —The Chicago Tribune "Brilliant, tender, and unexpectedly hilarious." —Marie Claire "[An] immensely entertaining memoir." — The Boston Globe “Irresistibly spunky….Barker’s memoir is what you’d hear if the reporter never turned off the voice recorder between interviews—brilliant firsthand outtakes that wind up telling us more about the Afghan debacle than any foreign policy briefing.” —The Seattle Times "Politically astute and clearly influenced by Hunter S. Thompson, Barker provides sharp commentary on the impotence of American foreign policy in South Asia… Fierce, funny and unflinchingly honest.” —Kirkus “A candid and darkly comic account of her eight years as an international correspondent for the Chicago Tribune …With self-deprecation and a keen eye for the absurd, Barker describes her evolution from a green, fill-in correspondent to an adrenaline junkie… In equal measure, Barker elucidates the deep political ties between Pakistan and Afghanistan, the U.S.’s role in today’s ‘whiplash between secularism and extremism,’ and blasts Pakistan’s leaders for destroying their nation through endless coups and power jockeying.” — Publishers Weekly "Reporter Kim Barker immersed herself in Afghanistan and Pakistan for nine years and returned with stories that poignantly reflect her deep love for both countries—and important insights into what went wrong. With dark, self-deprecating humor and shrewd insight, Barker chronicles her experiences as a rookie foreign reporter and the critical years in which the Taliban resurged amidst the collapse of the Afghan and Pakistani governments."xa0xa0xa0xa0 — The Daily Beast "Kim Barker's memoir about her five years covering Afghanistan and Pakistan for the Chicago Tribune is brave, funny and outrageous.... The Taliban Shuffle will pull you in so deep that you’ll smell the poppies and quake from the bombs." — The Minneapolis Star Tribune “Read this and try not to hurt yourself laughing. Who knew war could be so funny? The Taliban Shuffle isn’t like any other book out there about Afghanistan and Pakistan. It’s witty, brilliant, and impossible to put down. Think P. J. O’Rourke meets Paul Theroux. Kim Barker is a gifted storyteller, and her intrepid, sometimes wacky travels through these two strife-torn nations will leave you informed, amused, and—depending on your sense of adventure—wanting to tag along on her next trip.” —Rajiv Chandrasekaran, author of Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone “ The Taliban Shuffle is Scoop meets Dispatches , remixed with a twenty-first-century Bollywood soundtrack. Laugh-out-loud funny, it is the true story of what it is like to be a female journalist in one of the world's most exotic war zones, while telling the reader much about what is really going on today in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” —Peter Bergen, author of Holy War, Inc.: Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden and The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict between America and Al-Qaeda “Yes, there are bombs. And there is carnage. And all sorts of mayhem. But mostly there are people, human beings even, with appetites—for life, for adventure, for riches, for love. Ms. Barker offers this world—the human world caught in the crosshairs of history—with a vitality rarely seen in accounts of the war. A compelling read that offers readers a glimpse of the goings-on behind the byline.” —J. Maarten Troost, author of The Sex Lives of Cannibals “Kim Barker gives a true and amusing picture of hellholes and the reporters on assignment in them. But she breaks the journo code of silence and reveals a trade secret of the hacks who cover hellholes: The hell of the holes is that they’re kind of fun.” —P. J. O'Rourke KIM BARKER joined the Chicago Tribune in 2001 and was South Asia bureau chief from 2004 to 2009. She currently holds the prestigious Edward R. Murrow press fellowship at the Council on Foreign Relations. She lives in New York City. Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1WELCOME TO THE TERRORDOME I had always wanted to meet a warlord. So we parked our van on the side of the beige road and walked up to the beige house, past dozens of skinny young soldiers brandishing Kalashnikov assault rifles and wearing mismatched khaki outfits and rope belts hiked high on their waists. Several flaunted kohl eyeliner and tucked yellow flowers behind their ears. Others decorated their rifle butts with stickers of flowers and Indian movie starlets. Male ethnic Pashtuns loved flowers and black eyeliner and anything fluorescent or sparkly, maybe to make up for the beige terrain that stretched forever in Afghanistan, maybe to look pretty.Outside the front door, my translator Farouq and I took off our shoes before walking inside and sitting cross-legged on the red cushions that lined the walls. The decorations spanned that narrow range between unicorn-loving prepubescent girl and utilitarian disco. Bright, glittery plastic flowers poked out of holes in the white walls. The curtains were riots of color.We waited. I was slightly nervous about our reception. Once, warlord Pacha Khan Zadran had been a U.S. ally, one of the many Afghan warlords the Americans used to help drive out the Taliban regime for sheltering Osama bin Laden and his minions after the attacks of September 11, 2001. But like a spoiled child, Pacha Khan had rebelled against his benefactors, apparently because no one was paying enough attention to him. First he turned against the fledg-ling Afghan government, then against his American allies. In an epic battle over a mountain pass, the Americans had just killed the warlord’s son. The Pashtun code required revenge, among other things, and now, six days after the battle, here I was, a fairly convenient American, waiting like a present on a pillow in Pacha Khan’s house, hoping to find a story edgy enough to make it into my newspaper—not easy considering it was March 2003, and there were other things going on in the world. But Farouq told me not to worry. He had a plan.Pacha Khan soon marched into the room. He certainly looked the warlord part, wearing a tan salwar kameez, the region’s ubiquitous traditional long shirt and baggy pants that resembled pajamas, along with a brown vest, a bandolier of bullets, and a gray-and-black turban. The wrinkles on his face appeared to have been carved out with an ice pick. He resembled a chubby Saddam Hussein. We hopped up to greet him. He motioned us to sit down, welcomed us, and then offered us lunch, an orange oil slick of potatoes and meat that was mostly gristle. I had no choice, given how strictly Afghans and especially Pashtuns viewed hospitality. I dug in, using my hands and a piece of bread as utensils.But just because Pacha Khan fed us, didn’t mean he would agree to an interview. The Pashtun code required him to show us hospitality. It didn’t force him to talk to me. Pacha Khan squinted at my getup—a long brown Afghan dress over black pants, an Indian paisley headscarf, and cat-eye glasses. I kept shifting my position—with a bad left knee, a bad right ankle, and a bad back, sitting on the floor was about as comfortable as therapy.Farouq tried to sell my case in the Pashto language. The warlord had certain questions.“Where is she from?” Pacha Khan asked, suspiciously.“Turkey,” Farouq responded.“Is she Muslim?”“Yes.”“Have her pray for me.”I smiled dumbly, oblivious to the conversation and Farouq’s lies.“She can’t,” Farouq said, slightly revising his story. “She is a Turkish American. She only knows the prayers in English, not Arabic.”“Hmmm,” Pacha Khan grunted, glaring at me. “She is a very bad Muslim.”“She is a very bad Muslim,” Farouq agreed.I continued to grin wildly, attempting to charm Pacha Khan.“Is she scared of me?” he asked.“What’s going on? What’s he saying?” I interrupted.“He wants to know if you’re scared of him,” Farouq said.“Oh no,” I said. “He seems like a perfectly nice guy. Totally harmless. Very kind.”Farouq nodded and turned to Pacha Khan.“Of course she is scared of you,” Farouq translated. “You are a big and terrifying man. But I told her you were a friend of the Chicago Tribune , and I guaranteed her safety.”That satisfied him. Unaware of Farouq’s finesse, I proceeded with my questions about Pacha Khan’s deteriorating relationship with the Americans. Then I asked if I could have my photograph taken with the warlord, who agreed.“Make sure you get the flowers,” I told Farouq.In one picture, Pacha Khan peered sideways at me, with an expression suggesting he thought I was the strange one. I snapped Farouq’s picture with Pacha Khan as well. Souvenirs in hand, we left. But we still had two more hours of bumpy, unforgiving road south to the town of Khost, an experience similar to being flogged with baseball bats. Farouq taught me the numbers in the Dari language and told me about the real conversation he had with Pacha Khan.“I don’t think it’s ethical to say I’m Turkish,” I said.