The Wordy Shipmates
The Wordy Shipmates book cover

The Wordy Shipmates

Hardcover – Bargain Price, October 7, 2008

Price
$19.92
Format
Hardcover
Pages
272
Publisher
Riverhead Hardcover
Publication Date
Dimensions
5.8 x 1.01 x 8.56 inches
Weight
13.6 ounces

Description

From Publishers Weekly Starred Review. Essayist and public radio regular Vowell ( Assassination Vacation ) revisits America's Puritan roots in this witty exploration of the ways in which our country's present predicaments are inextricably tied to its past. In a style less colloquial than her previous books, Vowell traces the 1630 journey of several key English colonists and members of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Foremost among these men was John Winthrop, who would become governor of Massachusetts. While the Puritans who had earlier sailed to Plymouth on the Mayflower were separatists, Winthrop's followers remained loyal to England, spurred on by Puritan Reverend John Cotton's proclamation that they were God's chosen people. Vowell underscores that the seemingly minute differences between the Plymouth Puritans and the Massachusetts Puritans were as meaningful as the current Sunni/Shia Muslim rift. Gracefully interspersing her history lesson with personal anecdotes, Vowell offers reflections that are both amusing (colonial history lesson via The Brady Bunch ) and tender (watching New Yorkers patiently waiting in line to donate blood after 9/11). (Oct.) Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. From Bookmarks Magazine Most reviewers found Vowell to be a lively guide through the frequently misunderstood Puritan period. Several wrote that she will draw in readers who might not otherwise pick up a book on the subject: what could be better than history with the voice of Violet from The Incredibles ? But others found Vowell's treatment to be less dexterous; she slips in jokes where they don't make sense and too often explains the past through pop culture references despite her clear understanding of it through original texts. Those who enjoy traditional history books may be dissatisfied. Yet, as one reviewer noted, Vowell's irreverence frees her to explore the lives of neglected figures such as Anne Hutchinson and to illuminate aspects of the Puritan era that more serious authors might have missed.Copyright 2008 Bookmarks Publishing LLC From Booklist *Starred Review* Although Puritanism is conflated with modern religious fundamentalism and its disregard for any learning that doesn’t come from the Bible, Vowell argues passionately that Puritans were as enamored of wisdom and knowledge as religious virtue. Focusing on the Puritans who settled in 1692 in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, Vowell laments the image of Puritans as “boring killjoys” when in fact they were “fascinating killjoys” who, aside from their belief that Catholics were going to hell, were much more open to new ideas than we’ve been led to think. Drawing on letters, essays, and sermons, Vowell offers a penetrating look at the tensions between John Winthrop, John Cotton, Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, and others as they argued about the role of religion in government and everyday life. They saw themselves as God’s chosen people, a credo that set the tone for American history and notions of manifest destiny that have led to all manner of imposition on other lands and cultures. But they also vehemently debated separation of church and state and founded Harvard, even as they pondered the destiny of what Winthrop referred toxa0as the “shining city on the hill.”xa0A bookxa0dense with detail, insight, and humor. --Vanessa Bush Sarah Vowell is the bestselling author of The Wordy Shipmates , Assassination Vacation , The Partly Cloudy Patriot , Take the Cannoli , and Radio On . A contributing editor for public radio’s "This American Life", she lives in New York City. From The Washington Post From The Washington Post's Book World/washingtonpost.com Reviewed by Stephen Prothero Many young people today are allergic to history, even of the U.S. variety, and if you're foolish enough to steer them toward the colonial period, they start not just to sneeze but to retch. Sarah Vowell, a regular contributor to Chicago Public Radio's "This American Life," wants to make history go down easy. So she writes about the past with the irreverence of late-night television. Not long into The Wordy Shipmates, her new book on colonial New England and its aftereffects, we encounter not only such Puritan stalwarts as John Cotton and John Winthrop but also "The Brady Bunch," "Happy Days" and "The Simpsons." This approach yields a book that is as easy to read as The Fonz is to watch -- a book sprinkled with the sort of phrases and punctuation (exclamation points for example!) commonly found in text