“I don’t think it’s safe to say you’re American. The Americans just killed his son. Trust me. I know Afghans. I know what I’m doing.”I shut my mouth, but I still didn’t see what the big deal was. I had glasses. I was obviously harmless. And Pacha Khan seemed more bluster than bullet.As we wandered around Pacha Khan-istan, calling me naïve was almost a compliment; ignorant was more accurate. This was only my second trip to Afghanistan as a fill-in correspondent for the Tribune , and I was only supposed to babysit a war that nobody cared about while everyone else invaded Iraq. With my assumed swagger and misplaced confidence, I was convinced that I could do anything. Meeting a warlord whose son had just been killed by the Americans was nothing but a funny photo opportunity. I felt I was somehow missing out by not being in Iraq, the hitter sidelined for the cham-pionship game. Like everyone else, I figured Afghanistan was more of a sideshow than the big show.Back then, I had no idea what would actually happen. That Pakistan and Afghanistan would ultimately become more all consuming than any relationship I had ever had. That they would slowly fall apart, and that even as they crumbled, chunk by chunk, they would feel more like home than anywhere else. I had no idea that I would find self-awareness in a combat zone, a kind of peace in chaos. My life here wouldn’t be about a man or God or some cause. I would fall in love, deeply, but with a story, with a way of life. When everything else was stripped away, my life would be about an addiction, not to drugs, but to a place. I would never feel as alive as when I was here.Eventually, more than six years down the road, when the addiction overrode everything else, when normalcy seemed inconceivable, I would have to figure out how to get clean and get out. By then, I would not be the same person. I would be unemployed and sleeping at a friend’s house in Kabul. Dozens of Afghans and Pakistanis I met along the way would be dead, including one translator. Other friends would be kidnapped. Still other people would disappoint me, sucked into corruption and selfishness precisely when their countries needed them. I would disappoint others. None of us would get it right.When did everyone mess up? Many times, on all sides, but March 2003 is as good a start as any. From the beginning, the numbers were absurd: Post-conflict Kosovo had one peacekeeper for every forty-eight people. East Timor, one for every eighty-six. Afghanistan, already mired in poverty, drought, and more than two decades of war, with little effective government and a fledgling army that was hardly more than a militia, had just one peacekeeper for every 5,400 people. Then the foreigners cheated on Afghanistan. They went to Iraq.Had they known anything about the country at all, they would have known that this was a really bad idea. Afghanistan was the so-called Graveyard of Empires, a pitiless mass of hard mountains and desert almost the size of Texas that had successfully repelled invaders like the Brits and the Soviets and seemed amenable only to the unforgiving people born to it. Men learned to fight like they learned to breathe, without even thinking. They fought dogs, they fought cocks. They fought tiny delicate birds that fit in a human hand and lived in a human coat pocket, and they bet on the results. They fought wars for decades until no one seemed to remember quite what they were fighting for. The national sport was essentially a fight, on horseback, over a headless calf or goat. Over the years, whenever Afghan men would tell me that they were tired of fighting, looking weary and creased, I would have only one response: Sure you are.But now, on this road trip, I didn’t worry about any of that. I was like a child, happy with my picture, showing it repeatedly to Farouq, who repeatedly laughed. Hours of bone-crushing road after leaving my first genuine warlord, our driver, Nasir, pulled into Khost and the so-called hotel. It was a second-floor walk-up on Khost’s dusty main street, a place that looked as if a gun battle might break out at any second, as if High Noon could be filmed at any hour. Khost was a small city just over the border from Pakistan’s tribal areas, the semi-autonomous region where insurgents and criminals could roam freely. In Khost, as in the tribal areas, laws were more like helpful hints. Everyone seemed to have a weapon, even the two men sleeping on the hotel balcony, fingers twitching near their triggers. We walked past a room where two Afghan... Read more

Features & Highlights

  • A true-life
  • Catch-22
  • set in the deeply dysfunctional countries of Afghanistan and Pakistan, by one of the region’s longest-serving correspondents.
  • Kim Barker is not your typical, impassive foreign correspondent—she is candid, self-deprecating, laugh-out-loud funny. At first an awkward newbie in Afghanistan, she grows into a wisecracking, seasoned reporter with grave concerns about our ability to win hearts and minds in the region. In
  • The Taliban Shuffle,
  • Barker offers an insider’s account of the “forgotten war” in Afghanistan and Pakistan, chronicling the years after America’s initial routing of the Taliban, when we failed to finish the job. When Barker arrives in Kabul, foreign aid is at a record low, electricity is a pipe dream, and of the few remaining foreign troops, some aren’t allowed out after dark. Meanwhile, in the vacuum left by the U.S. and NATO, the Taliban is regrouping as the Afghan and Pakistani governments floun­der. Barker watches Afghan police recruits make a travesty of practice drills and observes the disorienting turnover of diplomatic staff. She is pursued romantically by the former prime minister of Pakistan and sees adrenaline-fueled col­leagues disappear into the clutches of the Taliban. And as her love for these hapless countries grows, her hopes for their stability and security fade. Swift, funny, and wholly original,
  • The Taliban Shuffle
  • unforgettably captures the absurdities and tragedies of life in a war zone.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(287)
★★★★
25%
(239)
★★★
15%
(144)
★★
7%
(67)
23%
(220)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Laughing or crying? Mostly both, at the same time ...

This girl had no clue. She was a mess. She was disorganized, in a crappy relationship, did not know what was going on around her, was ignorant and arrogant. Then she flew to Afghanistan, acted even more clueless, insulting and arrogant. Then, she developed some interest in the country, and later downright fell in love with it. And that changed her. The arrogance disappeared, and was replaced by respect for other people, other cultures. She became a war junkie during that time, did some seriously stupid things, but she matured, became a real grown up. She ended this chapter of her life with having a clue.
That is the story Kim Barker tells in this book. The story of personal growth, interwoven with her adventures as a foreign correspondent for a Chicago newspaper.
The stories she has to tell do not reveal any big surprises about Afghanistan, the war there, the Taliban or the US handling of all that mess. There are other books out there, which already dealt with those aspects. What makes this book stand out amongst them is the unique perspective of a somewhat naive American girl, who was thrown into this alien world with no preparation at all. She eventually learns to get a grip on this strange world, and on herself. She learns, matures, and lets the reader take part in this process.
Some adventures she describes are downright hilarious, others are very sad, some are a bit strange, but all are interesting. Her writing style is not the most polished one can imagine, but it gets the message across. She is a no frills person, sometimes harsh, sometimes brash, and that is beautifully reflected in her writing style.
The book is very entertaining, especially for someone like me, who has read about half a doyen books about the current Afghanistan war, most of them are more serious historical and political scholarly works.
This book tells the tale from a refreshingly different, very personal perspective.
73 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Different perspective; not preachy but it is funny & genuine

I really enjoyed "The Taliban Shuffle" by Kim Barker. A sign of how much I enjoyed it is I am recommending it to people as much as possible.

Barker is a journalist. This is her view of Afghanistan & Pakistan during the last 8 years or so. She does some reporting of the situation but mostly Shuffle is just that, a 'shuffle' of personal stories. The kind that don't make the news but make for good stories that stick in your brain.

One of the most haunting isn't even about the conflict but when she relates that she is relaxing for a Christmas holiday. She, like myself, hasn't heard yet of the tsunami that hit in 2004. That little anecdote won me over because it showed how fast things move in her world.

What I appreciated most is that Barker relates truly funny stories but humor is always best when it is laced with a kind of truthful melancholy. there is something absurd in how she describes how men in Afghanistan are so used to fighting that even when they talk of a day when they won't be fighting, she's been around long enough among them that she, nor others, believe them.

That is how this book rolls. It is funny, absurd, realistic, non-judgmental, filled with friendships, observations of corrupt and corruptible, frustrations and small victories, but mostly about how an unlikely person grew to love what seems like an unlovable place.

It is definitely a keeper for me.
27 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

It's no laughing matter when you fail at being funny.

One of my writing professors once shared, "if I ask you to write about a tomato - yes, a tomato - and if instead, I come away knowing what you look like... Then you have failed."

It sounds remarkably silly, but coming from someone whose books won the National Book Critics Circle Award and were nominated for the Pulitzer, this was actually a serious lesson for beginner writers. When I talk about that moment now with fellow students from the class, we recognize, in hindsight, what was really being taught here; "Remember, sometimes it's not about you. Less is better. Dig deep. Don't settle for the easy way out."

At the time, this professor was trying to separate those who could actually take on the real work of writing - the heavy lifting - from the younger, "oh-look-at-me" sophomoric writers who inevitably, when they had nothing else to say, simply wrote about themselves.