messages. But this breeziness also produces some simplistic arguments. Why do Americans see themselves as exceptional and ride that exceptionalism into war in Iraq? "Answer: Because Henry VIII had a crush on a woman who was not his wife." Still, Vowell gets a lot right. She is right to see the United States as a "Puritan nation"; the Puritans' influence over us did not die with the birth of the nation in the 1770s or even the birth of the counterculture in the 1960s. And she is right to understand the Puritans as perhaps the quintessential people of the book. The core premise of The Wordy Shipmates is that their "single-minded obsession with one book, the Bible, made words the center of their lives." What historian Perry Miller called the Puritans' "errand into the wilderness" was not primarily an economic or a political errand, Vowell argues. It was an errand in reading and writing and interpreting texts. The core text of this venture -- and of Vowell's book -- is John Winthrop's 1630 sermon "A Model of Christian Charity." Here Winthrop describes Massachusetts as "a city upon a hill" and sets in motion the sordid history of American exceptionalism -- a history that, according to Vowell, has vouchsafed to us (among other things) wars in the Philippines, Vietnam and Iraq. On first blush Vowell seems like an angry atheist set down at the historian's table. But under this anger is a good measure of empathy. Hers is not the narrative of an angry adolescent who never wants to return to her Pentecostal parents' home. It is the narrative of an adult who wants to see her American home for what it is -- and for what it has done to her, and to us. Central to Winthrop's "Christian Charity" was a "communitarian ethos" that Vowell admires. Breaking for one telling moment out of her oh-so-21st-century pose of Manhattanish irony, she refers to Winthrop's injunction to "delight in each other, make other's conditions our own, rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together" as "one of the most beautiful sentences in the English language." And at the end of the book she admits to falling in love with one side of Winthrop: "the Winthrop [whom] Cotton Mather celebrates for sharing his firewood with the needy, the Winthrop who scolds Thomas Dudley for overcharging the poor, the Winthrop of 'Christian Charity,' who called for 'enlargement toward others' and 'brotherly affection.' " Vowell, who was raised in Oklahoma and now lives in New York City, is part of what Republican candidates refer to as the East Coast elite, so it should not be surprising that the politics here is standard-fare liberal: President Reagan bad, Dr. King good. Bad of the Puritans to banish Anne Hutchinson -- "the Puritan Oprah" -- and to kill so many Indians in the Pequot War. To all of which, the Homer Simpson in me says, "D'oh!" Nonetheless, there are important historical points to make, and Vowell makes many of them well. At some moment between the time Winthrop delivered his famous sermon and Reagan was inaugurated, the covenant between Americans and God lost its "if" -- if you do mercy and seek justice, then God will bless you; but if you do otherwise, God will deliver punishment. We may be a Puritan nation, but what we have retained is only Puritanism's easy half. We are convinced that God blesses our endeavors, but we seldom consider that some of those endeavors are not worth blessing. And it never occurs to us that they might bring down upon us God's righteous anger. Vowell also makes something intriguing of the oft-discussed distinction between Winthrop and colonial New England's champion of religious liberty, Roger Williams. These two men, she observes, do not just embody the divide between "orthodox Massachusetts" and "madcap Rhode Island." They also illustrate what she calls "the fundamental conflict of American life" -- "between the body politic and the individual, between we the people and each person's pursuit of happiness." "At his city-on-a-hill best," Vowell writes in one of her book's best passages, "Winthrop is Pete Seeger, gathering a generation around the campfire to sing their shared folk songs. Williams is Bob Dylan plugging in at Newport, making his own noise." Vowell, whose other books include a quirky travelogue of sites related to the assassinations of Lincoln, Garfield and McKinley, obviously is partial to people who make their own noise. But to her credit, she also recognizes the dangers individualism poses to community. In the end, however, what makes The Wordy Shipmates float is not so much its arguments as its voice. Most writing on the Puritans is as dour as the Puritans themselves. Vowell has fun with them, and in the process, she helps us take seriously both their lives and their legacy. Copyright 2008, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved. Read more