This book is sort of like reading one of those writers. It's not funny at all. I think maybe, when people mentally transplant the author to American soil, it could be sort of amusing. Sort of. When I picked up the book I thought this would be a self-deprecating, ironic story complete with well intentioned but hilarious, disastrous moments. No. Sorry. This book is not that.

When you take into account that the author does such a bad job at capturing Afghanistan in general, it takes the book even further away from funny and more towards the opposite direction. It reads like a sophomore essay that has so clearly failed at the assignment. It's just sad. And even the intended humor gets swallowed by the pain you're feeling on behalf of the poor kid who's about to get his ass handed to him because, well, the kid failed.

I read this book as part of a Campus Book Club at my university as part of our "Af-Pak Month." There are lots of books about the region, but this elicited some of the strongest reactions among our group. One of the most memorable was from a student who shared that somewhere in India (I think she said New Delhi), there is a collection of letters from the British Colonial Period, written by British civilians who accompanied or visited their relatives stationed with British troops. Even the most well intentioned writers among them, simply could not relate to the "native," the "Hindoo," or essentially, "the Other." Instead, many of them would come up with their own opinionated narratives as to why Indian women wore saris, or why the Indians hadn't come up with forks and knives and ate with their hands. They resorted to simplistic one-liners to explain why the Indians loved yoghurt or Gandhi drank his goat milk (one memorable letter apparently mentioned, `they learn to breed, as fast as they learn to farm,' or something to that effect).

I may have been disappointed with "The Taliban Shuffle," when I first read it. But after this student (in a very clever way, I thought) elucidated the rather deep-seated problem with it, I now hate it. The worst part is, I don't even have to look through the book to see what she's getting at. In the first chapter alone, I come across all the superficial one-liners that explain why Afghan men fight, or why they like flowers.

Its not that we're a bunch of serious readers- we've read "Bossy Pants" by Tina Fey, and "Eat, Pray, Love" (which, I thought was so funny, sincere and beautifully written). I am currently reading Mindy Kaling's autobiography. I particularly love David Foster Wallace's "Big Red Son," which made me laugh out loud several times.

What I have learned from these writers is that humor is so very tricky. Its incredibly difficult to write, but if you succeed, the reading experience then becomes a beautiful Brechtian dynamic of simultaneously laughing while recognizing the humanity inherent in the situation.

Sadly, I think this book captures a different lesson. I originally offered, ""if you couldn't write about the tomato without making it about you, should you even be writing?" My Book Club friends had this final thought: when you fail at being funny when writing about Afghanistan and Afghans, you end up highlighting a host of serious problems about your perspective as a Western journalist in Afghanistan.
14 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

A fantastic read

I picked up "The Taliban Shuffle" when I was in Washington over the weekend and stayed up way too late the last couple of nights to finish it. In a nutshell? It's terrific and you should read it. I'm not a big non-fiction reader, but "The Taliban Shuffle" kept me entertained while I learned a lot about a part of the world I will never visit. It left such an impression that I got online to check out what the real book critics had to say. I couldn't possibly write anything better than Michiko Kakutani of the New York Times. So this is my lazy, "Yeah, what she said":

"What's remarkable about "The Taliban Shuffle" is that its author, Kim Barker -- a reporter at ProPublica and the South Asia bureau chief for The Chicago Tribune from 2004 to 2009 -- has written an account of her experiences covering Afghanistan and Pakistan that manages to be hilarious and harrowing, witty and illuminating, all at the same time.

It's not just that Ms. Barker is adept at dramatizing her own adventures as a reporter -- though she develops the chops of a veteran foreign correspondent, she depicts herself as a sort of Tina Fey character, who unexpectedly finds herself addicted to the adrenaline rush of war. It's also that Ms. Barker has discovered a voice in these pages that enables her to capture both the serious and the seriously absurd conditions in Af-Pak (Afghanistan and Pakistan), and the surreal deal of being a female reporter there, with dating problems ranging from the screwball (a boyfriend competing to cover the same story) to the ridiculous (being romantically pursued by the former prime minister of Pakistan).