Features & Highlights

  • The Wordy Shipmates
  • is
  • New York Times
  • ?bestselling author Sarah Vowell?s exploration of the Puritans and their journey to America to become the people of John Winthrop?s ?city upon a hill??a shining example, a ?city that cannot be hid.? To this day, America views itself as a Puritan nation, but Vowell investigates what that means? and what it should mean. What was this great political enterprise all about? Who were these people who are considered the philosophical, spiritual, and moral ancestors of our nation? What Vowell discovers is something far different from what their uptight shoe-buckles-and- corn reputation might suggest. The people she finds are highly literate, deeply principled, and surprisingly feisty. Their story is filled with pamphlet feuds, witty courtroom dramas, and bloody vengeance. Along the way she asks: * Was Massachusetts Bay Colony governor John Winthrop a communitarian, a Christlike Christian, or conformity?s tyrannical enforcer?
  • Answer: Yes!
  • * Was Rhode Island?s architect, Roger Williams, America?s founding freak or the father of the First Amendment?
  • Same difference.
  • * What does it take to get that jezebel Anne Hutchinson to shut up?
  • A hatchet.
  • * What was the Puritans? pet name for the Pope?
  • The Great Whore of Babylon.
  • Sarah Vowell?s special brand of armchair history makes the bizarre and esoteric fascinatingly relevant and fun. She takes us from the modern-day reenactment of an Indian massacre to the Mohegan Sun casino, from old-timey Puritan poetry, where ?righteousness? is rhymed with ?wilderness,? to a Mayflower-themed waterslide. Throughout,
  • The Wordy Shipmates
  • is rich in historical fact, humorous insight, and social commentary by one of America?s most celebrated voices. Thou shalt enjoy it.

Customer Reviews

Rating Breakdown

★★★★★
30%
(189)
★★★★
25%
(158)
★★★
15%
(95)
★★
7%
(44)
23%
(144)

Most Helpful Reviews

✓ Verified Purchase

Good High School Paper that Dreams of Growing Up into a Mature Book

I really wanted to like this work. I really did. I enjoy colonial history and I was looking forward to a `chic' interpretation of America's origins. But the further I got into the book I often had to pull away like a dizzy kid needing to gasp for oxygen after sipping on too much helium. And like the after effects of helium all I could hear in my mind was Vowell's high-pitched, sarcastic nasally narration as she condescendingly mocks 17th century men and women who crossed the Atlantic and built a colony which led to the rise of one of the most incredible nations the world has ever known because she thinks they brought scant reading material.

Historians usually write books if they believe they have new facts to share or if they have a fresh perspective that adds to the Great conversation. However, I'm not sure why or what compelled Vowell to write this book. Was it to demonstrate her skill in sprinkling sophomoric pop-culture references? If that was the goal, I think Seth McFarlane would have easily done a better job. But seriously, what is her point? She never makes this clear. As a result the book incoherently meanders on and on and on thinking it'll hold your attention with its unfunny sardonic humor and cheeky observations.

I must assume that there's a niche audience that Vowell was aiming for when she wrote this book, therefore it is only to those folks I would recommend this work. If you're unfamiliar with colonial American history and you're looking for an introduction, I would assume that even Vowell would not recommend her own book since prerequisite knowledge is essential to understand her `jokes'.
9 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Alternately entertaining and distasteful

By way of background on my perspective, I bought this booking knowing very little about Sarah Vowell - I've never seen or heard her, although I gather from reading the reviews here that she is a very distinctive personality on air. I very much enjoy reading histories and in that regard I have a taste for what the average reader might find boring.

Given that Vowell is not a historian of any sort, as I read the book it quickly became evident that the only thing she brings to the table with this book is her personality. This is basically the record of a New York, NPR-associated liberal passing variously favorable and unfavorable judgments on the Massachusetts Puritans. Although I was at times entertained and at times seriously annoyed by those judgments, the whole enterprise is a little too smug and self-satisfied for my tastes. And I say that as a New York, NPR-listening liberal. The writing itself is disjointed and repetitive. Overall, I wouldn't recommend it.

As an aside, I also thought it was a little pretentious and disingenuous of her to cite a reading list of primary sources, but no secondary sources. It is abundantly clear that she approached the material through secondary sources, using primary sources in an ancillary way and on the basis of those secondary sources. For her to give secondary sources no credit is just not right.
7 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

You'll want to buy a Vowell (Couldn't help myself)

What you see is what you get with Sarah Vowell. She is the girl next door, providing you live next to a girl who is goth, brainy, srarky and ironic. She's sort of a literary Joan Cusak.

Ms. Vowell's writings about history usually exist on three planes:

1. The history itself.
2. Her personal reaction to the history.
3. A usually snarky observation about how the historical site is commemorated by some unbelievably commercial and/or inapproprate landmark.

Most of the times it works, and I think it works suprisingly well in the illuminating story of 'The Wordy Shipmates'.

This is a book about the Pilgrims, some of whom were sticklers about documenting their struggles. These are not the Pilgrims of your 4th grade Thanksgiving Pageant. This is a book about (among other things) the Massachusetts Bay Colony, John Winthrop, Roger Williams, The Pequot Indians, Anne Hutchinson, Oliver Cromwell and Charles I.

Ms. Vowell gives context to the Pilgrim's journey from England: The wars between Protestants and Catholics that have devastated Europe and the theological differences between the Church of England and more radical Puritans and Calvinists. She explains the delicate dance that the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony must perform in order not to antagonize their English benefactors, when in reality the world they are building would not be at all to the liking of the Archbishop of Canterbury. She explains the Colonists' relations with the Native Americans, and the internal struggles they have in reconciling religious freedom with peace and order in their Commonwealth.

It is a fascinating look at the origins of the United States, and the colonists who (Vowell correctly points out) "...are more or less medieval people who are chronologically closer to Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales' than to 'The Wire'."

It is a very fresh way to look at history, somewhere between Barbara Tuchman and Dorothy Parker. Despite her detached and ironic sensibilities, she really connects with the subject and the people at hand. I really enjoyed it.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Good When She Sticks to History, But...

It's Thanksgiving time, and I read this book knowing it was a young writer's hip take on the founding of Boston (history near and dear to me as I live here). Not about the Pilgrims but about John Winthrop and his Puritans who arrive on the Arbella in 1630, the Massachusetts Bay colonists. The book is worth reading for the interesting take on history: you'll learn about the religious motives that drove the Puritans, how they differed than the Pilgrims, who were Separatists, life in old Boston, the Pequot War and massacre, Anne Hutchinson, and the complex relationship between Winthrop (Massachusetts' first governor) and Roger William (Rhode Island's founder). All this is done with a snappy, sometimes sarcastic, crisp and witty style they should appeal to young people especially. There are no chapters in the 248 page book, making it a long read, at times a bit tedious on the eyes. I like her style when she is sticking strictly to the history, and she has mostly done her homework.

The book has two big problems. First, her style, when she veers off into numerous tangents. Somehow Vowell will be speaking about a memorial to the indomitable Anne Hutchinson, and suddenly get on a rant about how business reply cards offer men one check box for their title ("Mrs.") but women get three ("Mrs., Miss, Ms.") which obviously is a judgment against women for their lifestyles---give it a rest, Sarah!

Sometimes the religious focus goes on and on, and I wondered where the book was going when suddenly, boom--we get back on track and resume the fascinating story of olde Boston again.

And her sarcasm, which works well in small doses when spicing up the history, works against her when she attempts, quite inadequately, to parallel events in the 1600s as direct forerunners to modern day politics and world events. Vowell just does not have the academic chops to make these comparisons, and the result comes across as a poorly researched analysis, bolstered mostly by sound bites and shrieking liberalism--and I am a liberal, and found it embarrassing. I felt I was reading a biased essay by a freshman in a college writing class. It was juvenile and took her away from the deep waters of the moment-to-moment events of Boston that I was enjoying, into shallow waters of her political point-of-view, where she lacks depth. She drew very poor conclusions based on hasty and questionable extrapolations.

Second, there is just too much personal interjection in the book. It detracts from the mostly delightful text; it reflects poorly on Vowell, because she reveals her own skewed biases against any religion, and against modern day conservatives. She is an armchair atheist, proudly proclaiming that she prefers her desk and comfy room, rather than front-line experience. She reveals at somewhat awkward times in the book her own strange childhood experiences with religion. The book becomes more a revealing look at a young author who has some psychological axes to grind. It really does detract from the story.