Black humor, it turns out, is a perfect tool for capturing the sad-awful-frequently-insane incongruities of war."
10 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

If you want to read it, get it from the library

A ditzy, bimbo female "journalist" on the lose in a war zone. A gutsy female reporter defying all odds wannabe. I found her to be arrogant, obnoxious, and out of touch. Ms. Barker is the epitome of why I lack respect for so many journalists. I do try to appreciate what war correspondents go through to bring us the story, unbiased hopefully, which doesn't happen too much these days, still, they are living in danger and that is to be respected.

But this gal simply doesn't have a clue. Personally I think she would benefit from some time on the couch w/a shrink than to traipse around in war zones to figure out why she is such a lost, sad, pathetic woman. Like others I ask where is the humor? I could see a few attempts at it but they were not successful. Where is the substance? I couldn't find any. I have read other books describing the nightly party scenes of journalists out looking for a good time and a lay, but this woman's saga was wasn't interesting or spell binding, it was boring. I find it hard that anyone would give this book 5 stars, unless they are family/friends. If you are looking for a story of a lonely gal on an escapade to find a man under the guise of a writer in war then this is the book for you.

*I did go online to read some of Ms. Barker's articles and they didn't hold my attention either.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

The 'chick flick' of the Afghan war

This is a woman reporter's life in Afghanistan and Pakistan in the 2003 period when the war there was being eclipsed by events in Iraq and the American foothold was gradually sliding backwards. The book is offbeat in being more about the personalities involved, and Ms. Barker's personal life, than the big picture military or political events. One could say it's the microcosmic view or even the 'chick flick' of war books - including her ongoing concerns what to wear (green camo or flat dark earth?) It does give a vivid picture of the characters who filled Barker's time there, the Afghans from local police to top officials including a leading Pakistani politician, the US military (who come across just as badly suited to this war as they were to the one in Vietnam), the community of expat journalists, and her boyfriends.

Especially her boyfriends. Barker seems to have a bit of a disorderly life, including an attraction to sketchy characters both personally and as a journalist. I found myself wishing she would stay away from this or that individual, for her own good. Her writing is effective in conveying the texture of people and daily life in that part of the world. But somehow the book is off kilter. While Barker was incredibly courageous in her work, her personal life is not really so interesting, and she comes across as unappealing, vain, and hard to get along with. Some of her involvements with the political figures bordered on inappropriate for a reporter. It's hard to put a finger on exactly what is wrong with the book, but somehow her personal shambles of a life is overly mixed with the political and military shambles of two nations. I was left with confused impressions.
6 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Gets better as it matures

At the beginning of the novel, Kim Barker is fairly naive and typically American. She jumps at the chance for an overseas assignment in Afghanistan... but she knows little of the culture or history of where she's going and none of the language. She makes ugly American mistakes, acting as a prima donna about accommodations and arrangements with little appreciation for the reality of the local situation, that even the basics we take for granted are luxuries. It was hard to get through this part, for me, as I winced at her decisions and actions.

But, as she gains seasoning and experience, she comes to rely on her fixer, and she starts to unveil some real insights into the situation. Fabooj should be training as a doctor - instead he's working as a translator and fixer for journalists, the best paying option for Afghanistan's best and brightest. Her time in Pakistan is where she really seems to get a handle on the politics and the underlying issues and expose them to us.

For most of the book, it feels a little aimless, as does Kim herself.

The blurbs said it would be funny. I did not find it funny at all.

It was interesting, and I was glad to finish it. But, I suspect there are better books out there if you want real insight into Afghanistan or the nature of journalism there.
5 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

An enjoyable book that could have easily been better.

The author of this book spent years reporting between Pakistan and Afghanistan, but this book is more a personal memoir than anything much to do with the wars. She felt at home in Afghanistan, and, indeed it doesn't seem to have been all that dangerous at the time. I learned that there were places where alcohol was readily available, and there were quite a few parties in both countries. I learned what the author and her friends wore to these parties, too. This type of info is interspersed with stories of her "fixer", her driver, and several kind of funny relationships with politicians. I also learned that back then a reporter could live a fairly normal life, or at least Kim Barker and her friends did.

Barker's writing style is engaging, and will keep you turning the pages (but won't keep you up all night). When I finished the book I couldn't help but think that something was missing, though. I think maybe the author should have added some of her news stories to the book, or delved a little deeper in the war part of the story. Maybe she was consciously trying to keep it light, or keep it funny, but it really wasn't funny, except for a few of the politicians personalities. It's a decent book, but I think it could have been much better.