I recommend the book, nonetheless. If you are a writer or debater this would be a great book to chew on. Vowell should be challenged on her many assumptions, particular when she tries to tie a motto on the Mass Bay Colony logo to WW II, Vietnam, Korea and Iraq, all in one sentence. I think Vowell has talent, but has issues to overcome. If she can get herself out of the way, I think she'd be an outstanding writer. I love the idea of making history entertaining--and by entertaining I mean exciting to read, fun to read, or even thought provoking. Vowell is not there yet, but could be someday. Read it for the history, and be sure to challenge her assumptions, connections to present-day, and opinions. It has many flaws, but many good parts. Have fun with it! Boston has a fascinating history and I am glad she wrote about it.

Though I have lived in Boston all my adult life, I still have not seen some of the monuments and statues she mentions, and thanks to this book, I will go and visit them. Mission Accomplished to make a reader take action after reading the book. But... I hope Vowell matures a bit more as a writer (hire a good editor next time who will challenge you!) so we can enjoy completely future books and not scratch heads or wince when reading the sub-par parts.
3 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Chatty Vowell makes History Fun!

The Wordy Shipmates tells the story of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 17th century. These Puritans arrived ten years after the Pilgrims founded Plymouth Colony to the south. They intended to create a shining "city on a hill," a phrase that has reverberated through American history to this day.

Vowell's prose is chatty, personal, practically gonzo. She admires the Puritans, but she maintains no illusions about them. Their grisly massacre of Native Americans, their persecutions, and their executions for heresy are presented in full. But Vowell also connects with their idealism, which was inherited by the flawed nation that grew upon their foundation.

Warning: this is not a book for fans of Fox News. If you can't think of Ronald Reagan as anything less than a demigod, do not bother. Vowell traces the flaws of our Puritan fathers and mothers through American history down to Abu Ghraib.

Those who prefer their history dry will not need to read this book. For the rest of us, it's a fun introduction to a fascinating part of our heritage, a heritage always in danger of disappearing between the "America can do no wrong" and the "America is evil" schools of cultural memory.
2 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Gift for a Friend

I love Sarah Vowell and think she should be a consonant . This was a gift for a friend and unfortunately she never mentioned it to me after thanking me. Sarah's the best of a younger generation; compassionate, erudite and wickedly funny. Maybe it's an acquired taste?
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Think you don't like history? Read this. Think you know something about the Pilgrims? Read this.

I don't actually remember how I found out about this book. NPR...probably. It was my favorite read of 2012 and most
recommended to my reading friends and most given as gift. History fused w/contemporary fused w/personal fused with
national and all insightful and/or humorous.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

Entertainingly Informative

Vowell does a good job at rendering the motivations and tensions of the Puritans led by John Winthrop that settled the Massachusetts Bay colony in an entertaining way. There are a few instances (very few) when her levity fell flat for me. But otherwise her distillations (both non-humorous and humorous) helped make the book informative, enlightening and enjoyable.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

I Was Disappointed... Wanted More of Vowell's Trademark Humor

Brief Description: Sarah Vowell uses her irreverence and considerable intelligence to explore the world and influence of "the Wordy Shipmates" (aka the Puritans of the Massachusetts Bay Colony), some of the wordiest and most influential settlers of the United States. With a particular emphasis on Massachusetts Bay Colony governor John Winthrop (who coined the famous and oft-used "city upon a hill" metaphor), Rhode Island's founder Roger Williams (whose personality confounded me over and over again) and Anne Hutchinson (a woman just couldn't keep her mouth shut when she should have), Vowell explores the influence and legacy of the Puritans on the United States.

My Thoughts: Although I realize that I want my history given to me by the likes of Sarah Vowell (irreverent and not afraid to go off to follow interesting tangents), I did not enjoy this book as much as I did Assassination Vacation. It just figures that the Puritans could put a damper on even Vowell's snarky smart-assedness. I can't quite figure out if it was the subject matter or Vowell just wasn't in the groove for this one, but I felt like I was listening to it forever. Part of it was that Vowell played it more straight than usual and there were fewer pop culture references and personal stories to liven things up. Still, I managed to learn a lot and gain a better understanding of U.S. history. I guess I was just expecting more laughs. Harumph.
1 people found this helpful
✓ Verified Purchase

excellent book

I bought this book after seing it's review on Jon Stewart's show. It's the first time I read history in such a funny , smart and witty style. Well done Sarah Vowell.. This is the way to write history.. Will seek all of the authors other books.
1 people found this helpful