There's a great book out there by a female correspondent: [[ASIN:0385527160 Every Man in This Village is a Liar: An Education in War]] which I think everyone should read. I understand that that wasn't the book Ms. Barker set out to write, and her book is good, but could have been excellent. Recommended for people who like their war stories on the light side.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Thin, chit-chatty

Breezy, lightweight collection of notes on time spent hanging out as a journalist in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Aside from her saintly "fixer" in Afghanistan, no one comes off well in this book, especially the politicians in both countries. Even after completing the book, I'm unsure if it was meant to have any kind of "gonzo" flavor or if it was just kind of a look backwards after Ms. Barker had left the area and been downsized by her paper, the Chicago Tribune. Some of the best parts of the book are her eviscerating the utterly clueless new owner of the Trib.

Overall -- it's thin, there's not a lot of narrative or purpose here that I was able to discern. Ms. Barker drifts from relationship to relationship, from car bombing to car bombing, never quite engaging with anyone or anything. Her depictions of the politicians in the region are as kind as they can be, yet still damning. An anecdote about an "embed" with a US Army group early in the book which inadvertently resulted in one of the soldiers being moved to a more dangerous area ends up costing him half his leg, yet when they meet again he holds no grudge -- she seems incompetent, not grasping what her story would mean. At no point in the book are solid moorings ever put down. The aimless quality both of the US involvement in the region (say -- what *are* the remaining achievable military objectives over there, anyway?) and her writing make his book kind of a challenge to push through. One hopes an editor tightened things up a bit before it actually went to press in its final form.

That Ms. Barker ended up working for the Council for Foreign Relations makes me wonder if she wasn't CIA or NSA posing as a journalist. But that's just my conspiracy streak at work. A lot of her observations are quite red-state.

Not a lot to recommend here. Proceed at your own peril. Someone added too much water to the soup.
4 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Whistling merrily through the graveyard of empires

Perhaps "The Taliban Shuffle" is a slyly disguised prophecy. If the ongoing and insoluble disasters of the Middle East can radiate enough despair to the world outside, they may eventually exhaust the supply. And perhaps the void of spent hatreds and failed hopes will be filled by a rediscovery of humor as a first step toward sanity.

Don't hold your breath waiting for such a thing to happen. But you can at least sample some resurgent humor as if it had. Former Chicago Tribune journalist Kim Barker has chronicled a harrowing and ditzy romp through the heart of Islamic darkness which is sharply different from every other book I've read about the region: it is actually funny. Her wordplay is witty, her prose moves like a breathless personal letter. She wields a flippant attitude like a razor, treating press interviews with warlords, presidents and power brokers like blind dates, obsessing over her clothes and make-up like the comic strip character, Cathy.

The brutality of Afghans toward one another (particularly their women) is subtly contrasted with their paradoxically sincere hospitality toward strangers (particularly if they're women). The customary regional indignities of being female (the endless propositions and butt-grabs) are treated less with righteous indignation than comic exasperation: one misogynistic overreacher gets punched in the nose.

Her narrative focus is quintessentially feminine: relationships--family, fellow journalists, translators, drivers, interviewees--are analyzed in excruciating detail, and we read more about what people are wearing than any guy would tell us. Her humor has just enough self-parody to suggest some of it may be unintended. Her musing about potential war-zone romantic candidates reminded me of the clueless letters usually addressed to Dear Abby.

One soon realizes that wisdom and incisive judgment are not prominent facets of Kim's mind. Unlike say, Sara Chayes in "The Punishment of Virtue" she offers no original perspectives, practical policy critiques nor shows any notable passion for seeing improvement in Afghans' lives. If she met any locals she admired or thought constructive, they aren't in this book. Locals seem mostly a dysfunctional backdrop for anecdotes, a career in journalism and a livelier Facebook persona.

I don't mean that it's a lousy book. It delivers on readability, but the tone is more personal and gossipy than informative. I did enjoy seeing a splash of bright humor fall on such a dismal subject. Humor can be a potent weapon in the conflict of ideas and it's one of the few nobody's tried in the Middle East.
4 people found this helpful